Calculation of Beam loss on foil septa C. Pai Brookhaven National Laboratory Collider-Accelerator Department 3-2-2005.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Matt Rooney RAL The T2K Beam Window Matt Rooney Rutherford Appleton Laboratory BENE November 2006.
Advertisements

Thermal Behavior of Materials
Thermal Behavior of Materials
50Hz N S Load All Actions A1  A weight is balanced at equilibrium position of a spring and produce a Simple Harmonic Motion with acceleration Which.
STATICALLY DETERMINATE STRESS SYSTEMS
The Current T2K Beam Window Design and Upgrade Potential Oxford-Princeton Targetry Workshop Princeton, Nov 2008 Matt Rooney.
Radiopharmaceutical Production Target Foil Characteristics STOP.
PHYSICS 103: Lecture 20 Blackbody Radiation Light Bulbs Agenda for Today:
Electric Currents and Resistance II Physics 2415 Lecture 11 Michael Fowler, UVa.
Member of the Helmholtz Association Takeshi Hirai | Institute of Energy Research | Association EURATOM – FZJ Cracking of a tungsten material exposed to.
Alexandr Drozhdin March 16, 2005 MI-10 Injection.
1 Introduction to Plasma Immersion Ion Implantation Technologies Emmanuel Wirth.
Breakdown in Solid Dielectrics
Laser Doppler Vibrometer tests Goran Skoro UKNF Meeting 7-8 January 2010 Imperial College London UKNF Target Studies Web Page:
Experiment with the Slinky
Solid Targets for the Neutrino Factory J R J Bennett Rutherford Appleton Laboratory, Chilton, Didcot, Oxon, OX11 0QX, UK
Design of an Aerospace Component
Studies of solid high-power targets Goran Skoro University of Sheffield HPT Meeting May 01 – 02, 2008 Oxford, UK.
Modelling shock in solid targets Goran Skoro (UKNF Collaboration, University of Sheffield) NuFact 06 UC Irvine, August 24-30, 2006.
Chapter 21 – Thermal Properties of Materials
Mercury Jet Studies Tristan Davenne Rutherford Appleton Laboratory Joint UKNF, INO, UKIERI meeting 2008 University of Warwick, Physics Department 3-4 April.
The JPARC Neutrino Target
Fuel Evaporation in Ports of SI Engines P M V Subbarao Professor Mechanical Engineering Department Measure of Useful Fuel …..
Workshop SLAC 7/27/04 M. Zolotorev Fluctuation Properties of Electromagnetic Field Max Zolotorev CBP AFRD LBNL.
New Symbol  – “beta” How “expandable” a material is. Depends on the material. Look it up in the book, or wikipedia.  usually 
1 cm diameter tungsten target Goran Skoro University of Sheffield.
Forging new generations of engineers. Properties of Materials.
Electrostatic Septum For AGS C. Pai Brookhaven National Laboratory Collider-Accelerator Department
Design of electrostatic septum for slow extraction from J-PARC main ring 2005, March 2nd ICFA septa workshop 2005 Acc. Lab., KEK M. Tomizawa, Y. Arakaki,
Stress and Strain Unit 8, Presentation 1. States of Matter  Solid  Liquid  Gas  Plasma.
Objective 5 MOTION & FORCES. Have this on your desk for EVERY question involving math. FORMULAS Constants & Conversions Ruler EVERY FORMULA YOU NEED IS.
Micro-Resistor Beam.
LER Workshop, CERN, October 11-12, 2006Detector Safety with LER - Henryk Piekarz1 LHC Accelerator Research Program bnl-fnal-lbnl-slac Accelerator & Detector.
Reducing shock in the Neutrino Factory target Goran Skoro (University of Sheffield) UKNF Meeting 11 January 2006.
BNL E951 BEAM WINDOW EXPERIENCE Nicholas Simos, PhD, PE Neutrino Working Group Brookhaven National Laboratory.
Electron beam machining (EBM) – MM461 Dr. Dermot Brabazon Sch. Of Mech. and Manu. Eng. Dublin City University.
