Co-funded by the European Community eContentplus programme The NATURE-SDIplus Solution for Data Harmonisation.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
INSPIRE Drafting Team „Data Specifications“
Advertisements

The NATURE–SDIplus project Best Practice Network for SDI in Nature Conservation Co-funded by the Community Programme eContentplus ECP-2007-GEO Co-funded.
NATURE-SDIplus Training Framework Training to Support INSPIRE Implementation Co-funded by the Community Programme eContentplus ECP-2007-GEO
ETIS+: European Transport Policy Information System - Development and Implementation of Data Collection Methodology for EU Transport Modelling Funded by.
INSPIRE Service Architecture
OneGeology-Europe - the first step to the European Geological SDI INSPIRE Conference 2010, Session Thematic Communities: Geology Krakow, June 24 th 2010.
Kick-off meeting Tuesday, June 02, 2015 Anders Östman Imad Abugessaisa.
Serving society Stimulating innovation Supporting legislation Meeting on OGC Sensor Observation Service (SOS) for INSPIRE Zhenya Valcheva.
Validation and Conformity testing - Status and planning (Carlo Cipolloni)
Managing Data Interoperability with FME Tony Kent Applications Engineer IMGS.
Update on INSPIRE: INSPIRE maintenance and implementation and INSPIRE related EEA activities on biodiversity CDDA/European protected areas technical meeting.
EuroGeographics Workshop Network Service, Paris, /06 Download services Olaf Østensen Network Services Drafting Team.
The NATURE–SDIplus Network Development Co-funded by the Community Programme eContentplus ECP-2007-GEO
User Perspective in Nature Conservation Co-funded by the Community Programme eContentplus ECP-2007-GEO
1 The INSPIRE Geoportal Ioannis Kanellopoulos Spatial Data Infrastructures Unit European Commission Joint Research Centre Institute for Environment and.
About How to Organise User Collection Workshop Karel Charvat, HSRS, CCSS.
1 NATURE-SDIplus Training Action Nature Conservation and INSPIRE introductory workshop (Hungary) 27 April 2011, GISIG AGENDA (GISIG Contribution): NATURE-SDIplus.
INSPIRE 2011 – Edinburgh – 1 st July Experiences harmonising Datasets conform INSPIRE: Geobide in IDENA and Nature SDI+ projects P. Echamendi, A. Huarte,
WP3 Interoperable datasets for nature conservation María Cabello Tracasa.
INSPIRE drafting teams work versus practical INSPIRE implementations, theory and practice Marek Brylski, Intergraph Polska Enviro-i-Fórum – Zvolen – Slovakia.
Serving society Stimulating innovation Supporting legislation Joint Research Centre The Inspire Geoportal Validator.
Status of INSPIRE implementation in EU Member States. INSPIRE conference – Lisbon, 26/05/2015 Paul Hasenohr, European Environment Agency.
1 July Integrating the UK Location Information Infrastructure and data.gov.uk Rod Kedge - UK Location Programme.
Co-funded by the European Community eContentplus programme NATURE-SDIplus Good Practices.
Roberto Lucchi Esri INSPIRE Discovery, View and Download and OGC standards.
Co-funded by the European Community eContentplus programme The NATURE-SDIplus Validation methodology.
© NERC All rights reserved Work Package 8 – Web Services and Technology Jonathan Lowndes
Co-funded by the European Community eContentplus programme The “Protected Areas” scenario of the HUMBOLDT project Roderic Molina GISIG NATURE-SDIplus Good.
Implementing INSPIRE Geoportal in Turkey Gencay SERTER City and Regional Planner 1 Ministry of Environment And Forestry Department of IT.
