Prepared by: Melanie Weaver, Waterfowl Program Lead Prepared for: Fish and Game Commission Meeting August 5, 2015 Agenda Item 29 2015-2016 Status of Waterfowl,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Waterfowl Hunting Zones and Splits for the 2011 – 2015 Seasons Paul Link LWF Commission 2/8/2011.
Advertisements

Status Update on Future Water Quality Strategies for the Refuge Kenneth G. Ammon, P.E., Deputy Executive Director, Everglades Restoration and Capital Projects.
International AEWA Single Species Action-Plan Taiga Bean Goose (Anser f. fabalis) Results from workshop in Tuusula November 2013 Mikko Alhainen Finnish.
Traditionally relied on MWI Random transect aerial survey –Reinecke et al. (1990) –Pearse et al. (2005) –State agencies continuing work MDWFP (2005-present)
USFWS Migratory Bird Program James R. Kelley Mississippi Flyway Representative.
Migratory Bird Program Conserving America’s Birds.
Successful Harvest Reporting and Human Dimensions of Waterfowl Hunting Regulations: How to make things work Craig A. Miller Human Dimensions Research Program.
History and Benefits of Wildlife Management
Association of Village Council Presidents Bethel, Alaska Vivian Korthuis Vice President of Community Services.
History of Wildlife Conservation in Ohio Jason T. Warren State Wildlife Officer Assigned to Ashtabula County.
Impacts of Changes in Water Rights on Waterfowl in the Lower Klamath Basin By Robert B. Frederick.
The Effects of Climate Change on Waterfowl Migration Flyway Habitat in North America By Jason Preuett Southern University Urban Forestry.
Role of Hunting in Wildlife Management Dr. Kenneth J. Raedeke Affiliate Professor University of Washington.
Big Game Most big game species underwent population fluctuations since European settlement, with often critically low numbers in late 1800’s early 1900’s,
31 DECEMBER VARIABLE FLOOD CONTROL DRAFT FOR LIBBY RESERVOIR U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Northwestern Division, North Pacific Region.
Market Hunting - See text
JOINT VENTURES Celebrating 25 Years of Bird Conservation.
Colonial Waterbirds Nesting on the Niagara River, Dave Moore 1 Francie Cuthbert 2 Chip Weseloh 1 Linda Wires 2 Niagara River RAP Implementation.
Water Supply Planning Initiative State Water Commission November 22, 2004.
History of Wildlife Conservation. First practiced in England during the Middle Ages Ignored by European settlers to the United States due to the abundance.
Bird Conservation on Private Lands Proactive Conservation.
Washington State Steelhead Status Review PACIFIC COAST STEELHEAD MEETING JON ANDERSON WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF FISH & WILDLIFE MARCH 9-11, 2010.
Biological Status Review for the Gray Wolf in Oregon and Evaluation of Delisting Criteria April 24, 2015 Russ Morgan Oregon Dept. of Fish & Wildlife.
Steelhead Stock Status Review and ESA Oregon Rhine Messmer ODFW District Staff Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife Pacific Coast Steelhead Management.
Lecture 8: Introduction to Stock Assessment
From a Study Design Assessment for Waterfowl Production Surveys on Tetlin NWR by Jonathan Greenberg (intern) and Joel Reynolds (former Regional Biometrician)
Waterfowl and Climate Change: Issues and Implications Sonja M. Smith.
Columbia River Basin White Sturgeon Framework Lynn Palensky Northwest Power and Conservation Council Portland, Oregon USA July 2013.
Strengthening Science Supporting Fishery Management  Standards for Best Available Science  Implementation of OMB’s Peer Review Bulletin  Separation.
Wildlife Management Practices and Techniques. What is Wildlife Management It is an important part of wildlife conservation. It is the ability to manipulate.
Kilarc-Cow Creek Hydroelectric Project Decommissioning FERC Project No. 606 Technical Meeting May 16, 2007, 1-4 pm Red Lion Redding, CA.
Conserving Bird Habitat in California’s Central Valley Bob Shaffer, CVJV Coordinator JVC Meeting Austin, Texas December 2006.
Symposium in Context of Yellow Rail Conservation JENNIFER WHEELER, US Fish and Wildlife Service, Waterbird Conservation for the Americas JANE AUSTIN, US.
