Search for emission from Gamma Ray Bursts with the ARGO-YBJ detector Tristano Di Girolamo Universita` “Federico II” and INFN, Napoli, Italy ECRS, September.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The MAGIC telescope and the GLAST satellite La Palma, Roque de los Muchacos (28.8° latitude ° longitude, 2225 m asl) INAUGURATION: 10/10/2003 LAT.
Advertisements

Lorenzo Perrone (University & INFN of Lecce) for the MACRO Collaboration TAUP 2001 Topics in Astroparticle and underground physics Laboratori Nazionali.
OBSERVATIONS OF AGNs USING PACT (Pachmarhi Array of Cherenkov Telescopes) Debanjan Bose (On behalf of PACT collaboration) “The Multi-Messenger Approach.
Latest results from ARGO-YBJ P. Camarri University of Roma “Tor Vergata” And INFN Roma Tor Vergata P. Camarri - WAPP Darjeeling, India - Dec 17-19,
Web: Contact: HAWC is a collaborative effort between institutions in the United States of America.
Terrestrial Gamma-ray Flashes. Gamma Ray Astronomy Beginning started as a small budget research program in 1959 monitoring compliance with the 1963 Partial.
24-28 May, 2010 S. Mastroianni - 17th Real-Time Conference, Lisboa, Portugal ARGO-YBJ is a cosmic ray air shower detector based on a single layer of RPC.
A Search for Point Sources of High Energy Neutrinos with AMANDA-B10 Scott Young, for the AMANDA collaboration UC-Irvine PhD Thesis:
HAWC Gus Sinnis VHE Workshop UCLA October, 2005 HAWC: A Next Generation Wide-Field VHE Gamma-Ray Telescope.
MACRO Atmospheric Neutrinos Barry Barish 5 May 00 1.Neutrino oscillations 2.WIMPs 3.Astrophysical point sources.
1 UNIVERSITA’ DEL SALENTO Facoltà di Scienze MM.FF.NN TIME MEASUREMENTS WITH THE ARGO-YBJ DETECTOR Dott.ssa Anna Karen Calabrese Melcarne Dottorato di.
RPCs in the ARGO-YBJ experiment P. Camarri (University of Roma “Tor Vergata” and INFN Roma 2) for the ARGO Collaboration Workshop on Physics with Atmospheric.
July 2004, Erice1 The performance of MAGIC Telescope for observation of Gamma Ray Bursts Satoko Mizobuchi for MAGIC collaboration Max-Planck-Institute.
Incontri di Fisica delle Alte Energie IFAE 2006 Pavia Vincenzo Vitale Recent Results in Gamma Ray Astronomy with IACTs.
International research project GALA: Monitoring of high energy gamma-ray astrophysical sources.
Gus Sinnis RICAP, Rome June 2007 High Altitude Water Cherenkov Telescope  Gus Sinnis Los Alamos National Laboratory for the HAWC Collaboration.
Milagro Gus Sinnis Milagro NSF Review July 18-19, 2005 Milagro: A Synoptic VHE Gamma-Ray Telescope Gus Sinnis Los Alamos National Laboratory.
Brenda Dingus 2 June 2005 Using Multiplicity Scalers to Constrain Solar Spectra Low Threshold of Air Shower PMTs have 8 different multiplicity discriminators.
1 UNIVERSITA’ DEL SALENTO Facoltà di Scienze MM.FF.NN TIME MEASUREMENTS WITH THE ARGO-YBJ DETECTOR Dott. Anna Karen Calabrese Melcarne Dottorato di Ricerca.
X.-X. Li, H.-H. He, F.-R. Zhu, S.-Z. Chen on behalf of the ARGO-YBJ collaboration Institute of High Energy Physics Nanjing GRB Conference,Nanjing,
Long-term monitor on Mrk 421 using ARGO-YBJ experiment S.Z Chen (IHEP/CAS/China, On behalf of the ARGO-YBJ collaboration  1. Introduction.
Cosmic-Ray Detection at the ARGO-YBJ observatory P. Camarri University of Roma “Tor Vergata” INFN Roma Tor Vergata.
Moriond 2001Jordan GoodmanMilagro Collaboration The Milagro Gamma Ray Observatory The Physics of Milagro Milagrito –Mrk 501 –GRB a Milagro –Description.
Gamma-Ray Bursts observed with INTEGRAL and XMM- Newton Sinead McGlynn School of Physics University College Dublin.
Detection of cosmic rays in the SKALTA experiment Marek Bombara (P. J. Šafárik University Košice), Kysak, August 2011.
222Rn daughters influence on scaler mode of ARGO-YBJ detector Irene Bolognino, University of Pavia and INFN E. Giroletti,C. Cattaneo,G. Liguori,P. Salvini,P.
WAPP Darjeeling, India December , 2009 The ARGO-YBJ experiment: results and perspectives Paolo Camarri on behalf of the ARGO-YBJ collaboration.
Development of Ideas in Ground-based Gamma-ray Astronomy, Status of Field and Scientific Expectations from HESS, VERITAS, MAGIC and CANGAROO Trevor C.
Moon shadow analysis -- Using ARGO experiment Wang Bo, Zhang Yi, Zhang Jianli, Guo Yiqing, Hu Hongbo Apri for NanJing Meeting
P. Bernardini September 10, 2006 ARGO-YBJ experiment and TeV gamma astronomy.
