Core Theme 5: Technological Advancements for Improved near- realtime data transmission and Coupled Ocean-Atmosphere Data Assimilation WP 5.2 Development.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Parameter Sensitivity of a Coupled Climate Model
Advertisements

Basics of numerical oceanic and coupled modelling Antonio Navarra Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia Italy Simon Mason Scripps Institution.
ECMWF long range forecast systems
Polly Smith, Alison Fowler, Amos Lawless School of Mathematical and Physical Sciences, University of Reading Exploring coupled data assimilation using.
Steffen M Olsen, Polar Oceanography, DMI, Copenhagen DK GEOMAR (6) Mojib Latif (WP lead) Wonsun Park %Thomas Martin %Fritz Krüger MPG (2) Johann Jungclaus.
Experiments with Monthly Satellite Ocean Color Fields in a NCEP Operational Ocean Forecast System PI: Eric Bayler, NESDIS/STAR Co-I: David Behringer, NWS/NCEP/EMC/GCWMB.
Verification of NCEP SFM seasonal climate prediction during Jae-Kyung E. Schemm Climate Prediction Center NCEP/NWS/NOAA.
Recent S/I Prediction Activities at IRI. IRI Climate Predictability Tool (CPT) Simon Mason.
Initialization Issues of Coupled Ocean-atmosphere Prediction System Climate and Environment System Research Center Seoul National University, Korea In-Sik.
Dynamical Downscaling of CCSM Using WRF Yang Gao 1, Joshua S. Fu 1, Yun-Fat Lam 1, John Drake 1, Kate Evans 2 1 University of Tennessee, USA 2 Oak Ridge.
Climate modeling Current state of climate knowledge – What does the historical data (temperature, CO 2, etc) tell us – What are trends in the current observational.
GEOS-5 AGCM for ISI Prediction Finite volume dynamical core (Lin, 2004) 1°x1.25°x72 layers Convection: Relaxed Arakawa-Schubert (Moorthi and Suarez, 1992)
Earth Systems Science Chapter 6 I. Modeling the Atmosphere-Ocean System 1.Statistical vs physical models; analytical vs numerical models; equilibrium vs.
The NCEP operational Climate Forecast System : configuration, products, and plan for the future Hua-Lu Pan Environmental Modeling Center NCEP.
1 THOR as of What is it all about? NADW – North Atlantic Deep Water 1 Sv = 10 6 m 3 /s Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation.
Verification of Numerical Weather Prediction systems employed by the Australian Bureau of Meteorology over East Antarctica during the summer season.
Coupled GCM The Challenges of linking the atmosphere and ocean circulation.
Hal Gordon CSIRO Atmospheric Research, Aspendale, Australia CSIRO Mk3 Climate Model: Tropical Aspects.
ESA Project- Coupled Model Assimilation Year 1 workshop Aim: To establish coupled Atmosphere-Ocean assimilation system at ECMWF and demonstrate improved.
Ocean Reanalysis D. Stammer. Continued development of ocean synthesis products and reanalysis; some now are truly global, including sea.
General comments Need for new observations versus new parameterizations? Should explore what GCOS and others are doing Urgent need for concerted physical.
Operational Global Model Plans John Derber. Timeline July 25, 2013: Completion of phase 1 WCOSS transition August 20, 2013: GDAS/GFS model/analysis upgrade.
Ensemble-variational sea ice data assimilation Anna Shlyaeva, Mark Buehner, Alain Caya, Data Assimilation and Satellite Meteorology Research Jean-Francois.
Mesoscale Modeling Review the tutorial at: –In class.
Dr Mark Cresswell Dynamical Forecasting 2 69EG6517 – Impacts & Models of Climate Change.
Towards Improving Coupled Climate Model Using EnKF Parameter Optimization Towards Improving Coupled Climate Model Using EnKF Parameter Optimization Zhengyu.
Sensitivity of atmospheric near-land temperature in Northern Europe to SST Andrey Vlasenko, Armin Köhl, Detlef Stammer University Hamburg.
Barcelona, 2015 Ocean prediction activites at BSC-IC3 Virginie Guemas and the Climate Forecasting Unit 9 February 2015.
SMHI in the Arctic Lars Axell Oceanographic Research Unit Swedish Meteorological and Hydrological Institute.
International CLIVAR Working Group for Seasonal-to- Interannual Prediction (WGSIP) Ben Kirtman (Co-Chair WGSIP) George Mason University Center for Ocean-Land-Atmosphere.
GOVST III, Paris Nov 2011 ECMWF ECMWF Activities on Coupled Forecasting Systems Status Ongoing research Needs for MJO Bulk formula in ocean models Plans.
