Partner (7) Faculdade de Ciências e Tecnologia Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Portugal Scientific team: Profª Ana Luisa Fernando Prof. Santos Oliveira Profª.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
WALT: Know the months of the year poem. Answer questions about the months.
Advertisements

Results showed in Figure 1 indicated that WE mean for grain pearl millet was higher 84% than corn and 22% than sorghum for the highland location. WE mean.
Determine seeding rate and hybrid effects on: Phenotypical and physiological plant measurements Canopy and leaf sensor measurements A goal in precision.
Optimizing Crop Management Practices with DSSAT. Our Goal With increasing population and climate change, the ability to maximize crop production is essential.
Yield, Protein, and Quality Response to Planting Date, Variety, and Late N. B.D. Brown. University of Idaho. Introduction Higher market prices for the.
Environmental conditions Maximum (ºC) Minimum (ºC) Rainfall (mm) 2014 June July August June
Effect of defoliation on growth and fruit production of Brazilian pepper tree, Schinus terebinthifolius Raddi (Anacardiaceae) Lucinda W. Treadwell and.
California experiment bins Left: August 16 – 1 st bin. 46 cm depth on right. Right: September 10 harvest date – 61 cm depth on left. Introduction: Some.
Chubaka Producciones Presenta :.
GM versus LAM: one case of deep convection (27 August 2001) Manuel João Lopes; Margarida Belo Pereira; Pedro Miranda Instituto de Meteorologia Faculdade.
Module X: Soil Moisture Relationships and Irrigation Lesson 2: Irrigation in Chili Pepper Cultivation After completing this lesson, you have learned to.
INFLUENCES OF IRRIGATION AND N FERTILIZATION ON MAIZE (Zea mays L.) PROPERTIES - Hrvoje PLAVSIC1 - Marko JOSIPOVIC1 - Luka ANDRIC1 - Antun JAMBROVIC1 -
2012 JANUARY Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
Mladen Todorovic & Rossella Albrizio (CIHEAM-IAMB, Italy) Ljubomir Zivotic (Institute for Water Management “Jaroslav Cerni”, Belgrade, Serbia) Deficit.
What is your Objective? THE PROBLEM  Curiosity???????? ???????? Observation is a key element here!!!
5.4 Sorghum Agronomy in Ethiopia
Due to (1) the impact of N on plant production, its economical and environmental impact, (2) the scale of energy needed to face worldwide demand, (3) the.
FOOD A G R I C U L T U R E E N V I R O N N M E N T BIOKENAF – QLK5-CT th technical meeting Madrid, September 2006 X. Nuttens, S. Cadoux.
3rd June, 2011 EFFECTS OF PICKING COWPEA LEAVES ON WEED CONTROL
Scaling up Crop Model Simulations to Districts for Use in Integrated Assessments: Case Study of Anantapur District in India K. J. Boote, Univ. of Florida.
FOOD A G R I C U L T U R E E N V I R O N N M E N T BIOKENAF – QLK5-CT final meeting ATHENS, February 2007.
1 In field Rainwater Harvesting for Improved Maize Production (Synthesis Results – Lessons & Challenges) By Mário Chilundo & Paiva Munguambe UEM-FAEF Final.
WP2. Adaptability and Productivity Field Trials Results from the fourth growing period and comparison of the results recorded from the years 2003, 2004.
Experiments conducted by RICEMAPP
AGRICULTURAL UNIVERSITY OF ATHENS DEPARTMENT OF CROP SCIENCE LABORATORY OF AGRONOMY Effect of deficit irrigation practice on the weed flora in a corn crop.
Mandana Tayefe, Ebrahim Amiri, and Azin Nasrollah Zade
Virtual Academy for the Semi Arid Tropics Course on Insect Pests of Groundnut Module 8: Seeds and Sowing After completing this lesson, you have learned.
WORD JUMBLE. Months of the year Word in jumbled form e r r f b u y a Word in jumbled form e r r f b u y a february Click for the answer Next Question.
Presented By Md. Towhidul Islam and M. A. Sattar Department of Environmental Science Bangladesh Agricultural University Mymensingh-2202, Bangladesh IMPACTS.
DATE POWER 2 INCOME JANUARY 100member X 25.00P2, FEBRUARY 200member X 25.00P5, MARCH 400member X 25.00P10, APRIL 800member.
NITROGEN FERTIGATION OF SUBSURFACE DRIP IRRIGATED BERMUDAGRASS M.A. Maurer* 1, J.A. Moken 2 and J.L. Young 1 1 Department of Agriculture, Stephen F. Austin.
Some Aspects of the. Environmental Impact Assessment and
Odile Huchette, research engineer Christèle Bellamy, research technician Didier Perrin and Eric Vade, research assistants G&H February 2003, Liverpool.
Figure 3. Concentration of NO3 N in soil water at 1.5 m depth. Evaluation of Best Management Practices on N Dynamics for a North China Plain C. Hu 1, J.A.
Effect of Compaction of Soil Surface to Increase Herbicide Effect in Upland Rice Cultivation By THAN TOE DEPUTY SUPERVISOR MYANMAR AGRICULTURE SERVICE.
After completing this Lesson, you have learned to answer: 1.Describe the practiced systems of pearl millet sowing? 2.Which system of pearl millet sowing.
After completing this Lesson, you have learned to answer: 1.Why pearl millet yields are often low when grown under rainfed conditions? 2.How irrigation.
After successful completion of this Lesson, you have learned to answer: 1.Why sorghum yields are often low when grown under rainfed conditions? 2.How irrigation.
INSTITUTO NACIONAL DE INVESTIGACIÓN Y TECNOLOGÍA AGRARIA Y ALIMENTARIA (INIA) DPTO. MEDIO AMBIENTE ALCALA DE HENARES, MADRID, SPAIN Madrid, September 2006.
Level II Agricultural Business Operations.  Understand and identify the key crop production targets  Be able to state performance targets for individual.
Opener Imagine that all the birds around the school are dying. How might you investigate the problem? Write a brief description of your investigation.
2011 Calendar Important Dates/Events/Homework. SunSatFriThursWedTuesMon January
Repeated undersowing of clover in organic cereal production. Nutrient dynamics and sustainability. Anne-Kristin Løes, Bioforsk Organic Food and Farming.
Ivona Sigurnjak, C. Vaneeckhaute, E. Michels, B. Ryckaert,
Practical solutions for professional farming Members Winter Conference Wednesday 12th January 2011.
Dr. Joe T. Ritchie Symposium : Evaluation of Rice Model in Taiwan Authors : Tien-Yin Chou Hui-Yen Chen Institution : GIS Research Center, Feng Chia University,
Some Aspects of the Environmental Impact Assessment of Kenaf production Ana Luísa Fernando Faculdade de Ciências e Tecnologia Universidade Nova de Lisboa.
July 2007 SundayMondayTuesdayWednesdayThursdayFridaySaturday
EcoBug D5.2. 3) WP2. Task Field trials with cyanobacteria added experimental EcoBug pellets: their effect to the egg laying of the cabbage root fly.
Adare, Co. Limerick. Ireland. Tel: Web:
Prof. DSc Eng. Zornitsa Popova, Assist. Prof. Dr Eng. Maria Ivanova
Mabeka, s., Svotwa, e. and katsaruware, R. d.
Technical Itinerary of Colza
QUALITY OF TOMATO SEEDLING IN APPLICATION BIOPRODUCTS
Results and Discussions
Dhurba Neupane1, Juan Solomon2 and Jay Davison3
Fertilizer Decisions Trial Nutrient Responses
Turn in WEBQUEST RIGHT NOW on front table
E.V. Lukina, K.W. Freeman,K.J. Wynn, W.E. Thomason, G.V. Johnson,
McDonald’s Kalender 2009.
McDonald’s Kalender 2009.
McDonald’s Kalender 2009.
Scientific Method.
Methods of Determining Canopy Closure in Winter Wheat
McDonald’s calendar 2007.
Overview Exercise 1: Types of information Exercise 2: Seasonality
McDonald’s calendar 2007.
Moisture Situation Update
2015 January February March April May June July August September
Presentation transcript:

Partner (7) Faculdade de Ciências e Tecnologia Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Portugal Scientific team: Profª Ana Luisa Fernando Prof. Santos Oliveira Profª Benilde MendesEngª Ana Catroga Drª Maria Paula Duarte Drª Gorete Serras Eng. João Morais Dr Nuno Lobato WP2 Adaptability and Productivity Field Trials

B Experimental fields Located in Monte de Caparica, in the Peninsula of Setúbal, near the University - near Lisbon, in the south border of river Tejo Latitude:38º 40´ N Longitude:9º W Altitude:50 m Urban area near the Atlantic coast and the estuarine zone Fields

Task 2.2 – Effect of different sowing dates and plant populations on biomass yields Major conclusions from

sowing dates x 2 varieties x 2 plant densities x 3 replicates S 1 : 26/6/2003 S 2 : 11/7/2003 S 3 : 12/7/2004 S 4 : 02/8/2004 S 5 : 04/5/2005 S 6 : 15/6/2005 V 1 : Tainung 2 V 2 : Everglades 41 D 1 : 20 plants/m 2 D 2 : 40 plants/m 2 Each field: 8 x 4 m 2 75 kg N/ha 120 kg K 2 O/ha 60 kg P 2 O 5 /ha

Sowing dates Best sowing date: Beggining of May

Sowing dates Best sowing date: Beggining of May Productivity vs sowing date: After 15th June productivities could be lower than 10t/ha Is this profitable? Question: What about sowing on the 15th April?

Varieties Everglades 41 presented always best results Althought differences were never statistically significative

Plant populations No significative differences But fields with 40 seeds/m2 more productive than with 20 seeds/m2

Harvest dates No significative differences, between October and January harvests (in terms of productivity) Are there differences in quality? October harvest is better?

Task 2.3 – Effect of irrigation and nitrogen fertilization on biomass yields Major conclusions from And results from 2007

4 irrigation levels x 3 nitrogen fertilization x 3 replicates I 1 : 0% PET I 2 : 25% PET I 3 : 50% PET I 4 : 100% PET N 1 : 0 kg N/ha N 2 : 75 kg N/ha N 3 : 150 kg N/ha Varieties: Tainung 2 ( ) Everglades 41 (2006) Each field: 8 x 5 m kg K 2 O/ha 60 kg P 2 O 5 /ha At early stages of growth, all the fields were fully irrigated in order to compensate the water deficit of the soil (plants with 20 cm height) 41 days after sowing (2003) 40 days after sowing (2004) 40 days after sowing (2005) 52 days after sowing (2006) Sowing: 04/07/ /07/ /05/ /5/ plants/m 2

2006 No significant difficulties were observed during this 4th period of work. Due to the fact that the fields were sowed earlier than in the first two years, also contributed to the good results obtained in this reporting period. Part of the problems experienced in the two first years, namely the intrusion of animals in the field, was clearly eliminated. Some goats invaded the fields in the end of August (only during one day). No damage was done in the fields except that they liked the leaves of the plants. Tainung 2 better tham Everglades 41.

Climatic conditions at Monte de Caparica 2006 Temperatures: slightly higher than normal values (1,1 tmin- 1,5ºC tmáx) Precipitation, lower than normal values is being a dry year, exceptions in March and June

Growth stages Physiological maturity > 50% Not yet (26th September) Half-bloom > 50% 65 ± 5 % Total emergence of seeds 5 ± 2 days after sowing Emergence 50% Not yet (26th September)

Sowing dates Best sowing date: May Question: Will be a difference between sowing at 24th May (2005) and 4th May (2006)? May be we can’t answer, because 24th May sowing was with Tainung 2 and 4th May sowing was with Everglades 41

Irrigation levels 2005, major quantity of water used, but a larger period of irrigation 2003 – 4th July – 30th September 2004 – 19th July – 30th September 2005 – 24th May – 30th September mm H20

Irrigation levels Significant differences among irrigation levels, I 0 <<< I 25 < I 50 < I 100

Comparison between 2005 and 2006 Significant differences among irrigation levels, I 0 << I 25 = I 50 = I , better results for I 0 and I 25. I 50, equal results, I 100 lower height

Comparison between 2005 and 2006 Significant differences among irrigation levels, I 0 << I 25 = I 50 = I , better results for I 0, I 25 and I 50, I 100 equal diameter

Comparison between 2005 and 2006 Significant differences among irrigation levels, I 0 << I 25 = I 50 = I , better results (may be because it is Everglades 41!)

Comparison between 2005 and 2006 Significant differences among irrigation levels, I 0 << I 25 = I 50 = I , better results for I 0 and I 25. I 50, equal results, I 100 lower productivity

Nitrogen levels No differences among N-fertilization levels, althought N 150 presents higher productivities

No differences among N-fertilization levels, althought N 0 presents lower results Nitrogen levels, 2006 results

No differences among N-fertilization levels, althought N 0 < N 75 < N 150 (in terms of productivity) Nitrogen levels, 2006 results

Harvest dates No significative differences, between October and January harvests (in terms of productivity) Are there differences in quality? October harvest is better?