Summary of Atlantic Swordfish Species Working Group Discussion (see also SCI -021)
Avian Influenza: Surveillance of Wild Birds U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service H. Dale Hall, Director U.S. Fish and Wildlife.
Seabird Monitoring in the California Current System U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service U.S. Geological Survey.
Habitat Management in an Integrated Framework John Eadie, UC Davis Mike Anderson, IWWR, Ducks Unlimited Canada Jim Ringelman, Ducks Unlimited Inc.
Program Implementation Lower Colorado River Multi-Species Conservation Program.
Kodiak National Wildlife Refuge. Kodiak NWR – Established ,000 acres On Afognak And Ban Islands Added with ANILCA 1.7 million acres on Kodiak,
Fish and Game Commission Meeting December 11, 2013 Marci Yaremko State/Federal Fisheries Program Marine Region 1 Photo: Edgar Roberts.
Planning & Community Development Department Zoning Code Amendment Public Hearing Proposed elimination of the 50% review step from the design review process.
Falconry Regulations Section 670 Summary of Proposals and Request for Recommendations Fish and Game Commission October 3, 2012 Agenda Item 2 Merlin. USFWS.
Do Resident and Non-resident Northern Bobwhite Hunters Self- Regulate their Harvest Based on Population Size? Chris Williams 1 and Roger Applegate 2 1.
Preliminary Upland Game Hunting Recommendations Fish and Game Commission Meeting April 16, 2014.
Draft. NAWMP Progress Assessment You did what with our $3 billion?
2014 Highlights By: Paul Telander, Wildlife Section Chief To: 2015 Roundtable Participants 16 January 2015.
Overview of Proposed Alaska National Wildlife Refuges Regulatory Changes U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
1 Agricultural Programs for Controlling Particulate Matter Pollution Ira Domsky, Deputy Director Air Quality Division presented to Western State Air Resources.
Sections 300 and 313: Upland Game Birds/Stamp Fish and Game Commission Meeting August 7, 2013 Dan Yparraguirre Wildlife and Fisheries Division 1.
G. Scott Boomer USFWS Harvest Management Working Group Meeting Buda, TX 29 November 2012.
Building the Future Of Waterfowl Together. What Is It? The Michigan Waterfowl Legacy (MWL) is a cooperative partnership to restore, conserve, and celebrate.
Fish and Game Commission Meeting December 3, 2014 Marine Region 1 Photo: Edgar Roberts.
Cooperation among state wildlife agencies with the purpose of protecting and conserving migratory birds in western North America. Involved with annual.
Building the Future Of Waterfowl Together. What Is It? The Michigan Waterfowl Legacy (MWL) is a cooperative partnership to restore, conserve, and celebrate.
California Department of Fish and Game Inland Desert - Region 6 San Jacinto Wildlife Area A Presentation to the California Fish and Game Commission March.
Department Recommendations for CA State Duck Stamp Species FGC Meeting October 19, 2011.
Grassland Water District Role Play Your Role: Water Managers of the Grassland Water District Instructions: 1)Read the following background information.
2008 Pennsylvania Turkey Hunter Survey Mary Jo Casalena, Robert C. Boyd & Christopher S. Rosenberry Pennsylvania Game Commission Bureau of Wildlife Management.
North Atlantic LCC Science Needs and Projects Background Vision and Mission 2010 Projects (review, status, next steps) 2011 Science Needs Assessment, Workshop.
California Department of Fish and Wildlife Wolf Plan Status June 4, 2014.
Deb Wilson-Vandenberg Fish and Game Commission Meeting April 13, 2016 Marine Region 1 Photo: Edgar Roberts Photo: Melanie Parker.
DEVELOPMENT OF A TIMELINE FOR A REVIEW OF SCIENCE AND POSSIBLE MANAGEMENT ACTIONS FOR COYOTES Fish and Game Commission October 8, 2014 Agenda item 16 (b)
Fish and Game Commission Meeting February 10, 2016 Marine Region 1 Photo: Edgar Roberts Photo: Melanie Parker.
Update for the Citizens Advisory Committee February 22, 2017
Ducks Unlimited.
Resident Canada Goose Regulations
State GHG.
Agenda Item D.1.a Supplemental NMFS Presentation 2 November 2018
Migratory Game Bird Regulations and Flyway Process
Evaluation in the GEF and Training Module on Terminal Evaluations
Presentation transcript:

Prepared by: Melanie Weaver, Waterfowl Program Lead Prepared for: Fish and Game Commission Meeting August 5, 2015 Agenda Item Status of Waterfowl, Habitats and Hunting Recommendations

Brief background on “waterfowl” Brief summary of process of population assessment and overarching approach to regulation setting Current status of habitats Current status of waterfowl populations Specific regulation recommendations

Primary wintering grounds in Pacific Flyway “Waterfowl” not 1 species: 8 goose populations from Russia, Alaska, Canada, all western states 28 duck species from Canada, all western states Stakeholders are not just Californians A shared resource and managed at a Flyway scale Alaska natives Other states Federal government But individual states can adopt more restrictive regulations

USFWS, CWS, CA and many other states Methodologies consistent and peer reviewed Monitor most species, but mallards “key stone” Longest running, most comprehensive wildlife survey CA survey conducted since 1948, redesigned 1992 USFWS and CWS conducted since 1955

Scope of the USFWS - CWS annual waterfowl survey

USFWS sets “frameworks” annually based on current year data and analyses Today DFW is recommending regulations But for the regulations Frameworks based on predicted populations Product of USFWS EIS Request to Notice in December, 2015 FGC Adoption in April, 2016 “Frameworks” Maximum season length/bag limits Earliest open and latest closing dates Migratory Bird Treaty Act limits hunting to 107 days

For ducks: annual breeding population surveys For Pacific Flyway: AK, OR and CA About to add British Columbia and Washington Harvest rates (from banded ducks) State of the art modeling framework Harvest objective: sustainable harvest over the long term For geese: Annual goose surveys Annual harvest surveys

Mallards drive the general duck regulations Generally most abundant duck (population and harvest) Life history characteristics similar to most other species Separate harvest strategies for pintail, scaup, canvasback Mid-continent mallards used prior to 2008 Relied solely on USFWS – CWS survey (prairies) In 2008, Western Mallard model adopted Uses western state data explicitly Historically, mallards more productive in west

Local stocks (AK, CA-OR) rather than midcontinent Harvest strategy more responsive to local conditions Conservative model < maximum sustained yield updates annually Based on population growth rate and harvest rates Incorporates statistical uncertainty Implemented through 4 regulatory options: Liberal, Moderate, Restrictive and Closed Varying season lengths and bag limits Model prescribes an optimal regulatory option given objective

Continental Ducks (all species): similar to last year (record high) Mallard & Green-wings = record high Pintail, Canvasback, Scaup = no change Pacific Flyway mallards: CA record low, unchanged in OR, down in AK All but 2 goose populations over objective Federal frameworks for ducks are liberal except Scaup

Current StatusGoal N CA Canada geese No survey1,250 Cackling Canada geese 311,100250,000 Aleutian Canada geese 189,11060,000 Black Brant 157,700162,000 Pacific Whitefront geese 565,400300,000 Snow geese (Russia) 185,000120,000 Snow geese (Canada) 434,000200,000 Ross’ geese 770,000100,000 Goose Population Status

Western Mallards Alaska California Oregon

Anticipate reduced wetland & agriculture habitats Size of reduction currently unknown Timing of water deliveries currently unknown Water availability differs within hunting zones Hunting seasons = incentive for creating habitat >65% wetland habitat in CA is privately owned

Recommendations

day seasons Varies by zone 7/day, no more than: 7 mallards, 2 hens 2 pintail 2 canvasback (increase of 1/day) 2 redheads 3 scaup/86 days

NE Zone: Oct 10 – Jan 22 (105 days) Scaup: Oct 10 – Dec 6 (58 days) & Dec 26 – Jan 22 (28 days) BOS, SSJV, So CA Zones: Oct 24 – Jan 31 (100 days) Scaup: Nov 7 – Jan 31 (86 days) CO River Zone: Oct 16 – Jan 24 (101 days) Scaup: Oct 31 – Jan 24 (86 days) Must match AZ regulations

100 – 107 day seasons Varies by zone Generally 25/day 15 white geese 10 dark geese Brant 2/day Zone/Special Management Area regulations – no changes

