Science Education in the United States: An International Perspective Oregon Summer Institute August 2006 William H. Schmidt Michigan State University.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Common Core State Standards for Mathematics: Shifts and Implications for Math Instruction Common Core State Standards for Mathematics: Shifts and Implications.
Advertisements

Recommends four years of math, three years of science, no difference in requirements for college-prep and career prep. We are using their K – 8 math standards.
Class of 2015 School year  AP Macroeconomics  Economics  Career & Life Planning  Introduction to Business  Introduction to Financial.
STUDENT PLACEMENT GUIDE
Current legislation requires the phase-out of high school TAKS and replaces it with 12 EOC assessments in  English I, English II, English III  Algebra.
Project Dual Credit Funding through the Ohio Department of Education Managed by the Western Buckeye Educational Service Center on behalf of the Region.
Illinois High School to College Success Report High School Feedback Reporting In Cooperation with ACT, Inc. Illinois Community College Board Illinois Board.
© 2003 Michigan State University The Level Playing Field: An American Myth William H. Schmidt Michigan State University October 8, 2003 Archived Information.
TPHS Choices Night Welcome prospective TPHS science students.
Common Core State Standards Focus on Math Training Module II.
WNC LASER WNC School Systems.  Increase students’ interest in STEM  Improve academic achievement related to STEM  Increase community support.
Context for El Paso’s K-16 Partnership K-12 Enrollment in twelve El Paso area school districts:167,269 Ethnic breakdown of student enrollment: Hispanic:88.1%
© 2006 Michigan State University, PROM/SESupported by NSF Cooperative Agreement EHR PROM/SE Science Associates Winter Institute SMART Consortium.
© 2004 Michigan State University PROM/SE: Promoting Rigorous Outcomes in Math and Science Education Overview, Fall 2004.
PROM/SE Summer Science Institute © 2005 MSU PROM/SE Promoting Rigorous Outcomes in Mathematics and Science Education, Supported by NSF Cooperative Agreement.
Promoting Rigorous Outcomes in Mathematics and Science Education PROM/SE Ohio Spring Mathematics Associate Institute April 27, 2005.
Final Session: Whole Group Please sit together with the other associates from your district (as much as possible) April 27, 2005.
0 Professional Development. 1 PD Design: Distributed Expertise Focal unit is District, not individual teachers Goal is to elevate aggregate level of knowledge.
Michigan Interim Assessments August Topics Where do interim assessments fit in a balanced assessment system? What are Michigan’s new interim assessments?
PROM/SE Summer Science Institute © 2005 MSU PROM/SE Promoting Rigorous Outcomes in Mathematics and Science Education, Supported by NSF Cooperative Agreement.
Academic Advising Presented by: 9th Grade Counselor Teresa Noble and 8 th Grade Counselor Laura Mundy North Junior High Court Hanson Boise High School,
KEEP IN MIND…..  Colleges are more concerned with GPA than curriculum (although they care about both).  Colleges DO NOT know what diploma type you receive.
8 th grade Student/Parent Meeting Bad Axe High School Graduation Requirements Class of 2014.
Teaching College Geology in High School: The Concurrent Challenges and Opportunities of Dual Credit Programs to Departments of Geology Carl N. Drummond.
Instructional Shifts for Mathematics. achievethecore.org 2 Instructional Shifts in Mathematics 1.Focus: Focus strongly where the Standards focus. 2.Coherence:
1 Exploring Coherence in the 2011 MA Curriculum Framework for Mathematics Exploration Activity : Tracing Domain and Cluster Progressions April 2011.
Welcome to WCHS Advanced Placement (AP) Night May 13, 2014 The Value Behind the Program What is Advanced Placement (AP)? Why take AP Courses? What AP Courses.
Results of the 2009 NAEP High School Transcript Study America’s High School Graduates Jack Buckley Commissioner National Center for Education Statistics.
Florida Department of Education Bureau of School Improvement Office of Curriculum Support.
