Synthesizing the lessons learned about the effectiveness of BMPs from existing and ongoing water quality monitoring studies Katie Foreman Liza Hernandez.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

A detailed, systematic spatial assessment of coastal habitat, critical natural resources, and associated human uses in the tidal waters and near-shore.

Advertisements

West Virginia Department of Environmental Protection Patrick Campbell - March 17, 2009.

RTI International RTI International is a trade name of Research Triangle Institute. Economic Study of Nutrient Credit Trading for the Chesapeake.

Watershed Implementation Plans: Seeking Cost Effective Solutions Jennifer Dindinger UMD Sea Grant Extension October 15, 2012.

Environmental Trust Funding Categories ▪ Habitat: actions to preserve or restore native habitats and areas critical to at-risk, rare or endangered.

Carin Bisland, Associate Director Chesapeake Bay Program Office Environmental Protection Agency November 21, 2014 The Bay’s Health & Future: How it’s doing.

Maryland Assateague Coastkeeper Baltimore Harbor Waterkeeper Chester Riverkeeper Choptank Riverkeeper Patuxent Riverkeeper Sassafras Riverkeeper Severn.

Chesapeake Bay Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Tracking Thursday, May 31, 2012 Martin Hurd, Vladislav Royzman, Tetra Tech, Inc. Brian Burch, Megan Thynge,

Negotiating our Water Future in Colorado & the Colorado River Basin Colorado’s Water Plan & the Colorado Basin Plan February 2015 Update Presentation developed.

Current Planning for 2017 Mid-Point Assessment Gary Shenk COG 10/4/2012 presentation credit to Katherine Antos and the WQGIT ad hoc planning team.

Manitoba PRAC Terrestrial Theme Update and 2011/12 Workplan PRAC Terrestrial Forum SRC, Saskatoon, SK March 15, 2011.

Chesapeake Bay Program Monitoring Activities and Monitoring Network Design Chesapeake Bay Program Monitoring Activities and Monitoring Network Design Stephen.

Lessons from Chesapeake Bay Restoration Efforts Understanding the role of nutrient reduction activities in improving water quality.

Update on Chesapeake Bay Issues Presentation to the Chesapeake Bay and Water Resources Policy Committee July 17, 2009 Ted Graham & Steve Bieber COG Department.

Update on Forest Goals and Progress in the Chesapeake Bay Partnership Citizens Advisory Committee Meeting, 8/23/13 Sally Claggett & Julie Mawhorter, US.

Ann Swanson Executive Director Chesapeake Bay Commission May 2012 Market Solutions and Restoring the Chesapeake The Economics of Nutrient Trading.

Forestry BMP Review Process Mark Sievers, Tetra Tech Forestry Workgroup (FWG) Conference Call—February 1, 2012.

US EPA Update Advisory Committee on Water Information Michael Shapiro, Ph.D. Deputy Assistant Administrator U.S. EPA Office of Water.

Peyton Robertson, NOAA February Goal: Restore oyster populations in 20 tributaries by 2025 Tributary Selection: MD & VA Oyster Restoration Interagency.

Wetland Monitoring and Assessment Mid-Atlantic States

Lower Susquehanna River Watershed Assessment Citizens Advisory Committee November 29, 2012 Anna Compton USACE 1.

Drafting the New Chesapeake Bay Agreement, Goals and Outcomes – Decision/Actions From Management Board Meetings June 13 and 18, 2013.

Best Management Practices and the Chesapeake Bay Program Watershed Model Jeff Sweeney University of Maryland Chesapeake Bay Program Office

James Edward, Deputy Director Chesapeake Bay Program Office U.S. Environmental Protection Agency November 20, 2014 The Bay’s Health & Future: How it’s.

Milestone Evaluations and Long Term Water Quality Monitoring Trends: What are They Telling Us About Where We are and Where We are Heading Chesapeake Bay.

Developing Final Phase II WIPs and Milestones Jim Edward EPA Deputy Director Chesapeake Bay Program Office DDOE Meeting with Federal Partners February.