Increase season length from 30 to 37 days 3-yr midwinter survey average exceeds 135,000 Flyway management plan allows increase in harvest at this level May result in an additional 200 to 500 brant harvested Recommendation: Northern Brant: Nov 8 – Dec 14 Balance of State Brant: Nov 9 – Dec 15

Regular Season Dark geese: Oct 10 – Jan 17 (100 days) White geese: Nov 7 – Jan 17 (72 days) OR Oct 24 – Jan 3 (72 days) Late Season White geese: Feb 7 – Mar 10 (33 days) Whitefronts: Mar 6 – Mar 10 (5 days) 25/day: 15 white and 10 dark geese, no more than 2 Large Canada geese

Early Season Canada geese Oct 3 – Oct 7 (5 days) Regular Season (all geese) Oct 24 – Jan 31( 100 days) Late Season Whitefronts & white geese: Feb 13 – Feb 17 (5 days) 25/day: 15 white and 10 dark geese

SSJV Zone: Oct 24 – Jan 31 (100 days) 25/day: 15 white and 10 dark geese So CA Zone: Oct 24 – Jan 31 (100 days) 18/day: 15 white and 3 dark geese CO River Zone: Oct 16 – Jan 24 (101days) 10/day: up to 10 white and 4 dark geese CA must match AZ adjacent zone

North Coast Special Management Area Regular Season: Nov 8 – Jan 31 (85 days) Late Season: Feb 20 – Mar 10 (20 days) Sac Valley Special Management Area Oct 24 – Dec 21 (59 days) Imperial Valley Special Management Area Regular Season: Nov 7 – Jan 31 (86 days) Late Season: Feb 6 – Feb 21 (16 days) Youth Hunt Days NE Zone 14 days prior, 2 days All other zones 7 days after, 2 days Falconry – no change

Contact: Melanie Weaver, Waterfowl Program Lead (916) Photo by Chris Nicolai

32 day late season hunt started in Private lands only Modeled after North Coast and Imperial Special Management areas Established as a tool to alleviate goose depredation Basin refuges have minimal harvest of white geese in October, hunting tool needs to be available in Jan for spring return

18 Type C areas 12 dominated by sagebrush or conifers 4 dominated by riparian habitat 2 dominated by seasonal wetlands Hunting opportunity low for geese

Breeding population 20% below last year and 34% below LTA – lowest estimate on record Mallards banded in CA = high % of CA mallard harvest Higher proportion of ducks shot early are local Should limits be reduced? Most hunters do not achieve daily bag limits

  Bag 1: range of 47% - 56%   Bag 2: range of 23.2% – 23.4%   Bag 3: range of 10% - 12%   Bag 7: range of 2% - 3%   Conclusion: to protect mallards without reducing season length, bag limit would have to be reduced substantially

What reduction in daily bag limit equates to a 14 day season length reduction? 100 day seasons ( ) average harvest = 315, day season (2012) = 243, day season (2013) = 128, day season (1984) = 265,000 -Bag limit in 1984 was 5, not 7 -Excluding 2002 and 2004 Need a 15% reduction in harvest to obtain moderate season harvest

100 day seasons ( ) avg = 315, day season (2012) = 243, day season (2013) = 128, day season (2014) = 106, = overall decline in duck harvest

NE Zone: Oct 10 – Jan 3 BOS, So CA, SSJV zones: Nov 7 – Jan 31 Co R Zone: Must match Arizona Goose seasons remain 100+ days

NE Zone: Oct 10 – Oct 18 (9) & Oct 27 – Jan 11 (77) BOS, So CA, SSJV Zones: Oct 24 - CO R Zone: Must match Arizona Goose seasons remain 100+ days

2012 = 243, = 127, = 106,370 Most species declined in harvest in 2014

States discuss options at flyway meetings Goose discussions largely dominate Framework changes require approval at 3 levels Subcommittee, full committee (technical) level and council (policy) level Flyway forwards recommendations to Service Service establishes framework States set regs (FGC role) Must be within framework

Team approach State and federal management agencies Systematic process for making objective decisions Technical Group Deliberation of System Dynamics Policy Guiding Document or Body Development of harvest objectives Routine check-in with Flyway Councils