TPHS Choices Night Welcome prospective TPHS science students February 26 th 2015.
Looking Beneath the Surface What we can learn from the Minnesota TIMSS Science Results William H. Schmidt Michigan State University.
© 2006 Michigan State University, Center for Research in Mathematics and Science Education Content Standards in an International Context William H. Schmidt.
Columbia College. Environmental Literacy through Science Instruction and Leadership Development.
Education in a Global Context February 28, 2008 William H. Schmidt University Distinguished Professor Michigan State University.
Catherine Schulte Clermont County ESC Ohio Educator Leader Cadre
Analyses of West Virginia Mathematics and Science Curricular Objectives in effect July 2008 William H. Schmidt University Distinguished Professor Michigan.
Texas Regional Collaboratives for Excellence in Science and Mathematics Teaching*: An Exemplary Texas MSP Program Gina S. Day Deputy Associate Commissioner,
Improving Teacher Quality Grants, Cycle 5: External Evaluation Report December 8 th, 2008 University of Missouri Evaluation Team.
Science Department Aparna Rajagopal (Chairperson)
1 Comparing International Assessments to NAEP May 30, 2008 Eugene Owen Senior Advisor, NCES International Activities Program This paper is intended to.
THE 2005 NAEP HIGH SCHOOL TRANSCRIPT STUDY. THE 2005 HIGH SCHOOL TRANSCRIPT STUDY Today ’ s Presentations.
Issues in High School Mathematics Oregon Summer Institute August, 2006 William H. Schmidt Michigan State University.
2015 Curriculum Night Presentation.  Earth Science (Honors and Academic)  Biology (Honors and Academic)  Chemistry  Physics  Environmental Science.
MCAS 2007 Grade 10 ELA – Math – Science & Technology.
Analysis: Birth to Adulthood December 2011 State of Literacy in Monterey County.
Content and School Effectiveness: Role and Impact December 12, 2006 William H. Schmidt Michigan State University.
Common Core Math Introduction Part 1: Instructional Shifts.
Science Course Offerings and Sequences. Choices for 9 th Grade CP Biology CP Biology Accelerated Biology Accelerated Biology.
06/13 Introduction. 06/13  A research university with a focus on Engineering and the Natural Sciences  24,600.
Grad Requirements Presentation.  10 credits must be Grade 12 “Provincially Approved” courses (2.5 courses) English 11 or Communications 11 & English.
What is the Advanced Placement Program? The Advanced Placement Program are courses taught at local high schools, which allow students to participate in.
What Works And Is Hopeful Grover J. (Russ) Whitehurst, Ph.D. Director Institute of Education Sciences United States Department of Education About High.
Past, Present, & Key to our Future. * In 1995 a survey was conducted across DE and it was found that the predominant form of Science Education was textbook.
Bridgewater-Raritan Regional School District Program Evaluations A summary of recommendations from the completed program evaluations March 6, 2009.
Readable Science Textbooks: An International Perspective Oregon Summer Institute August 2006 William H. Schmidt Michigan State University.
© 2005 MSU PROM/SE Promoting Rigorous Outcomes in Mathematics and Science Education, Supported by NSF Cooperative Agreement EHR International Comparative.
Maria Lawson-Davenport Advanced Instruction Specialist Program Updates: Advanced Programs.
An Historical Perspective Tina Cantrell, PhD. Principal John Hersey High School.
AP BIOLOGY Prerequisite: “B” or better in Biology CP & teacher recommendation Designed to be a second year advanced Biology course This is a college level.
River Dell Math Placement 7th Grade into 8 th Grade.
FHS Science Department
PROM/SE Summer Science Institute
Assessing Progress Towards Meeting NAUTeach Program Goals
TPHS Information Night
Science Education in the United States: An International Perspective Oregon Summer Institute August 2006 William H. Schmidt Michigan State University.
PROM/SE: Promoting Rigorous Outcomes in Mathematics and Science Education February, 2006.
Education in a Global Context April 24, 2008 William H
David Pyle, Earth Sciences.
Council Rock High School North
Presentation transcript:

Science Education in the United States: An International Perspective Oregon Summer Institute August 2006 William H. Schmidt Michigan State University

© 2005 Center for Research in Mathematics and Science Education, Michigan State University Instructional Content Constructs  Curricular Coherence Curricular Structure  Curricular Focus Exposure Time (OTL)  Curricular Rigor Level of Complexity

Number of Science Topics Intended by Standards for Each Grade © 2005 Center for Research in Mathematics and Science Education, Michigan State University

Yearly Science Instruction Time 4 th Grade: 100 hours/year ≈ 33 minutes/day

© 2005 Center for Research in Mathematics and Science Education, Michigan State University Science Topics Intended by the Top-Achieving TIMSS Countries

© 2005 Center for Research in Mathematics and Science Education, Michigan State University Science Topics Intended by the Top-Achieving TIMSS Countries (Part 1)

© 2005 Center for Research in Mathematics and Science Education, Michigan State University Science Topics Intended by the Top-Achieving TIMSS Countries (Part 2)

© 2005 Center for Research in Mathematics and Science Education, Michigan State University Science Topics Intended by the Top-Achieving TIMSS Countries (Part 3)

© 2005 Center for Research in Mathematics and Science Education, Michigan State University Science Topics Intended by 22 U.S. States for Grades 1-8

© 2005 Center for Research in Mathematics and Science Education, Michigan State University Science Topics Intended by 2 U.S. States for Grades 1-8 Michigan Ohio

© 2005 Center for Research in Mathematics and Science Education, Michigan State University Science Topics Intended by One U.S. State at Each Grade

© 2005 Center for Research in Mathematics and Science Education, Michigan State University Science Topics Intended by On U.S. State at Each Grade (continued)

© 2005 Center for Research in Mathematics and Science Education, Michigan State University Percent of students taking each type of science course in 7 th and 8 th grade in the U.S. (TIMSS 1995)

© 2005 Center for Research in Mathematics and Science Education, Michigan State University LSAY High School Science Course Enrollment

© 2005 Center for Research in Mathematics and Science Education, Michigan State University Number of Science Courses Offered in 7 Districts

© 2005 Center for Research in Mathematics and Science Education, Michigan State University Number of Course Patterns for Meeting High School Science Requirement in 7 Districts

© 2005 Center for Research in Mathematics and Science Education, Michigan State University Physics II Earth Science 1 Earth Science 2 Biology 1Biology 2 Physical Science 1 Physical Science 2 Gen. Life Sci. 1 Gen. Life Sci. 2 Anatomy/Physio. 1 Anatomy/Physio. 2 AP Biology 2 Chemistry 1 Chemistry 2 CP Biology 1 CP Biology 2 AP Chemistry 1AP Chemistry 2 Physics 1 CP Chemistry 1CP Chemistry 2 Master Research Master Program Gen. Sci. 1 Gen. Sci. 2 Gen. Sci. 3 Gen. Sci. 4 AP Biology 1 Diagram of Science Course-Taking Sequences in District F

© 2005 Center for Research in Mathematics and Science Education, Michigan State University Average Percent Correct on PROM/SE Science Items Types by Type of High School Science Courses

© 2005 Center for Research in Mathematics and Science Education, Michigan State University Average Percent Correct on PROM/SE Science Items Types by Socio-Economic Status

International Grade Placement of Curriculum Content Across Districts © 2005 MSU PROM/SE Promoting Rigorous Outcomes in Mathematics and Science Education, Supported by NSF Cooperative Agreement EHR Grade International Grade Placement (IGP)

Average Percent Correct on 1995 TIMSS Science Items © 2005 Center for Research in Mathematics and Science Education, Michigan State University

Average Percent Correct on TIMSS 1995 End-of-Secondary Science Literacy Test © 2005 MSU PROM/SE Promoting Rigorous Outcomes in Mathematics and Science Education, Supported by NSF Cooperative Agreement EHR