Azriel Goldschmidt AMANDA/IceCube Collaboration Meeting Laguna Beach, CA March 2003 String-18 Progress and Plans.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Electromagnetic shower in the AHCAL selection criteria data / MonteCarlo comparison of: handling linearity shower shapes CALICE collaboration meeting may.

Advertisements

Uniformity Measurement of the Hamamatsu 10 inch PMT Hiroko Miyamoto Dept. of Physics CHIBA University Laguna Beach2003.

30 March Global Mice Particle Identification Steve Kahn 30 March 2004 Mice Collaboration Meeting.

Calibration of the 10inch PMT for IceCube Experiment 03UM1106 Kazuhiro Fujimoto A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements of the degree.

Linda R. Coney – 24th April 2009 Online Reconstruction & a little about Online Monitoring Linda R. Coney 18 August, 2009.

IceCube 1400 m 2400 m AMANDA South Pole IceTop Skiway 80 Strings 4800 PMT Instrumented volume: 1 km3 (1 Gt) IceCube is designed to detect neutrinos of.

Jianchun (JC) Wang, 08/21/99 RICH Electronics and DAQ Chip Carrier Short Cable Transition Board Long Cable Data Board Crate J.C.Wang Syracuse University.

The IceCube High Energy Telesope The detector elements Expected Sensitivity Project Status Shigeru Yoshida Dept. of Physics CHIBA Univ. ICRC 2003.

More on Testbeam Analysis FLZ. Stability Checks for TCMT Pedestal stability already shown by Kurt MIP calibration stability Response stability.

ACD calibrations Pedestals Measured from online script Measure PHA w/ HV off, no charge injection Use cyclic triggers ~ ADC counts, very narrow.

CFT Calibration Calibration Workshop Calibration Requirements Calibration Scheme Online Calibration databases.

IceTop Tank Calibration Abstract This report outlines the preliminary method developed to calibrate IceTop tanks using through going single muon signals.

Sean Grullon with Gary Hill Maximum likelihood reconstruction of events using waveforms.

DAQ Hardware status - overview R. Stokstad DOM Main Board –Schedule (Minor) –Design (Przybylski) –Firmware (Stezelberger) –Testing (Goldschmidt) DOR Board.

1 S. E. Tzamarias Hellenic Open University N eutrino E xtended S ubmarine T elescope with O ceanographic R esearch Readout Electronics DAQ & Calibration.

A km 3 Neutrino Telescope: IceCube at the South Pole Howard Matis - LBNL for the IceCube Collaboration.

IceCube DAQ Mtg. 10,28-30 IceCube DAQ: “DOM MB to Event Builder”

IceCube: String 21 reconstruction Dmitry Chirkin, LBNL Presented by Spencer Klein LLH reconstruction algorithm Reconstruction of digital waveforms Muon.

Greg Sullivan University of Maryland Data Filtering and Software IceCube Collaboration Meeting Monday, March 21, 2005.

SINP MSU, July 7, 2012 I.Belolaptikov behalf BAIKAL collaboration.

Time calibration IceCube reconstruction workshop UMD, November 2004 Dmitry Chirkin, LBNL.

1 N eutrino E xtended S ubmarine T elescope with O ceanographic R esearch Operation and performance of the NESTOR test detector.

String-18 New-DAQ Commissioning Azriel Goldschmidt AMANDA Collaboration Meeting Berkeley, March 2002.

IceCube Data Acquisition :: Status Presentation before the IceCube Science Advisory Committee W. R. Edwards / K. Hanson for DAQ Mar 29, 2006 – Madison,

Erik Blaufuss University of Maryland Data Filtering and Software IceCube Collaboration Meeting Monday, March 21, 2005.

Standard Candle, Flasher, and Cascade Simulations in IceCube Michelangelo D’Agostino UC Berkeley PSU Analysis Meeting June 21-24, 2006.

Calibrating the first four IceCube strings Kurt Woschnagg, UCB L3 Detector Characterization IceCube Collaboration Meeting, Bartol, March 2004.

The ANTARES detector: background sources and effects on detector performance S. Escoffier CNRS Centre de Physique des Particules de Marseille on behalf.

IceTop DAQ: 1 David Seckel – 8/27/2003, College Park, MD IceTop DAQ David Seckel University of Delaware.

IC59 Cascade Filter Comparison between the recos for (HLC+SLC) and (HLC only) pulses Part I Mariola Lesiak-Bzdak LBNL 1 Cascade Phone Call, Nov. 8, 2010.

String-18 Development Workshop, Overview Azriel Goldschmidt AMANDA/ICECUBE Collaboration Meeting Berkeley March 2002.

IceCube Calibration Overview Kurt Woschnagg University of California, Berkeley MANTS 2009 Berlin, 25 September identical sensors in ultraclean,

DOM Main PCB Testing Gerald Przybylski October 23, 2002 Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory.

5 June 2002DOM Main Board Engineering Requirements Review 1 DOM Main Board Software Engineering Requirements Review June 5, 2002 LBNL Chuck McParland.

FPD STATUS Carlos Avila Uniandes/UTA 1. FPD overview 2. Roman pot and detector status 3. FPD readout integration status 4. Software status 5. Stand-alone.

IceTop DAQ: 1 David Seckel – 8/27/2003, College Park, MD IceTop Data Handler and Triggers David Seckel University of Delaware.

DOM MB Test Results at LBNL Main Board Readiness Status Review LBNL, July 2003 Azriel Goldschmidt.

5 June 2002DOM Main Board Engineering Requirements Review 1 DOM Main Board Hardware Engineering Requirements Review June 5, 2002 LBNL David Nygren.

Time and amplitude calibration of the Baikal-GVD neutrino telescope Vladimir Aynutdinov, Bair Shaybonov for Baikal collaboration S Vladimir Aynutdinov,

PMT measurements in Antares Oleg Kalekin on behalf of Antares collaboration VLVnT 2011 Erlangen

LHCf Detectors Sampling Calorimeter W 44 r.l, 1.6λ I Scintilator x 16 Layers Position Detector Scifi x 4 (Arm#1) Scilicon Tracker x 4(Arm#2) Detector size.

Review of Ice Models What is an “ice model”? PTD vs. photonics What models are out there? Which one(s) should/n’t we use? Kurt Woschnagg, UCB AMANDA Collaboration.

Moller Polarimeter Upgrading for PREx in 1)Mollar Analysis & Upgrading Works during/after 2009 PVDIS 2)Flash ADC based DAQ dead-time measurement.

S.MonteilPS/SPD COMMISSIONING1 OUTLINE 1)PROGRESS REPORT. 2)PLANS. 3)CONCLUSION. COMMISSIONING MEETING – JUNE 2008.

Basic Measurement of the Hamamatsu 10 inch PMT at –40 degree –40 degree Hiroko Miyamoto Dept. of Physics CHIBA University The Uniformity measurement of.

1M. Ellis - MICE Tracker PC - 1st October 2007 Station QA Analysis (G4MICE)  Looking at the same data as Hideyuki, but using G4MICE.  Have not yet had.

A. Tsirigotis Hellenic Open University N eutrino E xtended S ubmarine T elescope with O ceanographic R esearch Reconstruction, Background Rejection Tools.

IceTop Design: 1 David Seckel – 3/11/2002 Berkeley, CA IceTop Overview David Seckel IceTop Group University of Delaware.

TREND DAQ BASIC PRINCIPLES … Antennas DAQ ADC Trigger condition: Max > N.σ ??? First level trigger: Nant > 3 antennas ? -By antenna : - 1 data file (Nevent.

Status of Detector Characterization a.k.a. Calibration & Monitoring Project Year 2 objectives ( → Mar ‘04) 1. Calibration plan (first draft in March.

1 Cosmic Ray Physics with IceTop and IceCube Serap Tilav University of Delaware for The IceCube Collaboration ISVHECRI2010 June 28 - July 2, 2010 Fermilab.

