March 3, 2009 V.Karimäki, Sensor planarity 1 1 Sensor planarity study (pogress report) V. Karimäki Project meeting Helsinki 03.03.2009.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Impact parameter studies with early data from ATLAS
Advertisements

Antonis Leisos KM3NeT Collaboration Meeting the calibration principle using atmospheric showers the calibration principle using atmospheric showers Monte.
Giuseppe Roselli (CMS-RPC) Università degli Studi di Bari – INFN RPC Efficiency with Track Reconstruction Giuseppe Roselli.
Electromagnetic shower in the AHCAL selection criteria data / MonteCarlo comparison of: handling linearity shower shapes CALICE collaboration meeting may.
June 6 th, 2011 N. Cartiglia 1 “Measurement of the pp inelastic cross section using pile-up events with the CMS detector” How to use pile-up.
Moving Averages Ft(1) is average of last m observations
Page 1 Calculating the Beam Position at the Ecal for DESY Run (Independent of Tracking) Hakan Yilmaz.
Cluster Threshold Optimization from TIF data David Stuart, UC Santa Barbara July 26, 2007.
2015/6/23 1 How to Extrapolate a Neutrino Spectrum to a Far Detector Alfons Weber (Oxford/RAL) NF International Scoping Study, RAL 27 th April 2006.
Minimum bias vertex distribution for 1998/99 e - p data and reweighting routine é Measuring the minimum bias vertex distribution. Ricardo Gonçalo, 21/3/2000.
New MC set summary Old MC set summary 400k events generated for each set in STARlight Radius adjusted for matching exponential slope of t-spectrum Fully.
CC ANALYSIS STUDIES Andy Blake Cambridge University Fermilab, September 2006.
1 BABS 502 Moving Averages, Decomposition and Exponential Smoothing Revised March 11, 2011.
Correlation & Regression
Problem 1 Given a high-resolution computer image of a map of an irregularly shaped lake with several islands, determine the water surface area. Assume.
Atmospheric Neutrino Oscillations in Soudan 2
Craft09 Visual Summary and Efficiency Trackermaps Giuseppe Zito : Infn Bari Italy Giuseppe Zito, Infn Bari.
Blue: Histogram of normalised deviation from “true” value; Red: Gaussian fit to histogram Presented at ESA Hyperspectral Workshop 2010, March 16-19, Frascati,
W  eν The W->eν analysis is a phi uniformity calibration, and only yields relative calibration constants. This means that all of the α’s in a given eta.
Current Status of Hadron Analysis Introduction Hadron PID by PHENIX-TOF  Current status of charged hadron PID  CGL and track projection point on TOF.
Irakli Chakaberia Final Examination April 28, 2014.
HBD Performance Estimates Zvi Citron 3 April 2008 HL Meeting.
Outrigger Timing Calibration & Reconstruction Milagro – 11/17/03 Shoup – 1 Purpose: To incorporate outrigger hits in event angle fitting Additionally incorporated.
1 Lesson 8: Basic Monte Carlo integration We begin the 2 nd phase of our course: Study of general mathematics of MC We begin the 2 nd phase of our course:
Workshop on B/Tau Physics, Helsinki V. Karim ä ki, HIP 1 Software Alignment of the CMS Tracker V. Karimäki / HIP V. Karimäki / HIP Workshop.
Status of straw-tube tracker V.Peshekhonov, D.Peshekhonov, A.Zinchenko JINR, Dubna V.Tikhomirov P.N.Lebedev Physics Institute, Moscow Presented on the.
T.Dorigo, INFN-Padova1 Muon Momentum Scale Status and plans M.De Mattia, T.Dorigo, U.Gasparini – Padova S.Bolognesi, C.Mariotti – Torino CMS-Padova – 1.
Kalanand Mishra April 27, Branching Ratio Measurements of Decays D 0  π - π + π 0, D 0  K - K + π 0 Relative to D 0  K - π + π 0 Giampiero Mancinelli,
Status of Pattern Recognition for the T-Tracker Hans Wenzel, Hogan Nguyen March 12 th, 2011 Introduction Hans implemented stereo hits, formed by the intersection.
Normal Curvature of Surface p  N T Local geometry at a surface point p:  surface normal N. The plane containing N and T cuts out a curve  on the surface.
Mitglied der Helmholtz-Gemeinschaft Calibration of the COSY-TOF STT & pp Elastic Analysis Sedigheh Jowzaee IKP Group Talk 11 July 2013.
MGT-491 QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS AND RESEARCH FOR MANAGEMENT OSMAN BIN SAIF Session 22.
MCMC reconstruction of the 2 HE cascade events Dmitry Chirkin, UW Madison.
Bartol Flux Calculation presented by Giles Barr, Oxford ICRR-Kashiwa December 2004.
1 Introduction to Statistics − Day 4 Glen Cowan Lecture 1 Probability Random variables, probability densities, etc. Lecture 2 Brief catalogue of probability.
Beam Extrapolation Fit Peter Litchfield  An update on the method I described at the September meeting  Objective;  To fit all data, nc and cc combined,
CMS Torino meeting, 4 th June, 2007 R. Castello on behalf of Torino Tracker’s group Tracker Alignment with MillePede.
1 BABS 502 Moving Averages, Decomposition and Exponential Smoothing Revised March 14, 2010.
06/2006I.Larin PrimEx Collaboration meeting  0 analysis.
A different cc/nc oscillation analysis Peter Litchfield  The Idea:  Translate near detector events to the far detector event-by-event, incorporating.
Kalanand Mishra February 23, Branching Ratio Measurements of Decays D 0  π - π + π 0, D 0  K - K + π 0 Relative to D 0  K - π + π 0 decay Giampiero.
1 Status of Tracker Alignment b-tagging Workshop Nhan Tran (JHU) On behalf of the Tracker Alignment Group.
Statistics 350 Lecture 2. Today Last Day: Section Today: Section 1.6 Homework #1: Chapter 1 Problems (page 33-38): 2, 5, 6, 7, 22, 26, 33, 34,
Problem 1: Service System Capacity CustomersServed Customers Queue Server Problem: Can a server taking an average of x time units meet the demand? Solution.
UIUC - BTeV Muon Trigger S. Davis, M. Haney, M. Selen, Use FPGA hardware + DSP algorithms to find tracks in muon detector subsystem. –Must provide adequate.
Upsilon production and μ-tagged jets in DØ Horst D. Wahl Florida State University (DØ collaboration) 29 April 2005 DIS April to 1 May 2005 Madison.
DESY BT analysis - updates - S. Uozumi Dec-12 th 2011 ScECAL meeting.
FinCMS Dec 19, 2008 V.Karimäki, Sensor shapes 1 1 Tracker calibration for curved sensors (brief overview) V. Karimäki FinnCMS meeting Helsinki
A Study on Leakage and Energy Resolution
Lecture 24: Surface Representation
The simple linear regression model and parameter estimation
Lesson 8: Basic Monte Carlo integration
Planar distortions for SCT Barrel Modules
Reduction of Variables in Parameter Inference
Ex1: Event Generation (Binomial Distribution)
ORCA proposed public plots
Beam Tilt & TFC: Can we see a (MC) beam tilt?
Update on TB 2007 Xtal Irradiation Studies at H4
No notecard for this quiz!!
Reddy Pratap Gandrajula (University of Iowa) on behalf of CMS
Light Balance Update (Measuring VAOD with cosmic rays.)
Beam Tilt & TFC: Can we see a (MC) beam tilt?
A module in TrkFixup Gerry Lynch October 1, 2005
Preliminary Request: Mean Charged Multiplicity in DIS
Slope measurements from test-beam irradiations
SCT Wafer Distortions (Bowing)
May Test Beam Analysis – Sensor Homogeneity – Preliminary!
Status report on CATA-01/POLA-01 coincidence measurements
Recent Results on TRT Alignment
Presentation transcript:

March 3, 2009 V.Karimäki, Sensor planarity 1 1 Sensor planarity study (pogress report) V. Karimäki Project meeting Helsinki

March 3, 2009 V.Karimäki, Sensor planarity 2 1 Recall the basic idea Q: track impact point at planar sensor P: true impact point at curved sensor near the true hit position Q': point where our flat detector model assumes the hit lies Departure from planarity causes a systematic offset:  u = (du/dw)*w P du/dw=t 1 /t 3 from track direction t = (t 1,t 2,t 3 ) Our CMSSW detector model: planar sensors (w=0)

March 3, 2009 V.Karimäki, Sensor planarity 3 1 Hit correction for non-planarity  Corrected u-coordinate: u c = u h -  u = u h - (t 1 /t 3 )*w[1]  So preserve the detector model, but do correction  From [1]: w=(t 3 /t 1 )*  u  For fixed position (u,v): w= [2]  So systematics (  u) in residuals give an estimate of w i.e. the surface coordinates, computing [2] in bins

March 3, 2009 V.Karimäki, Sensor planarity 4 1 Sensor curvature can be studied 1.Parametrizing shape: w=au 2 +buv+cv 2 and fitting a,b,c 2.Model independent sensor shape by plotting mean residuals weighted with (t 3 /t 1 ) as a function of u,v

March 3, 2009 V.Karimäki, Sensor planarity 5 1 Verification with Monte Carlo Parameterized surface Fitted surface

March 3, 2009 V.Karimäki, Sensor planarity 6 1 Model independent surface shape  By plotting weighted uncorrected mean residuals Here MC

March 3, 2009 V.Karimäki, Sensor planarity 7 1 Sensor shape study in cosmics  CRAFT data  CMSSW  TOB and TIB so far  Begin with non-aligned data  Pick up a few sample modules

March 3, 2009 V.Karimäki, Sensor planarity 8 1 Residuals profile, uncorrected v [cm]

March 3, 2009 V.Karimäki, Sensor planarity 9 1 Residuals profile, corrected v [cm]

March 3, 2009 V.Karimäki, Sensor planarity 10 1 Residuals, uncorrected, a TOB mod

March 3, 2009 V.Karimäki, Sensor planarity 11 1 Residual correction for non-planarity

March 3, 2009 V.Karimäki, Sensor planarity 12 1 Corrected residual

March 3, 2009 V.Karimäki, Sensor planarity 13 1 Sensor shape, example

March 3, 2009 V.Karimäki, Sensor planarity 14 1 Summary By simple Monte Carlo:  Demonstrated method to fit sensor shape  Method to correct hit positions  Demonstrated model independent way to look for possible sensor curvature Cosmics:  First studies using TOB  No significant effects so far  Further studies with many more modules