E951 Experiment Target Response Re-evaluation N. Simos, H. Kirk, P. Thieberger Brookhaven National Laboratory K. McDonald Princeton University.
2009/1/16-18 ILD09 Seoul 1 Notes for ILD Beam Pipe (Technical Aspect) Y. Suetsugu, KEK Parasitic loss Vacuum pressure profile Some comments for beam pipe.
August 7, 2003K. Chow, LHC Luminosity Detector Thermal Analysis1 Analysis cases Approach: Start simple to get information— with speed with confidence that.
Francesco Cottone INFN & Physics Departments of Perugia, Pisa, Florence (Collaboration Work under VIRGO Project) Thermomechanical properties of silicon.
XFEL-INJ1/2 DUMPS Remarks / Requirements, Injector Beam Dynamic Review Meeting, DESY, Mon. 23. October 2006 ‹#› XFEL - INJ 1/2.
INVESTIGATIONS OF MULTI-BUNCH DIELECTRIC WAKE-FIELD ACCELERATION CONCEPT National Scientific Center «Kharkov Institute of Physics and Technology» Kharkov,
THE PHYSICS OF RADIOLOGY The Production and Properties of X Rays Part Two BME College Sherman sheen.
UKNF 12 January 2005 Target Studies J R J Bennett RAL.
56 MHz SRF Cavity Cryostat support system and Shielding C. Pai
-Plasma can be produced when a laser ionizes gas molecules in a medium -Normally, ordinary gases are transparent to electromagnetic radiation. Why then.
Shield Module Design Considerations Adam Carroll Van Graves July 3, 2014.
Design of DC septum magnets based on measurements and 3D calculation of an R&D septum magnet for Rapid Cycle Synchrotron of J-PARC Masao Watanabe, Accelerator.
J-PARC neutrino experiment Target Specification Graphite or Carbon-Carbon composite cylindrical bar : length 900mm, diameter 25~30mm The bar may be divided.
Parameters of the NF Target Proton Beam pulsed10-50 Hz pulse length1-2  s energy 2-30 GeV average power ~4 MW Target (not a stopping target) mean power.
Shock Tests on Tantalum and Tungsten J. R. J. Bennett, S. Brooks, R. Brownsword, C. Densham, R. Edgecock, S. Gray, A. McFarland, G. Skoro and D. Wilkins.
Russian Research Center” Kurchatov Institute” Shock wave propagation near 450 GeV and 7 TeV proton beams in LHC collimator materials Alexander Ryazanov.
AAE450 Spring 2009 Kelly Leffel Structures and Thermal [Kelly Leffel] [Structures and Thermal]
TPSG4 validation at HighRadMat #6 Cedric Baud, B. Balhan, Jan Borburgh, Brennan Goddard, Wim Weterings.
Simulation of heat load at JHF decay pipe and beam dump KEK Yoshinari Hayato.
Sonic / Ultrasonic Anemometers
ENG/BENE, ENG Plenary, 16 March 2005 The New UK Programme for Shock Studies J R J Bennett RAL.
Design for a 2 MW graphite target for a neutrino beam Jim Hylen Accelerator Physics and Technology Workshop for Project X November 12-13, 2007.
TS Cool Down Studies TSu Unit Coils (24-25) N. Dhanaraj and E. Voirin Tuesday, 10 March 2015 Reference: Docdb No:
704 MHz cavity design based on 704MHZ_v7.stp C. Pai
High intensity electron beam and infrastructure Paolo Valente * INFN Roma * On behalf of the BTF and LINAC staff.
Patient is placed between X-ray tube and silver halide film.
Chiara Di Paolo EN-STI-TCD Material Choice for the Vacuum Window at the Exit of BTM.
Positron production rate vs incident electron beam energy for a tungsten target
Target R&D for JHF neutrino
Parameters of the NF Target
EUROnu Beam Window Studies Stress and Cooling Analysis
ECE699 – 004 Sensor Device Technology
Chapter 27 Problems 1,11,12,15,16,22,32,33,36,49,56.
ENERGY Energy J Kinetic Energy J Elastic potential energy J Ek Ee E
Presentation transcript:

Calculation of Beam loss on foil septa C. Pai Brookhaven National Laboratory Collider-Accelerator Department

Abstract Many of the foils in the AGS H20 electrostatic septum failed during 2004 heavy ion run. An analysis has been performed to find the cause of this foil failure. This analysis is based on the thermal effect of the energy that beam deposits in the foil.

In the heavy ion (gold) run the foil septum is not the extraction device. So there is no electric field applied in the cathode. There is no extraction of beam takes place. The circulating beam continuously hits the foil until the foils break. Foil Cathode No Voltage Heavy Ion beam continuously hits the foil Heavy Ion beam hits Electrostatic Septum

Possible failure Modes of Septum Foil 1. Melted by instantaneous beam energy 2. Broken by thermal shock stress 3. Broken by thermal stress at high temperature 4. Broken by vibration and wave resonating

Calculation Approach Beam energy: In each circulation when beam hit the foil, the direct blocked beam will deposit energy in the foil. The fraction of energy deposited is based on the ratio of Gaussian distribution and foil section area. Heat transfer: a. Foil internal energy b. Conduction to neighboring material. c. Radiation to surroundings Thermal stress: Thermal Shock and stress

Gold Ion Beam Properties Beam Energy: 10 Gev (atomic Weight:197) Beam intensity: 1x10 9 ion/pulse Beam size: 5 mm diameter (Gaussian distribution) Beam circular area: mm 2 Pulse length: 50x10 -9 sec (may be in 4 bunches) One revolution time: 2.5x10 -6 sec

Gold Ion Beam Energy Deposited Energy per ion: E=(1 Mev/gm/cm 2 ) x (Z 2 )x density x L E= 1.453x10 -9 Joule Where: Density of Foil: 19.7 gm/cc, (75W 25Re) Z=72 L=.1 cm (.035", foil width) Deposit Energy per pulse: Joule (1x10 9 ion/pulse)

The fraction of energy deposited is based on the ratio of Gaussian distribution and foil section area Fraction of beam Hits Foil Estimation

Energy deposited in the Foil Beam distribution : 3D Gaussian,  = 1.25 mm Volume of the Bell shape Gaussian distribution: Volume of foil cut through Bell shape (slice): Ratio of Volume, cut out slice to total volume: Total beam energy in one pulse: Joule Energy deposited in foil in each pass: Joule Number of circulations to dump all energy: 1242 passes Total time for 1242 passes:.003 seconds.

Physical properties of Foil Size:.001” thick x.03” width Free length: 1.5 cm Density of Foil: 19.7 gm/cc, (75W25Re) Specific heat of Foil:.14 J/gm.K Cross section area that hit by the beam:.127 mm 2 Volume hit by beam:.11mm 3 (.002 gm) Weight of foil hit by beam:.002 gm

Mechanical Properties of Foil 1.Material : Alloy, 75% Tungsten and 25% Rhenium (75W 25 Re). 2.Young’s modulus: 62x10 6 psi 3. Melting point of Foil (75W25Re): 3,393 o K. 4. Mechanical Strength: (.2% yield ) at 20 o C, 249,000 psi at 1,200 o C, 59,000 psi to 78,000 psi at 2,000 o C, 6,000 psi to 7,000 psi

Natural Frequency of Tensioned Foil Lateral vibration frequency of tensioned foil: Where: T is the Tension: 58,000 psi g is acceleration of gravity W is weight of unit length L is free length of foil F= 1,870 Hz Beam circulation time: 2.5  s (400,000 Hz)

Wave Speed In The Foil Wave Speed in the Foil: Where: E: is the Young’s Modules: 62.37x10 6 psi  is density of foil: 19.7 g/cm 3 V= 4,562 m/second Wave travel distance in one pass:.009 in (50 ns) Wave travel distance between passes:.45 in (2.5  s) Foil Width:.035”

Excitation by the beam 1.Excitation by one pulse a. Pulse length: 50 x second b. Full pulse travel distance: 15 meter c. Bunch number: 4 d. Each bunch travel distance: 3.75 meter e. Wave travel distance in foil:.009 in (1/4 foil width) f. The beam hits the foil as a shock. 2.Excitation by circulating beam a. Circulating time: 2.5 x second b. Wave travel distance in foil:.45 in (12 foil width) c. Frequency of Beam hits coil: 400,000 Hz d. Natural frequency of foil : F= 1,870 Hz

Radiation heat from Foil Radiation heat from foil: Q=  A  T 4 Where:  is the emissivity of Foil :.5 A is the radiation surface of foil:.089 cm 2  is Stefan-Boltzman Constant T is foil Temperate: 1500 o K Q= Joule/second Equivalent Energy Deposit from beam: H= 468 Joule/second ( J/2.5  s)

AGS Electrostatic Septum Ceramic Standoff Corona Cathode Septum moving slide Slide for system removal C-core and foil

C-Core and foil model. 125” thick C-Core Slice Foil.035” width 8 foils/in Spring tension: 2 lb.