Gus Sinnis Asilomar Meeting 11/16/2003 The Next Generation All-Sky VHE Gamma-Ray Telescope.
Multi-TeV  -ray Astronomy with GRAPES-3 Pravata K Mohanty On behalf of the GRAPE-3 collaboration Tata Institute of Fundamental Research, Mumbai Workshop.
XXXI International Cosmic Ray Conference, ICRC 2009 Lodz, Poland, July 7-15, 2009 Time structure of the Extensive Air Shower front with the ARGO-YBJ experiment.
ARGO-YBJ experiment in Tibet Rome, RICAP’07, June 20, 2007 G. D'Alì-Staiti for the ARGO-YBJ Collaboration.
Gamma-Ray Astronomy with the ARGO-YBJ experiment G. Di Sciascio INFN – Sez. Roma “TorVergata” On behalf of ARGO-YBJ Collaboration 5th AGILE Workshop 2008.
Hadronic interaction studies with the ARGO-YBJ experiment (5,800 m 2 ) 10 Pads (56 x 62 cm 2 ) for each RPC 8 Strips (6.5 x 62 cm 2 ) for each Pad ( 
1 UNIVERSITA’ degli STUDI di LECCE Facoltà di Scienze MM.FF.NN Dottorato di Ricerca in Fisica Presentazione attività di ricerca Dottoranda : Anna Karen.
Hybrid measurement of CR light component spectrum by using ARGO-YBJ and WFCTA Shoushan Zhang on behalf of LHAASO collaboration and ARGO-YBJ collaboration.
ECRS 2008A.Surdo: Measurement of the p-air inelastic cross section with ARGO-YBJ 1 Measurement of the proton-air inelastic cross section with ARGO-YBJ.
ArgoYBJ: further steps for the next thfuture WAPP 2009 Bose Institute, Mayapuri, Darjeeling Dec 12 th 2009 By R. Santonico.
Tests of RPCs (Resistive Plate Chambers) for the ARGO experiment at YBJ G. Aielli¹, P.Camarri¹, R. Cardarelli¹, M. Civardi², L. Di Stante¹, B. Liberti¹,
EAS Time Structures with ARGO-YBJ experiment 1 - INFN-CNAF, Bologna, Italy 2 - Università del Salento and INFN Lecce, Italy A.K Calabrese Melcarne 1, G.Marsella.
Temporal and spatial structure of the Extensive Air Shower front with the ARGO- YBJ experiment 1 - INFN-CNAF, Bologna, Italy 2 - Università del Salento.
A Future All-Sky High Duty Cycle VHE Gamma Ray Detector Gus Sinnis/Los Alamos with A. Smith/UMd J. McEnery/GSFC.
High Redshift Gamma-Ray Bursts observed by GLAST Abstract The Gamma-ray Large Area Space Telescope (GLAST) is the next generation satellite for high energy.
June 6, 2006 CALOR 2006 E. Hays University of Chicago / Argonne National Lab VERITAS Imaging Calorimetry at Very High Energies.
Combining Gamma and Neutrino Observations Christian Spiering, DESY.
Gamma-Ray Burst Working Group Co-conveners: Abe Falcone, Penn State, David A. Williams, UCSC,
Abstract Since the beginning of its operation in April 2005, the MAGIC telescope was able to observe ten different GRB events since their early emission.
Search for GRBs Using ARGO Data in Shower Mode Guo Y.Q. For ARGO-YBJ Collaboration BeiJing 2008/09/26.
Sources emitting gamma-rays observed in the MAGIC field of view Jelena-Kristina Željeznjak , Zagreb.
Detecting Air Showers on the Ground
NEVOD-DECOR experiment: results and future A.A.Petrukhin for Russian-Italian Collaboration Contents MSU, May 16, New method of EAS investigations.
The Large High Altitude Air Shower Observatory LHAASO.
ICRC 2011Ignacio Taboada | Georgia Tech1 Sensitivity of HAWC to Gamma Ray Bursts Ignacio Taboada Georgia Institute of Technology Aug 11, 2011 – ICRC.
Shoushan Zhang, ARGO-YBJ Collaboration and LHAASO Collaboration 4 th Workshop on Air Shower Detection at High Altitude Napoli 31/01-01/ IHEP (Institute.
1 Cosmic Ray Physics with IceTop and IceCube Serap Tilav University of Delaware for The IceCube Collaboration ISVHECRI2010 June 28 - July 2, 2010 Fermilab.
32 nd ICRC –Beijing – August 11-18, 2011 Silvia Vernetto IFSI-INAF Torino, ITALY On behalf of the ARGO-YBJ collaboration Observation of MGRO J with.
Measurement of the CR light component primary spectrum B. Panico on behalf of ARGO-YBJ collaboration University Rome Tor Vergata INFN, Rome Tor Vergata.
On behalf of the ARGO-YBJ collaboration
The ARGO-YBJ experiment
Gamma ray astronomy with ARGO-YBJ
Andrea Chiavassa Universita` degli Studi di Torino
University and INFN of Naples
The Monitoring System of the ARGO-YBJ Data Acquisition
astroparticle physics with ARGO-YBJ
The Status of the ARGO Experiment at YBJ
“Gamma Astronomy with the ARGO-YBJ experiment"
CALET-CALによる ガンマ線観測初期解析
"Physics and astronomy results with the ARGO-YBJ experiment"
Presentation transcript:

Search for emission from Gamma Ray Bursts with the ARGO-YBJ detector Tristano Di Girolamo Universita` “Federico II” and INFN, Napoli, Italy ECRS, September 9, 2008, Košice for the ARGO-YBJ Collaboration

The ARGO-YBJ experiment Collaboration between:Collaboration between:  Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare (INFN) – Italy  Chinese Academy of Science (CAS) Site: YangBaJing Cosmic Ray Laboratory (Tibet, P.R. of China), 4300 m a.s.l.Site: YangBaJing Cosmic Ray Laboratory (Tibet, P.R. of China), 4300 m a.s.l. Site Coordinates: longitude 90° 31’ 50” E, latitude 30° 06’ 38” N

Physics Goals    -ray Astronomy: search for Galactic and extragalactic point sources with a large field of view (~2 sr) and a duty cycle  100%, at an energy threshold of a few hundreds of GeV   Diffuse  -Rays from the Galactic plane and SuperNova Remnants   Gamma Ray Burst (GRB) physics in the full GeV – TeV energy range   Cosmic Ray physics: spectrum and composition up to  10 3 TeV anti-p / p ratio at energy  TeV proton-air cross section (talk by A. Surdo)   Sun and Heliosphere physics with an energy threshold  10 GeV through the observation of Extensive Air Showers (EASs) produced in the atmosphere by  -rays and primary nuclei

Detector layout Single layer of Resistive Plate Chambers (RPCs) with a full coverage (92% active surface) of a large area (5600 m 2 ) + sampling guard ring (6700 m 2 in total) cm of lead converter time resolution ~1 ns space resolution = strip 10 Pads (56 x 62 cm 2 ) for each RPC 8 Strips (6.5 x 62 cm 2 ) for each Pad 1 CLUSTER = 12 RPCs 78 m 111 m 99 m74 m (5.7  7.6 m 2 )  detection of small showers (low energy threshold)

Experiment Hall CLUSTER RPC RPC also with analog charge readout

Data Acquisition The detector carpet is connected to two different DAQ systems, working independently: Shower Mode: for each event the location and timing of each detected particle is recorded, allowing the reconstruction of the lateral distribution and of the arrival direction (see also poster by D. Martello with results in  -ray astronomy) Scaler Mode: the counting rate of each CLUSTER is measured every 0.5 s, with very poor information on both the space distribution and the arrival direction of the detected particles

Scaler Mode DAQ For each CLUSTER 4 scalers record every 0.5 s the rates of counts ≥1, ≥2, ≥3 and ≥4 in a time window of 150 ns Measured rates are, respectively, ~ 40 kHz, ~ 2 kHz, ~ 300 Hz and ~ 120 Hz Counting rates for a given multiplicity are then obtained with the relation n i = n  i – n  i+1 (i=1,2,3) The energy threshold for photons is about 1 GeV, lower than the highest energies detected by satellite experiments The modular structure of the detector allowed the collection of data during the different mounting phases During data taking, the detector active area increased from 693 to 6628 m 2

Physics Goals in Scaler Mode I will focus on the search for emission from GRBs  GRBs: search for the high energy tail and spectral cutoff  Solar physics: Forbush Decreases and Ground Level Enhancements in correlation with neutron monitors Enhancements in correlation with neutron monitors  Correlation with changes of the Atmospheric Electric Field (thunderstorms) (thunderstorms)