Bassett Creek Water Management Commission Joint Advisory Group Meeting January 23, 2001.

Understanding the Effectiveness of BMPs: Synthesizing Lessons Learned from Water Quality Monitoring Studies Katie Foreman & Liza Hernandez August 15, 2012.

Updating Background Conditions and BMP Efficiencies Jeff Sweeney Environmental Protection Agency Chesapeake Bay Program Office

Collaboration and Outreach Workgroup West Palm Beach November 2006.

Lessons Learned from BMP evaluation studies in the nontidal streams and river in the Chesapeake Bay Watershed Katie Foreman University of Maryland Center.

Hypoxia Management tools: indicators & models Bob Wood John Jacobs Heath Kelsey Xinsheng Zhang Cooperative Oxford Lab

Watersheds and Wetlands

RIVER TO BAY A STUDY OF WATERSHEDS 7TH GRADE SCIENCE 2008.

District of Columbia Watershed Implementation Plan (WIP) Blue Plains Regional Committee 1 District Department of the Environment Watershed Protection Divsion.

Understanding the Effectiveness of BMPs: Synthesizing Lessons Learned from Water Quality Monitoring Studies Katie Foreman & Liza Hernandez April 9, 2012.

Understanding the Effectiveness of BMPs: Synthesizing Lessons Learned from Water Quality Monitoring Studies Katie Foreman & Liza Hernandez April 5, 2012.

Streams & Springs Breakout Session Trans-boundary collaboration Meeting July 9, 2014.

OUTREACH and EDUCATION SUBCOMMITTEE Dianne Timmins, Chair Eastern Brook Trout Joint Venture- Fish Habitat Partnership.

U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey CBP Partnership Team- Enhance Monitoring in the Bay and its Watershed Scott Phillips, USGS Jonathan.

2004 Tributary Strategies: Assessment of Implementation Options Steve Bieber Water Resources Program Presented at: COG Chesapeake Bay Policy Committee.

Non-tidal network monitoring update for calendar year 2011 Non-tidal Monitoring Workgroup 8 February 2011 Bill Romano MD Dept. of Natural Resources Photograph.

What is a Watershed ?. When it rains, the water has to go somewhere. Where does all the water go? Down the sewer In the drains Downhill To the creeks.

Clifton Bell, P.E., P.G. Chesapeake Bay Modeling Perspectives for the Regulated Community.

Chesapeake Bay Program’s Baywide and Basinwide Monitoring Networks: Options for Adapting Monitoring Networks and Realigning Resources to Address Partner.

Bay Guidance Programs. The Bay Program partnership includes: 19 federal agencies Nearly 40 state agencies and programs in DE, MD, NY, PA, VA,

Tidal Monitoring and Analysis Workgroup (TMAW) Meeting February 7, 2013 Annapolis, MD Katie Foreman and Liza Hernandez University of Maryland Center for.

Lessons Learned from BMP evaluation studies in the nontidal streams and river in the Chesapeake Bay Watershed Katie Foreman University of Maryland Center.

1 Phase 5.3 Calibration Gary Shenk 3/31/ Calibration Method Calibration method largely unchanged for several years –P5.1 – 8/ first automated.

Chesapeake Bay TMDL 2017 Midpoint Assessment: A Critical Path Forward Lucinda Power EPA Chesapeake Bay Program Office Citizens Advisory Committee Meeting.

The Chesapeake Bay By: Ray Carlton III. How water is in the Chesapeake Bay? There is fifteen trillion gallons of water.

Development of the Indigenous Cultural Landscape Concept in the Chesapeake October 23, 2014 National Park Service Chesapeake Bay.

Citizen Stewardship Outcome Kick Off Meeting 11/18/2014.

HAMPTON ROADS REGIONAL WATER RESOURCES MANAGEMENT PROGRAM Presentation John M. Carlock, AICP Deputy Executive Director, Physical Planning Hampton Roads.

JULIE MAWHORTER MID-ATLANTIC URBAN & COMMUNITY FORESTRY COORDINATOR CHESAPEAKE TREE CANOPY STRATEGY & WORKPLAN UPDATE CITIZEN’S ADVISORY.

