Lecture 21 – The Geoid 2 April 2009 GISC-3325.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
A Comparison of topographic effect by Newton’s integral and high degree spherical harmonic expansion – Preliminary Results YM Wang, S. Holmes, J Saleh,
Advertisements

Lecture 5 – Earth’s Gravity Field GISC Schedule for next two weeks You are responsible for material in Chapters 1-4 in text as well as all lectures.
Tidal and Geodetic Vertical Datums State Geodetic Advisor, NGS National Ocean Service, NOAA Sacramento, CA October, 2005 Workshop.
Lecture 15 – Geodetic Datums 23 February 2010 GISC3325.
Tidal Datums Text and Figures Source: NOAA/NOS CO-OPS Tidal Datums related publications.
Class 25: Even More Corrections and Survey Networks Project Planning 21 April 2008.
National report of LITHUANIA THE 4th BALTIC SURVEYORS FORUM, 2013, Ventspils, LATVIA Eimuntas Parseliunas Geodetic Institute of Vilnius Technical University.
OPUS-Database: Supplemental Data for Better Datum Conversion Models D.R. Roman and N.D. Weston F.I.G. Working Week Session TS04A: National Geodesy I Marrakech,
The Four Candidate Earth Explorer Core Missions Consultative Workshop October 1999, Granada, Spain, Revised by CCT GOCE S 43 Science and.
An example of gravimetric geoid computation: The Iberian Gravimetric Geoid of 2005.
Better Positions and Improved Access to the National Spatial Reference System  Multi-Year CORS Solution  National Adjustment of 2011  New NGS Datasheet.
Refinements to the North American Datum of 1983 Multi-Year CORS Solution and the National Adjustment of 2011 Dr. Neil D. Weston Chief, Spatial Reference.
Geographic Datums Y X Z The National Imagery and Mapping Agency (NIMA) and the Defense Mapping School Reviewed by:____________ Date:_________ Objective:
Vertical Datums and Heights
NOAA’s National Geodetic Survey USGG2009 & GEOID09: New geoid height models for surveying/GIS ACSM-MARLS-UCLS-WFPS Conference FEB 2009 Salt Lake.
Geoid Surfaces and Theory Session B of Datums, Heights and Geodesy Presented by Daniel R. Roman, Ph.D. Of the National Geodetic Survey.
0/27 Merriam-Webster: a branch of applied mathematics concerned with the determination of the size and shape of the earth and the exact positions of points.
Use of G99SSS to evaluate the static gravity geopotential derived from the GRACE, CHAMP, and GOCE missions Daniel R. Roman and Dru A. Smith Session: GP52A-02Decade.
Modern Navigation Thomas Herring MW 10:30-12:00 Room
A New & Improved National Spatial Reference System Refinements of the North American Datum of 1983 through the Multi-Year CORS Solution and the National.
Model of the theoretical gravity Normal gravity Elevation effect The effect of material beneath the station - the plate effect Topographic or terrain effect.
Geography 370 Locating Positions on the Earth
1 Assessment of Geoid Models off Western Australia Using In-Situ Measurements X. Deng School of Engineering, The University of Newcastle, Australia R.
Geoid Modeling at NOAA Dru A. Smith, Ph.D. National Geodetic Survey National Ocean Service, NOAA November 13, 2000.
Outline  Construction of gravity and magnetic models  Principle of superposition (mentioned on week 1 )  Anomalies  Reference models  Geoid  Figure.
Leveling Chapter 4. Why do we perform leveling surveys? To determine the topography of sites for design projects Set grades and elevations for construction.
Geoid Height Models at NGS Dan Roman Research Geodesist.
Integrated and Collaborative Organizations Create Geospatial Solutions Geospatial Solutions by DBZ Achieving Great Heights: Toward a Better Vertical Reference.
Lecture 7 – More Gravity and GPS Processing GISC February 2009.
Height Modernization Making the Most of the Indiana HARN and the INDOT CORS March 14, 2007 By William A. Schmidt, PE, LS Manager of Aerial Engineering,
Lecture 18: Vertical Datums and a little Linear Regression GISC March 2009 For Geoid96.
Improved Hybrid Geoid Modeling and the FY 2000 Geoid Models Dr. Daniel R. Roman January 16, : :30 Conference Room 9836.
