Alain Blondel, 24 July 2006 NA49/T2K phone Meeting NA49/T2K Introduction to the physics case Preamble: since I have not myself run any code or simulations.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Precision Neutrino Oscillation Measurements & the Neutrino Factory Scoping Study for a Future Accelerator Neutrino Complex – Discussion Meeting Steve Geer,
Advertisements

MINOS+ Sterile Neutrino Studies J.Thomas UCL J.Evans (UCL), A.Gavrilenko (W&M), M.Matthis (W&M)A.Sousa(Harvard) UCL.
Expected Sensitivity of the NO A  Disappearance Analysis Kirk Bays (Caltech) for the NO A Collaboration April 14, 2013 APS DPF Denver Kirk Bays, APS DPF.
Results from Daya Bay Xin Qian On behalf of Daya Bay Collaboration Xin Qian, BNL1.
Sharpening the Physics case for Charm at SuperB D. Asner, G. Batignani, I. Bigi, F. Martinez-Vidal, N. Neri, A. Oyanguren, A. Palano, G. Simi Charm AWG.
A long-baseline experiment with the IHEP neutrino beam Y. Efremenko detector Presented by.
T2K neutrino experiment at JPARC Approved since 2003, first beam in April Priorities : 1. search for, and measurement of,   e appearance  sin.
Sinergia strategy meeting of Swiss neutrino groups Mark A. Rayner – Université de Genève 10 th July 2014, Bern Hyper-Kamiokande 1 – 2 km detector Hyper-Kamiokande.
Neutrino physics: experiments and infrastructure Anselmo Cervera Villanueva Université de Genève Orsay, 31/01/06.
F Axis Off Axis Physics Potential Cambridge Off-Axis Meeting 12 January 2004 Gary Feldman.
Neutrino-CH 19 October 2006 Alain Blondel HARP and K2K 1. The K2K experiments 2. beam related uncertainties 3. HARP and results 4. K2K and results 5. conclusions.
Beam e background with antineutrinos Lots of discussion recently; does not look like getting needed amount of pME running will happen (or not easily at.
Alain Blondel Analysis meeting Global Analysis Group Leaders: Alain Blondel, deputies Christos Touramanis and Eric Zimmerman Charge: To study.
MINOS 1 Beam e ’s from antineutrinos David Jaffe and Pedro Ochoa September 27 th 2007  Preliminaries  Data & MC  Expected sensitivities  Preliminary.
F.Sanchez (UAB/IFAE)ISS Meeting, Detector Parallel Meeting. Jan 2006 Low Energy Neutrino Interactions & Near Detectors F.Sánchez Universitat Autònoma de.
Reactor & Accelerator Thanks to Bob McKeown for many of the slides.
1 CC analysis update New analysis of SK atm. data –Somewhat lower best-fit value of  m 2 –Implications for CC analysis – 5 year plan plots revisited Effect.
1 Recent developments on sensitivity calculations Effect of combined le and me running –Is there a statistical advantage over pure le running? Discrimination.
2/21/2008 P5 neutrino session1 Conventional neutrino experiments Heidi Schellman P5 February 21, 2008.
1/16 MDC post-mortem redux Status as of last CC meeting: –True values of cross-section and oscillation parameters were used to reweight the ND and FD MC.
Statistical Analysis of Systematic Errors and Small Signals Reinhard Schwienhorst University of Minnesota 10/26/99.
A long baseline neutrino oscillation search - MINOS Reinhard Schwienhorst School of Physics and Astronomy University of Minnesota.
Atmospheric Neutrino Oscillations in Soudan 2
A. Blondel, M.Campanelli, M.Fechner Energy measurement in quasi-elastics Unfolding detector and physics effects Alain Blondel Mario Campanelli Maximilien.
Expected Sensitivity of the NO A  Disappearance Analysis Kirk Bays (Caltech) for the NO A Collaboration April 14, 2013 APS DPF Denver Kirk Bays, APS DPF.
Caren Hagner CSTS Saclay Present And Near Future of θ 13 & CPV in Neutrino Experiments Caren Hagner Universität Hamburg Neutrino Mixing and.
Precision measurement of mixing angles and CP Hisakazu Minakata PUC-Rio.
Results and Implications from MiniBooNE LLWI, 25 Feb 2011 Warren Huelsnitz, LANL
1 PHYSICS IN THE NuMI BEAM with a ~10 kiloton LARTPC prototype ASH RIVER or SOUDAN J.Schneps PRELIMINARY,UNFINISHED, & ROUGH Sept. 27, 2007.
The Earth Matter Effect in the T2KK Experiment Ken-ichi Senda Grad. Univ. for Adv. Studies.
The NOvA Experiment Ji Liu On behalf of the NOvA collaboration College of William and Mary APS April Meeting April 1, 2012.
Alain Blondel NUFACT11 1 August Rhone route Shopping route Historic route count >> 30 minutes ! Boarding on ship Henri-Dunant at 19:15 CANT BE LATE.
