Definitions What it’s about Teaching it Assessing it.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Crew Compliment. OBJECTIVES The importance of Safety & the effects of reduce crew.
Advertisements

Robert L. Helmreich, Ph.D. FRAes The University of Texas
TEM as an Analytical Tool
ICAO Global TEM & NOSS Symposium EUROCONTROL IANS Luxembourg November 9, 2005 Threat and Error Management Training for Air Traffic Control Officers Greg.
The pilot and airline operator’s perspective on runway incursion hazards and mitigation options Session 3 Presentation 1.
Human Factors Review ATC Chapter 8. Aim To review principals of human factors to a BAK level of knowledge.
Threat & Error Management
Incident Review Meeting Guidance Material & Presentation Template
Short Field Takeoff & Landing
Best Practices for Taxi Operations at Towered & Non-Towered Airports
An Introduction to Threat and Error Management 1.
P-2028 Minnesota Wing Aircrew Training: Tasks P-2028 Crew Resource Management.
IFR Decision Making.
AERONAUTICAL DECISION MAKING
Human Factors for Part 135 Air Operators
1 Enhancing Flight Crew Management of Unexpected Events This presentation is intended to enhance the reader's understanding, but it shall not supersede.
Unit 6 – Risk Management and safety management system
Commercial Decision Making Commercial Opns Need to focus on safety Decisions may not be popular Never base inflight decisions on how it will affect your.
Best Practices for Taxi Operations at Towered & Non-Towered Airports
Downloaded from AERONAUTICAL DECISION MAKING THE FLIGHT INSTRUCTORS’ LESSON PLAN.
Weather Technology in the Cockpit (WTIC) - Uncertainty/Probabilistic Information in the Cockpit Projects July 21, 2014 Gary Pokodner 1 Friends and Partners.
HUMAN FACTORS Lets look a little closer at a few HF elements in respect of “Gliding”. VISION, LOOKOUT & the Limitations of the Human Eye. VISION, LOOKOUT.
Presented to: By: Date: Federal Aviation Administration FAAST Runway Safety Training Proper Planning Promotes Safer Ground Operations.
Incident Review Meeting Example  The next slides are an example of how to complete the template and identify latent conditions, threats, errors, UAS and.
Mission Aircrew School Chapter 14: Crew Resources Management (March 2011)
Error Management OGHFA 1_HP_06_VIS_Error Management 1.
Presented to: Instructors and Pilot Examiners By: The FAASTeam Date: July 1 to September 30, 2012 Federal Aviation Administration Downloaded from
Threat and Error Management in Aviation
Downloaded from 9/14/2015 Aeronautical Decision Making - The Theory Behind the Practice 1 AERONAUTICAL DECISION MAKING The Theory Behind The.
(MEP) Safety Forum in Riga Essential Elements: Thorough flight preparation, including: Training lesson / examination session planning (Flight Plan, sequence.
READY OR NOT THE FLIGHT REVIEW. FLIGHT REVIEW A FLIGHT REVIEW IS REQUIRED WITHIN THE PREVIOUS 24 CALENDAR MONTHS TO ACT AS PIC.
2 2003, TNA543 於台南機場撞上施工車輛 Aloha Airline.
Missed-Approach or Go-around: A Maneuver conducted by pilot when instrument or visual approach cannot be completed to a landing..
US IL Flying Club June 1 st, VERSION 4.
Presented to: By: Dennis H. Whitley Date: March 1, 2011 Federal Aviation Administration SOUTHERN REGION FAASTeam/Area 1 Approach and Landing Accidents.
Runway Incursion Causal Categories OPERATIONAL ERROR (OE) - A human error caused by a tower controller. There are over 8000 tower controllers in the U.S.
Threat and Error Management. What is TEM?  “Defensive flying”
Threat and Error Management In Helicopters. Inherently unstable Low level environment Time factor - slim margin for error and intervention Instructing.
READY OR NOT THE FLIGHT REVIEW.
Low Level Flying And Special Use Airspace Capt John Withelder.
Human Factors. Six key areas proposed Fatigue, Automation Insertion of new technologies, Physical environment, Pilot decision making, Procedural non-compliance,
Alex Montgomery.  Fly aircraft used to transport cargo or people  Coordinate location using a variety of different gauges and tools and relay that information.
Ex. 6 - Straight-and-Level Flight Ex. 6 – Straight-and-Level Flight.
Brendon Bourne Northern Region Flight Examiner. CAA Flight Tests Standards Guide Threat and Error Management The candidate exhibits a high level of situational.
Presented to: By: Date: Federal Aviation Administration How Did This Happen? Southern Region Runway Safety Team ORL CFI Workshop BJ Ault-Meyers, ctr Senior.
The air traffic controller’s perspective on runway incursion hazards and mitigation options Session 2 Presentation 1.
How Did That Happen? Analyzing Prevention Resources Available.
SOPs. Pinnacle Airlines Flt th Oct 2004 Objectives By the end of this session you will be able to:  Identify the factors that led to the loss.
Commercial Decision Making
Safety Nets: Primary or Secondary Defenses? Does it Matter?
Soaring Safety Foundation
DJ de Nysschen Wonderboom Air Traffic Control
Error.
Case Study Title CRM CASE STUDY.
Case Study Title CRM CASE STUDY.
Case Study Title CRM CASE STUDY.
The air traffic controller’s perspective on runway incursion hazards and mitigation options Session 2 Presentation 1.
The pilot and airline operator’s perspective on runway incursion hazards and mitigation options Session 2 Presentation 2.
Case Study Title CRM CASE STUDY.
Case Study Title CRM CASE STUDY.
Case Study Title CRM CASE STUDY.
Situational Awareness
The air traffic controller’s perspective on runway incursion hazards and mitigation options Session 3 Presentation 3.
The pilot and airline operator’s perspective on runway incursion hazards and mitigation options Session 3 Presentation 1.
The pilot and airline operator’s perspective on runway incursion hazards and mitigation options Session 2 Presentation 2.
Case Study Title CRM CASE STUDY.
Case Study Title CRM CASE STUDY.
Case Study Title CRM CASE STUDY.
Case Study Title CRM CASE STUDY.
“Hey Cathy, I’m a Real Pilot”
Presentation transcript:

Definitions What it’s about Teaching it Assessing it

A situation or event that has the potential to impact negatively on the safety of a flight, or any influence that promotes opportunity for pilot error EXTERNAL: Weather, traffic INTERNAL: Fatigue, complacency

Errors are defined as crew actions or inactions that: lead to a deviation from crew or organisational intentions or expectations; reduce safety margins; and increase the probability of adverse operational events.

Typical errors in GA may include: incorrect performance calculations; inaccurate flight planning non-standard communications aircraft miss-handling incorrect systems operation or management checklist errors Human beings will make errors

Pilot induced aircraft position or speed deviations, misapplication of flight controls or incorrect systems configuration associated with a reduced margin of safety

Loss of directional control during a stall (error) resulting in an unusual aircraft attitude (state); Inappropriate instrument scan (error) resulting in flight below best single engine rate of climb (blue line) speed (state).

Passenger brief Pre take-off brief Checklists SADIE Systematic scan

So what’s new? What is TEM about? Raising Awareness

Human Factors in Flight: Frank H Hawkins, Second edition, P115 To demonstrate the blind spot, hold the drawing at arms length, close the left eye and move the picture toward you keeping the right eye focused on the cross.

Verbalise your decision making process

Verbalise