1.Introduction 2.Description of model 3.Experimental design 4.Ocean ciruculation on an aquaplanet represented in the model depth latitude depth latitude.
NOCS: NEMO activities in 2006 Preliminary tests of a full “LOBSTER” biogechemical model within the ORCA1 configuration. (6 extra passive tracers). Developed.
Coupled Model Data Assimilation: Building an idealised coupled system Polly Smith, Amos Lawless, Alison Fowler* School of Mathematical and Physical Sciences,
Multi-Perturbation Methods for Ensemble Prediction of the MJO Multi-Perturbation Methods for Ensemble Prediction of the MJO Seoul National University A.
NACLIM CT1/CT3 1 st CT workshop April 2013 Hamburg (DE) Johann Jungclaus.
BMRC coupled modelling: Oscar Alves, Guomin Wang, Neville Smith, Aihong Zhong, Faina Tseitkin, Andrew Marshall BMRC Model Development.
Operational sub-regional Long-Range Forecasting Unit at RA VI Regional Climate Center – South-East European Virtual Climate Change Center Vladimir Djurdjevic.
Modern Era Retrospective-analysis for Research and Applications: Introduction to NASA’s Modern Era Retrospective-analysis for Research and Applications:
Combined Ocean-Geodetic Analysis of Global and Regional Ocean Mass-, and Freshwater Transport Divergences D. Stammer, A. Köhl, V. Romanova, F. Sigismund,
CCSM Atmospheric Model Working Group Summary J. J. Hack, D. A Randall AMWG Co-Chairs CCSM Workshop, 28 June 2001 CCSM Workshop, 28 June 2001.
Mechanisms of drought in present and future climate Gerald A. Meehl and Aixue Hu.
ECPC Seasonal Prediction System Masao Kanamitsu Laurel DeHaan Elena Yulaeva and John Roads.
Summary 26 September 2012 Core Theme 4: Predictability of the THC Lead: W. Hazeleger (KNMI) Participants: ECMWF, UREAD, GEOMAR, MET-O, MPG, KNMI.
The GEOS-5 AOGCM List of co-authors Yury Vikhliaev Max Suarez Michele Rienecker Jelena Marshak, Bin Zhao, Robin Kovack, Yehui Chang, Jossy Jacob, Larry.
Page 1© Crown copyright 2004 WP5.3 Assessment of Forecast Quality ENSEMBLES RT4/RT5 Kick Off Meeting, Paris, Feb 2005 Richard Graham.
Constraining a global, eddying, ocean and sea ice model with level-2 QuikSCAT wind stress data: First results D. Menemenlis, H. Zhang, H. Brix, and D.
Contribution of MPI to CLIMARES Erich Roeckner, Dirk Notz Max Planck Institute for Meteorology, Hamburg.
© Crown copyright Met Office Uncertainties in the Development of Climate Scenarios Climate Data Analysis for Crop Modelling workshop Kasetsart University,
AOMIP status Experiments 1. Season Cycle 2. Coordinated - Spinup Coordinated - Analysis Coordinated 100-Year Run.
THOR Presented by Doug Smith (MET OFFICE) Project coordinator: Detlef Quadfasel (UHAM)
A Brief Introduction to CRU, GHCN, NCEP2, CAM3.5 Yi-Chih Huang.
One-year re-forecast ensembles with CCSM3.0 using initial states for 1 January and 1 July in Model: CCSM3 is a coupled climate model with state-of-the-art.
Ocean Climate Simulations with Uncoupled HYCOM and Fully Coupled CCSM3/HYCOM Jianjun Yin and Eric Chassignet Center for Ocean-Atmospheric Prediction Studies.
ECMWF Training course 26/4/2006 DRD meeting, 2 July 2004 Frederic Vitart 1 Predictability on the Monthly Timescale Frederic Vitart ECMWF, Reading, UK.
Verfasser/in Webadresse, oder sonstige Referenz GECCO ACTIVITIES (Armin Köhl, Nuno Sera, Nikolay Kuldenov) GECCO-2: Global (including Arctic), extension.
CT2 : Assessing sources of uncertainty in ocean analysis and forecasts We consider the structural sources of uncertainty generic to all practical forecasting.
1/39 Seasonal Prediction of Asian Monsoon: Predictability Issues and Limitations Arun Kumar Climate Prediction Center
A Brief Introduction to CRU, GHCN, NCEP2, CAM3.5
Coupled atmosphere-ocean simulation on hurricane forecast
Climate , Climate Change, and climate modeling
GFDL Climate Model Status and Plans for Product Generation
Sub-seasonal prediction at ECMWF
Y. Xue1, C. Wen1, X. Yang2 , D. Behringer1, A. Kumar1,
Modeling the Atmos.-Ocean System
ECMWF activities: Seasonal and sub-seasonal time scales
66-SE-CMEMS-CALL2: Lot-3 Benefits of dynamically modelled river discharge input for ocean and coupled atmosphere-land-ocean systems Hao Zuo, Fredrik Wetterhall,
Joint Proposal to WGOMD for a community ocean model experiment
Presentation transcript:

