Loran Integrity Performance Panel The Loran Integrity Performance Panel (LORIPP) The LORIPP Team Loran Team Meeting McLean, VA July 30, 2002.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
International Civil Aviation Organization
Advertisements

Using Seasonal Monitor Data to Assess Aviation Integrity Sherman Lo, Greg Johnson, Peter Swaszek, Robert Wenzel, Peter Morris, Per Enge 36 th Symposium.
Loran Integrity Performance Panel The Loran Integrity Performance Panel Sherman Lo, Per Enge, & Lee Boyce, Stanford University Ben Peterson, Peterson Integrated.
PROJECT RISK MANAGEMENT
Long RAnge Navigation version C
Hazardously Misleading Information Analysis for Loran LNAV Dr. Ben Peterson, Peterson Integrated Geopositioning Dr. Per Enge, Dr. Todd Walter, Dr. Sherman.
Differential Loran Ben Peterson, Ken Dykstra & Peter Swaszek Peterson Integrated Geopositioning & Kevin Carroll, USCG Loran Support Unit Funded by Federal.
Chapter 2Test Specification Process. n Device Specification Sheet – Purpose n Design Specification – Determine functionality of design n Test List Generation.
Transitioning to Time of Transmission Control in the U.S. Loran System ILA 2003 Boulder, CO Mr. Gene Schlechte CAPT Curtis Dubay, P.E. U. S. Coast Guard.
32 nd International Loran Association November 3-7, 2003 Predicting Differential Loran-C Performance in Boston Harbor Erik Johannessen Andre Grebnev Wouter.
Loran Integrity Performance Panel Loran Integrity & Performance Panel (LORIPP) Per Enge, Stanford University, November 2003 Based on the work of: Federal.
I-95 Corridor Coalition Vehicle Probe Project 1 The Validation Process I-95 Corridor Coalition Vehicle Probe Project AASHTO SSOM -
Avionics Engineering Center Characterization of Atmospheric Noise in the Loran-C Band Presented to the International Loran Association (ILA-32) November.
AOSC 634 Air Sampling and Analysis Lecture 1 Measurement Theory Performance Characteristics of instruments Nomenclature and static response Copyright Brock.
Limits of static processing in a dynamic environment Matt King, Newcastle University, UK.
Regression Analysis. Unscheduled Maintenance Issue: l 36 flight squadrons l Each experiences unscheduled maintenance actions (UMAs) l UMAs costs $1000.
Testing an individual module
Managing Project Risk.
Spring 2006 EE 548 Ultra Wideband Radio: Ranging Spring 2006.
1 BA 555 Practical Business Analysis Review of Statistics Confidence Interval Estimation Hypothesis Testing Linear Regression Analysis Introduction Case.
Short Course on Introduction to Meteorological Instrumentation and Observations Techniques QA and QC Procedures Short Course on Introduction to Meteorological.
LORAN C By Farhan Saeed.
Loran Integrity Performance Panel Integrity Fault Tree for Loran Sherman Lo Second LORIPP Meeting Portland, OR September 23-24, 2002.
Mitigation of the Effects Early Skywaves Ben Peterson, Peterson Integrated Geopositioning & Per Enge, Stanford University Funded by Federal Aviation Administration,
1 Prediction of Software Reliability Using Neural Network and Fuzzy Logic Professor David Rine Seminar Notes.
V-1 TFE: The New Heartbeat of Loran T. P. Celano, Timing Solutions Corporation LT Kevin Carroll, Loran Support Unit.
Multiplexing GPS & eLoran on single RF cable for retrofit installations Benjamin Peterson Peterson Integrated Geopositioning International Loran Association.
Loran Integrity Performance Panel The Loran Integrity Performance Panel Sherman Lo, Per Enge, & Lee Boyce, Stanford University Ben Peterson, Peterson Integrated.
A Preliminary Study of Loran-C Additional Secondary Factor (ASF) Variations International Loran Association 31st Annual Convention And Technical Symposium.
An algorithm for dynamic spectrum allocation in shadowing environment and with communication constraints Konstantinos Koufos Helsinki University of Technology.
A Framework for Energy- Scalable Communication in High-Density Wireless Networks Telvis Calhoun Wireless Sensor Networks CSC Dr. Li 8/27/2008.
Error Analysis Accuracy Closeness to the true value Measurement Accuracy – determines the closeness of the measured value to the true value Instrument.
VTT-STUK assessment method for safety evaluation of safety-critical computer based systems - application in BE-SECBS project.
POWER CONTROL IN COGNITIVE RADIO SYSTEMS BASED ON SPECTRUM SENSING SIDE INFORMATION Karama Hamdi, Wei Zhang, and Khaled Ben Letaief The Hong Kong University.
Differential eLoran Reference Station for Maritime and Precise Time Applications Gerard Offermans, Arthur Helwig, Reelektronika NL International Loran.
High Accuracy Nationwide Differential Global Positioning System (HA-NDGPS) UPDATE Jim Arnold September, 2009.
Getting a Bearing on ASF Directional Corrections 32 nd Annual Technical Symposium International Loran Association 5 Nov 2003 Boulder, CO.
Page 1 Designing for Health; A Methodology for Integrated Diagnostics/Prognostics Raymond Beshears Raytheon 2501 W. University McKinney, TX
Generic Approaches to Model Validation Presented at Growth Model User’s Group August 10, 2005 David K. Walters.
Federal Department of Home Affairs FDHA Federal Office of Meteorology and Climatology MeteoSwiss Task 1 of PP Interpretation 1.1Further applications of.
 Chapter 13 – Dependability Engineering 1 Chapter 12 Dependability and Security Specification 1.
10. Satellite Communication & Radar Sensors
James T. Doherty Institute for Defense Analyses 16 October 2007
Presented to: IWG 26 By: Jason Burns (FAA) Date: February 5-7, 2014 Federal Aviation Administration DFMC Work Plan Update.
Hazardously Misleading Information Analysis for Loran LNAV Dr. Ben Peterson, Peterson Integrated Geopositioning Dr. Per Enge, Dr. Todd Walter, Dr. Sherman.
1 Distribution Statement “A” (Approved for Public Release, Distribution Unlimited)5/15/2012 Advanced Radio Frequency Mapping (RadioMap) Dr. John Chapin.
1 Loran-C User Position Software (LUPS) Navigation Performance with the August 2001 Cross-Country/Alaska Flight Test Data Jaime Y. Cruz and Robert Stoeckly.
Statistics Presentation Ch En 475 Unit Operations.
DRAFT WAAS Integrity Resolution Process Pat Reddan 22 June 2005 ZETA ASSOCIATES.
SOFTWARE PROJECT MANAGEMENT
P-Static Effects Testing
F E D E R A L A V I A T I O N A D M I N I S T R A T I O N A I R T R A F F I C O R G A N I Z A T I O N Loran Update Mitchell Narins (US FAA) G. Thomas Gunther.
NCAF Manchester July 2000 Graham Hesketh Information Engineering Group Rolls-Royce Strategic Research Centre.
1 Purpose of the Evaluations To determine whether Loran-C can provide the: Accuracy Availability Integrity Continuity, and Coverage to support Lateral.
Spectrum Sensing In Cognitive Radio Networks
Test Plan: Introduction o Primary focus: developer testing –Implementation phase –Release testing –Maintenance and enhancement o Secondary focus: formal.
Transmitter Performance Section Participants –LSU –NAVCEN –NAVCEN (West) –Peterson Integrated Geo-positioning, Inc –BAH LORIPP Meeting #2 Portland, OR.
LORAN Modernization Loran Data Channel Mr. Raymond Agostini International Loran Association Orlando, FL October 15, 2007.
Fault Free Integrity of Mid-Level Voting for Triplex Carrier Phase Differential GPS Solutions G. Nathan Green – The University of Texas at Austin Martin.
Data Collection Effort Objectives Time of Transmission (TOT) monitors Time of Arrival (TOA) monitors Pulse Analysis Measurements re UTC, & sign of delay.
LORIPP Meeting July 24-25, Implementing a LORIPP-Compliant Option in the Loran-C User Position Software (LUPS) LORIPP Meeting July 24-25, 2002 Jaime.
Loran Integrity Performance Panel LORIPP Documentation Tom Gunther, Sherman Lo Second LORIPP Meeting Portland, OR September 23-24, 2002.
Forecast 2 Linear trend Forecast error Seasonal demand.
Limits of static processing in a dynamic environment Matt King, Newcastle University, UK.
Master independent, multi-chain navigation Requirement –Resolution of 200 usec cross chain lane ambiguities Ambiguities are 20 usec in Europe Would also.
1.) Acquisition Phase Task:
Loran c R.Ezhilarasan( ) R.Dinesh( )
Loran Integrity & Performance Panel (LORIPP)
Open Loop Tracking of GPS Radio Occultation for LEOs
International Civil Aviation Organization
Presentation transcript:

Loran Integrity Performance Panel The Loran Integrity Performance Panel (LORIPP) The LORIPP Team Loran Team Meeting McLean, VA July 30, 2002

Loran Integrity Performance Panel LORIPP Background What is LORIPP and why does it exist? QDetermine Requirements (System Engineering) QIdentify Threats to Loran and Determine Threat Allocations (Fault Tree) QBound/Mitigate Effects of these Threats QDevelop Threat Models QProvide Substantiated Information on Loran Capabilities What will we accomplish? QProve Stand Alone Loran Can Act as a Redundant Navigation System (RNP 0.3 or 0.5)

Loran Integrity Performance Panel Threats to Loran Integrity Transmitter Propagation Effects QInterference (Atmospheric Noise, P Static, Sky Wave) QGround Wave Propagation Phenomena (ASF, ECD, SNR) Receiver

Loran Integrity Performance Panel LORIPP Work Plan Transmitter Performance (LSU, PIG, Tom G., NAVCEN) Receiver Algorithms & Performance (PIG, Stanford, USCGA) Fault Tree (Stanford, Kevin B., NAVCEN) System Engineering (PIG, Bob W.) P-Static Evaluation (Bob E., Bob T., Bob L., Bob W., Frank G., Kevin B.) Atmospheric Noise (Stanford, PIG, Kevin B., Bob W.) Ground Wave Propagation: ASF, ECD and Signal Strength (Bob W., USCGA, NAVCEN, LSU, PIG, Tom G., OU, FAATC) Loran Communications (Stanford, PIG, Frank G.) Sky Wave (Bob W., USCGA) Documentation & Meeting Logistics (Tom G., Stanford, NAVCEN)

Loran Integrity Performance Panel System Engineering Development of Coverage Analysis Tools Calculation of Continuity & 95% Accuracy Reliability, i.e., Mean Time between Failures, etc. QAvionics QNew Transmitter Equipment (validate assumptions)

Loran Integrity Performance Panel Fault Tree Integrity Fault Tree Continuity Fault Tree Determine Allocations in Error Budget Q ECD (propagation, receiver calibration, receiver noise) Q TOA (receiver noise) QTails of the distributions

Loran Integrity Performance Panel Preliminary Integrity Fault Tree Probability (HPE > HPL) > /hour Probability Transmitter Caused HMI Probability Propagation Caused HMI Probability Receiver Caused HMI Transmitter Timing Evil Waveform CW RFI Sky Wave ASF Effects Cross Rate ECD

Loran Integrity Performance Panel Transmitter Performance Determine ABS Threshold, Time to Blink from Onset of Fault, Probability of Out of Tolerance w/o blink Determine Transmitted ECD Tolerance, Blink on transmitted ECD? *** Determine Threat Monitor Requirements at transmitter, Certification Requirements for Monitors Calibration re UTC Chain Operations Q TOE verus SAM Analysis of coverage under each situation Q Control of TOE to UTC vs measurement of TOE to UTC and transmission of measured offset

Loran Integrity Performance Panel Receiver Algorithms & Performance (1/2) Determine the probability of false alarm & missed detection of blink/off air at given SNR (given time to alarm requirement) Establish SNR Threshold (for reliably identifying the correct station & cycle) with 7 9s of confidence Master independent, multi-chain navigation Q Resolution of 200 usec cross chain lane ambiguities Q Identification of secondary w/o master Loran Cycle Integrity Calculations Q Weighted Sum Squared Error vs Sum Squared Error Q Analysis of probability of cycle slips after verifying cycle integrity

Loran Integrity Performance Panel Receiver Algorithms & Performance (2/2) Input from Potential Manufacturers – Validate Assumptions of HMI Analysis Determine ECD Requirement Determine Loop Time Constants Develop Simulator Q Averaging time Q HPL calculation

Loran Integrity Performance Panel Basic Receiver HMI Algorithm Cycle Resolution Verifies that the correct cycle is being tracked Determine P wc (probability of being on the wrong cycle) HPL Calculation Determines the % confidence bound on horizontal error Determine HPL Cannot meet RNP 0.3 or 0.5 Requirements P wc < 1x10 -7 P wc > 1x10 -7 HPL > 0.3 NM (RNP 0.3) HPL > 0.5 NM (RNP 0.5) HPL < 0.3 NM HPL < 0.5 NM

Loran Integrity Performance Panel HPL Equation Uncorrelated Bias Terms Random Terms Correlated Bias Terms

Loran Integrity Performance Panel P Static Educate LORIPP via tutorial paper and briefing. Determine how P static fits into Fault Tree QDifferent faults caused by P static and Allocations What would the continuity allocation be? What is max level of P static Developing H-field Antenna Test Plan and, at a minimum, determine a figure for SNR drop outdoors

Loran Integrity Performance Panel Atmospheric Noise Determine the necessary analysis level, i.e., 95%, 99%, or 99.9%, worst time period or averaged over time? Determine and Develop Applicable Databases Time Domain Model for Simulation Determine the credit that can be claimed for non-linear processing Implement Results in Simulator and Receiver

Loran Integrity Performance Panel Ground Wave Propagation: ASF, ECD and Signal Strength Data Collection QGuidance/requirements definition for data collection effort (also collecting ECD & SNR data) QCoordinate with Atmospheric Noise Threat Model Data Analysis Q % bounds on remaining errors QCorrelated vs. Uncorrelated terms QMathematical modeling & prediction including terrain of SS, ECD, & ASF?

Loran Integrity Performance Panel Sky Wave Quantify effects on TOA bias Quantify effects on ECD bias Receiver technology for mitigation Integrity Allocation & Threat Model

Loran Integrity Performance Panel Loran Communications Effects on Navigation if Signals are Modulated Impact on Availability, Integrity, Accuracy, & Continuity if Loran Data is Transmitted QWhat data? QAnd at what rates? Quantify the benefits provided by the data channel in improving Loran Nav. performance (Availability, Integrity, Accuracy, & Continuity)

Loran Integrity Performance Panel Documentation & Meeting Logistics Collect White Papers from Briefings Loran/LORIPP Web resource? Meeting Minutes Organize Project and Arrange Priorities Determine Documentation Methodology

Loran Integrity Performance Panel Summary The LORIPP just had its first meeting this past week QThe major (critical) issues for Loran RNP 0.3 were discussed QA work plan was developed to gather the data and perform the analysis necessary to prove Loran performance QFuture meetings are planned to further develop the integrity analysis – late September