September 28, 2010 Train the Trainer session.  How Data Director can assist in maintenance of assessment and intervention data and how to analyze the.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
National PBIS Leadership Forum October 19, 2012 Jennifer Parmalee, MPA Director of Children and Family Services Onondaga County Department of Mental Health.
Advertisements

Response to Instruction ________________________________ Response To Intervention New Opportunities for Students and Reading Professionals.
Professional Learning Communities Connecting the Initiatives
The Baldrige Model of Performance Excellence
3:1 Service Delivery Model
Response to Intervention: School-Wide Multi-Level Prevention Carriage Crest Elementary.
Implementation of the PA Core Standards. Effective Communication Guiding Principle 1 Design and establish systems of effective communication among stakeholders.
How Do We Know We Are Making Progress? Virginia Department of Education Office of School Improvement
Using Data Effectively or Why Weigh the Hog If You Aren’t Going To Feed It? Presented by Ronni Ephraim, Chief Instructional Officer Los Angeles Unified.
Student Services Personnel and RtI: Bridging the Skill Gap FASSA Institute George M. Batsche Professor and Co-Director Institute for School Reform Florida.
Edward S. Shapiro Director, Center for Promoting Research to Practice Lehigh University, Bethlehem, PA Planning for the Implementation of RTI: Lessons.
Special Education Collaborative Meeting Policies, Procedures, Practices Fall 2011.
Help for Struggling Students. “RTI” stands for “Responsiveness to Instruction” Tier 1: Core instruction, sufficient for 80-90% of students.
PED 383: Adapted Physical Education Dr. Johnson.  Who needs them?  Students with Disabilities  Students with Unique needs  Individualized Education.
RTI and Special Education: Making sense of it all!
“Service Only” Plans and Special Education Related Services Karen R. McNamara Director of Student Services Wrentham Public Schools.
No More “Speech Only” Evals Comprehensive Evaluations with Specific Speech/Language Concerns.
Implementing RTI Using Title I, Title III, and CEIS Funds Key Issues for Decision-makers.
CHANGING ROLES OF THE DIAGNOSTICIAN Consultants to being part of an Early Intervention Team.
Statewide Expectations Presenter: Christine Spear Alabama Department of Education.
Understanding Response to Intervention (RtI) : What it Is & How it Works in Midway ISD.
1 Visions of Community 2011 March 12, 2011 The Massachusetts Tiered System of Support Madeline Levine - Shawn Connelly.
Tennessee Department of Education Compliance Training February 2012 Department of Exceptional Children.
Comprehensive Reading Model Teaching Reading Sourcebook 2 nd edition.
Waverly Community Schools Standards Overview AdvancED District Accreditation External Review Team Visit April 21-24, 2013Welcome.
Data Warehouse Overview From Calhoun ISD - PowerPoints Data Director and D4SS “Instead of overloading teachers, let’s give them the data they need to conduct.
Writing Two ‘Online’ LEA Perspectives Craven County Schools Mike Tart, ELA/Writing Learning Systems Coach Cindy Manning, LEA Test Coordinator.
Arshall Public Schools Walking the Talk: The Role of Leadership in Implementing an RtI Framework Presented By: Barb Sramek, District Administrator Barb.
Instruction, Assessment & Student Achievement Presented: September 23, 2013 Bessie Weller Elementary School.
Unified Support Services Workgroup recommendations August 2012.
Response to Intervention. Background Individuals with Disabilities Education Act of 2004 Changes to align with No Child Left Behind (NCLB) Allows districts.
0 1 1 TDOE’s accountability system has two overarching objectives and Growth for all students, every year Faster growth for those students who are furthest.
Maine’s Response to Intervention Implementation: Moving Forward Presented by: Barbara Moody Title II Coordinator Maine Department of Education.
INSTRUCTIONAL EXCELLENCE INVENTORIES: A PROCESS OF MONITORING FOR CONTINUOUS IMPROVEMENT Dr. Maria Pitre-Martin Superintendent of Schools.