Core Theme 5: Technological Advancements for Improved near- realtime data transmission and Coupled Ocean-Atmosphere Data Assimilation WP 5.2 Development of coupled ocean-atmosphere assimilation capabilities Lead: Detlef Stammer (UHAM) Participants: UHAM, MPG-M, ECMWF, KNMI

WP 5.2: Development of coupled ocean- atmosphere assimilation capabilities Objectives : Improve initialization of coupled models using ocean syntheses and evaluate the improved skill of those coupled models Building of coupled assimilation capabilities that ultimately will allow to constrain coupled model directly through climate observations.

Individual Tasks Coupling MITgcm to Planet Simulator and testing. Done Running forecast experiments. Done Preparation of observational atmospheric test data set.Done Developing and testing variational data assimilation system around the Planet Simulator. Done Planet Simulator assimilation. Done Integration of coupled components. Done Coupled MITgcm-Planet Simulator assimilation Ongoing

Initialization Techniques GOALS & TASKS & METHODS GOALS to improve climate forecasts through better initialization procedures and by improving uncertain model parameters To evaluate predictability in coupled ocean-atmosphere models TASKS Testing initialization procedures: 1. full state optimization, diagnostic of mean drift 2. drift correction by employing flux correction 3. anomaly initialization

THE COUPLED MODEL combines two GCM: ocean model – MITgcm (Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge) atmospheric model - UCLAgcm (University of California, Los Angeles) DATA GECCO synthesis ( ) HadI SST Levitus climatology TEST EXPERIMENTS control run, integration over 50 year Initial state = 50 yrs after spinup from Levitus (January) initializing with absolute values (ensemble: 5 members, 10 year) Initial state = GECCO (January 1997) For evaluation: anomalies are computed with respect to 50 yrs GECCO climatology anomaly coupling scheme (ensemble: 5 members, 10 year) Initial state = Model climatology + [GECCO (January 1997) – GECCO mean] For evaluation: anomalies are computed with respect to the climatology of yrs of the coupled run flux correction Initialization Techniques TEST EXPERIMENTS Ocean Model MITgcm Domain 80°N:80°S; 360×244×46 Resolution 1°× 1° (± 80°: ± 30°); 1°× 1/3° (± 30°: 0°) 46 vertical layers Atmospheric Model UCLAgcm Domain 90°N:90°S; 140×91×30 Resolution 2.5°× 2° 30 vertical layers

MOC Predictions FSI AI FCI

Skill Scores: SST FSI AI FCI MOC Correlation RMSE

THOR Coupled Model: pleTHORa MITgcm: ocean only configurations, with and without seaice, from ECCO/GECCO; PlanetSimulator: an Earth System Model of Interme-diate Complexity built around an atmospheric dynami-cal core based on the Hoskins and Simmons (1975) multispectral layer model.