Alain Blondel. AIDA-Neutrino meeting AIDA Neutrino detector studies 1. News from the neutrino scene 2. Beam requirements for AIDA 3. Discuss.
Long Baseline Neutrino Beams and Large Detectors Nicholas P. Samios Istanbul, Turkey October 27, 2008.
Preliminary Results from the MINER A Experiment Deborah Harris Fermilab on behalf of the MINERvA Collaboration.
If  13 is large, then what ? Hisakazu Minakata Tokyo Metropolitan University.
Extrapolation Neutrino Flux measured at Near Detector to the Far Detector Near Detector Workshop, CERN, 30 July 2011 Paul Soler, Andrew Laing.
Steve Geer IDS Meeting CERN March Neutral Currents and Tests of 3-neutrino Unitarity in Long-Baseline Exeriments Steve Geer Barger, Geer, Whisnant,
Search for Electron Neutrino Appearance in MINOS Mhair Orchanian California Institute of Technology On behalf of the MINOS Collaboration DPF 2011 Meeting.
Study of neutrino oscillations with ANTARES J. Brunner.
Optimizing the green-field beta beam NuFact 08 Valencia, Spain June 30-July 5, 2008 Walter Winter Universität Würzburg.
Search for Sterile Neutrino Oscillations with MiniBooNE
Beam Extrapolation Fit Peter Litchfield  An update on the method I described at the September meeting  Objective;  To fit all data, nc and cc combined,
21 march 2007 LAUNCH Heidelberg Alain Blondel SYSTEMATIC ERRORS for accelerator-based long baseline experiments -- cross-sections -- matter effects From.
Michel Gonin – Ecole Polytechnique – France : SUPER NOVA SN1987A Super-Kamiokande Introduction neutrino oscillations mixing matrices Introduction.
Proposal for the study to define what is really necessary and what is not when the data from beam, ND and SK are combined A.K.Ichikawa 2008/1/17.
2 July 2002 S. Kahn BNL Homestake Long Baseline1 A Super-Neutrino Beam from BNL to Homestake Steve Kahn For the BNL-Homestake Collaboration Presented at.
T2K Status Report. The Accelerator Complex a Beamline Performance 3 First T2K run completed January to June x protons accumulated.
CP phase and mass hierarchy Ken-ichi Senda Graduate University for Advanced Studies (SOKENDAI) &KEK This talk is based on K. Hagiwara, N. Okamura, KS PLB.
1 A study to clarify important systematic errors A.K.Ichikawa, Kyoto univ. We have just started not to be in a time blind with construction works. Activity.
1 Study of physics impacts of putting a far detector in Korea with GLoBES - work in progress - Eun-Ju Jeon Seoul National University Nov. 18, 2005 International.
Point source analysis with tracks and showers Aart, Javier, Tino 1.
NUMI NUMI/MINOS Status J. Musser for the MINOS Collatoration 2002 FNAL Users Meeting.
All lepton generation and propagation with MMC Dmitry Chirkin, UCB/LBNL AMANDA meeting, Uppsala, 2004.
September 10, 2002M. Fechner1 Energy reconstruction in quasi elastic events unfolding physics and detector effects M. Fechner, Ecole Normale Supérieure.
More material for P5 Milind Diwan for the Homestake neutrino detector group 3/1/2008.
Extrapolation Techniques  Four different techniques have been used to extrapolate near detector data to the far detector to predict the neutrino energy.
MIND Systematic Errors EuroNu Meeting, RAL 18 January 2010 Paul Soler.
NEAR DETECTOR SPECTRA AND FAR NEAR RATIOS Amit Bashyal August 4, 2015 University of Texas at Arlington 1.
BSM Group Activities DUNE Collaboration Meeting –ND Physics Jan. 14, 2016 Jae Yu Univ. of Texas at Arlington.
T2K Experiment Results & Prospects Alfons Weber University of Oxford & STFC/RAL For the T2K Collaboration.
Precision Measurement of Muon Neutrino Disappearance with T2K Alex Himmel Duke University for the The T2K Collaboration 37 th International Conference.
Epiphany06 Alain Blondel A revealing comparison: A detailed comparison of the capability of observing CP violation was performed by P. Huber (+M. Mezzetto.
Systematics Sanghoon Jeon.
Neutrino Oscillations and T2K
J. Musser for the MINOS Collatoration 2002 FNAL Users Meeting
Neutrino Oscillation Physics with a Neutrino Factory
ND280 upgrades Alain Blondel T2K meeting 3June15
Parameter Degeneracy in Neutrino Oscillations (and how to solve it?)
T2KK sensitivity as a function of L and Dm2
Presentation transcript:

Alain Blondel, 24 July 2006 NA49/T2K phone Meeting NA49/T2K Introduction to the physics case Preamble: since I have not myself run any code or simulations of performance what follows aims at bringing out arguments to build up the physics case for the T2K NA49 proposal.

Alain Blondel, 24 July 2006 NA49/T2K phone Meeting philosophy: envisage this experiment as if it would never be done again ==> get from CERN assurance that either we collect a sufficient amount of data in the first couple of years, (preferred solution) or that the apparatus is preserved in a good enough state From HARP experience these measurements are everything but easy. Do the measurement to a quality level that allows sufficient precision to the end of the programme

Alain Blondel, 24 July 2006 NA49/T2K phone Meeting Standard Oscillation framework --Four different phases/precision levels 1. Precision measurements of disappearance channel --> Atmospheric parameters:  m 2 23, sin 2  23 Here we are mostly concerned about the far/near ratio for CC   events useful plots: Far/near for non-oscillated   and sensitivity to K/pi ratio, Pion average mom., average p T or model. 2. Discovery or confirmation of the   e channel --> order of magnitude of  13 need good measurement of (at least) the K/pi ratio since this affects the near/far ratio for e background and    background useful plots: Far/near for e background and    background 3. Precise measurement of P(   e ) for comparison with e.g. D-CHOOZ for  CP or NOvA for matter effects (statistical error will depend on  13 ) Useful plots: all of the above +? 4. Ultimate measure: A CP in T2HK or T2KK etc… need a precise measurement of the neutrino and antineutrino fluxes for numu and nue, with perhaps one overall normalization missing. From the HyperK plots 2% systematics already bites into the stat. precision? some antineutrino plots? Non Standard Oscillation: ex: disappearance measurements in the NC channel check serile neutrinos etc… useful plots: Far/near for non-oscillated    e ?

Alain Blondel, 24 July 2006 NA49/T2K phone Meeting from Hiraide

Alain Blondel, 24 July 2006 NA49/T2K phone Meeting from Fechner