Maryland’s Journey— Focus Schools Where We’ve Been, Where We Are, and Where We’re Going Presented by: Maria E. Lamb, Director Nola Cromer, Specialist Program.
1 The Special Education Assessment and IEP Process EDPOWER Teacher Institute 2013.
HELP!!! Support Team-Triage Section 504Special EdELLG & T Most Common Structure Reading Program A Other effective/ affective intervention systems Classroom.
Instructional Leadership in Low-Performing Schools Nikolai Vitti September 21, 2009 Florida Association of Staff Developers Tampa, FL.
1 RESPONSE TO INSTRUCTION ________________________________ RESPONSE TO INTERVENTION New Opportunities for Students and Reading Professionals.
NASDSE November 14, 2006 Margaret McGlinchey Kim St. Martin.
Reform Model for Change Board of Education presentation by Superintendent: Dr. Kimberly Tooley.
A Mission of Restoration
2011 OSEP Leadership Mega Conference Collaboration to Achieve Success from Cradle to Career 2.0 RTI: Instructional Process and Evaluation Component Response.
Decision Rules Include…  Assessments used  How data are validated  Program Placement  Criteria for making instructional decisions at each tier (identify.
Improvement Planning Mischele McManus Infant/Toddler and Family Services Office of Early Childhood Education and Family Services July 20, 2007
Project 3 Supporting Technology. Project Proposal.
Data Report July Collect and analyze RtI data Determine effectiveness of RtI in South Dakota in Guide.
Northwest ISD Target Improvement Plan Seven Hills Elementary
Presented By WVDE Title I Staff June 10, Fiscal Issues Maintain an updated inventory list, including the following information: description of.
Alvarado Elementary North Student Support Teams January 2010.
Evaluation for Eligibility l 8/26/05 3 Evaluation2 Objectives  To ensure that school staff are aware of evaluation /reevaluation procedures under IDEA.
Florida Charter School Conference Orlando, Florida November, 2009 Clark Dorman Project Leader Florida Statewide Problem-Solving/RtI Project University.
RtI Response to Instruction and Intervention Understanding RtI in Thomspon School District Understanding RtI in Thomspon School District.
Zimmerly Response NMIA Audit. Faculty Response Teacher input on Master Schedule. Instructional Coaches Collaborative work. Design and implement common.
Winter  The RTI.2 framework integrates Common Core State Standards, assessment, early intervention, and accountability for at-risk students in.
“ Let us not be content to wait and see what will happen, but give us the determination to make the right things happen”- Horace Mann 2014 MCAS Overview.
Teaming/Data/Interventions RtI Infrastructure: Teaming RtI Partnership Coaches meeting January 6, 2011 Terry Schuster, RtI Partnership Lead Coach.
USING RTI TO IMPROVE STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT IN LITERACY A Report to Our Stakeholders TEMPLATE to fill in/ add to/ delete as you see fit! SCHOOL NAME– Board.
SPECIAL EDUCATION PROCEDURES TO ADDRESS NON-COMPLIANT FINDINGS RELATED TO CHILD FIND Presenter Jim Kubaiko, Director Special Education.
Note: In 2009, this survey replaced the NCA/Baldrige Quality Standards Assessment that was administered from Also, 2010 was the first time.
Response to Intervention
New Jersey Tiered System of Supports (NJTSS)
POLICIES AND PROCEDURES FOR PARENT REQUESTS
ARC Chairperson Training
Documented District Support Needs
ARC Chairperson Training
Presented by: Dr. Sue Abel
Procedures for school teams to address struggling students
Update on the TEA Sped corrective action plan
Response to Intervention in Illinois
Presentation transcript:

September 28, 2010 Train the Trainer session

 How Data Director can assist in maintenance of assessment and intervention data and how to analyze the data to help in the REED process  To understand the legal requirements and protocol/components of the REED process  The requirements for determining eligibility for SLD  What your next steps will be following this training