Temperature rise in the first pass (50 nsec) oKoK Room T: 300 o K  T=3.78 o K

Temperature rise After 20 passes (50  sec) Room T: 300 o K  T=75.7 o K oKoK

Temperature rise in the first 20 passes (1.0  sec) oKoK Second o K 50  sec

Temperature rise in 500 passes ( sec) oKoK Second 2194 o K sec

Temperature rise After 500 passes ( sec) oKoK Room T: 300 o K T=2194 o K

Temperature rises in the foil: 1.Each pass of the beam will deposit Joules in the foil. The temperature of the foil will be raised up 3.78 o K. 2.After 20 passes ( 50  sec), the temperature of the foil will be raised to o K. 3.After 500 passes ( sec), the temperature of the foil will be raised to 2194 o K. 4.The temperature rise is a direct function of passes of beam. 5.In such a small time scale not much thermal conduction takes places to transfer heat out. The heating spot is almost the same size as the beam size.

57,185 psi N/cm 2 Tensile stress of foil under spring tension (initial condition) Spring tension: 2 lb.

Temperature distribution in first pass (50ns) oKoK Room T: 300 o K Duration Time:50ns  T=3.78 o K

Thermal Shock stress Room T: 300 o K Duration Time:50ns  T=3.78 o K N/cm 2 1,682 psi Material strength: at 20 o C, 249,000 psi at 1,200 o C, 59,000 psi to 78,000 psi at 2,000 o C, 6,000 psi to 7,000 psi Spring tension: 57,185 psi Total stress : 58,867 psi

Total stress when temperature rises (spring load + thermal stress)-1 No. of passes: 5 T= 300 o K Max.  =57,185 psi No. of passes: 10 T= 337 o K Max.  =57,675 psi

Total stress when temperature rises (spring load + thermal stress)-2 No. of passes: 58 T= 521 o K Max.  =62,507 psi No. of passes: 142 T= 837 o K Max.  =71017 psi

No. of passes: 225 T= 1152 o K Max.  =79,355 psi No. of passes: 308 T= 1468 o K Max.  =87,326 psi Total stress when temperature rises (spring load + thermal stress)-3

No. of passes: 392 T= 1783 o K Max.  =94877 psi No. of passes: 475 T= 2099 o K Max.  =102,015 psi Total stress when temperature rises (spring load + thermal stress)-4

Thermal stress and temperature at 1470 K, (no. of passes 308) Max.  =87,326 psi T= 1470 o K t=7.7x10 -4 sec

Time, Second Temperature o K Stress psi Thermal Stress rises along with temperature rises Foil breaking point T=1500 o K S=87,000 psi

Thermal stress in the foil: 1.Each pass of the beam will deposit Joules in the foil and raise the foil temperature by 3.78 o K. In 50 ns this temperature rise will generate a thermal shock of 1,682 psi. 2.The initial stress in the foil from spring load is 57,185 psi. Since the thermal expansion is very small, there is almost no reduction in the the spring load. The shock stress will add to the spring tension stress. 3.When temperature rises the thermal stress increases too. 4.When temperature rises the strength of the foil reduced.

Conclusion 1.Each pass of the beam will raise the foil temperature by 3.78 o K. 2.The thermal shock will add 1,682 psi to the spring tension stress. This stress is not big enough to break the foil. 3. In 50 ns pulse time, the stress wave travels only.009”, ¼ of foil width. There is no stress wave adding up effect. 4. Natural frequency of foil is 1.87 KHz. The frequency of beam passing is 400 KHz. There is no resonance vibration effect. 5.When the beam continuous hits the foil, the radiation is not enough to cool the foil. The coil temperature will be raised above 1500 o K. In this point the foil will break due to the stress exceeds the strength of the foil. 6. When foils break at 1500 o K, the aluminum core may melt. Melting temperature of aluminum is 933 o K.