B ≥ 4 H & V, KNOWN & TRUSTED POINTS? B LOCALIZATION RESIDUALS-OUTLIERS? B DO ANY PASSIVE MARKS NEED TO BE HELD? RT BASE WITHIN CALIBRATION (QUALITY TIE.
20 FEB 2009 Salt Lake City, UTACSM-MARLS-UCLS-WFPS Conference 2009 Geoid Modeling, GRAV-D and Height Mod.
Integration of Future Geoid Models Dan Roman and Yan M. Wang NOAA/NGS Silver Spring, MD USA December 3-4, 2008.
The National Geodetic Survey Gravity Program Benefits and Opportunities Juliana Blackwell, Director National Geodetic Survey (NGS)
Upcoming Changes to the National Spatial Reference System
Representing the Earth
Evaluating Aircraft Positioning Methods for Airborne Gravimetry: Results from GRAV-D’s “Kinematic GPS Processing Challenge” Theresa M. Damiani, Andria.
GRAV-D Part II : Examining airborne gravity processing assumptions with an aim towards producing a better gravimetric geoid Theresa Diehl*, Sandra Preaux,
Improved Covariance Modeling of Gravimetric, GPS, and Leveling Data in High-Resolution Hybrid Geoids Daniel R. Roman, Ph.D. Research Geodesist.
Data Requirements for a 1-cm Accurate Geoid
Establishing A Gravity Plan Ohio Department of Transportation October 14, 2011.
NATIONAL READJUSTMENT WHAT WHY HOW WHEN NAD83(NSRS)
Shape of the Earth, Geoid, Global Positioning System, Map Coordinate Systems, and Datums Or how you can impress your friend on a hike D. Ravat University.
OUTLINE:  definition and history  three major models  how are reference shapes used  geodetic systems G EODESY.
A Brief Introduction to Gravity UT Intro to Geophysics Class March 10, 2009 Austin-Bergstrom Airport Theresa Diehl, Ph.D. Research Geodesist NOAA National.
Revolution in Earth Measurement Traditional Surveying uses benchmarks as reference points Global Positioning uses fixed GPS receivers as reference points.
The Height Modernization Program in the United States and the Future of the National Vertical Reference Frame 1 Renee Shields National Geodetic Survey,
AUSGeoid Richard Bean Robyn Stevens 26 May Geoid 3D surface of equal gravity (Equipotential) Not smooth like an ellipsoid Transformation needed.
International Symposium on Gravity, Geoid and Height Systems GGHS 2012, Venice, Italy 1 GOCE data for local geoid enhancement Matija Herceg Per Knudsen.
Catherine LeCocq SLAC USPAS, Cornell University Large Scale Metrology of Accelerators June 27 - July 1, 2005 Height Systems 1 Summary of Last Presentation.
Lecture 7 – Gravity and Related Issues GISC February 2008.
SIO 226: Introduction to Marine Geophysics Gravity
A comparison of different geoid computation procedures in the US Rocky Mountains YM Wang 1, H Denker 2, J Saleh 3, XP Li 3, DR Roman 1, D Smith 1 1 National.
GEOID03 in Louisiana and Alaska Dr. Yan M Wang and Dr. Daniel R Roman Geodesist, NGS/NOAA ACSM Annual Conference and Technology Exhibition Orlando, FL.
Investigation of the use of deflections of vertical measured by DIADEM camera in the GSVS11 Survey YM Wang 1, X Li 2, S Holmes 3, DR Roman 1, DA Smith.
Lecture 15 – Geodetic Datums 5 March 2009 GISC3325.
Improving Regional Geoid by optimal Combination of GRACE Gravity Model and Surface Gravity Data YM Wang, DR Roman and J Saleh National Geodetic Survey.
ESA Living Planet Symposium 28 June - 2 July 2010, Bergen, Norway A. Albertella, R. Rummel, R. Savcenko, W. Bosch, T. Janjic, J.Schroeter, T. Gruber, J.
Nic Donnelly – Geodetic Data Analyst 5 March 2008 Vertical Datum Issues in New Zealand.
Geodetic Control and Datums Where is it? How Accurately can we map it?
The Global Positioning System Rebecca C. Smyth April 17 - May 2, 2001.
GRAVITY.
Improvements to the Geoid Models
Vertical datum unification on Iberia and Macaronesian islands with a local gravimetric geoid. First results J. Catalão(1), M. Sevilla(2) 1) University.
GISC3325-Geodetic Science 20 January 2009
Lecture 17: Geodetic Datums and a little Linear Regression
Geoid Enhancement in the Gulf Coast Region
Outline Construction of gravity and magnetic models Reference models
Presentation transcript:

Lecture 21 – The Geoid 2 April 2009 GISC-3325

Class Update Read Chapter 10 of text. Deadline for Reading Assignments (2) is 16 April 2009. Good set of definitions are available at: http://www.geod.nrcan.gc.ca/hm/gloss_e.php#qg Good article on latest U.S. geoid model http://www.ngs.noaa.gov/GEOID/USGG2009/tech.html

Geoid The equipotential surface of the Earth's gravity field which best fits, in a least squares sense, global mean sea level. Dependent upon the irregular distribution of masses of the Earth. It is the surface to which heights refer. There are two “implementations” of geoid modeling: gravimetric and hybrid.

Geoid Model and Horizontal Datum NAD 83 Earth-centered (geocentric) ellipsoid. GRS-80. Heights determined by GPS are computed with respect to it. NAD 27 Fitted to the reference ellipsoid. NOT geocentric. No geoid model associated with NAD 27.

NAVD 88 Based on a minimum-constraint adjustment of Canadian-Mexican-U.S. leveling observations. The height of the primary tidal benchmark at Father Point/Rimouski, Quebec, Canada, was held fixed as the constraint. This constraint satisfies the requirements of shifting the datum vertically to minimize the impact of NAVD 88 on U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) mapping products

NAVD 88 datum + global geopotential A “recent” study by Rapp (1996) compares ITRF93 GPS positions and a global geopotential model against the NAVD 88 vertical datum. Rapp found a mean offset for the NAVD88 datum of -27 cm when computed with a set of 397 GPS points. In sense that NAVD 88 is beneath global geoid model.

Marine Geoid Height of the sea surface caused by both gravity and the active ocean circulation. Topex/Poseidon launched 1992.

SST Equations a = c*(delta_t / 2) h = N + Hbar + a “a” distance from satellite to sea surface “C” is speed of light (electromagnetic energy) “delta_t” is roundtrip time of signal h = N + Hbar + a “h” ellipsoid height “N” is geoid height “Hbar” is difference between mean instantaneous sea level and geoid “a” height observation from satellite

Sea Surface Topography SST SST: Deviation of the mean sea surface from the geoid. Differs from geoid by 1-2 meters due to Salinity difference Large-scale differences in atmospheric pressure Strong ocean currents Use of SST yields precision of ~ 2 meters.

Gravity Datums Potsdam Gravity Reference System 1909 Standard until IGSN adopted (60 years) +/- 3 milliGals International Gravity Standardization Net 1971 Worldwide network: 24,000 gravimeter, 1,200 pendulum and 10 absolute measurements. Collected over twenty years. Adjusted by a small Working Group of the International Association of Geodesy. Datum is determined not by an adopted value at a single station, but by the gravity values for 1854 stations obtained from a single least squares adjustment of absolute, pendulum and gravimeter data. Standard error +/- 50 microGals

Surface Gravity measurements Absolute Formerly pendulum now falling mass Relative Each meter has own calibration value. Observations made at a number of points with the differences the measurement. Require observations be made in loops that start and end on same point to account for drift in instrument.

