Simulation Of 2D Hg Jet Using Implicit LES Method Yan March. 20 th 2014 1.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Introduction to Computational Fluid Dynamics

Advertisements

On The Dynamics of Mercury Target Delivery and Dump By Foluso Ladeinde Stony Brook University Stony Brook, New York Muon Collider Design Workshop.

Results of 2D Hg Jet Simulation and Experimental Data Yan April 10 th

Spray G Modeling ECN 3.0 April 5 th, ECN 3: Spray G - Spray Modeling 2 April 4-5, 2014 Participating InstitutionAbbreviationResearcher(s) Argonne.

Nozzle Study Yan Zhan, Foluso Ladeinde April, 2011.

Youngwook Kang, Cornell University Andrei Simion, The Cooper Union

2D Free Jet Simulations (FLUENT)

MUTAC Review April 6-7, 2009, FNAL, Batavia, IL Mercury Jet Target Simulations Roman Samulyak, Wurigen Bo Applied Mathematics Department, Stony Brook University.

Who Wants to Be a CFD Expert? In the ME 566 course title, CFD for Engineering Design, what does the acronym CFD stand for? A.Car Free Day B.Cash Flow Diagram.

Pharos University ME 352 Fluid Mechanics II

3D Hg Jet Simulations Yan Zhan June 13, Outline Hg Jet Inlet Condition – Case1: Outlet of the pipe without a bend and a weld – Case2: Outlet of.

Fluid Mechanics 10.

POSTER TEMPLATE BY: Presentations.com POSTER TEMPLATE BY: Presentations.com Outlet Inlet n’=375 n=150 n φ =75 (dφ=1.2 ⁰ ) Extra Terms.

BNL Review - December 12, 2005 MERIT Experiment Window Study - Proton Beam Windows - Optical Windows N. Simos, PhD, PE Energy Sciences & Technology Department.

CE 230-Engineering Fluid Mechanics Lecture # BERNOULLI EQUATION.

Neutrino Factory Mercury Flow Loop V. Graves C. Caldwell IDS-NF Videoconference March 9, 2010.

Simulation of High-Intensity Roman Samulyak, Tongfei Guo

Mercury Jet Studies Tristan Davenne Rutherford Appleton Laboratory Joint UKNF, INO, UKIERI meeting 2008 University of Warwick, Physics Department 3-4 April.

Negative if into control volume Positive if out of control volume In simple unidirectional flow casesIn general Unit normal pointing out from control volume.

Formula sheet No explanation is made on purpose Do not assume that you need to use every formula In this test always assume that K entrance = 0.5, K exit.

Additional Calculations of the MERIT Mercury Jet Using the UCLA HIMAG Code Neil Morley and Manmeet Narula Fusion Science and Technology Group, UCLA

1 Optical Diagnostic Results of MERIT (Mercury Intense Target) Experiment at CERN H. Park, H. Kirk, T.Tsang, K. McDonald, F. Ladeinde NFMCC Meeting Fermilab,

CE1501 CE 150 Fluid Mechanics G.A. Kallio Dept. of Mechanical Engineering, Mechatronic Engineering & Manufacturing Technology California State University,

Preliminary Assessment of Porous Gas-Cooled and Thin- Liquid-Protected Divertors S. I. Abdel-Khalik, S. Shin, and M. Yoda ARIES Meeting, UCSD (March 2004)

Brookhaven Science Associates U.S. Department of Energy MUTAC Review March 16-17, 2006, FNAL, Batavia, IL Target Simulations Roman Samulyak Computational.

Forces Acting on a Control Volume Body forces: Act through the entire body of the control volume: gravity, electric, and magnetic forces. Surface forces:

Numerical Simulations for Jet-Proton Interaction Wurigen Bo, Roman Samulyak Department of Applied Mathematics and Statistics Stony Brook University (March.

Pipe Flow Considerations Flow conditions:  Laminar or turbulent: transition Reynolds number Re =  VD/  2,300. That is: Re 4,000 turbulent; 2,300

FE Hydraulics/Fluid Mechanics Review

Lecture Objectives: Review discretization methods for advection diffusion equation Accuracy Numerical Stability Unsteady-state CFD Explicit vs. Implicit.

Area of a Rectangle Mathematics for Grade … CCCC llll iiii cccc kkkk t t t t oooo s s s s tttt aaaa rrrr tttt EXIT.

BIEN 301 Individual Project Presentation

Introduction to COMSOL Travis Campbell Developed for CHE 331 – Fall 2012 Oregon State University School of Chemical, Biological and Environmental Engineering.

Simulation of Droplet Drawback in Inkjet Printing

Freestream Behavior of Water in Microgravity NASA Student Flight Reduced Gravity Opportunities Program Research Advisor: Dr. Eugene Ungar Student Lead:

1 Optical Diagnostic Results of MERIT Experiment and Post-Simulation H. Park, H. Kirk, K. McDonald Brookhaven National Laboratory Princeton University.

