Input/Output Lindsay Robertson Sarah Wilson Katie Luscombe.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

THEORY OF SECOND LANGUAGE LEARNING

Advertisements

Krashen’s “monitor model” The acquisition-learning hypothesis The monitor hypothesis The natural order hypothesis The input hypothesis The affective.

Second language learning

Second Language Acquisition

Chapter 4 Key Concepts.

SLA Research: Who Cares? TESOL Spain Conference March 2011 Geoff Jordan.

How Languages Are Learned 4th edition Patsy M

Formal Approaches to Second Language Acquisition Steven Robinson Blackman High School

Multimedia Call: Lessons to be learned from research on instructed SLA by Carol chapelle Iowa State University Daniel, Rania, Alice.

Theories of Second language Acquisition

The Basics of Language Acquisition

T HE USE OF SOCIAL NETWORKING FOR SECOND LANGUAGE ACQUISITION Monica McCrory (PhD Student) University of Missouri at Columbia

Group Members Data Collection Vincent’s books Websites about Vincent Face-to-face interview Questionnaires Data Analysis Attitude Visual and auditory.

Input and Interaction and Second Language Acquisition

Facilitating Negotiated Interaction

Language Development in FL-Medium Learning Environment Eeva Rauto Vaasa University of Applied Sciences

The Natural Approach Introduction. **The term NA was developed by Tracy Terrl and Stephen Krashen in 1977 **The term NA was developed by Tracy Terrl and.

in Learner –Centered Classrooms

Education of English Conversation

Sharonda Walker Texas Woman’s University. Acquisition-Learning Monitor Natural Order Input Affective Filter.

ACRONYMS ACRONYM DEFINITION NOTES EFL English as a foreign language

DEVELOPING ART LESSONS WITH AT-RISK YOUTH AND ELLS IN MIND Delanie Holton Art Teacher Fletcher Primary and Intermediate Aurora, CO.

Colorado State University April 12 th, 2014 Leslie Davis Devon Jancin Moriah Kent Kristen Foster THEORIES OF SECOND LANGUAGE ACQUISITION: What are their.

Explaining second language learning

Theories of Second language Acquisition

Liza Funke EDU 528 INTRODUCTION Our students are technology-oriented Second language acquisition is social in nature MOOs are technological, social language.

  I think doing a lot of grammar exercises is necessary.

Individual Differences in SLA: Gender 1.Interlanguage Not a rich area for examination of gender differences. Selinker, L. (1969). Language transfer. General.

Teaching language means teaching the components of language Content (also called semantics) refers to the ideas or concepts being communicated. Form refers.

The Interpersonal Mode

L2 learning context The Sociocultural perspective Miss. Mona AL-Kahtani.

Multimedia CALL: Lessons to Be Learned from Research on Instructed SLA Carol A. Chapelle Presenters: Thorunn April.

UNIT 5 AN ADDITIVE APPROACH TO PLANNING IN PLURILINGUAL CLASSROOMS.

Keeping the Classroom in the Target Language Shuhan C. Wang, Ph.D. with Carol Ann Dahlberg, Ph.D. STARTALK, Chicago October 2008.

Input and Interaction Ellis (1985), interaction, as the discourse jointly constructed by the learner and his interlocutors and input is the result of.

DISCOURSE ASPECTS OF INTERLANGUAGE Ellis 2003, Chapter 5 pp. 43 – 50 Bastian Surya Adinegara ( ) Fatimah( ) Lilik Suryani ( )

Principles. Language acquisition, first or second, occurs only when comprehension of real messages occurs, and when the acquirer is not "on the defensive".

Second Language Acquisition for Teachers

Inha University 2010 English Education Program. Welcome to Language Teaching Activities For Teachers Inha Tesol 2010 Friday Nights 7:55 -9:10.

Second Language Acquisition

Applied Linguistics Written and Second Language Acquisition.

Krashen’s Hypotheses about Second language Acquisition YL-TESOL.