XIth International Congress for Mathematical Geology - September 3-8, 2006 – Liège, Belgium Contribution of GeoScienceML to the INSPIRE data harmonisation.
HLANDATA PROJECT: FIRST RESULTS AND SYNERGIES Isabel Goñi, TRACASA.
Update on INSPIRE CDDA/European protected areas technical meeting 2015 Darja Lihteneger Project manager - Data centres and INSPIRE implementation IDM -
1 - DG ENV Brussels, 5 March 2003 Draft INSPIRE Legislative proposal The key issues 9th INSPIRE Expert Group Meeting Brussels.
The Geographic Information System of the European Commission (GISCO) By Albrecht Wirthmann, GISCO, Eurostat ESPON.
Co-funded by the European Community eContentplus programme Actions summary Kick-off meeting Genova, 6-8 November 2008 IRIDE Congress Centre Via SS Giacomo.
Serving society Stimulating innovation Supporting legislation Update of Discovery MS MD Schemas and Tools – MIWP-8 Tim Duffy, James.
Co-funded by the European Community eContentplus programme NATURE-SDIplus infrastructure Carmelo Attardo – GISIG Andrea Fiduccia, Stefano Turcato – Intergraph.
NATURE-SDIplus Metadata Specification Co-funded by the Community Programme eContentplus ECP-2007-GEO
Emanuele roccatagliata gisig NATURE-SDIplus contribution to the INSPIRE DS testing Nature-SDIplus, Best Practice Network ECP
Testing - an essential aspect of establishing an SDI Clemens Portele, Anders Östman, Michael Koutroumpas, Xin He, Janne Kovanen, Markus Schneider, Andriani.
WISE Working Group D September 2009, Brussels Jon Maidens.
Sum-up of common issues from pilots Different types of exercises when joining statutory reporting & INSPIRE implementation: 1-To explain ‘INSPIRE fitting.
Making the CDDA data model INSPIRE compliant Project information and status 2015 Eionet Biodiversity Ecosystems, Indicators and Assessments NRC Workshop.
GeoSciML meeting April 24th-28th 2006 INSPIRE Drafting teams.
Darja Lihteneger, November 2015, Copenhagen, Denmark INSPIRE Data Modelling for Reporting Data Flows – CDDA conceptual data model and INSPIRE Eionet.
WISE GIS/IT Workshop, Dublin January INSPIRE Architecture & WISE Steve Peedell Spatial Data Infrastructures Unit European Commission Joint.
Work package in ABC III Specific Contract with PwC/interactive instruments on implementation of INSPIRE validator Clemens Portele, interactive instruments.
Briefing and Planning meeting on INSPIRE validator implementation – Discussion 16/12/2015.
What’s new at ArcGIS for INSPIRE Roberto Lucchi Guenther Pichler.
CDDA data model according INSPIRE Protected sites specification Tools used in the project.
Bavarian Agency for Surveying and Geoinformation AAA - The contribution of the AdV in an increasing European Spatial Data Infrastructure - the German Way.
WP3 Task 3.2 Adaptation of the Training Material.
European Monitoring Platform for Mapping of QoS and QoE
Workflow on publishing monitoring data using INSPIRE
NATURE-SDIplus Infrastructure.
Tomas Kliment Junior Researcher Italian National Research Council
MIWP 5 – Validation and conformity testing
Report on Member State progress in implementing the Directive
Geospatial Knowledge Base (GKB) Training Platform
The Re3gistry software and the INSPIRE Registry
INSPIRE MIG-T MIWP-16 activity report.
MIWP Action ”Priority List of E-Reporting Datasets”
Status on eu actions from the kick-off meeting
WP 4 - Revision of Natura 2000 dataflow
Joni Kaitaranta HELCOM Secretariat
4th Meeting of the MIG-P, Brussels, June 2016
… Two-step approach Conceptual Framework Annex I Annex II Annex III
NEW STEPS IN THE PROJECT GIS NATURA 2000
WISE and INSPIRE By Albrecht Wirthmann, GISCO, Eurostat
Presentation transcript:

co-funded by the European Community eContentplus programme The NATURE-SDIplus Solution for Data Harmonisation

2 PRESENTATION OVERVIEW The DH-TWG The DH methodology The procedure for data transformation The procedure for metadata transformation The guidelines The matching tables The transformation tools A practical example of data remodeling The methodology to facilitate and to monitor the status of the DH process

3 Data harmonisation process involves:  Different players (data providers, technological partners, research partners)  Operational implementation of DH impacts on different tasks WHY A DH-TWG? 3 Need of a dedicated technical coordination  DH-TWG

4 LINKED TASKS

THE OVERALL DH METHODOLOGY (1/3) SOURCE SIDE TARGET SIDE Selection of the target schema Analysis of the target schema Creation of the Matching table Matching analysis Data transformation HARMONISED DATASET TOOLS GUIDELINES & PROCEDURES Selection of the sample DS Analysis and schematisation of the sample DS 5

THE OVERALL DH METHODOLOGY (2/3) 6

THE OVERALL DH METHODOLOGY (3/3) The services we have created:  Web Map Services (WMS) and Web Feature Services (WFS) for the Data  Catalogue Web Services (CSW) for the Metadata Once processed, harmonised, transformed and made accessible through the Geoportal, spatial datasets, metadata and network services (accessibility and usability) have been validated 7

THE PROCEDURE FOR DATA TRANSFORMATION Identify a source data model Create a simple geodata structure Fill the Data matching table Document the process Choose Transformation Tool Perform Transformation Store Transformation Rules Publish harmonised Data 8

Identify a source metadata profile Fill the Metadata matching table Document the process Choose Metadata Editor Create or Update Metadata Store Transformation Rules Publish harmonised Metadata THE PROCEDURE FOR METADATA TRANSFORMATION 9

THE GUIDELINES Procedures for metadata profile and data model implementation, including Quality control for the harmonisation process 10

Spatial Datasets:  Final Matching table for PS (Annex I)  Final Matching Tables for BR, HB, SD (Annex III) Metadata:  Final Matching table for PS (Annex I)  Final Matching Tables for BR, HB, SD (Annex III) THE MATCHING TABLES (1/3) 11

THE MATCHING TABLES (2/3) 12

THE MATCHING TABLES (3/3) 13

THE TRANSFORMATION TOOLS Transformation tools for metadata:  MDweb (IRD), INSPIRE Metadata Editor, CatMDEdit, GeoNetwork, MIG Metadata Editor, disy Preludio. Transformation tools for spatial datasets:  GeoConverter, GeoMedia Fusion, Humboldt Alignement Editor, Go Publisher Tools surveyed, investigated and under testing by Technical Partners, used by DPs 14

Tool capabilities surveyed 1.Reading non ISO profile 2.Reading ISO profile 3.Allowing to define / load specific profiles (in our cases Nature- SDIplus) 4.Allowing manual / semiautomatic / automatic mapping processes 5.Allowing save and reuse automatic process 6.Perform quality mapping control: Any? Specify 7.Publish metadata catalogue (CSW) 8.Allowing multilingualism 9.License 10.Allowing different export formats 11.Other interesting characterises 12.System Requirements Software, Hardware SURVEY OF THE TOOLS FOR METADATA TRANSFORMATION 15

Tool capabilities surveyed 1.Enumerate input formats 2.Enumerate output formats 3.Read input data 4.Change Coordinate reference System 5.Allowing to define / load specific target model 6.Allowing manual / semiautomatic / automatic mapping 7.Allowing to save transformation process 8.Any transformation quality control. Specify 9.Allowing multilingualism 10.License 11.System Requirements Software, Hardware SURVEY OF THE TOOLS FOR DS TRANSFORMATION 16

EXAMPLE OF APPLICATION OF DH PROCEDURE – STEP 1 STEP 1.1: Selection of the sample source dataset Natura2000 dataset of Greece, source: EIONET; free download STEP 1.2: Deep analysis of the source dataset cntrygr_ENG_SCI -SPA_Aug_2009.mdb (MS Access mdb) GR_Natura2000 _v27.shp + Commission Decision 97/266/EC of concerning a site information format for proposed Natura2000 sites 17

EXAMPLE OF APPLICATION OF DH PROCEDURE – STEP 5 WFS deployment with GO Publisher WFS Harmonised PS datasets viewed with Gaia 18

MONITORING DH PROCESS Prepared a template to collect feedback from DP about Data Harmonisation Prepared a template to collect feedback from DP about Metadata Harmonisation Prepared a tool (excel spreadsheet based) to monitor the status of the DH proces 19

MONITORING DH PROCESS 20

14 different “tool configurations” used by DPs in the Metadata Harmonisation Process 21

16 different “tool configurations” used by DPs in the Datasets Harmonisation Process 22