A Chemical and Microbiological Assessment of Brooklyn Creek Highland IB Group 4 Students, Class of ‘14: Brett Baldwin, Vanessa Borowicz, Josie Brune, Trenton.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
West Virginia Department of Agriculture Water Quality Monitoring Program 2009 Photo by Paul Morley.
Advertisements

Calculating Water Quality
Stormwater. Industry a potential source of pollution Most remediation is simple structuring Training is critical Chemical treatment should be last resort.
Probes/kits used in testing the water quality 2014 Group 4 Project.
Cold Water Habitat Evaluation Gilbert Creek & Elk Creek June – August 2005 Matthew D. Rasmussen Applied Science Undergraduate UW-Stout Menomonie, WI
2009 Water Quality Monitoring Report – Fish Creek Vaughn Hauser, B.Sc. Naomi Parker, B.Sc., BIT, CEPIT.
Division of Water Quality
Measurement of Dissolved Oxygen with a Luminescence-based Oxygen Quenching Sensor By Cary B. Jackson, Ph.D. Hach Company.
Water Quality; An Introduction to Water Quality Research in the Yakima Watershed.
Water Quality Monitoring of Lake St. Joseph Watershed Principal Investigator: Beatrix Haggard, Ph.D. Co-Principal Investigators: James Hendrix Donnie Miller,
Shell Creek Watershed Research Group Advisors: Mark Seier and Karen Malmkar Researchers: Audrey Wondercheck, Mark O’Brien, Alisha Dunlap, Caitlin.
H 2 whOa! The Governor’s Institute of Environmental Science & Technology- Water Group.
Common Monitoring Parameters. Step 1 Consider purpose/objectives of monitoring Assess use attainment Characterize watershed Identify pollutants and sources.
Assessing Aquatic Ecosystems & Measurement. Aquatic Ecosystem Assessment The health of an aquatic ecosystem can be determined by examining a variety of.
Volunteer Training Group Meeting –Project Orientation –Project Requirements –Paperwork –Safety Training Field Session –Site Orientation –Project Training.
Water Quality Analysis of Tryon Creek State Park By Matthew J LaForce Environmental Chemistry II WQT134 Spring 07 Water Quality Analysis of Tryon Creek.
Water Quality Analysis Methods and Applications. Water Quality Analysis Physical Factors including suspended materials (called suspended solids) and dissolved.
Condition of the Water & Streambanks– Preliminary Results Marty St. Clair Coe College August 15, 2013.
20-Jan-2010electrical, computer and energy engineering Environmental Engineering Linking Mathematics and Chemistry to Engineering Dr. Abbazadegan Graduate.
Water Quality Monitoring and Parameter Load Estimations in Lake Conway Point Remove Watershed, L’Anguille River Watershed, and Bayou Bartholomew Presented.
1 Water Quality: Temperature How is water quality affected by temperature?
Temperature of Stream Site (upstream to downstream) Temperature ( °C )Average ( °C ) °C °C °C °C °C °C According to.
Water Conditioning Process
Red Lake Watershed District Water Quality Monitoring.
An Experiment with the BACKPACK LAB ™ by Hanna Instruments.
Water Testing By Pearl, Marlee, and Riahna McKenny Elementary March 21,2012.
Water Quality Testing By Josie, Davina, and Spencer McKenny Elementary 3/22/12.
To determine how a manmade structure, an overpass, effects aspects of stream water quality and discharge.
Module 10/11 Stream Surveys Stream Surveys – February 2004 Part 1 – Water Quality Assessment.
Water quality determination Kuruvunga springs Catalina Marambio Jones SEE-LA GK12 program March 20 th, 2013.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Quantifying tolerance indicator values for common stream fish species of the United States Michael.
Temperature Measured with a thermometer Units are ◦C
Shell Creek Watershed Study Advisors – Mark Seier, Suzy Goedeken, & Karen Malmkar Researchers –Katie O’Brien, Jake Kaufman, Mark O’Brien, Aubrey.
1 Factors influencing the dynamics of excessive algal blooms Richard F. Ambrose Environmental Science and Engineering Program Department of Environmental.
Summary of Water Quality Data Analysis from the Storm Water Management Ponds of Central Park Fredericksburg, VA Dr. Michael L. Bass Miña Recta, Diana Gutierrez.
1 Floodplain Management Session 11 Biology Water Quality Prepared by Susan Bolton, PhD, PE.
Larkin Creek Phase II Project Jennifer L. Bouldin, PhD Ecotoxicology Research Facility Arkansas State University.
Map courtesy of Alabama Water Watch Water Quality Monitoring and Assessment Of Factory Creek In Sumter County, Alabama Brian Burnes University of West.
An assessment of water quality in tropical streams located in primary and secondary rainforest By Emily Schultz Supervisor: Cheryl Baduini.
Water Analysis & Control. Water analysis & control WATSAN M15 ERU 2 Contents 1.Chemical parameters and ranges 2.Water sources: Sampling procedures 3.Laboratory.
STORET 1001 and the State of Utah Monitoring Strategy Today you will see: –What kind of attributes are available in STORET –How results, stations, and.
METHODS. Physical Methods Steam Profile Discharge Air Temperature Water Temperature Relative Humidity.
Sarah Brunsvold and Kasey Marley Faculty Mentor: Dr. Zuhdi Aljobeh Department of Civil Engineering Valparaiso University.
Shell Creek Watershed Study Advisors – Mark Seier & Suzy Goedeken Researchers – Sheila O’Brien, Brett Roberg, Jessica Boschen, Sean Farrier,
MADMEN CHAPTER VOLUNTEER MONITORING PROGRAM
ARISTOTLE UNIVERSITY OF THESSALONIKI Dept. of Civil Engineering Division of Hydraulics & Environmental Engineering Laboratory of Environmental Engineering.
North Creek Water Quality Prepared by Jon Rogers and Carie McCoy.
Water Quality in the Alaskan Arctic By Kaylan Duthie December 1, 2005.
Temperature. What is Temperature? Temperature is the measure of the average kinetic energy in a system. May be measured in Celsius (°C) or Fahrenheit.
Think about answering the questions: Who? What? Where? When? Why? How? Before your volunteers begin collecting data.
Rush Creek 2012 EmmaBeccaCassidy Feat. Guido Temperature The purpose of the temperature test was to check the temperature of the river to make sure the.
Bergen Swamp Stream Study and Analysis Presentation by: Matthew Vaccarella Click here to starthere Introduction.
 Water Quality Variability in a Bioswell and Concrete Drainage Pipe, Southwest Lincoln, Nebraska Jessica Shortino, B.S. University of Nebraska-Lincoln.
Water Measurements In EcoMUVE you can measure seven abiotic factors of the pond: temperature, dissolved oxygen, phosphates, nitrates, turbidity, pH, and.
Water Quality of Rush Creek Spring (2012) Morgan F. Cara Lantz Rebecca H. & Ruth Lee.
Water Quality Testing.
Annual Membership Meeting Water Quality Report 2010
OBJECTIVES a. To evaluate the impact of continuing schemes
Water Testing APES.
Water Testing APES.
Caddo Lake Nutrient Study Roy Darville - Caddo Lake Institute
Characterization of Dissolved Solids in the Ohio River
Investigating Mill Creek
Groundwater Quality UNIT 5.
Current Status Chemical Metrology Sub Division, RCM LIPI
What will we be testing the water for?
Water Quality Monitoring
A Public Friendly Approach to Sharing Water Quality Data
Little River Ditches Watershed Monitoring
Lake Comparison Physical and Chemical Properties
Presentation transcript:

A Chemical and Microbiological Assessment of Brooklyn Creek Highland IB Group 4 Students, Class of ‘14: Brett Baldwin, Vanessa Borowicz, Josie Brune, Trenton Cameron, Pam Choi, Jon Daigle, Megan Ellis, James Galpin, Janelle Garrett, Mac Gold, Madison Goodspeed, Emily Haagerup, Tristan MacLean, Will Matous, Sam McInnes, Ben Obal, Athena Read, Katy Richards, Reina Stewart, Sarah Stewart Grantham, Audrey Smith, Anabelle St. Denis, Callum Thomas, Jack Thomas, Theo Truax, Zach Turple, Amy Walsh, Kim Webber

Spawning stream for Coho & Chum Brooklyn Creek

Rainbow, sea-run, resident Cutthroat trout

Brooklyn Creek Miscellaneous flora & fauna

Brooklyn Creek Recognizing the first assessment: Matthew Arndt, Danny Atchison, Chelsea Eby, Ben Farnell, Sara Harrison, Kris Isenor, Morgan Jackson, Kim Seed, Dane Stabel, Dean Wall, Dallyn Willis February – May 2000 (Additional data collected December 2000 – May 2001)

Brooklyn Creek Data Collection: May 22 nd, 2013 Three sites: Guthrie Dogwood Balmoral

The Sites

Questions to Answer: 1.Define and/or explain the parameters assigned. 2.Why are these parameters useful/important in assessing stream health? 3.Explain the nature of the tests performed to assess these parameters, and the theory behind each test. 4.Where relevant, state the allowable levels for each parameter. 5.Present data and compare to allowable levels.

Group 1: pH, Temperature, Hardness, Turbidity Josie Brune, Audrey Smith, Reina Stewart, Sarah Stewart Grantham, Kim Webber

Data Site 1 Guthrie Site 2 Dogwood Site 3 Balmoral Air Temperature ( o C) Water Temperature ( o C) Optimum: 8-15 ( o C) Turbidity (NTU’s) 8.0 NTU or less pH Level Optimum: 6.5 – Water Hardness (mg/L CaCO 3 ) Hardness <60 considered “soft” Hardness >120 considered “hard”

Group 2: Fecal Coliforms, Dissolved O 2, Biological Oxygen Demand Janelle Garrett, Emily Haagerup, Ben Obal, Amy Walsh

Data SiteResult (CFU/100mL)Allowable Limit (CFU/100mL) 1 – Guthrie – Dogwood – Balmoral Fecal Coliforms:

Data Biological Oxygen Demand: SiteResult (mg/L)Detection Limit (mg/L) 1 – Guthrie < – Dogwood < – Balmoral<5.05

Data Dissolved Oxygen: Site NumberResult (mg/L) FROM HACH KIT Result (mg/L) FROM N.I.L. DO PROBE

Group 3: Total Suspended & Dissolved Solids, Conductivity Brett Baldwin, James Galpin, Athena Read

Data Allowable LimitSite 1Site 2Site 3 TSS – 25 mg/L5.5 mg/L8.0 mg/L6.5 mg/L TDS (No parameters) 86 ppm84 ppm74 ppm Conductivity (No parameters) mS/cm0.126 mS/cm0.110 mS/cm (Test minimum for TSS – 5 mg/L)

Group 4: Anion Concentration, Salinity Vanessa Borowicz, Megan Ellis, Mac Gold, Madison Goodspeed, Anabelle St. Denis

Data Monitored Anions Working Water Quality Guidelines for B.C. Results Highland Secondary May 10 th 2000 Results (ppm) Highland Secondary May 2 nd 2001 Results (ppm) Highland Secondary May 22 nd 2013 Results (mg/L) Nitrate = NO ppm maximumSite #1 – 0.51 Site #2 – 0.45 Site #3 – 0.76 Site #1 – 0.26 Site #2 – 0.30 Site #3 – 0.43 Site #1 – 0.09 Site #2 – 0.12 Site #3 – 0.20 Nitrite = NO ppm maximum when Cl - is less or equal to 2 Site # Site # Site # Site #1 – 0.04 Site #2 – <0.006 Site #3 – 0.04 Site #1 – <0.05 Site #2 – <0.05 Site #3 – <0.05 Sulfate = SO ppm maximumSite # Site # Site # Site #1 – 6.37 Site #2 – 6.16 Site #3 – 6.36 Site #1 – 3.0 Site #2 – 3.0 Site #3 – 2.7 Chloride = Cl ppm maximumSite # Site # Site # Site #1 – Site #2 – Site #3 – Site #1 – 9.6 Site #2 – 9.3 Site #3 – 7.9 Fluoride = F ppm max. (hardness <50) 0.3 ppm max (hardness >50) Site # Site # Site # Site #1 – 0.05 Site #2 – 0.08 Site #3 – 0.07 Site #1 – <0.05 Site #2 – <0.05 Site #3 – <0.05

Group 5: Elemental Concentration Will Matous, Sam McInnes, Katy Richards, Theo Truax, Zach Turple

Data Experimental Results: ElementAccepted Value Site #1 Guthrie Site #2 Dogwood Site #3 Balmoral Al.1 mg/L0.172 mg/L0.229 mg/L0.238 mg/L Ca4 mg/L11.2 mg/L11.4 mg/L9.57 mg/L Sn0.008 µg/L mg/L mg/L mg/L

Data 2000/2001 Results: Element Site #1 Guthrie Site #2 Dogwood Site #3 Balmoral Units Al<0.01 mg/L Ca mg/L Sn<2 µg/L

Data % of Accepted Value Present (Experimental Data) Element Site #1 Guthrie Site #2 Dogwood Site #3 Balmoral Al172%229%238% Ca280%285%239.25% Sn2500%5000%1250%

Data % Change from 2000/2001 Results Element Site #1 Guthrie Site #2 Dogwood Site #3 Balmoral Al>1600%>2200%>2300% Ca-2.78%-6.48%-27.80% Sn-(<99%)-(<98%)-(<99.5%)

Group 6: Rate of Water Flow Trenton Cameron, Jon Daigle, Tristan MacLean, Callum Thomas, Jack Thomas

Data LocationWidth Average (m) Depth Average (m) Average Cross-Sectional Area (m 2 ) Site = 0.24 Site = 0.18 Site = 0.18 Calculating Average Cross-Sectional Area

Data LocationTest 1Test 2Test 3Test 4Test 5Average (s) Site Site Site Measuring Travel Time: Orange Test: Ping Pong Test: LocationTest 1Test 2Test 3Test 4Test 5Average (s) Site Site Site

Data LocationAverage Cross Sectional Area (m 2 ) Length of Travel (m) Correlation Factor Average Time (s) Water Flow (m 3 /sec) Site (50 L/s) Site (80 L/s) Site (130 L/s) Calculating Water Flow: Water Flow with Orange: Water Flow with Ping Pong: LocationAverage Cross Sectional Area (m 2 ) Length of Travel (m) Correlation Factor Average Time (s) Water Flow (m 3 /sec) Site (60 L/s) Site (90 L/s) Site (120 L/s)

Data LocationAverage Water Flow (m 3 /sec) Site (55 L/s) Site (85 L/s) Site (135 L/s)

Acknowledgements

Thanks To… North Island Laboratories Project Watershed