Integrated Approach for Assessing and Communicating Progress toward the Chesapeake Bay Water-Quality Standards Scott Phillips USGS, STAR May 14, 2012 PSC.

For EBTJV meeting October 26, 2010 Executive Order Strategy for Protecting and Restoring the Chesapeake Bay Watershed.

6 th Grade Science Seneca Ridge Middle School SOL 6.7 b: The location and structure of Virginia regional watershed systems.

1 Chesapeake Bay TMDL Watershed Implementation Plan – Phase II James Davis-Martin, Chesapeake Bay TMDL Coordinator Citizens Advisory Committee to the Chesapeake.

Update for the Citizens Advisory Committee February 22, 2017

Wetland Monitoring and Assessment Mid-Atlantic States

CIE 274 Civil and Environmental Systems

2025 Chesapeake Bay Climate Change Load Projections

Human dependence Practice questions Human.

Hi there! Michelle Williams WQGIT Staffer

Chesapeake Bay TMDL Milestones, Progress, Mid-point Assessment

Wetland Monitoring and Assessment Mid-Atlantic States

James Davis-Martin Chesapeake Bay Program Manager

Chesapeake Bay Program Climate Change Modeling 2.0

Citizens Advisory Committee EPA/CBP Program Update Jim Edward Deputy Director Chesapeake Bay Program Office February 20-21,2019 Williamsburg, VA.

Presentation transcript:

Synthesizing the lessons learned about the effectiveness of BMPs from existing and ongoing water quality monitoring studies Katie Foreman Liza Hernandez February 13, 2012 Water Quality Goal Implementation Conference Call

Outline Background on the project Progress thus far Next steps Feedback

Background Synthesizing the state of knowledge from monitoring studies that look at the effectiveness of BMPs –2009 MRAT recommendations –April STAR topical meeting with WQGIT –WIPs and verification of practices

Potential products Detailed report –Conclusions will include information gaps and ways to apply the lessons learned from past studies to improve our implementation in the future Newsletters (executive summaries) –For targeted audiences

Process Literature Review –Tidal Chesapeake Bay studies –Nontidal Chesapeake Bay studies –National and international large ecosystem studies

Study locations CBW Nontidal StoriesCB Tidal Stories Stories outside of the CB Watershed Anne Arundel Co. stream restoration (MD) Back River (MD)Boston Harbor (MA) Bald Eagle Creek (PA) Baywide synthesis (MD and VA)Everglades (FL) Big Spring Run and Mill Creek (PA) Choptank (MD)Great Lakes (Midwest) Brush Run Creek (PA) Corsica (MD)Kanahoe (HI) Cullers Run (WV) Gunston Cove (VA)Lake Champlain (VT) German Branch (Choptank, MD) Mattawoman Creek (MD)Neuse River Estuary (NC) Little Conestoga Creek (PA) Patuxent (MD)Tampa Bay (FL) Lower Monocacy River/Lake Linganore (MD) Potomac (MD)Australia Minebank Run (MD) Susquehanna Flats (MD)Denmark Muddy Creek/ Lower Dry River (VA) Wye (MD)Spain Occoquan River (VA) Owl Run (VA) Sawmill Creek (MD) Silgo Creek (MD) Spring Branch (MD) Spring Creek (PA) Stephen Foster Lake (PA) Trap pond (DE) Upper Pocomoke River (MD) Wetlands (MD) Willis River (VA)

Interpreting the findings “Synthesis” workshop Lessons learned can be grouped into 3 main categories: –BMP performance to improve water quality. What do we know? –Way to improve implementation. How do improve implementation approaches for BMPs. –Reduce Uncertainty. What do we need to adaptively manage in the future?

Next Steps Feedback from WQGIT on report outline and list of study locations Synthesis team to finalize common themes in lessons learned (Feb.) Feedback from the WQGIT (March) Write report and determine communication strategy (March) Review process (April-May) Release (June-July)