WP 5.2: pleTHORa coupling: replacement of seaice- and ocean- compartments of the PlanetSimulator by MITogcm plus seaice configuration: coarse resolution setup with an atmosphere on a T21 grid and 5 sigma levels, and the MITogcm on a 5.625º grid having the North Pole shifted to Greenland, using 15 vertical levels testing: coupled system with single CPU on a notebook, performance is approx. 30 model years/day

Model configuration: 1. Atmosphere with T21L10 resolution: all ice processes (thermodynamic sea ice model, snow on sea ice allowed, skin temperature computed) land processes on (except “biome” module) no fresh water correction all moisture processes off (evaporation, large scale precipitation, convective precipitation and dry convective adjustment are switched off) 2. Ocean: global domain with 4 degree uniform lat/lon resolution and 15 depth levels Identical Twin Experiment Test Control Variables: Scalar perturbation applied only to the atmospheric parameters Data: only ocean temperature and salinity data. Assimilation window: 7 days Adjoint of pleTHORa

Ten process parameters in the atmosphere : tfrc(1): time scale for linear drag, top level tfrc(2): time scale for linear drag, level 2 tdissd: diffusion time scale for divergence tdissz: diffusion time scale for vorticity tdisst: diffusion time scale for temperature tpofmt: tuning of long wave radiation scheme vdiff_lamm: constant for vert. diffusion and surface fluxes vdiff_b: constant for vertical diffusion and surface fluxes vdiff_c: constant for vertical diffusion and surface fluxes vdiff_d: constant for vertical diffusion and surface fluxes

Improving Coupled Model through parameter optimization Model Used: Planet Simulator (PlaSim-T21) Data used: Simulated observations from the model. Results: Sensitivity of the model cost function with number of integration days. The cost function becomes noisier as integration time increases GF approach: Using a set of 9 control parameters the Cost function can be reduced for the model integrated upto 7 days. GF works for linear models and can’t be used for longer period runs with PlaSim. SPSA approach: Using a set of 2 control parameters. Cost function can be reduced for longer model runs. (figure attached for 30 day run) Future Work: Make use of real observations (ERA-40 data).

1 Day 30 Days Sensitivity of the cost function to perturbation in model parameters for (a) 1 day integration (b) 30 days integration. The x- axis denotes percentage of perturbation applied to each parameter. Y axis denotes model cost function Control Parameters Used Time scale for linear drag (tfrc1,2) Diffusion time scale for vorticity (tdissz) Diffusion time scale for divergence (tdissd) Diffusion time scale for temperature (tdisst) Tuning parameters for vertical diffusivity and surface fluxes (vdiff_b, vdiff_c, vdiff_d) Tuning of longwave radiation scheme (tpofmt) absorption coefficient for h­­ 2 O continuum (th2oc) tuning of cloud albedo range 1 (tswr1) PlaSim’s Sensitivity For more days the model’s behavior is non linear

The graphs show the plot of cost function for PlaSim integrated for 30 days. Control parameters in this case were TH2OC and TSWR1. X axis represents the number of iterations. There is ~ 60% reduction in Cost function Green’s Function approach works for shorter time scales (up to 7 days) during which the model’s behavior is nearly linear The graphs show the plot of cost function, parameter norm and gradient norm on the y axis w.r.t. number of iterations on the xaxis. Green function plot is on Logarithmic scale. The model was run for 7 days using 9 control parameters. SPSA approach works even when the model behavior is non- linear Green’s function approach is not suitable for longer time scale due to non-linearity of the model.

Deliverables

THOR is a project financed by the European Commission through the 7th Framework Programme for Research, Theme 6 Environment, Grant agreement