Gravity Measurement Reductions Gravity anomaly is the difference between the actual acceleration of gravity at a point on the surface of the earth and the computed normal acceleration of gravity of the same point on the level ellipsoid. Free-air - Only accounts for the elevation of the station not mass between the station and the geoid. Bouguer – Accounts for the variations of gravity due to differences in the density and mass of underlying materials.

Geoid Height Distance from the ellipsoid to the geoid measured along the normal to the ellipsoid. Geoid height, geoid separation or geoid undulation

Stokes function Theorem is not valid if masses exist outside the geoid. Hence the need to reduce gravity measurements to anomalies. While the function looks different from version in text, it is just reorganized. Also uses 1/sin rather than csc (these are equivalent).

U.S. Geoid models Gravimetric geocentric geoid Hybrid based on Earth Gravity Model, DEM data, and gravity measurements. Current model USGG 03 (beta version USGG 09 is posted to NGS site) Hybrid based on Gravimetric Model with datum transformations plus GPS on benchmarks Current model is Geoid 03 (beta version Geoid 09 is posted to NGS site)

Gravimetric geoid data used 2.6 million terrestrial, ship, and altimetry- derived gravity measurements 30 arc-second Digital Elevation Data A1-arcsecond DEM for the Northwest USA (NGSDEM99) The EGM96 global geopotential model

Geoid 03 In addition to the gravimetric geoid model USGG2003, the GEOID03 model consisted of the following input: 14185 NAD 83 GPS heights on NAVD 88 leveled bench marks

USGG 09 Characteristics One arc-minute model (2 km by 2 km nodal spacing) Based on the EGM08 reference model. Model is complete to spherical harmonic degree and order 2159, and contains additional coefficients extending to degree 2190 and order 2159. Improved surface gravity and terrain data.

USGG 09 evaluation Has significantly reduced long wavelength errors EGM 09. More accurate than previous models: new computation method new satellite gravity model improved altimetric gravity anomalies. In comparison with GPSBM implied geoid undulations, the improvement goes from 9.1 cm to 7.3 cm for USGG2003 and USGG2009, respectively.

Geoid 09 Builds on gravimetric model. Incorporates National Readjustment of 2007 modified most GPS-derived coordinates (including heights) at the cm- to dm-level. Changes in vertical component mostly around 2 cm, with few changes exceeding 10 cm. Produced by tailoring USGG2009 to fit the 12,715 points where both GPS-derived ellipsoid height and NAVD 88 differentially- determined heights were available.

14,308 points

GPS-derived heights Differential leveling is too expensive. Accurate GPS height determinations can only be achieved using differential methods. GPS baselines result from the combination of data observed simultaneously at at least two sites. Common errors cancel. GPS observations only yield ellipsoid heights. We must apply a geoid model to approximate NAVD 88 heights.

http://www. ngs. noaa. gov/PUBS_LIB/NGS59%20-%202008%2006%209-FINAL-2 http://www.ngs.noaa.gov/PUBS_LIB/NGS59%20-%202008%2006%209-FINAL-2.pdf

Note on hybrid geoid modeling Regional gravimetric geoids and quasi-geoid models are now commonly fitted to GPS leveling data which simultaneously absorbs leveling, GPS and quasi-geoid errors due to their inseparability.

NAVD 88 via OPUS OPUS provides an Ortho Hgt (NAVD 88) by applying the Geoid 03 value to the el hgt at the computed point. Peak-to-peak error in Ortho Hgt takes the el hgt peak-to-peak error and adds an error estimate for geoid model.