1 Monitoring/Evaluation Program Overview December 3, 2008 Title III Director’s Meeting.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

The No Child Left Behind Act and Title 1 Schools What Parents Should Know and Do.

Advertisements

Procedures for ESEA Consolidated Monitoring Effective July 1, 2011 – June 30, 2014 Monitoring For Results.

NCLB Consolidated Monitoring Integrated Approach to Title III Monitoring.

(Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act) and

PACTS Online Tools Adriana Golumbeanu, Loretta Brown and Randall Richardson Office of Federal Programs.

Coordinating Equitable Services for Private Schools Christine T. Miller Red Clay Consolidated School District December 7, 2010 DSU – Martin Luther King.

Monitoring A Process to Enhance Program Administration.

ESEA Title III AMAOs Ensuring Academic Success for English Learners Dr. Shereen Tabrizi, Manager Special Populations Unit Maria Silva, EL Consultant Office.

NCLB Monitoring Cycle 1 Policies and Procedures. Letter  Explains monitoring process  Lists required documentation  Lists activities  Directions for.

1 The Federal No Child Left Behind Act and the Financial Impact on Manchester Public Schools Fiscal Year

Title I LEA and Peer Review Process of School Improvement Plans Kokomo Center Schools Kokomo, IN.

The Monitoring Process

English Language Learners Directors’ Meeting Annual Measurable Achievement Objectives.

ESEA Program Review Russ Sweet Preparing for ESEA Program Reviews of Titles I-A, II-A, VI-B (REAP), and X Summer 2014.

On Site Review Process Office of Field Services.

1 Michigan Department of Education Office of School Improvement ISD/RESA Workshop February 26, 2008.

Welcome to the Annual Meeting for Parents in a Title I Building.

Three Easy Steps to Your On-Site Review David Gray, MDE Sara Shriver, MAS/FPS.

Title I Technical Assistance Training Federal and State Programs.

Subrecipient Monitoring FY15 of Education Oklahoma State Department of Education Office of Federal Programs Federal Programs Office of Titles I, II, III,

Virginia Department of Education Coordinators’ Academy July 22 – July 24, 2015.

I Have Been Notified That A School in My District Needs an "ESCA"? What Does that Mean? Regional Workshop for Differentiated Accountability New York State.

Spring Directors’ Meeting Department of Education Update May 9, 2008.

Successful Program Implementation: Meeting Compliance Statutes Virginia Department of Education Office of Program Administration and Accountability Title.

» September 3, 2015 » December 3, 2015 » February 4, 2016.

1 DRAFT Monitoring/Evaluation Overview September 20, 2010 Title III Director’s Fall Meeting.

Title III Evaluation/Monitoring Process and Next Steps May 7, 2009 Title III Directors’ Spring Meeting.

Welcome to the Annual Meeting of Title I Parents Insert School Name/Date.

Title III, Part A: Language Instruction for Limited English Proficient (LEP) and Immigrant Students  The purpose of Title III, Part A is to help ensure.

SACS-CASI Southern Association of Colleges and Schools Council on Accreditation and School Improvement FAMU DRS – QAR Quality Assurance Review April 27-28,

Staying on Message in Changing Times Oklahoma Statewide System of Support (SSOS) January 7, 2011 Dr. Cindy Koss, Assistant State Superintendent Oklahoma.

On Site Review Overview. 2 The On Site Review Process.

1 NCLB Title Program Monitoring NCLB Title Program Monitoring Regional Training SPRING 2006.

Michigan School Improvement Framework. The Vision… Provide a comprehensive framework based on current research and best practice to serve as a road map.

Iowa Support System for Schools in Need of Assistance (SINA) Overview and Audit Iowa Department of Education and AEA 267 August 2011.

Virginia Association of Federal Education Program Administrators (VAFEPA) October 15, 2014 Virginia Department of Education Office of Program Administration.

On Site Review Process Office of Field Services.

On Site Review Process Office of Field Services Last Revised 8/15/2011.

Creating a Good Title III Plan Title III & Migrant Directors’ Meeting Lansing, Michigan April 26, 2011 Shereen Tabrizi, Ph.D. Manager, Special Populations.

OCTE Fall Update November 1, 2012 Elizabeth Collins (517)

Improvement Planning Mischele McManus Infant/Toddler and Family Services Office of Early Childhood Education and Family Services July 20, 2007

Procedures for ESEA Consolidated Monitoring Effective July 1, 2011 – June 30, 2014 Monitoring For Results Reviewed & Revised with COP April 2011.

Title III Desk Monitoring Oregon Department of Education September 24,

Arizona Department of Education Office of English Language Acquisition Services.

Presented by: Jan Stanley, State Title I Director Office of Assessment and Accountability June 10, 2008 Monitoring For Results.

Successfully “Translating” ELPA Results Session #25 Assessment and Accountability Conference 2008.

