Quantum Mechanical Cross Sections In a practical scattering experiment the observables we have on hand are momenta, spins, masses, etc.. We do not directly.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Quantum One: Lecture 6. The Initial Value Problem for Free Particles, and the Emergence of Fourier Transforms.
Advertisements

The electromagnetic (EM) field serves as a model for particle fields
Integrals over Operators
Quantum One: Lecture 5a. Normalization Conditions for Free Particle Eigenstates.
Neutron Scattering Theory For Bio-Physicists Hem Moktan Department of Phycis Oklahoma State University.
Quantum One: Lecture 3. Implications of Schrödinger's Wave Mechanics for Conservative Systems.
Chapter (6) Introduction to Quantum Mechanics.  is a single valued function, continuous, and finite every where.
January 23, 2001Physics 8411 Elastic Scattering of Electrons by Nuclei We want to consider the elastic scattering of electrons by nuclei to see (i) how.
Particlesymbolrest energy in MeV electron e muon  neutral pion  charged pion   proton p neutron.
The electromagnetic (EM) field serves as a model for particle fields  = charge density, J = current density.
Quantum Description of Scattering
Higher Order Multipole Transition Effects in the Coulomb Dissociation Reactions of Halo Nuclei Dr. Rajesh Kharab Department of Physics, Kurukshetra University,
The Klein Gordon equation (1926) Scalar field (J=0) :
4. The Postulates of Quantum Mechanics 4A. Revisiting Representations
PHYS 3313 – Section 001 Lecture #17
Lecture 5: Electron Scattering, continued... 18/9/2003 1
Density Matrix Density Operator State of a system at time t:
Physics 452 Quantum mechanics II Winter 2011 Karine Chesnel.
Chang-Kui Duan, Institute of Modern Physics, CUPT 1 Harmonic oscillator and coherent states Reading materials: 1.Chapter 7 of Shankar’s PQM.
Nanostructures Research Group CENTER FOR SOLID STATE ELECTRONICS RESEARCH Time-Dependent Perturbation Theory David K. Ferry and Dragica Vasileska Arizona.
Cross section for potential scattering
Announcements Homework returned now 9/19 Switching to more lecture-style class starting today Good luck on me getting powerpoint lectures ready every day.
Ch 9 pages Lecture 22 – Harmonic oscillator.
Cross Sections One of the most important quantities we measure in nuclear physics is the cross section. Cross sections always have units of area and in.
P460 - dev. wave eqn.1 Developing Wave Equations Need wave equation and wave function for particles. Schrodinger, Klein-Gordon, Dirac not derived. Instead.
Ch ; Lecture 26 – Quantum description of absorption.
Lecture 16: Beta Decay Spectrum 29/10/2003 (and related processes...) Goals: understand the shape of the energy spectrum total decay rate sheds.
Wednesday, Oct. 17, 2012PHYS , Fall 2012 Dr. Jaehoon Yu 1 PHYS 3313 – Section 001 Lecture #13 Wednesday, Oct. 17, 2012 Dr. Jaehoon Yu Properties.
Scattering of particles - topic 1 - june 2007 Particle Scattering: –Differential cross section –Trajectories and currents –Mean free path Quantal Scattering:
Quantum Two 1. 2 Evolution of Many Particle Systems 3.
Monday, Sep. 20, 2010PHYS 3446, Fall 2010 Andrew Brandt 1 PHYS 3446 – Lecture #4 Monday, Sep Dr. Brandt 1.Differential Cross Section of Rutherford.
Physics 361 Principles of Modern Physics Lecture 11.
Physics 452 Quantum mechanics II Winter 2012 Karine Chesnel.
Oct 2006, Lectures 6&7 Nuclear Physics Lectures, Dr. Armin Reichold 1 Lectures 6 & 7 Cross Sections.
PHYS 3446 – Lecture #6 Monday, Sept. 15, 2008 Dr. Andrew Brandt
Introduction to Time dependent Time-independent methods: Kap. 7-lect2 Methods to obtain an approximate eigen energy, E and wave function: perturbation.
Phy 303: Classical Mechanics (2) Chapter 3 Lagrangian and Hamiltonian Mechanics.
Schrödinger’s Equation in a Central Potential Field
Lecture 6: Cross Section for Electron Scattering 23/9/2003 Recall from last time: where V n is the normalization volume for the plane wave electron.
MAGNETIZATION AND SPIN MAGNETIC MOMENTS Among macroscopic objects we find those which have a permanent magnetic field, even if there are no obvious macroscopic.
Monday, Jan. 31, 2005PHYS 3446, Spring 2005 Jae Yu 1 PHYS 3446 – Lecture #4 Monday, Jan. 31, 2005 Dr. Jae Yu 1.Lab Frame and Center of Mass Frame 2.Relativistic.
MODULE 13 Time-independent Perturbation Theory Let us suppose that we have a system of interest for which the Schrödinger equation is We know that we can.
Lecture 2 - Feynman Diagrams & Experimental Measurements
Particle properties/characteristics specifically their interactions are often interpreted in terms of CROSS SECTIONS.
Paul Vaandrager Supervisor: Prof S. Rakitianski 10 July 2012 A Study of Resonant- and Bound-State Dependence on the Variables of a Step-Potential for a.
Theory of Scattering Lecture 3. Free Particle: Energy, In Cartesian and spherical Coordinates. Wave function: (plane waves in Cartesian system) (spherical.
Quantum One.
Systems of Identical Particles
M. Sc Physics, 3rd Semester
From Lagrangian Density to Observable
Theory of Scattering Lecture 2.
Elastic Scattering in Electromagnetism
CHAPTER 5 The Schrodinger Eqn.
Quantum One.
4. The Postulates of Quantum Mechanics 4A. Revisiting Representations
Quantum One.
Quantum One.
Quantum One.
Quantum Two.
RELATIVISTIC EFFECTS.
Theory of Scattering Lecture 3.
Quantum Two Body Problem, Hydrogen Atom
The Stale of a System Is Completely Specified by lts Wave Function
Scattering Theory: Revised and corrected
Nuclear Reactions.
PHYS 3313 – Section 001 Lecture #19
Chapter 3 Modeling in the Time Domain
PHYS 3446 – Lecture #4 Monday, Sept. 11, 2006 Dr. Jae Yu
Examples of QED Processes
Quantum One.
Presentation transcript:

