1 Oregon Content Standards and Assessment System Evaluation Prepared for the Oregon Department of Education by WestEd Dr. Stanley Rabinowitz Dr. Edynn.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
RIDE – Office of Special Populations
Advertisements

1 Common Core State Standards What they are! & How they came to be! Implications for New Jersey New Jersey State Board of Education May 4, 2011 Dorothy.
The Readiness Centers Initiative Early Education and Care Board Meeting Tuesday, May 11, 2010.
West Virginia Schools 21 st Century Learning. WV Content Standards and Objectives.
Parent Advisory Council Seven Hills Classical Academy May 10, 2012.
Determining Validity For Oklahoma’s Educational Accountability System Prepared for the American Educational Research Association (AERA) Oklahoma State.
DC CAS Kickoff Tamara Reavis Director Standards, Assessment, and Accountability.
1 Oregon Content Standards and Assessment System Evaluation Prepared for the Oregon Department of Education by WestEd Dr. Stanley Rabinowitz Dr. Edynn.
Key questions around the Common Core and revised Standards.
High School Leadership Summit Transforming High Schools Linda Clarke Executive Director Houston A+ Challenge October 8, 2003 Archived Information.
WHAT DO SMARTER QUESTIONS LOOK LIKE? COMPUTER ADAPTIVE TEST: ENGLISH.
English Language Proficiency Standards (ELPS) for English Language Learners (ELLs) Pennsylvania Department of Education Bureau of Teaching Learning and.
Keystone State Reading Conference October 29, 2012 Dr. Deb Carr, King’s College.
1 Welcome to Julius West MS Middle School Reform Phase II:
1 Oregon Content Standards Evaluation Project, Contract Amendment Phase: Preliminary Findings Dr. Stanley Rabinowitz WestEd November 6, 2007.
NCCSAD Advisory Board1 Research Objective Two Alignment Methodologies Diane M. Browder, PhD Claudia Flowers, PhD University of North Carolina at Charlotte.
Philomath School District Board of Directors Work Session May 10, 2012.
1. 2 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations –for all students –for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through.
College-Ready Determination Policy and Performance Level Descriptors July
1 Executive Limitation 12: Curriculum and Instruction Darlene Westbrook Chief Academic Officer Denise Collier Executive Director for Curriculum Monitoring.
Oregon Department of Education Agency Overview Susan Castillo, Superintendent of Public Instruction Patrick Burk, Deputy Superintendent Mike Greenfield,
SOCIAL SCIENCES STANDARDS REVIEW AND REVISION February 2009-June 2011 PRESENTATION TO THE STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION.
Lee County School District January 2012 Common Core State Standards: An Overview.
I. Oregon’s New Diploma II. Core Standards Structure III. Essential Skills Presented by Oregon Department of Education.
I Have Been Notified That A School in My District Needs an "ESCA"? What Does that Mean? Regional Workshop for Differentiated Accountability New York State.
Framework for High- Quality English Language Proficiency Standards and Assessments P r e pa r e d b y t h e Assessment and Accountability Comprehensive.
Oregon’s New Diploma Requirements: Oregon’s New Diploma Requirements: What You’ll Need to Know 2008 Superintendent’s Summer Institute August 4-6, 2008.
1. Housekeeping Items June 8 th and 9 th put on calendar for 2 nd round of Iowa Core ***Shenandoah participants*** Module 6 training on March 24 th will.
1 Alternate Assessments Based on Modified Academic Achievement Standards Fen Chou, Ph.D. Louisiana Department of Education GSEG Project Kick-off Meeting.
A state-wide effort to improve teaching and learning to ensure that all Iowa students engage in a rigorous & relevant curriculum. The Core Curriculum.
Milwaukee Mathematics Partnership External Evaluation Schools and School Leadership Report by Tanya Suarez, Suarez & Associates June 9, 2005.
Summary of WestEd Analysis of Current K-12 Standards & Assessments Presented to UEE October 12, 2007.
Oregon’s Core Standards and Assessment Standards & Assessment Task Force March 20, 2008.
Aligning Literacy Curriculum Instruction Across the District Summit for Urban Education May 5, 2005 David Bible Helena Dameron Maya Marlowe.
Standard Setting Results for the Oklahoma Alternate Assessment Program Dr. Michael Clark Research Scientist Psychometric & Research Services Pearson State.
Dr. Nancy S. Grasmick July 26,2012.  Maryland is proud to be the top-ranked state in U.S. growth as reported in this study, and judged by Education Week.
Wisconsin Standards for CTE. Timeline New accountability system begins & AYP ends (ESEA waiver) New proficiency benchmarks for WKCE reading & mathematics.
Mid-Course Adjustments in Learning Results Implementation CAEA Summer Conference Patrick R. Phillips, Deputy Commissioner August 15, 2005.
REPORT OF THE PROVINCIAL GRADE 3, 6, AND 9 ASSESSMENTS.
HANDOUT 3 Middle School Reform. 2 What does it take to prepare our middle school students for the 21 st Century? They must be able to … Work in teams.
1 Oregon’s New Core Standards Structure Superintendent’s Summer Institute August 2008.
1. Administrators will gain a deeper understanding of the connection between arts, engagement, student success, and college and career readiness. 2. Administrators.
Local Educational Agency Plan (LEA Plan) Cambrian School District Board Presentation March 22, 2012.
Oregon Diploma & Essential Skills Task Force Phase I : Defining the Essential Skills Work Session October 1, 2007.
Oregon Standards: An Update 2009 Superintendent’s Summer Institute Oregon Department of Education August 3, 2009.
Los Angeles Unified School District Local District G Principals Meeting.
Part I Educational Technology1 INTRODUCING THE STANDARDS TOOLKIT (Educational Technology) Performance Indicator Progression Scope and Sequence Instructional.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Tom Torlakson, State Superintendent of Public Instruction 2014 NATIONAL CONFERENCE ON STUDENT ASSESSMENT Re-envisioning.
Credit for Proficiency Taskforce Oregon Department of Education February 5, 2008 Engagement, Achievement & Transition Oregon Diploma–Getting Students Ready.
Diploma Implementation Advisory Task Force September 26, 2006.
NECAP Presentation for School Year March 26,
No Child Left Behind Impact on Gwinnett County Public Schools’ Students and Schools.
1 Oregon Standards Evaluation Project, Contract Amendment Phase: Summary of Preliminary Findings Dr. Stanley Rabinowitz WestEd December 6, 2007.
1 Oregon’s Content Standards Revision Process Oregon State Board of Education October 2008.
Better or Not…Here They Come Ohio’s Encounter with the Common Core & Revised Standards.
How was LAA 2 developed?  Committee of Louisiana educators (general ed and special ed) Two meetings (July and August 2005) Facilitated by contractor.
School Improvement Needs Assessment – © Iowa Association of School Boards Assessment Conducted by the Iowa Association of School Boards.
Presentation to the Nevada Council to Establish Academic Standards Proposed Math I and Math II End of Course Cut Scores December 22, 2015 Carson City,
Oregon Statewide System of Support for School & District Improvement Tryna Luton & Denny Nkemontoh Odyssey – August 2010.
Colorado Achievement Plan for Kids Update November 2011.
Diane Mugford – Federal Accountability, ADAM Russ Keglovits – Measurement and Accountability, ADAM Renewing Nevada’s ESEA Waiver Flexibility Request.
Ohio’s Learning Standards Standards Revision Discussion Group.
Phyllis Lynch, PhD Director, Instruction, Assessment and Curriculum
Oregon Content Standards and Assessment System Evaluation
Oregon’s Content Standards Revision Process
Physical Education Academic Content Standards
Bethel School District CCSS Plan
New Prospect Elementary School
History of No Child Left Behind (NCLB)
INTRODUCING THE STANDARDS TOOLKIT
Presentation transcript:

1 Oregon Content Standards and Assessment System Evaluation Prepared for the Oregon Department of Education by WestEd Dr. Stanley Rabinowitz Dr. Edynn Sato January 2007

2 Background: Overview One of several key projects funded by the Gates Foundation Independent evaluation by WestEd, a non-profit educational research, development, and service agency

3 Content Standards and Assessment System Evaluation: Why? Content standards signal what knowledge and skills are valued (breadth and depth) Current state content standards have undergone periodic revision Need to continuously revisit and re-evaluate on a set schedule

4 Content Standards and Assessment System Evaluation: Why? Rigorous standards and assessments are major levers for improving student achievement –Signal goals –Focus instruction –Provide information for improvement to the state, districts, schools

5 Content Standards and Assessment System Evaluation: What? WestEd will: Review the content standards (all grades, academic content areas) Evaluate the structure of the content standards Evaluate alignment between the state assessments and the content standards Make recommendations for improvement of structures and systems

6 What? WestEd will address questions regarding: –the structure and quality the state content standards –the alignment of state assessments to state standards Recommendations will be based on data from the analyses that have practice and policy implications Research-based information related to assessment and accountability models/practices will be provided as available

7 Key Deliverables Preliminary report of an initial review of selected content standards and grades using initial protocol/criteria Final report for the comprehensive review of the content standards Final report for the alignment of assessments to content standards Final report on the structure and quality of Oregon’s content standards and assessments

8 Content Standards and Assessment System Evaluation: How? WestEd’s independent evaluation will be conducted in three phases: 1. Preliminary Review of Selected Content Standards 2. Comprehensive Evaluation of Content Standards 3. Alignment Studies of Content Assessments and Standards

9 How? 1. Preliminary Review of Selected Content Standards Purpose: To refine protocol and criteria for standards evaluation Focus: Two grades in three content areas (selected to represent a range of formats) Protocol: Successfully implemented in numerous states that have successfully met USED NCLB Peer Review requirements

10 How? 2. Comprehensive Evaluation of Content Standards English language arts Mathematics Science Social sciences Arts Second languages Physical education Health education Technology English language proficiency

11 How? 3. Alignment Studies of Content Assessments and Standards Content English language arts Mathematics Science Items Oregon’s multiple-choice knowledge and skills state test items Tests One test blueprint/specification for English language arts, mathematics, and science

12 How? WestEd’s independent evaluation will involve analysts with expertise in large-scale test development standards development alignment measurement and statistics the content areas curriculum and instruction the K-12 student population No Child Left Behind (NCLB) Oregon programs and history

13 How? Stakeholder engagement: Discussions—These discussions will not influence WestEd’s independent and objective analyses, rather they will inform the analyses Surveys

14 How? Stakeholder groups include: ODE staff, such as - Management Team - Curriculum and Assessment staff State Board of Education OAESD Instructional Leader Council PK-20 Coordination Advisory Group Literacy Leadership State Steering Committee Critical Friends Advisory Group

15 Content Standards and Assessment System Evaluation: When? December 1, 2006 through June 30, 2007 –Report of a preliminary review of selected content standards and grades using initial protocol/criteria (January 2007) –Final report for the comprehensive review of the content standards (March 2007) –Final report for the alignment studies (March/April 2007) –Final report on the structure of Oregon’s content standards and assessments (May 2007)

16 For more information about the standards and assessment evaluation: ode.state.or.us/go/real For more information about WestEd: