How to Design R&D Projects

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
VPlus+ Improved Price Optimization Model from. Copyright © 2000 Renaissance Research & Consulting, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Advertisements

1 Ganesh Iyer Perceptual Mapping XMBA Session 3 Summer 2008.
Target Marketing Process: Linking Customer Needs to Marketing Action
Part Five Product Decisions 12 Developing and Managing Products.
Kinney ● Raiborn Cost Accounting: Foundations and Evolutions, 8e © 2011 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated,
7-1 Ch.7:PRODUCT STRATEGY Product Classification (1 of 3) Consumer Product Classifications –Convenience Products –Shopping Products –Specialty Products.
xcalibur The Might of Markland William Johnson Eduardo Kamisato Barbara Mulvenna.
BA 162: Marketing Strategy Fall 2000 Lisa Cain. What is MARKSTRAT 3? Marketing Strategy Simulation 2 Industries, 5 firms per industry –different “starting”
MGT-519 STRATEGIC MARKETING AAMER SIDDIQI. LECTURE 14.
Niche Markets. What is a niche market? Niche marketing is the process of finding and serving profitable market segments and designing custom-made products.
Strategic Planning and the Marketing Process
Scaling and Attitude Measurement in Travel and Hospitality Research Research Methodologies CHAPTER 11.
222 Third Street Cambridge, MA Tel: (617) Fax: (617) The Markstrat Challenge I.
Theory on Pricing Strategy
Segmentation & Target Marketing
MARKETING STRATEGY O.C. FERRELL • MICHAEL D. HARTLINE
Kinney ● Raiborn Cost Accounting: Foundations and Evolutions, 9e © 2013 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied, duplicated,
1 BOSTON LONDON PARIS S TRAT X Licensing Division S TRAT X Licensing Division The Markstrat Challenge I.
Chapter 2 Supply Chain Strategy Copyright 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Chapter Six Building Customer Relationships. BuildingNurturingLoyaltyRetentionReactivation.
Marketing Management • 14e
PRICE BUNDLING Price bundling is the tactic of marketing two or more products and/or services for a price below the sum of the individual prices It creates.
222 Third Street Cambridge, MA Tel: (617) Fax: (617) The Markstrat Challenge I.
Chapter 24 Responsibility Accounting and Performance Evaluation
Marketing Research Aaker, Kumar, Day Seventh Edition Instructor’s Presentation Slides.
Marketing Research Aaker, Kumar, Day and Leone Tenth Edition Instructor’s Presentation Slides 1.
Positioning - Where do u stand ? Contents Background Definition Positioning & Perception Positioning Concepts Positioning Process Positioning Strategy.
MarkStrat Final Presentation
OHT 8.1 © Pearson Education Limited 2003 Brassington and Pettitt: Principles of Marketing, 3rd Edition Product management.
1 BOSTON LONDON PARIS The Markstrat Challenge II S TRAT X Licensing Division S TRAT X Licensing Division.
SM91.87 Business Simulation Part II. 2 Your success in Markstrat will greatly depend on your ability to manage the development and positioning of brands.
By Alia Zafar Head HR Relationship Management& OD (North) HBL Satisfaction Surveys for the Effectiveness of the Organization.
Chapter 8 - slide 1 Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall Chapter Eight Product, Services, and Brands: Building Customer.
© 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing Prentice Hall. Note 17 Generic Strategies— Advantage and Scope.
PRICING OF SERVICES. Differences between customer evaluation of pricing between services and goods: 1.Customers have limited or inaccurate reference price.
Cosmo Group I Meagan Carrow Xiaodan Dong. Outline Analysis of past performance Main strategies pursued Main Adjustments Key Lessons Recommendations for.
{ Determine services to provide for customers When a business determines which services to offer its customers, it should consider: The nature of the.
Introduction to Conjoint Analysis.. Different Perspectives, Different Goals Buyers: Most desirable features & lowest price Sellers: Maximize profits by:
Team Handoff MFers MarketForecasters Cohort Two Industry Bravo Lindsey Battaglia Scott Christensen Matthew Derganc Adam Frey Gregory Young February 6 th,
Financial Statistics Unit 2: Modeling a Business Chapter 2.2: Linear Regression.
Where We Have Been u Quetzal : Define your business. u Jones Blair: Market Targeting.
Lecture 24 Electronic Business (MGT-485). Recap – Lecture 23 E-Business Strategy: Formulation – External Assessment Key External Factors Relationships.
Unit 4.1 What Are The Key Decisions That Businesses Make?
Market Driving Strategies
© 2013 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Developing a Marketing Plan
Customer-Driven Marketing
Multidimensional Scaling and Correspondence Analysis © 2007 Prentice Hall21-1.
DEMAND ANALYSIS Prof. Patrick GOUGEON, ESCP-EAP  Various perspectives  Consumer choices  Elasticity ratios  Defining the market.
222 Third Street Cambridge, MA Tel: (617) Fax: (617) The Markstrat Challenge II.
Market mapping – what does this mean?
Lesson 1 - Pricing VIRTUAL BUSINESS - RETAILING. What is Pricing? The method followed by a business to determine the selling price for its product or.
Copyright © Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved. 13–1 Stages for Establishing Prices FIGURE 13.1.
Pricing Strategy. Price strategy One of the four major elements of the marketing mix is price. Pricing is an important strategic issue because it is related.
The Markstrat Challenge I
Business-Level Strategy
Vice Presidents of Marketing; Jaspreet Garcha & Ryan Neal
The Markstrat Challenge II
The Markstrat Challenge II
Straight Line Graphs (Linear Graphs)
Multidimensional Scaling and Correspondence Analysis
Chapter 8: Selecting an appropriate price level
4 P’s - Price.
STRATX Licensing Division
Targeting Positioning
Supply Chain Management: From Vision to Implementation
Markstrat – Team Jupiter A
Why Digital Marketing Career Is Important? Presented By:- Abhinav Shashtri.
4 P’s - Price.
1.1 Meeting customer needs
Presentation transcript:

How to Design R&D Projects

Information Related to R&D Projects TABLE OF CONTENT Information Related to R&D Projects Specifying a Sonite R&D Project Specifying a Vodite R&D Project

Sources of information related to R&D projects Company Report Newsletter Benchmarking Semantic Scales MDS Conjoint Analysis

The “Report” shows the base R&D project of your marketed brands

The “Report” lists all Sonites or Vodites R&D projects Listing of available R&D projects as well as on-going ones. New brands can be launched or existing ones can be upgraded with available projects. The brand will have the physical characteristics specified in the project. The current base cost is the transfer cost of the units produced, for the first production batch of 100,000 units. If the cumulative production level is lower, the unit transfer cost will be higher. If the cumulative production level is higher, the unit transfer cost will be lower. The minimum base cost is the minimum cost that can be specified in a cost-reduction R&D project with the same physical characteristics. Unit transfer cost = $158 Why ??

Sources of information related to R&D projects Company Report Newsletter Benchmarking Semantic Scales MDS Conjoint Analysis

The “Newsletter” gives the physical characteristics, the base costs and prices of all marketed Sonites or Vodites brands

Sources of information related to R&D projects Company Report Newsletter Benchmarking Semantic Scales MDS Conjoint Analysis

The “Benchmarking” study gives estimates of competitive R&D budgets Useful to determine when first Vodite brands will be launched.

Sources of information related to R&D projects Company Report Newsletter Benchmarking Semantic Scales MDS Conjoint Analysis

The “Semantic Scales” study provides a graphical representation of segment needs and brand perceptions Segment ideal points Six dimensions : 5 physical characteristics plus price Brand perceptions

The “Semantic Scales” study tracks the evolution of segment needs The lifetime of an R&D project is several years long. Design R&D projects that will be attractive in a few years time. ?

Additional charts give exact coordinates of ideal points and brand perceptions on a 1-7 scale Compare brand perceptions with segment expectations. R&D will let you fill in the gap Need to improve Design Good fit in Max Freq and Power

The “Semantic Scales” study plots the brand perceptions against the brand physical characteristics Do graphical interpolations on these charts to calculate the characteristic in Kg, Dm3, KHz, W, … that corresponds to a given value on the 1-7 scale Singles’ Ideal Max Freq in 2 years : 4.50 Singles’ Ideal Max Freq in 2 years : 30 KHz

Sources of information related to R&D projects Company Report Newsletter Benchmarking Semantic Scales MDS Conjoint Analysis

The “MDS” study provides a graphical representation of segment needs and brand perceptions in three “composite” dimensions Three dimensions : Economy, Performance and Convenience Segment ideal points Brand perceptions

MDS dimensions are discovered by the MDS methodology and thus are a good representation of segment needs Brand physical characteristics and prices have an influence on MDS dimensions. For instance, Performance is strongly linked with Power and Max Freq.

The “MDS” study also tracks the evolution of segment needs The lifetime of an R&D project is several years long. Design R&D projects that will be attractive in a few years time. ?

Additional charts give exact coordinates of ideal points and brand perceptions on a -20 to +20 scale Compare brand perceptions with segment expectations. R&D will let you fill in the gap Need to improve Convenience

The “MDS” study plots the brand perceptions against the brand physical characteristics Do graphical interpolations on these charts to calculate the characteristic in Kg, Dm3, KHz, W, … that corresponds to a given value on the -20 to +20 scale Pros Ideal Performance in 2 years : 10 Irrelevant if the MDS dimension and the characteristic are not strongly linked Pros Ideal Power in 2 years : 75 W

Sources of information related to R&D projects Company Report Newsletter Benchmarking Semantic Scales MDS Conjoint Analysis

The “Conjoint Analysis” study plots the utilities of various levels in each of the four most important characteristics Higher utilities mean higher customer satisfaction levels Beware, the four levels are arbitrarily set. Maximum utility may be achieved for a fifth level.

The “Conjoint Analysis” study indicates what characteristics are the most important ones In the Sonite market, Price is the most important dimension, followed by Power. For instance, almost 80% of the decision is driven by Price for Singles.

Specifying a Sonite R&D Project TABLE OF CONTENT Source of Information Related to R&D Projects Specifying a Sonite R&D Project Specifying a Vodite R&D Project

Repositioning an existing Sonite brand through R&D in 7 steps 1. Decide on which segment to target using the MDS maps . 2. Determine what characteristics are important to that segment using the Semantic Scales or Conjoint Analysis. 3. Identify the dimensions where the gap between “Ideal” levels and your brand “Perceived” levels are the largest ones, using the Semantic Scales or MDS. 4. Decide on which brand characteristics you should modify. Small gaps and/or non-important characteristics can be ignored. 5. Calculate the “ideal” level in each characteristic you want to upgrade, using graphical interpolations. Remember to take the evolution of needs into account. 6. Estimate the future price of the brand when it is repositioned and decide on a “Base Cost” that will give you an acceptable profitability ratio. Or develop the project at the minimum possible base cost (R&D budget will be higher) 7. Launch an R&D project with the new characteristics and the new base cost, using the current base project as a starting point.

A Complete Example : Repositioning SIBI SIBI : Based on PSIBI Weight = 19 Kg - Design = 8 - Volume = 60 dm3 Max Freq = 15 KHz - Power = 20 W Base cost = $99 (current cost = $79) Target Segment : Singles Most important characteristics : Power, Max Freq, Design Ideal Power in two years = 4.80 = 65 W Ideal Max Freq in two years = 4.70 = 30 KHz Ideal Design in two years = 5.20 = 7 R&D project PSIN1 Weight = 19 Kg - Design = 7 - Volume = 60 dm3 Max Freq = 30 KHz - Power = 65 W Develop project at minimum cost

Open the R&D decision form and create a new project PSIN1 using PSIBI as a basis.

Enter the new characteristics and then use an on-line query to estimate the budget.

Your R&D project is now ready to be launched Your R&D project is now ready to be launched. It will be available next period to modify an existing brand or introduce a new one.

Specifying a Vodite R&D Project TABLE OF CONTENT Source of Information Related to R&D Projects Specifying a Sonite R&D Project Specifying a Vodite R&D Project

Specifying a Vodite R&D project The only available data are the “Semantic Scales - Ideal Values” and the importance of characteristics. Eg: Most important characteristic : “Max Freq” Ideal level for Innovators : 4.90 on the 1 to 7 scale Ideal “Max Freq” in KHz for this segment ???

Specifying a Vodite R&D project (cont’d) When no brands are marketed, estimating ideal characteristics through graphical interpolation is not possible. One has to assume that 1 on the semantic scales corresponds to the minimum feasible characteristic, e.g.: 5 KHz 7 on the semantic scales corresponds to the maximum feasible characteristic, e.g.: 20 KHz Variations are linear in between 5 1.0 7.0 20 4.9 15

On your marks. Get set. Go! Respect the deadline Good luck!