Have everyone share one or two hopes and fears Combine any that are similar Report out to larger group

 In 2004, IDEA was reauthorized mandating states to make enhancements/changes to:  How we intervene with students prior to a SE referral for evaluation (SIDR process),  How we determine students eligible as Specific Learning Disabilities (SLD),  How we analyze existing evaluation data when developing an evaluation plan (REED)  In 2009, Michigan developed criteria for these processes and mandated that LEAs develop procedures to align with these requirements

 Once Michigan disseminated the new criteria, we:  changed the REED process within the Illuminate system to align, and  Develop a committee to establish a SLD guideline document  All districts will implement these procedures during the sy and beyond  Calhoun DCIA and DSE have combined their efforts to help sustain these procedures and develop a framework for districts to implement these processes

 The Student Intervention Data Review (SIDR) process. Since:  This is a multifaceted process (Tiered Intervention)  The CISD RtI committee had developed a proposal  Mandated by Specific Learning Disabilities evaluation process We need to take time to establish a framework and supports to help districts implement this process.  CISD DCIA and DSE are working together  This is an enhancement to Child Study Team process Very data driven Mandated for Specific Learning Disabilities evaluation process Best practice Process not a form but documentation is key Intervention driven Aligns with the CISD Literacy Position Paper Each district will identify a team to be trained and will conduct trainings with your district DCIA and DSE will be providing support within each LEA

 Tim Hall will be training us on resources and data analysis process available for districts to assist with this process  The REED and SLD are data rich processes  Use of these data systems must be used by teams as they work through the processes  As you train staff/admin back in your district, you will want to train on data collection and analysis

 Karen, Julia and Kristin will walk us through the SLD guideline requirements  This process replaces the discrepancy model and must be implemented by every district  Each district publicly posted how they will determine SLD within their district (by Sept 1 st )  Eligibility can be done via RtI or PSW models. Since districts within CISD do not have a RtI process established, all districts will use the PSW model.  Each year the method (RtI or PSW) will be reviewed for each district

GRADES DISTRICTK AlbionPSW ArborPSW AthensPSW Battle CreekPSW BellevuePSW CCHSPSW EndeavorPSW Harper CreekPSW HomerPSW LakeviewPSW Mar LeePSW MarshallPSW Marshall AcademyPSW OlivetPSW PennfieldPSW TekonshaPSW Union CityPSW CISDPSW for all programs considering SLD eligibilities

 Jennifer, Jen and I will review the REED process  Replaces the initial and reevaluation process  Completed every 36 months after initial evaluation  A report in Data Director is being created that aligns with the REED  Process of reviewing existing data  Illuminate SE (formerly FOCUS) has aligned to these new requirements  Allows for attachments of assessments, reports, other documentation  Interfaces, Referral, Eval Plan, Consent form, and Eval Log  Determines whether a MET is necessary

Tiered Intervention SIDR Coaching for Learning REED SLD guidelines School Improvement

ISD District Central Office Principal (instructional leader) PLCs – Content, grade, SIP, SIDR Teams Classroom Instructor, Literacy and Instructional Coaches, Support staff Families, Educational and Community Stakeholders

 Data  Resources/Support  Research-based/Evidence-Based Practices  PD  Leadership

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

SLD GUIDELINES

REED PROCESS

 Out of state transfers  These must be considered initials  Must review eligibility criteria from the previous state and must complete an out of state initial REED  Must be done within 30 school days from transfer in date or an extension must be sought  If data missing from previous state, during the evaluation process, GE may be implement interventions and progress monitor  Parent requests  Talk with the parents to explain the SIDR process  As part of the evaluation process GE will implement interventions and progress monitor

 Your district team will go back to your district and train all GE and SE teachers, Principals, other support staff on the SLD and REED process  As we develop more about the SIDR process, we will be sharing this data with you  All these documents will be put on the CISD shared drive this week that the supervisors can access  Use the presentations ppts and activities during your trainings