Neutrino Factory / Muon Collider Target Meeting Numerical Simulations for Jet-Proton Interaction Wurigen Bo, Roman Samulyak Department of Applied Mathematics.

2D Jet Simulation Updates Jan.23 rd 2014 Yan Zhan SUNY Stony Brook 1.

Example Problem A car is traveling on a dry road with a velocity of m/s. The driver slams on the brakes and skids to a halt with an acceleration.

Some slides on UCLA LM-MHD capabilities and Preliminary Incompressible LM Jet Simulations in Muon Collider Fields Neil Morley and Manmeet Narula Fusion.

Brookhaven Science Associates U.S. Department of Energy MERIT Project Review December 12, 2005, BNL, Upton NY MHD Studies of Mercury Jet Target Roman Samulyak.

1 NUMERICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL STUDIES OF THIN-LIQUID-FILM WALL PROTECTION SCHEMES S.I. ABDEL-KHALIK AND M. YODA G. W. Woodruff School of Mechanical Engineering.

Modelling Spray Impingement

Numerical Model of an Internal Pellet Target O. Bezshyyko *, K. Bezshyyko *, A. Dolinskii †,I. Kadenko *, R. Yermolenko *, V. Ziemann ¶ * Nuclear Physics.

Post Injection Process in Port Injection Systems P M V Subbarao Professor Mechanical Engineering Department Models Based Predictions of Multi-physics.

Potential Flow and Computational Fluid Dynamics Numerical Analysis C8.3 Saleh David Ramezani BIEN 301 February 14, 2007.

Boundary Layer Correction Air enters a two-dimensional wind tunnel as shown. Because of the presence of the boundary layer, fluid will be displaced away.

Simulation of High-Power Mercury Jet Targets for Neutrino Factory and Muon Collider R. Samulyak, 1,2 H.C. Chen, 1 H.G. Kirk, 2 K.T. McDonald 3 1 Stony.

1 February 07, 2008 Simulation Status of Mercury Jet Target HeeJin Park.

1 NFMCC Friday Meeting January 4, 2008 Optical Diagnostic Results of MERIT Experiment at CERN HeeJin Park.

Lecture Objectives: - Numerics. Finite Volume Method - Conservation of  for the finite volume w e w e l h n s P E W xx xx xx - Finite volume.

CFD Exercise 1 Laminar & turbulent flows with COMSOL.

Droplet Dynamics Multi-phase flow modelling Background D d = 0.001m,  d = 1000 kg/m 3,  d = kg/ms,  ad = N/m,  a = 1 kg/m 3,  a = 1 ×

From: Hydraulic Loss of Finite Length Dividing Junctions

Workshop 7 Tank Flushing

2D Free Jet Simulations (FLUENT)

2D Jet Simulation Testing

A Multiscale Approach to Mesh-based Surface Tension Flows

The inner flow analysis of the model

Model Validation Drop Collisions: Exp. vs. Sim.

CFD-Team Weekly Meeting - 8th March 2012

Mercury Catcher Status

Sunny Ri Li, Nasser Ashgriz

Chapter 7: Solid and Fluids

Calculate Area with grid lines no grid lines. Calculate Area with grid lines no grid lines.

E. Papanikolaou, D. Baraldi

Objective Reynolds Navier Stokes Equations (RANS) Numerical methods.

Calculate Area with grid lines no grid lines. Calculate Area with grid lines no grid lines.

On the Journey of Fuel Droplets in Ports – Phase 2

Example 3.E - Graf Assume a channel with uniform flow at a depth of 5.03 m. Channel is rectangular with a width of 9 m and average velocity of 12 m/s.

Presentation transcript:

Simulation Of 2D Hg Jet Using Implicit LES Method Yan March. 20 th

Problem Description 2 Sketch of the mercury free jet with MHD and energy deposition for the MERIT experiment

Numerical Calculation 3 (a)(b) Determination of the mesh size: Assume only primary breakup, the critical liquid Weber number is less than 10, then Δx < 0.89 μm. Then mesh grid number would be 2.444e+11 when mesh is uniform. The Side view of Hg Jet Flow Draft (a) In Dimension (b) Normalized By Jet Exit Diameter PhaseDensityViscositySurface Tension Air1.225 kg/m m 2 /s N/m Mercury13456 kg/m ×10 -7 m 2 /s Jet velocity = 20 m/s (fully developed), D h = m, Re Hg =

Numerical Calculation 4 Simplified Model For Preliminary Simulation Grid number for halved model is 1,976,968 (width = 172, length = 11,494, Δx ≈ 4.437e-5 m). One flow-through = s.

Results [click to watch movie] 0 < t < s 5