Egle TOMASI-GUSTAFSSON CEA DSM IRFU SPhN and CNRS/IN2P3/ IPNO 16-VI-2009 1 Space-Like and Time-Like Form Factors Compared analysis Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 The and -Z Exchange Corrections to Parity Violating Elastic Scattering 周海清 / 东南大学物理系 based on PRL99,262001(2007) in collaboration with C.W.Kao, S.N.Yang.
Advertisements

q=q V +q sea q=q sea so: total sea (q+q): q sea = 2 q Kresimir Kumericki, Dieter Mueller, Nucl.Phys.B841:1-58,2010.
Onset of Scaling in Exclusive Processes Marco Mirazita Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare Laboratori Nazionali di Frascati First Workshop on Quark-Hadron.
P.Lenisa Polarized Antiprotons Experiments 1 dr. Paolo Lenisa Università di Ferrara and INFN - ITALY Project X Workshop FNAL, 01/26/08 Polarized Antiprotons.
The Electromagnetic Structure of Hadrons Elastic scattering of spinless electrons by (pointlike) nuclei (Rutherford scattering) A A ZZ  1/q 2.
DESY PRC May 10, Beyond the One Photon Approximation in Lepton Scattering: A Definitive Experiment at DESY for J. Arrington (Argonne) D. Hasell,
Marc Vanderhaeghen Johannes Gutenberg Universität, Mainz Olympus Coll. Meeting, DESY, February 23-24, 2010 TexPoint fonts used in EMF. Read the TexPoint.
TIME-LIKE BARYON FORM FACTORS: EXPERIMENTAL SITUATION AND POSSIBILITIES FOR PEP-N Roberto Calabrese Dipartimento di Fisica and I.N.F.N. Ferrara, Italy.
Richard MilnerDESY April 6, OLYMPUS Overview Motivation for the experiment Progress to date on the experiment The path forward.
Study of e + e  collisions with a hard initial state photon at BaBar Michel Davier (LAL-Orsay) for the BaBar collaboration TM.
CEA DSM Dapnia Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Frascati, 20 Gennaio Model independent properties of two photon exchange Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Saclay, France.
Proton polarization measurements in π° photo-production --On behalf of the Jefferson Lab Hall C GEp-III and GEp-2γ collaboration Wei Luo Lanzhou University.
The Structure of the Nucleon Introduction Meson cloud effects: two-component model Strange form factors Results Summary and conclusions Roelof Bijker ICN-UNAM.
LEPTON PAIR PRODUCTION AS A PROBE OF TWO PHOTON EFFECTS IN EXCLUSIVE PHOTON-HADRON SCATTERING Pervez Hoodbhoy Quaid-e-Azam University Islamabad.
Proton polarization measurements in π° photo- production --on behalf of the Jefferson Lab Hall C GEp-III and GEp-2 γ collaboration 2010 Annual Fall Meeting.
The angular dependence of the 16 O(e,e’K + ) 16  N and H(e,e’K + )  F. Garibaldi – Jlab December WATERFALL The WATERFALL target: reactions on.
Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson 1 Peculiar Features of Electromagnetic Proton Form Factors Varenna, 15-VI Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson CEA, IRFU,SPhN, Saclay, France.
J. RitmanForschungszentrum Juelich The PANDA Experiment: Exploring the Emergence of Structure in Matter.
Prague 05-10/07/2004Marialaura Colantoni1 Advance Study Institute SYMMETRY and SPIN Marialaura Colantoni* on behalf of the COMPASS coll. *Universita’ del.
Introduction 2. 2.Limitations involved in West and Yennie approach 3. 3.West and Yennie approach and experimental data 4. 4.Approaches based on.
1 1.Introduction 2.Limitations involved in West and Yennie approach 3.West and Yennie approach and experimental data 4.Approaches based on impact parameter.
Model dependent and model independent considerations on two photon exchange Model dependent and model independent considerations on two photon exchange.
Probe resolution (GeV) N π,  Q 2 =12 GeV 2 Q 2 =6 GeV 2 The study of nucleon resonance transitions provides a testing ground for our understanding.
CEA DSM Dapnia Egle TOMASI-GUSTAFSSONAugust 5, High order radiative corrections in Electron-Proton scattering Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Saclay, France.
Duality: Recent and Future Results Ioana Niculescu James Madison University Hall C “Summer” Workshop.
CEA DSM Dapnia Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Gomel, July 31, Polarization Observables and Hadron Structure (1) Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson Saclay, France.
Deeply Virtual Compton Scattering on the neutron Malek MAZOUZ LPSC Grenoble EINN 2005September 23 rd 2005.
Nucleon Form Factors and the BLAST Experiment at MIT-Bates
Electromagnetic form factors of the proton in the time-like region with the PANDA detector GDR/LQCD Autrans, 6-7 Juin 2005 Saro Ong IPN Orsay and UPJV.
G E p -2γ experiment and the new JLab Hall-C Focal Plane Polarimeter Mehdi Meziane The College of William & Mary - APS Meeting April 14, On behalf.
A Measurement of Two-Photon Exchange in Unpolarized Elastic Electron-Proton Scattering John Arrington and James Johnson Northwestern University & Argonne.
Two-photon physics in hadronic processes Marc Vanderhaeghen College of William & Mary / Jefferson Lab PPP7 workshop, Taipei, June , 2007.
Hadron form factor measurements at large momentum transfer Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson IRFU, SPhN- Saclay, and IN2P3- IPN Orsay France Kolomna, 11-VI
Chung-Wen Kao Chung-Yuan Christian University, Taiwan
Search for two-photon effects in charge asymmetry measurements from electron and positron scattering on nucleon and nuclei E. Tomasi-Gustafsson 1,2, M.
GEp-III in Hall C Andrew Puckett, MIT On behalf of the Jefferson Lab Hall C GEp-III Collaboration April 15, 2008.
BINP '06 1 Nucleon Form Factors Strike Back R. Baldini Ferroli, Centro Fermi/INFN-LNF 2 e + e - collisions from  to  BINP 27 feb
Chung-Wen Kao Chung-Yuan Christian University, Taiwan National Taiwan University, Lattice QCD Journal Club Two is too many: A personal review.
Nucleon Elastic Form Factors: An Experimentalist’s Perspective Outline: The Fib and the Questions EM FF Strangeness Glen Warren Battelle & Jefferson Lab.
Proton Form Factor Measurements with Polarization Method L.Pentchev The College of William and Mary For the GEp-2  and GEp-III collaborations JLab, June.
JLab PAC33, January 16, 2008 Polarization transfer in WACS 1  p   p Polarization transfer in Wide-Angle Compton Scattering Proposal D. Hamilton,
Hall C Summer Workshop August 6, 2009 W. Luo Lanzhou University, China Analysis of GEp-III&2γ Inelastic Data --on behalf of the Jefferson Lab Hall C GEp-III.
Envisioned PbWO4 detector Wide-Angle Compton Scattering at JLab-12 GeV with a neutral-particle detector With much input from B. Wojtsekhowski and P. Kroll.
1 FAIR SIMULATION ACTIVITIES AND PHENOMENOLOGICAL STUDIES AT IPN ORSAY PANDA Collaboration Meeting, GSI, Sep. 5, 2011 Béatrice Ramstein for the.
CLAS Collaboration at Jefferson Lab Deuteron Spin Structure function g 1 at low Q 2 from EG4 Experiment Krishna P. Adhikari, Sebastian E. Kuhn Old Dominion.
TPE Contributions to Proton EM Properties in TL Region Dian-Yong Chen Institute of High Energy Physics, Beijing
Lecture 4 – Quantum Electrodynamics (QED)
Timelike Compton Scattering at JLab
M. Radici - Time-like form factors
Modelling Hadron Form Factors
Theory : phenomenology support 12 GeV
P I N P Two Photon Exchange in elastic electron-proton scattering: QCD factorization approach Nikolai Kivel in collaboration with M. Vanderhaeghen DSPIN-09.
James Johnson Northwestern University & Argonne National Lab
The College of William and Mary Charlottesville, October 9, 2008
Elastic Scattering in Electromagnetism
Wide Angle Compton Scattering
Proton Form Factors Over a period of time lasting at least 2000 years,
Hadron Form Factors Rolf Ent Jefferson Lab
Can We Learn Quark Orbital Motion from SSAs?
Two-photon physics in elastic electron-nucleon scattering
Wei Luo Lanzhou University 2011 Hall C User Meeting January 14, 2011
Study of e+e- pp process using initial state radiation with BaBar
Radiative Corrections : selected comments
DANTE: DAnae Nucleon Time-like form factor Experiment
Study of e+e collisions with a hard initial state photon at BaBar
Egle TOMASI-GUSTAFSSON
Scaling Study of the L-T Separated p(e,e’π+)n Cross Section at Large Q2 Tanja Horn Jefferson Lab APS/DNP meeting 2007 DNP07 October 2007.
for the A1 collaboration
Two-photon exchange in p-p collisions
GEp-2γ experiment (E04-019) UPDATE
Presentation transcript:

Egle TOMASI-GUSTAFSSON CEA DSM IRFU SPhN and CNRS/IN2P3/ IPNO 16-VI Space-Like and Time-Like Form Factors Compared analysis Egle Tomasi-Gustafsson SPhN-Saclay and IPN-Orsay 2009 Varenna, June 16, 2009

Egle TOMASI-GUSTAFSSON CEA DSM IRFU SPhN and CNRS/IN2P3/ IPNO 16-VI PLAN Introduction: Form factors in one photon exchange approximation …. Model Independent Statements q 2 >0 e-e- e+e+ p p Experimental Situation –Space-Like –Time-like Future Panda/FAIR and JLab 12 GeV: –Determination of proton form factors –Transition to QCD: Asymptotics –Reaction mechanism (1 or 2  exchange) Conclusions

Egle TOMASI-GUSTAFSSON CEA DSM IRFU SPhN and CNRS/IN2P3/ IPNO 16-VI Hadron Electromagnetic Form factors –Characterize the internal structure of a particle (  point-like) –In a P- and T-invariant theory, the EM structure of a particle of spin S is defined by 2S+1 form factors. –Elastic form factors bring information on the nucleon ground state –Neutron and proton form factors are different –Playground for theory and experiment –at low q 2 probe the size of the nucleus, –at high q 2 test QCD scaling

Egle TOMASI-GUSTAFSSON CEA DSM IRFU SPhN and CNRS/IN2P3/ IPNO 16-VI The proton vertex is parametrized in terms of FFs: Pauli and Dirac F 1,F 2 Electromagnetic Interaction q 2 <0 e-e- e-e- pp or in terms of Sachs FFs: GE=F 1 -  F 2, GM=F 1 +F 2,  =-q 2 /4M 2 The electron vertex is known,   The interaction is carried by a virtual photon of mass q 2 What about high order radiative corrections ?

Egle TOMASI-GUSTAFSSON CEA DSM IRFU SPhN and CNRS/IN2P3/ IPNO 16-VI Analyticity _ _ q 2 <0 e-e- e-e- pp q 2 >0 e-e- e+e+ p p q2q2 q 2 =4m p 2 FFs are complex FFs are real Unphysical region GE=GM Space-like Time-like GE(0)=1 GM(0)=  p Asymptotics - QCD - analyticity p+p ↔ e + +e - e+p  e+p p+p ↔ e + +e - + 

Egle TOMASI-GUSTAFSSON CEA DSM IRFU SPhN and CNRS/IN2P3/ IPNO 16-VI The Rosenbluth separation  Holds for 1  exchange only Linearity of the reduced cross section PRL 94, (2005)  tan 2  e dependence  Q 2 fixed

Egle TOMASI-GUSTAFSSON CEA DSM IRFU SPhN and CNRS/IN2P3/ IPNO 16-VI Crossing Symmetry Scattering and annihilation channels: - Described by the same amplitude : - function of two kinematical variables, s and t p 2 → – p 2 k 2 → – k 2 - which scan different kinematical regions

Egle TOMASI-GUSTAFSSON CEA DSM IRFU SPhN and CNRS/IN2P3/ IPNO 16-VI Time-like observables: | G E | 2 and | G M | 2. As in SL region: - Dependence on q 2 contained in FFs - Even dependence on cos 2  (1  exchange) - No dependence on sign of FFs - Enhancement of magnetic term but TL form factors are complex! A. Zichichi, S. M. Berman, N. Cabibbo, R. Gatto, Il Nuovo Cimento XXIV, 170 (1962) B. Bilenkii, C. Giunti, V. Wataghin, Z. Phys. C 59, 475 (1993). G. Gakh, E.T-G., Nucl. Phys. A761,120 (2005).

Egle TOMASI-GUSTAFSSON CEA DSM IRFU SPhN and CNRS/IN2P3/ IPNO 16-VI Experimental Status (space-like) q 2 <0 e-e- e-e- pp

Egle TOMASI-GUSTAFSSON CEA DSM IRFU SPhN and CNRS/IN2P3/ IPNO 16-VI The nucleon form factors VDM : IJL F. Iachello..PLB 43, 191 (1973) Extended VDM (G.-K. 92): E.L.Lomon PRC 66, ) Hohler NPB 114, 505 (1976) Bosted PRC 51, 409 (1995) ElectricMagnetic neutron proton E. T.-G., F. Lacroix, Ch. Duterte, G.I. Gakh, EPJA 24, 419 (2005) To update…new data!

Egle TOMASI-GUSTAFSSON CEA DSM IRFU SPhN and CNRS/IN2P3/ IPNO 16-VI The simultaneous measurement of Pt and Pl reduces the systematic errors ! Polarization Method (exp) A.I. Akhiezer, M.P. Rekalo

Egle TOMASI-GUSTAFSSON CEA DSM IRFU SPhN and CNRS/IN2P3/ IPNO 16-VI Statistics and Preliminary Results from G Ep (III) New equipment worked beautifully: BigCal and FPP 8.54 GeV 2 point: 1.63 billion triggers collected Analyzing power at 5.4 GeV/c close to Dubna value 6.8 GeV 2 point: 160 million triggers 5.2 GeV 2 point: a test of the spin transport at 180 o μ p G Ep /G Mp = Q 2 C. Perdrisat, V. Punjabi

Egle TOMASI-GUSTAFSSON CEA DSM IRFU SPhN and CNRS/IN2P3/ IPNO 16-VI STATUS on EM Form factors Space-like region 1)"standard" dipole function for the nucleon magnetic FFs GMp and GMn 2) linear deviation from the dipole function for the electric proton FF GEp 3) contradiction between polarized and unpolarized measurements 4) non vanishing electric neutron FF, GEn.

Egle TOMASI-GUSTAFSSON CEA DSM IRFU SPhN and CNRS/IN2P3/ IPNO 16-VI Two-photon exchange Different results with different experimental methods !! - Both methods based on the same formalism - Experiments repeated New mechanism ? 1  -2  ~  =e 2 /4  =1/ ’s: Gunion, Lev…

Egle TOMASI-GUSTAFSSON CEA DSM IRFU SPhN and CNRS/IN2P3/ IPNO 16-VI Experimental Status (time-like) q 2 >0 e-e- e+e+ p p

Egle TOMASI-GUSTAFSSON CEA DSM IRFU SPhN and CNRS/IN2P3/ IPNO 16-VI Time-Like Region E. T-G., F. Lacroix, C. Duterte, G.I. Gakh, EPJA 24, 419 (2005) VDM : IJL F. Iachello..PLB (1973) Extended VDM (G.-K. 92): E.L.Lomon PRC (2002) ‘QCD inspired’ proton neutron

Egle TOMASI-GUSTAFSSON CEA DSM IRFU SPhN and CNRS/IN2P3/ IPNO 16-VI STATUS on EM Form factors Time-like region 1)No individual determination of |GE| and |GM| 2)Assume GE=GM (valid only at threshold) 3)TL nucleon FFs are twice larger than SL FF   QCD =0.3 GeV A(p) = 56.3 GeV 4 A(n) = GeV 4 VMD or pQCD inspired parametrizations (for p and n):

Egle TOMASI-GUSTAFSSON CEA DSM IRFU SPhN and CNRS/IN2P3/ IPNO 16-VI Models in T.L. Region (polarization) VDM : IJL Ext. VDM ‘QCD inspired’ R AyAxx Ayy Axz Azz E. T-G., F. Lacroix, C. Duterte, G.I. Gakh, EPJA 24, 419(2005)

Egle TOMASI-GUSTAFSSON CEA DSM IRFU SPhN and CNRS/IN2P3/ IPNO 16-VI Space-like and Time-like E.T-G, Phys. Part. Nucl. Lett. 4, 281 (2007)  =0.5  =0.2  =0.8 F E =  G 2 E  red F E =    tot F M =    tot   GeV GeV 2

Egle TOMASI-GUSTAFSSON CEA DSM IRFU SPhN and CNRS/IN2P3/ IPNO 16-VI Space-like and Time-like  =0.2  =0.5  =0.8 E.T-G, Phys. Part. Nucl. Lett. 4, 281 (2007) 10% F E =  G 2 E  red

Egle TOMASI-GUSTAFSSON CEA DSM IRFU SPhN and CNRS/IN2P3/ IPNO 16-VI Radiative Return (ISR) e + +e -  p + p +  B. Aubert ( BABAR Collaboration) Phys Rev. D73, (2006)

Egle TOMASI-GUSTAFSSON CEA DSM IRFU SPhN and CNRS/IN2P3/ IPNO 16-VI Results (ISR) G E = G M ? B. Aubert [Babar Collaboration, PRD 73, (2006)