GRB High Energy Tails ?  EGRET detected emission above 1 GeV from 3 GRBs, with photons up to 18 GeV (GRB940217, about 90 minutes after the burst start) 18 GeV (GRB940217, about 90 minutes after the burst start)  Hints (~3  ) of emission at higher energies from GRB970417a (E > 650 GeV, Milagrito) and GRB920925c (E > 20 TeV, HEGRA AIROBICC) Milagrito) and GRB920925c (E > 20 TeV, HEGRA AIROBICC)  The Tibet Air Shower array found an indication of 10 TeV emission in a stacked analysis of 57 bursts stacked analysis of 57 bursts  Many theoretical models predict a significant high energy tail for GRBs  High energy  -rays are absorbed by the Extragalactic Background Light (EBL), whose amount however is not yet well known. Light (EBL), whose amount however is not yet well known. The  -ray extinction increases with the GRB redshift z. The  -ray extinction increases with the GRB redshift z. Recent obsevation of blazar 3C279 (z = 0.536) with MAGIC at E > 80 GeV ! Recent obsevation of blazar 3C279 (z = 0.536) with MAGIC at E > 80 GeV !  The GeV – TeV energy range may reveal the spectral cutoff of GRBs, constraining emission models constraining emission models

Search Triggered by Satellites  Search started since the first GRB detection by Swift on December 17, 2004 (as a Follow-Up instrument) on December 17, 2004 (as a Follow-Up instrument)  Selection of GRBs with zenith angle  <45°  Search for an excess in the scaler counts in coincidence with the satellite detection (T90) with the satellite detection (T90)  In case of no signal evidence, calculation of the fluence upper limit (at 99% confidence level) upper limit (at 99% confidence level)  Search for a signal from stacked GRBs (both in phase and time) (both in phase and time)

GRB Sample Total number of GRBs analyzed: 39 With known redshift: 8 Long duration GRBs (> 2s): 34 Short duration GRBs (≤ 2s): 5

Distribution of the Significances The distribution of the statistical significances is compared with a standard normal distribution mean  = 0.26 N

Upper Limits in the 1  100 GeV range Fluence upper limits obtained extrapolating the keV power law spectra measured by satellites Fluence upper limits obtained assuming a differential index 2.5 Red triangles represent GRBs with known redshift, for the others z = 1 is assumed to consider extragalactic absorption (Kneiske et al. 2004)

Upper Limits to the Cutoff Energy An upper limit on the GRB cutoff energy is given by the intersection of the fluence upper limit, as a function of the cutoff energy, with the extrapolation of the fluence measured by satellites If the spectra of these GRBs extended up to E cut with the index measured by satellites, a 99% c.l. signal would have been produced extrapolation upper limit

GRBs Stacked in Phase The resulting significances for the 10 phase bins show that there is no evidence of emission at a certain phase The overall significance of the GRBs stacked in phase (adding up all the 10 bins) with respect to background fluctuations is 0.36  The 33 GRBs with T90  5 s (0.5 s  10 bins) have been added up in phase scaling their total duration, in order to search for a possible cumulative high energy emission at a certain phase of the low energy burst

GRBs Stacked in Time The resulting significances for the 9 time bins show that there is no evidence of emission for a certain  t The data of the first  t seconds (  t = 0.5, 1, 2, 5, 10, 20, 50, 100, 200) after T 0 for all the GRBs have been added up, in order to search for a possible cumulative high energy emission with a fixed duration after the low energy trigger T 0 (the 9 bins are not independent) The overall significance of the GRBs stacked in time (taking into account the dependency of the 9 bins) with respect to background fluctuations is 0.27 

Search for GRBs in Shower Mode 20 GRBs analyzed between July 2006 and July 2008 No significant excess found for any of them 99% c.l. upper limits to the fluence determined assuming a power law spectrum with differential index 2.0 (considering absorption by EBL when redshift available) Values down to  erg/cm 2 in the 10 GeV  1 TeV range More details about this analysis in Chen et al. (Proc. Nanjing GRB Conference, June 2008)

Conclusions Until now, the search for emission from GRBs with Until now, the search for emission from GRBs with the ARGO-YBJ detector has given no positive result the ARGO-YBJ detector has given no positive result The simple scaler mode has shown a good The simple scaler mode has shown a good sensitivity, with fluence upper limits down to sensitivity, with fluence upper limits down to  erg/cm 2 in the 1  100 GeV energy range  erg/cm 2 in the 1  100 GeV energy range The directional capability of the shower mode at The directional capability of the shower mode at energies of a few hundreds of GeV allows to study energies of a few hundreds of GeV allows to study GRBs in the whole 1 GeV  1 TeV energy range GRBs in the whole 1 GeV  1 TeV energy range