Types of reasoning… Deductive Those aimed at validity…attempt to convince us of the conclusion using linked premises (i.e. the premises directly link.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Basics of Logical Argument Two Kinds of Argument The Deductive argument: true premises guarantee a true conclusion. e.g. All men are mortal. Socrates.
Advertisements

Writing. Writing Process Prewriting Drafting Revising Editing/Proofreading Publishing/Presenting.
Rhetorical Fallacies: Non Sequitur and Post Hoc, Ergo Propter Hoc
Logical Arguments in Mathematics. A proof is a collection of statements and reasons in a logical order used to verify universal truths. However… depending.
Debate. Inductive Reasoning When you start with a probable truth, and seek evidence to support it. Most scientific theories are inductive. Evidence is.
The Problem of Induction Reading: ‘The Problem of Induction’ by W. Salmon.
Intro to Logic: the tools of the trade You need to be able to: Recognize an argument when you see one (in media, articles, people’s claims). Organize arguments.
Reasoning Automated Deduction. Reasonable Arguments Argument: An attempt to demonstrate the truth of a conclusion from the truth of a set of premises.
Science and induction  Science and we assume causation (cause and effect relationships)  For empiricists, all the evidence there is for empirical knowledge,
Essential Deduction Techniques of Constructing Formal Expressions and Evaluating Attempts to Create Valid Arguments.
Cognitive Processes PSY 334 Chapter 10 – Reasoning & Decision-Making August 19, 2003.
Essential Deduction Techniques of Constructing Formal Expressions Evaluating Attempts to Create Valid Arguments.
2.1 Demonstrative Geometry Proofs (page 46)
Building Logical Arguments. Critical Thinking Skills Understand and use principles of scientific investigation Apply rules of formal and informal logic.
Introduction to Social Science Research
Christianity, Belief & Science. Strengths  The scientific method is rational, and objective.  It is a logical process which can be repeated by others.
How to Argue Successfully Deductive and Inductive Reasoning.
Daily Learning Targets: I can apply the rules for writing parallel sentences in my writing. I can apply concepts learned in order to score 80% or higher.
7th Grade Do not let me forget. You need field trip permission slips today! Today: Assign debate topics Debate guided notes Stretch You need to have at.
An In-Depth Look at the Rhetorical Analysis Essay Question
Photo Album by Administrator. Crooped The "School of Athens General to Specific- Deductive Reasoning is key ! Plato 424BC– 347 BC Get Down with the Inductive.
Logic and Philosophy Alan Hausman PART ONE Sentential Logic Sentential Logic.
Stage 2 Philosophy Argument Analysis I think. Therefore I am. I think I think… Therefore I might be.
Three Modes of Persuasion Qualitative/Quantitative September 2011 Rhetoric: Communication Techniques.
Aristotelian Logic & Fashioning an Argument A Study of Deductive Reasoning.
Deductive vs. Inductive Logic This course is about deductive logic. But it is important to know something about inductive logic.
Argumentative Appeals/ Methods of Persuasion Speech Unit English 10A.
Review Inductive Reasoning moves from specific details to a general conclusion. The conclusion has to be “figured out” then we have to decide if it valid,
Review from Yesterday…. Rhetoric vs. Dialectic Deduction : conclusion is necessitated by, or reached from the previously stated facts (premises). Remember.
Debate Basics: The Logical Argument. Argument An argument is a set of claims presented in a logical form. An argument attempts to persuade an audience.
READING #4 “DEDUCTIVE ARGUMENTS” By Robert FitzGibbons from Making educational decisions: an introduction to Philosophy of Education (New York & London:
HOW TO CRITIQUE AN ARGUMENT
Breaking Down An Arguments Into Propositions
The construction of a formal argument
On the BACK of note card from yesterday Explain what makes advertising slogans powerful. Is it words? Elaborate. Use an example from yesterday’s worksheet.
PHIL 2525 Contemporary Moral Issues Lec 2 Arguments are among us…
Cognitive Processes PSY 334 Chapter 10 – Reasoning & Decision-Making May 28, 2003.
Chapter 32: How to Read an Essay. General Questions (pp ) What does the word, phrase, clause, or sentence mean? Is the claim true? Are the claims.
Syllogisms and Three Types of Hypothetical Syllogisms
CAHSEE: The Writing Task The Essay Overview LAW, BUSINESS & GOVERNMENT ACADEMY CAHSEE PREPARATION.
Spotting Fallacies. Fallacy Fallacies are those arguments which display errors in reasoning.
Arguments Arguments: premises provide grounds for the truth of the conclusion Two different ways a conclusion may be supported by premises. Deductive Arguments.
Cognitive Processes PSY 334 Chapter 10 – Reasoning.
Reason. Reason It rained last night. It rained last night. There are no sharks in Sun-Moon lake. There are no sharks in Sun-Moon lake. The sun will rise.
Higher / Int.2 Philosophy 12. Our Learning  Fallacy Reminder  Summary following Homework NAB  Class NAB.
PHI 103 ASH Courses For more course tutorials visit Get Ready to grant success at exam by shop at uoptutorial.
Text Table of Contents #4: What are the Reasons?.
Section 2-4 Deductive Reasoning.
Chapter 3 Basic Logical Concepts (Please read book.)
Chapter 9 Warranted Inferences. Chapter 9 Warranted Inferences.
In-class Writing Tomorrow you should write a short essay about a time when you were sick or injured or a time when your life was affected by the illness.
Fallacious Logic: Non Sequitur
False Association, False Causation, False Authority, & Faulty Premise
Disjunctive Syllogism
The Ontological Argument: An Introduction
Evaluate Deductive Reasoning and Spot Deductive Fallacies
How do we evaluate an argument for effectiveness?
In pairs, write a list of all the reasons people believe in God.
Reasoning, Logic, and Position Statements
Thinking Critically Copyright © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc.
A Closer Look at Inductive vs. Deductive Reasoning
Writing the Persuasive Essay: Step by Step to a 5
How can you write a great introduction?
Logical Fallacies.
8C Truth Tables, 8D, 8E Implications 8F Valid Arguments
How can you write a great introduction?
Two exams 10 ‘thinking skills’ to develop
Thinking Like a Scientist?
If there is any case in which true premises lead to a false conclusion, the argument is invalid. Therefore this argument is INVALID.
If there is any case in which true premises lead to a false conclusion, the argument is invalid. Therefore this argument is INVALID.
Presentation transcript:

Types of reasoning… Deductive Those aimed at validity…attempt to convince us of the conclusion using linked premises (i.e. the premises directly link to the conclusion). Those aimed at validity…attempt to convince us of the conclusion using linked premises (i.e. the premises directly link to the conclusion).Inductive Attempt to generalise from evidence – offer a conclusion about all things of a type by making observations about a limited number of things of that type. Attempt to generalise from evidence – offer a conclusion about all things of a type by making observations about a limited number of things of that type.

Deductive (p1) All oranges are fruits (p2) All fruits grow on trees (c) Therefore, all oranges grow on trees (p1) All bachelors are single (p2)Johnny is single, (c) Hence, Johnny is a bachelor

Inductive (p) All of the Harry Potter books have been good. (c) Therefore, the next Harry Potter book will also be good. (p1) All shops in the UK took £ sterling yesterday. (p2) All the shops in the UK took £ sterling before yesterday and for as long as I can remember as well., (c) Therefore, all shops in the UK will take £ sterling tomorrow. (p)The sun rose yesterday, and everyday before that for as long as the Earth has existed. (c) Therefore, the sun will rise tomorrow.

Unreliable Arguments Fallacies

General Introduction Fallacies are types of arguments that display errors in reasoning of a certain kind. Fallacies are types of arguments that display errors in reasoning of a certain kind. Fallacies are genuine arguments: real attempts to persuade us to accept the conclusion based on the premises. Fallacies are genuine arguments: real attempts to persuade us to accept the conclusion based on the premises. P P.51-52

Tasks 1. Re-read about explain, in detail, inductive and deductive arguments. 2. Re-read and explain ‘affirming the consequent’ and ‘denying the antecedent’ in detail (use the structure examples to help you outline these.

Next time in Philosophy… In pairs/threes: In pairs/threes: Create a short (1-1 ½ minutes) presentation on the type of fallacy you draw from the FALLACY HAT Create a short (1-1 ½ minutes) presentation on the type of fallacy you draw from the FALLACY HAT Your choice of format – PPT, STORY BOARDS…surprise me. Your choice of format – PPT, STORY BOARDS…surprise me.