Quantum Mechanical Cross Sections In a practical scattering experiment the observables we have on hand are momenta, spins, masses, etc.. We do not directly measure the distances between the projectile and the target nucleus. pfpf pipi We start with an initial system of a target in state |A> and the projectile in momentum state |p i >. After the reaction the residual product is in state |B> and the outgoing fragment in momentum state | p f >. We call the initial state |a>=|Ap i > and the final state |b>=| Bp f >. We know from experience that interactions cause changes in momenta, and in general, all other changes a system may experience. In classical physics we call the Hamiltonian the generator of time evolution. This is a statement of dynamics. The same concept applies in quantum mechanics. The Hamiltonian, H, governs the time evolution of a quantum system. Equation (1) is the Schroedinger equation in ket notation. (1) 1

We define the time evolution operator U(t,t 0 ) such that a system evolves from some initial configuration, |a> to a final configuration |c> according to |c; t> = U(t,t 0 ) |a; t 0 >. U(t,t 0 ) is a function of the Hamiltonian. The relationship between U(t,t 0 ) and the Hamiltonian is worked out in books on quantum mechanics (ref. 1,2). We will assume that the target and projectile have some internal Hamiltonians H A and H p and that the target and projectile interact via an interaction V. The total Hamiltonian is H = H A + H p + V = H 0 + V. Where H 0 = H A + H p, is called the free Hamiltonian. We assume that V becomes negligibly small for large separations between the projectile and target. The total time evolution operator can be written as ( ref.2) U(t,t 0 ) = U 0 (t,t 0 ) U I (t,t 0 ). In this expression U 0 (t,t 0 ) is the time evolution operator derived from the free Hamiltonian and U I (t,t 0 ) depends on both H 0 and V. It is expressed in the integral equation 2

We assume that the free Hamiltonian is time independent. Then U 0 (t’,t 0 ) in equation (4) is the time evolution operator due to H 0. If the states |a> and |b> are eigenstates of H 0, then the time evolved states of |a> and |b> are The time evolved state |c; t> = U(t,t0) |a; t0> is given by ( ref. 2), Equation (6) tells us that at time t=-T/2 the system is initially in state |a>. At time T/2 the system has evolved into state |c;T/2> which consists of a sum of possible eigenstates |b;-T/2>, each weighted with an amplitude given by S ba, which is time dependent. If we let T/2 and –T/2 go to infinity, then S ba is called the “S – matrix”. The S-matrix must be properly normalized (See ref. 2 chapt. 3). Particle decay rates and cross sections can be calculated once the S-matrix is known. 3

From our discussion in lecture 2 we determined that the scattering rate is L L L We want to connect this derivation to a quantum calculation. The probability that the initial state a will make the transition to b is | S ba | 2. If N t is the number of targets in the box of sides L, and  p the number of projectiles which have traversed the box then the number of transitions from state a to b is : 4

In an actual calculation the S-matrix will contain terms that cancel the L 3 term in (7). In a non-relativistic calculation v = p/m, whereas for the relativistic case v = p/E. Examples of the differential cross section  are: Elastic scattering of a particle into a solid angle  Projectile scattering into a solid angle  and momentum bite  p. Cross section for 3 body final state, as in 3 He(e,e’p) 2 H, ( 2 bound nuclear states) 5

Multi-body final state where the electron and proton are detected, in 3 He(e,e’p)X, Examples of calculating the S-matrix ( ref. 2 chapter 3). We want to calculate since From eqn(6) 6

The states are assumed to be orthonormal so we get Substituting eqn (2) into eqn (8) yields Equation (9) implicitly includes the time evolution operator, so solutions to (9) are obtained through successive iterations, for example, If we substitute this expression into eqn (9) we obtain 7

Eqn (10) is the first approximation, or Born approximation, in the perturbation series expansion of the S-matrix. The expansion can be carried out to higher orders as can be seen. The second order term in the expansion is We will focus on the first term, equation (10), as an approximation for the S- matrix. 8

From equation (3) we obtain H I. Consider the case where the interaction V is time independent. Then the time integral only includes the exponential term. As we let T go to infinity the time integral becomes a delta function in energy. However, we will take the limit of T to infinity a bit later in the calculation. 9

Substituting (12) into (7) we get for the differential cross section, 10

We now take advantage of eqn in ref. 1, And we obtain for the cross section We see that conservation of energy automatically appears if the time interval T is long enough. We will use (13) to calculate the quantum mechanical cross section in the first approximation (Born approximation) of the S-matrix. Note that the matrix element is, 11

Cross section for potential scattering In a practical scattering situation we have a finite acceptance for a detector with a solid angle . There is a range of momenta which are allowed by kinematics which can contribute to the cross section. The cross section for scattering into  is then obtained as an integral over all the allowed momenta for that solid angle. In the case of potential scattering we will assume only elastic scattering is allowed. This means that there is a change in momentum between the incoming particle and outgoing particle. We are using periodic boundary conditions, or box normalization, ( see ref. 2) for which the incoming and outgoing states are plane wave states. The incoming wave |a> is 12

The outgoing state |b> is All possible outgoing states |b> which can be accepted by the solid angle must be included in the summation. We next substitute the matrix element into the above equation. This will be an integral over all relevant degrees of freedom needed to describe the states a and b. For a position dependent interaction and the plane waves above, the integration is over configuration space. 13

But we will consider only potentials diagonal ( local) in configuration space. Notice that the matrix element is proportional to the Fourier transform of the potential. 14 

In eqn (17) we note the sum over possible n values. The smallest change possible in n is dn = 1. We want to convert the sum in (17) into an integral over wave numbers. And from eqns (15) we realize that 15

We substitute (18) into (17) an obtain Note that in the delta function in (20) we have functions ( the energies) of the momenta k, whereas the variable of integration is k. We use the following property of functions of the delta function. In the case of potential scattering, or elastic scattering, the zeroes occur for k = k b = k a. The derivative of the energy with respect to the wave number k is 16

Integrating over k, the delta function selects the value k = k a which we will simply call k, the magnitude of the initial wave number. Thus, We are now in a position to evaluate the differential elastic cross section using eqn (21) for any potential V. We will need to find the Fourier transform of the potential as a function of q. 17

(1) “Modern Quantum Mechanics – Revised Edition”, J. J. Sakurai, Addison-Wesley, 1994 (2) “Relativistic Quantum Mechanics and Field Theory”, Franz Gross, John Wiley & Sons,