Language as a by-product of learning about real-world content.

Second Language Acquisition Theories (A brief description) Compiled by: Nicole Lefever.

SECOND LANGUAGE ACQUISITION AND MATERIALS DEVELOPMENT Chapter 2 1.

Approaches to (Second) Language Acquisition. Behaviorism (Theory) tabula rasa (to be filled with language material) children learn language by imitation;

The Linguistic Environment (Ch. 4)

KERALA UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF TEACHER EDUCATION, KUMARAPURAM,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM POWERPOINT PRESENTATION B. Ed COURSE Name of the trainee: ……………………………….

A well-balanced language course should consis t of four roughly equal strands: Meaning-focused input Meaning focused output Language focused learning Fluency.

Negotiating meaning in the mixed-ability language classroom María F. Muradás-Taylor University of York.

Stephen Krashen SECOND-LANGUAGE ACQUISITION THEORY.

Second language acquisition vs foreign language learnirg.

ELL353 Welcome to Week #3 Dr. Holly Wilson. This Week’s Assignments 1. Readings 2. Discussion #1: Teaching Vocabulary 3. Discussion #2: Vocabulary Lesson.

Comprehensible Input Hypothesis — A classic theory in SLA Speaker: Wang Na Major: Applied Linguistics Date: June,

Second Language Acquisition Think about a baby acquiring his first language. Think about a person acquiring a second language. What similarities and differences.

INTERACTION HYPOTHESIS – M.Long

Boulder Valley Public Schools Sheltered Instruction.

How Languages Are Learned

Listen to Learn By: Alexandre Papa. Listening to a foreign language before speaking it will help students acquire it more easily.

Theories of Language Acquisition

Second Language Acquisition & English Teaching

Glottodidattica Lesson 5.

Theories of Language Acquisition

The Interaction Hypothesis

Explaining Second Language Learning

Theories of First and Second Language Acquisition

Brian J English Ph.D. School of Global Studies Tama University

Theories of Second language Acquisition

CPD for Primary Languages

Today’s class Listening, Speaking, TEE Review Learning theories

Presentation transcript:

Input/Output Lindsay Robertson Sarah Wilson Katie Luscombe

What is Input? What is Output? Are there different kinds? How many of you are TESOL minors???

Second Language Acquisition  Interactionist Theory – importance of two way communication in the target language.  Nativist Theory – comprehensible target language input which is one- way.

Different Types of Input  Comprehensible Input  Meaning - focused Input  Interactive Input  Modified Input

Comprehensible Input  First hypothesized by Stephen Krashen over 30 years ago.  Expanded Chomsky’s Language Acquisition Device.  Language acquisition takes place during human interaction in the target language.

Comprehensible Input…  Krashen i+1 This hypothesis is concerned more with “acquisition” not “learning” The only time a learner can understand the input if they can connect to prior knowledge and known concepts

Meaning-Focused Input  Learning through listening and reading.  Main focus is gaining knowledge and understanding of what is read or listened to.  Examples: extensive reading, listening to stories, watching a movie, and being a listener in a conversation.

Modified Input  Teacher talk  Foreigner talk  Not simply speaking loudly  For example: Native speaker speaking slower and more deliberately to a non-native speaker.

Interactive Input  Long  Interactionist  Significance of interactional modifications which occur in the negotiating of meaning when communication problems arrive.

What are your experiences using these types of input???? You don’t always necessarily have to switch into English to make something comprehensible!!!!!

Output  Comprehensible Output Comprehensible Input from the other prespective. Producing language at a level that can be understand by your conversational partner. Pushed Output

Output  Swain – “Output Hypothesis” (1985) Producing language is part of the process of second language learning. Noticing/Triggering Function Hypothesis – Testing Function Metalinquistic (Reflective) Function

What are your experiences with output? Think of how many ways you can produce language???

Why has it taken so long?  Not till 1985 was output considered really important, why is this so?  What is input without output?