Egle TOMASI-GUSTAFSSON CEA DSM IRFU SPhN and CNRS/IN2P3/ IPNO 16-VI Form Factors with p+p e + + e - 1) Knowledge of proton form factors up to large q 2 2) Transition to QCD: Asymptotics 3) Reaction mechanism (1 or 2 photon exchange)

Egle TOMASI-GUSTAFSSON CEA DSM IRFU SPhN and CNRS/IN2P3/ IPNO 16-VI D. Marchand, IPN Orsay 24 3 body reactions: “easy” to eliminate  kinematical constraints  PID  2 charged body reactions (π + π -, μ + μ -, K + K - ) Most important background is π + π - : Are we able to discriminate e + e - from π + π - ? YES ! High statistics GEANT4 simulations  Worse case : few 0 / 00 pollution / cos  CM bin (0.1)  < 1% on the total cross section up to 16 GeV 2 Physical Background

Egle TOMASI-GUSTAFSSON CEA DSM IRFU SPhN and CNRS/IN2P3/ IPNO 16-VI Individual determination of GE and GM up to large Q 2 Expected Results(I) R=GE/GM BaBAR PS170 PANDA sim L = 2x10 32 cm -2.s -1, 10 7 s (~100 days)

Egle TOMASI-GUSTAFSSON CEA DSM IRFU SPhN and CNRS/IN2P3/ IPNO 16-VI Proton: F2 /F1 and pQCD Brodsky and Farrar (75): Q 2 F 2 /F 1 constant Belitsky, Ji and Yuan (03): Q 2 F 2 /F 1 → ln 2 (Q 2 /  2 ) → C. Perdrisat

Egle TOMASI-GUSTAFSSON CEA DSM IRFU SPhN and CNRS/IN2P3/ IPNO 16-VI Asymptotic region -Test of analytical properties Expected Results (II)

Egle TOMASI-GUSTAFSSON CEA DSM IRFU SPhN and CNRS/IN2P3/ IPNO 16-VI Phragmèn-Lindelöf theorem Asymptotic properties for analytical functions E. T-G. and G. Gakh, Eur. Phys. J. A 26, 265 (2005)  =0.05, 0.1 If f(z)  a as z  along a straight line, and f(z)  b as z  along another straight line, and f(z) is regular and bounded in the angle between, then a=b and f(z)  a uniformly in the angle.

Egle TOMASI-GUSTAFSSON CEA DSM IRFU SPhN and CNRS/IN2P3/ IPNO 16-VI Phragmèn-Lindelöf theorem E. T-G. and M. P. Rekalo, Phys. Lett. B 504, 291 (2001) Applies to NN and NN Interaction (Pomeranchuk theorem) t=0 : not a QCD regime! Connection with QCD asymptotics?

Egle TOMASI-GUSTAFSSON CEA DSM IRFU SPhN and CNRS/IN2P3/ IPNO 16-VI Conclusions Hadron form factors: a bridge between perturbative and non perturbative QCD Progress in experiment and theory Next future (> 2014) –12 GeV beams at JLab: increase Q 2 to 15 GeV 2. Two experiment in preparation - antiprotons up to 15 GeV/c Precise determination of |GE| and |GM| Cross section measurement up to q 2 to ~20 GeV 2. Towards a unified description of form factors, for a better comprehension of the hadron structure

Egle TOMASI-GUSTAFSSON CEA DSM IRFU SPhN and CNRS/IN2P3/ IPNO 16-VI G Ep /G Mp with 12 GeV at JLab 31 Two new experiments approved to run after the 12 GeV upgrade (to be completed end of 2013). Whether they should run depends again on Dubna calibration to 7.5 GeV/c (12.5 GeV 2 ).

Egle TOMASI-GUSTAFSSON CEA DSM IRFU SPhN and CNRS/IN2P3/ IPNO 16-VI Two-Photon exchange 1  -2  interference is of the order of  =e 2 /4p=1/137 (in usual calculations of radiative corrections, one photon is ‘hard’ and one is ‘soft’) The 2  amplitude is expected to be mostly imaginary. The 1  -2  interference is more important in time- like region, as the Born amplitude is complex In the 70’s it was shown [ J. Gunion and L. Stodolsky, V. Franco, F.M. Lev, V.N. Boitsov, L. Kondratyuk and V.B. Kopeliovich, R. Blankenbecker…] that, at large momentum transfer, due to the sharp decrease of the FFs, if the momentum is shared between the two photons, the 2  - contribution can become very large.

Egle TOMASI-GUSTAFSSON CEA DSM IRFU SPhN and CNRS/IN2P3/ IPNO 16-VI Two Photon exchange

Egle TOMASI-GUSTAFSSON CEA DSM IRFU SPhN and CNRS/IN2P3/ IPNO 16-VI Fitting the angular distributions.. E. T-G. and M. P. Rekalo, Phys. Lett. B 504, 291 (2001) Cross section at 90 0 Angular asymmetry The form of the differential cross section: is equivalent to:

Egle TOMASI-GUSTAFSSON CEA DSM IRFU SPhN and CNRS/IN2P3/ IPNO 16-VI Mpp= A=0.01±0.02 Mpp=2.4-3 E. T.-G., E.A. Kuraev, S. Bakmaev, S. Pacetti, Phys. Lett. B (2008)

Egle TOMASI-GUSTAFSSON CEA DSM IRFU SPhN and CNRS/IN2P3/ IPNO 16-VI Simulations Approximations: Neglect contributions to GE,GM Consider only real part Main effect: odd cos  - distribution q 2 =5.4,8.2,13.8 GeV 2

Egle TOMASI-GUSTAFSSON CEA DSM IRFU SPhN and CNRS/IN2P3/ IPNO 16-VI    0.2 11 q 2 =5.4 GeV 2 N=a 0 +a 2 cos  sin 2  +a 1 cos 2 , a 2 ~2 

Egle TOMASI-GUSTAFSSON CEA DSM IRFU SPhN and CNRS/IN2P3/ IPNO 16-VI Two photon exchange The calculation of the box amplitude requires the description of intermediate nucleon excitation and of their FFs at any Q 2 Different calculations give quantitatively different results Theory not enough constrained! Model independent statements

Egle TOMASI-GUSTAFSSON CEA DSM IRFU SPhN and CNRS/IN2P3/ IPNO 16-VI {g1{g 1  -2  interference { 22 11 { M. P. Rekalo, E. T.-G. and D. Prout, Phys. Rev. C60, (1999)

Egle TOMASI-GUSTAFSSON CEA DSM IRFU SPhN and CNRS/IN2P3/ IPNO 16-VI Unpolarized cross section Induces four new terms Odd function of  Does not contribute at  =90° Two Photon Exchange:

Egle TOMASI-GUSTAFSSON CEA DSM IRFU SPhN and CNRS/IN2P3/ IPNO 16-VI Properties of the TPE amplitudes with respect to the transformation: cos  = - cos  i.e.,    -  (equivalent to non-linearity in Rosenbluth fit) Based on these properties one can remove or single out TPE contribution Symmetry relations E. T.-G., G. Gakh, NPA (2007)

Egle TOMASI-GUSTAFSSON CEA DSM IRFU SPhN and CNRS/IN2P3/ IPNO 16-VI Differential cross section at complementary angles: Symmetry relations The DIFFERENCE enhances the 2  contribution: The SUM cancels the 2  contribution:

Egle TOMASI-GUSTAFSSON CEA DSM IRFU SPhN and CNRS/IN2P3/ IPNO 16-VI Is there any experimental evidence of two photon exchange? (real part) NO

Egle TOMASI-GUSTAFSSON CEA DSM IRFU SPhN and CNRS/IN2P3/ IPNO 16-VI

Egle TOMASI-GUSTAFSSON CEA DSM IRFU SPhN and CNRS/IN2P3/ IPNO 16-VI From the data: deviation from linearity << 1%! Parametrization of 2  -contribution for e+p E. T.-G., G. Gakh, Phys. Rev. C 72, (2005)

Egle TOMASI-GUSTAFSSON CEA DSM IRFU SPhN and CNRS/IN2P3/ IPNO 16-VI Linear fit to e+ 4 He scattering

Egle TOMASI-GUSTAFSSON CEA DSM IRFU SPhN and CNRS/IN2P3/ IPNO 16-VI γ -Gamma Models and Data 47 The inclusion of hard 2γ exchange: Chen et al (2003) with GPDs, Blunden et al (2003) in hadronic model 12/7/2015 Expt. Jlab measured Ratio PL/PT for Q 2 =2.49 GeV 2 at 3 values of ε PRELIMINARY C. Perdrisat,L. Pentchev NO ε-dependence at 0.01 level NO evidence of 2  contribution Bystriskyi et al., LSF PR C75, (2007)

Egle TOMASI-GUSTAFSSON CEA DSM IRFU SPhN and CNRS/IN2P3/ IPNO 16-VI Asymptotics