Utilitarianism Lecture 3: Utilitarianism and justice.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Libertarianism and the Philosophers Lecture 4
Advertisements

EM Winter Read for Friday  Chapter  Cases Eminent Domain Battling Over Bottled Water  Articles Isbister: Income distribution Maxwell:
2 H i g h e r E d u c a t i o n © Oxford University Press, All rights reserved. Chapter 3: Political theory: Social justice and the state Barr: Economics.
Lecture 6 John Rawls. Justifying government Question: How can the power of government be justified?
Chapter Three: Justice and Economic Distribution
Distribution. Why Does Distribution Matter?  Ethical and practical question  Follows from sustainable scale: How can we care about the well being of.
Justice as Fairness by John Rawls.
Module 10 The Role of Government The Canadian Welfare Society and Taxation.
John Rawls, Who? GETTING TO THE ASSIGNED ARTICLE: A THEORY OF JUSTICE (1971) HOW WERE PEOPLE THINKG ABOUT ETHICS AND JUSTICE? – Utilitarian.
POVERTY AND THE DISTRIBTUION OF INCOME INTRODUCTORY LECTURE.
Unit VIII Income Inequality. In this chapter, look for the answers to these questions:  How much inequality and poverty exist in our society?  What.
Rawls John Rawls ( ): A Theory of Justice (Harvard UP, 1971) -and other books, notably Political Liberalism (1990) -and Justice as Fairness Restated.
January 20, Liberalism 2. Social Contract Theory 3. Utilitarianism and Intuitionism 4. Justice as Fairness – general conception 5. Principles.
Class 11 Slides Shifting From Efficient Allocation to Fair Distribution of Resources If Suppliers Are More Than Passive Actors in the Markets for Health.
Why does inequality matter? The effects of a corrosive force.
Econ4620 Alexander W. Cappelen
Income inequality and poverty Chapter 20 Copyright © 2004 by South-Western,a division of Thomson Learning.
Public Policy Second lecture. Human rights In comerison with middle ages, the modern age, inspired by the enlightenment and liberalism, marked a fundamental.
Chapter One: Moral Reasons
INCOME REDISTRIBUTION: CONCEPTUAL ISSUES
Redistribution, Efficiency, Fairness 1. Consider a Possibility Frontier Most government action we have thought about is getting you from inside the frontier.
Utilitarianism. Our Everyday Ethical Choices Consider the last ethical choice you had to make in the most general terms, what were you thinking about?
Utilitarianism Michael Lacewing
CHAPTER 12 Income Redistribution: Conceptual Issues Copyright © 2010 by the McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin.
Social Changes Industrial Revolution completely changed people’s lives. Average workday – hours per day. Average work week – 6 days. Wages: –Men.
Chapter 16 Challenge To Market Effectiveness 6: Inequality McGraw-Hill/IrwinCopyright © 2009 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Wellbeing and Democracy Derek Bell Newcastle University.
Contractualism and justice (1) Introduction to Rawls’s theory.
Utilitarianism is a kind of consequentialism
SOME REMARKS ON BENTHAM’S UTILITARIAN ETHICS Marco E.L. Guidi Università di Pisa Dipartimento di Scienze Economiche.
18 CHAPTER Taxation and Redistribution PUBLIC SECTOR ECONOMICS: The Role of Government in the American Economy Randall Holcombe.
LIBERTY, EQUALITY AND JUSTICE GONDA YUMITRO. LIBERTY Liberty is the ultimate moral ideal. Individuals have rights to life, liberty, and property that.
CONNECTING WORLDS Inequalities in rights. What is the Welfare State? Why is its maintenance at risk? It is a concept of government in which the state.
Philosophy 360: Business Ethics Chapter 3. Consequentialism: Is part of a theory about what makes certain actions right or wrong. In a nutshell: Actions.
06 Fairness and Distributive Justice Figures and tables.
Redistributing Income in Theory
Class 12 slides: Equity and Redistribution following Rawls Other conceptions of Welfare (151) Alternative Concepts of Utility (154) Cash versus In-kind.
Arguments against the Market  Engels complains that free market is completely wasteful.  This is also a utilitarian argument. It leads crisis after crisis.
Justice and Economic Distribution
CHAPTER 12 Income Redistribution: Conceptual Issues Copyright © 2010 by the McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin.
American Free Enterprise Economics Chapter 3. Basic Principles of Free Enterprise Chapter 3: Section 1.
Part Six: Public Policy “Justice is itself the great standing policy of civil society; and any eminent departure from it, under any circumstances, lies.
American Free Enterprise: The Benefits of Free Enterprise.
Three Modern Approaches. Introduction Rawls, Nozick, and MacIntyre Rawls, Nozick, and MacIntyre Have significant new approaches Have significant new approaches.
Farid Abolhassani Equity 12. Learning Objectives After working through this chapter, you will be able to: Describe the relationship between equality and.
Utilitarianism: objections Michael Lacewing
Core Democratic Values By: Carolyn && Laila :). Life Life basically means that each person has the right to live.
QUIZ FOUR The Consumer Theory. 1.According to the principle of diminishing marginal utility: A. The more of a good a consumer consumes the lower her total.
DORAL ACADEMY MRS. ORTEGA LAW STUDIES JUSTICE PROFESSOR SANDEL’S HARVARD LECTURES.
WEEK 2 Justice as Fairness. A Theory of Justice (1971) Political Liberalism (1993)
Chapter 1 Introduction: The Citizen and Government.
American Political Culture
INCOME REDISTRIBUTION
Basic Principles of Justice in the Just Society
Political theory and law
Fairer Scotland – Background
Civic Participation in a Democracy
Rawls’ Theory of Justice
Ethical Theories Ethical Theories Unit 5.
MODULE 3 By: Chris Martinez.
Module 3 (Adamczak) Theories of Justice.
EQUALITY JYOTI Assistant Professor Department of Political Science
INCOME REDISTRIBUTION: CONCEPTUAL ISSUES
CORE DEMOCRATIC VALUES
Right Vs Left Wing LO: Understand the difference between Right Wing and Left Wing political views.
Civic Participation in a Democracy
Copyright © 2005 Pearson Education Canada Inc.
Professional Ethics (GEN301/PHI200) UNIT 3: JUSTICE AND ECONOMIC DISTRIBUTION Handout #3 CLO#3 Evaluate the relation between justice, ethics and economic.
Income and wealth Is efficiency, specialisation and trade benefitting everyone? If not who gains who loses?
Presentation transcript:

Utilitarianism Lecture 3: Utilitarianism and justice

Equal consideration of interests The principle: One unit of happiness has the same value, no matter whose it is. This is implicit in the requirement to maximize total happiness

Example

Other principles of equality Equality of well-being (welfare, utility) Equality of resources Rights of democratic equality

Equality of well-being This principle would require making everyone equally happy Utilitarianism doesn’t care how happy anyone already is It just looks at making the biggest increase in the total amount of happiness

Equality of well-being (cont) Utilitarianism says to increase the inequality of well-being in this example

Equality of resources Utilitarianism is not in principle committed to this--it depends on the circumstances Example: putting money where it will make the biggest difference might increase inequality of wealth Example: regressive taxation that increases average welfare These cases might be exceptional

Marginal utility The marginal utility of a resource to a person is the difference in that person’s well being an additional unit of the resource would make Principle of declining marginal utility: The marginal utility of a resource for a person declines as the amount of the resource increases This principle steers utilitarianism toward equality of resources

Incentives If equality of resources would make people less productive, then a utilitarian might support inequalities because of their effect on incentives

Rights of democratic equality Civil and political liberties Equality of opportunity