Calorimeter Cosmics Patrick Robbe, LAL Orsay & CERN, 20 Feb 2008 Olivier, Stephane, Regis, Herve, Anatoly, Stephane, Valentin, Eric, Patrick.

AHCAL Electronics. Status Commissioning Mathias Reinecke for the AHCAL developers EUDET electronics and DAQ meeting Paris Palaiseau, Jan. 14th, 2010.

DAQ and Trigger for HPS run Sergey Boyarinov JLAB July 11, Requirements and available test results 2. DAQ status 3. Trigger system status and upgrades.

 13 Readout Electronics A First Look 28-Jan-2004.

Online Monitoring : Detector and Performance check

South Pole Ice model Dmitry Chirkin, UW, Madison.

IceCube System Testing

IC40 Physics Run Preparations

Muon Recording Studies and Progress for the MICE Tracker

A First Look J. Pilcher 12-Mar-2004

String 21 Flashers and AMANDA

Time resolution measurement with Madison test-DAQ

Light Sources for AMANDA/IceCube Cross-Calibration

Time calibration Dmitry Chirkin, LBNL UC Berkeley, November 2004.

String-21 Flasher Analysis

CLAS12 Timing Calibration

Preliminary Comparison of Monte Carlo and 9-string IceCube Data

Geometry and Timing Verification with Flashers

Summary of yet another Photonics Workshop AMANDA/IceCube Collaboration Meeting Berkeley, March 19, 2005.

Presentation transcript:

Azriel Goldschmidt AMANDA/IceCube Collaboration Meeting Laguna Beach, CA March 2003 String-18 Progress and Plans

Fast Communications –changes to firmware and software done –35 DOMs can now (finally!) handle 350 kBaud –Upgrade to 525 kBaud or higher possible –Now working on surface DAQ bottlenecks Data compression/bandwidth studies with string-18 waveforms, relevant for string-18 and IceCube -see Klaus H.’s talk- –Plan for software data reduction/compression running on ARM –Remains to be seen if ARM can handle the load

String-18 Progress and Plans (cont…) Improved understanding of waveforms: discriminator noise, pedestal pattern, ringing, etc, by Improved understanding of time correlated light in DOMs -see Klaus H.’s other talk- –This has implications for both String-18 and IceCube Surface DAQ “bug” fix during 02/03 season “thanks Holger!” –Time calibration to global clock to < 3.5 ns Tested VLF antenna effect on communications

New Flasher Runs –for Kurt & Co (is it still bumpy?) –for further understanding of timing/software trigger New LED trigger capabilities (for PMT transit times and gain calibration) String-18 Progress and Plans (cont…)

Example of a Flasher Event: Times and Waveforms ATWD 1.8 ns/sampleFADC 60 ns/sample

Another Flash

Ringing… Waveform Studies: Lots of progress from a fresh look by Seckel

Waveform Studies: Lots of progress from a fresh look by Seckel (cont…) Discriminator noise…

Waveform Studies: Lots of progress from a fresh look by Seckel (cont…) Discriminator noise, distinct from pedestal pattern...

String-18 (Digital) VLF immunity

Plans IceCube effort has currently higher priority, but if resources are allocated: First: remove surface DAQ data bottlenecks Second: implement software data reduction Third: Implement online trigger (string processor implied)

ATWD and ADC waveforms Example: 3 photons in 2 microseconds ATWD0 High GAIN 1.7 ATWD1 Low Gain 1.7 ATWD2 Nothing 1.7 ATWD3 Clock 1.7 ADC  s 217 ns ns/sample Time Sample Number

Muon Data: Checking timestamps with coincidences from consecutive OM’s T (DOM N) T (DOM N+1) DeltaT = T (DOM N) - T (DOM N+1) Zoom around [-1,+1]  sec : Mean at ~ -24 nsec Consistent with expectation for downgoing muons 12 m

Example Muon Event #1 Only first hit in each OM shown Down flow of light Late hits consistent with light scattering Late Hit