1 Title IA Online Coordinator Training Parent Involvement

1 Title IA Coordinator Training Preparing for Title IA Monitoring

Welcome to today’s Webinar: Tier III Schools in Improvement We will begin at 9:00 AM.

Federal Program Monitoring Overview and Organization.

Understanding AMAOs Annual Measurable Achievement Objectives for Title III Districts School Year Results.

The Michigan Department of Education Program Evaluation Tool (PET) Lessons Learned & Support Documents.

On Site Review Process. 2 Overview of On Site Review Materials and Process.

Presented By WVDE Title I Staff June 10, Fiscal Issues Maintain an updated inventory list, including the following information: description of.

Title III Annual Measurable Achievement Objectives (AMAOs): LEA Reports and Responsibilities Presented by the Pennsylvania Department of Education Bureau.

Interrelationships: Plans + Funding = Student Proficiency Ingham ISD Curriculum Director’s Meeting November 4, 2015.

Moving Title IA School Plans into Indistar ESEA Odyssey Summer 2015 Presented by Melinda Bessner Oregon Department of Education.

The Nebraska Frameworks External Visitation Team Exit Report.

Subrecipient Monitoring FY14 Oklahoma State Department of Education Federal Programs Office of Titles I, II, III, VI and X.

January 2012 Mississippi Department of Education Office of Instructional Enhancement and Internal Operations/Office of Special Education 1 Noncompliance.

1 Willa Spicer, Assistant Commissioner Cathy Pine, Director Carol Albritton, Teacher Quality Coordinator Office of Professional Standards, Licensing and.

NH Department of Education Developing the School Improvement Plan Required by NH RSA 193-H and Federal Public Law for Schools in Need of Improvement.

Brentwood Elementary Title One Annual Parent Meeting September 20, :00 PM.

1 PACTS-Self Evaluation November 1, 2006 Video Conference Elaine Zabor Consultant Office of Federal Programs.

Community Liaison Training NCLB Parental Involvement Requirements “Creating an Audit Trail” October 19, 2007 Eduardo Elizondo, Director Federal Programs.

March 23, SPECIAL EDUCATION ACCOUNTABILITY REVIEWS.

S O S FOR S E S Wednesday, February 28, 2007

SCHOOL and DISTRICT ACCREDITATION

ESL/Title III Consultants

Presentation transcript:

1 Monitoring/Evaluation Program Overview December 3, 2008 Title III Director’s Meeting

2 MDE Responsibility Michigan Department of Education (MDE) is responsible for monitoring all ELL/Immigrant program performance to ensure compliance under the No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB).

3 Fulfilling MDE’s Responsibility Develop process to determine the current status of each program/district’s progress.

4 The Process Develop evaluation tool Develop evaluation model Distribute the tool to LEAs Collect tool, analyze data Determine what type of review Conduct review Recommend improvement plan for districts

5 Purpose of Evaluation Checklist Tool Title III Program Evaluation Checklist Designed to provide districts with a self assessment tool to determine program progress and compliance with NCLB Designed to provide MDE with a baseline review of all districts Provide a sustainable model to maintain timely annual reviews

6 Evaluation Checklist Tool Contents Six Sections Administrative Responsibilities Student Identification Parent & Community Involvement Instructional Programs & Assessment Teacher Qualifications and Professional Development Program Evaluation & School Improvement

7 Snap Shot of Evaluation Tool

8

9 The Evaluation Model Documentation + Performance = Type of Review Performance Data AYP AMAOs MEAP ELPA + Evaluation Checklist Type of Review =

10 Types of Review Desk Telephone Focused On-Site

11 Types of Reviews Desk/Telephone Conducted for programs that have demonstrated positive program outcomes and achievement results based on state data for ELLs.

12 Types of Reviews Focused On-site Conducted for programs/districts that have not made significant progress based on state achievement data and or fiscal audit findings.

13 Send evaluation notification letter with Evaluation Checklist Tool. Return completed Evaluation Checklist Tool to the Office of School Improvement (OSI) by January 30, OSI will notify Program/District of date, time, and type of review. Reviews will begin the second week of February Evaluation Program Implementation

14 Evaluation Program Implementation Reviews conducted by ELL/Evaluation Monitoring Consultant. Some reviews will be conducted in collaboration with Field Service Team. Subsequent to reviews, OSI will provide districts with written feedback on progress, noting commendations and recommendations for improvement.

15 Required Documentation Complete and return to OSI a hard copy of the Evaluation Checklist Tool. Forward an electronic copy of the Evaluation Checklist Tool to OSI. See for Evaluation Checklist Tool, Forward completed copy to

16 Required Documentation Program/Districts selected for focused on-site reviews must assemble a documentation notebook with each section and item clearly labeled. Notebooks remain at the school district in preparation for on-site visit.

17 Contact list Betty Underwood Linda Forward Roberto Saenz Michigan Department of Education Office of School Improvement Academic Support

18 Evaluation Monitoring Overview Q & A