The Adaptive Mirror for the E-ELT

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
FAR-IR OPTICS DESIGN AND VERIFICATION EXPERIMENTAL SYSTEM AND RESULTS Final Meeting “Far-IR Optics Design and Verification”, Phase 2 27 November 2002,
Advertisements

Osservatorio di Arcetri Adaptive primary mirrors for ELTs A. Riccardi 1, P. Salinari 1, G. Brusa 1, R. Ragazzoni 1, S. Esposito 1, D. Gallieni 2 and R.
The adaptive secondary mirror for the 6.5 conversion of the MMT
TMT.OPT.PRE DRF011 Thirty Meter Telescope Secondary and Tertiary Mirror Systems International Symposium on Photoelectronic Detection and Imaging.
TMT.OPT.PRE DRF01 14 September Requirements and Conceptual Design of M2 System Ben Platt Myung Cho Mark Sirota 14 September 2007.
GLAO Workshop, Leiden; April 26 th 2005 Ground Layer Adaptive Optics, N. Hubin Ground Layer Adaptive Optics Status and strategy at ESO Norbert Hubin European.
TMT.OPT.PRE DRF01 14 September Requirements and Conceptual Design of M3 System Ben Platt Myung Cho Mark Sirota 14 September.
The adaptive secondary mirror. Current technology for MMT/LBT A. Riccardi 1, G. Brusa 1, C. Del Vecchio 1, P. Salinari 1, R. Biasi 2, M. Andrighettoni.
INAF-Osservatorio di Arcetri 3-4 May Tuorla Observatory Opticon Meeting Adaptive secondary and primary mirrors for ELTs A. Riccardi 1, G. Brusa 1,2,
George Angeli 11 September, 2001 Current Concepts and Status of GSMT Control Systems.
Keck I Cassegrain ADC: Preliminary Design Overview UCO/Lick Observatory 15 October 2003.
Géraldine Guerri Post-doc CSL
October 10th, 2007Osservatorio Astrofisico di Arcetri1 Application of the pyramid wavefront sensor to the cophasing of large segmented telescopes F. Quirós-Pacheco,
M2 Assembly and Feed Optics Ron Price August 25, 2003.
September 24, 2005 Magellan F/15 Chopping Secondary 1 Magellan F/15 Chopping Secondary Magellan SAC Meeting Laird Close (Principle Investigator) Victor.
FLAO Alignment Procedures G. Brusa, S. Esposito FLAO system external review, Florence, 30/31 March 2009.
Adaptive Optics for Wavefront Correction of High Average Power Lasers Justin Mansell, Supriyo Sinha, Todd Rutherford, Eric Gustafson, Martin Fejer and.
N A S A G O D D A R D S P A C E F L I G H T C E N T E R I n s t r u m e n t S y n t h e s i s a n d A n a l y s i s L a b o r a t o r y Earth Atmosphere.
Keck Next Generation Adaptive Optics Team Meeting 6 1 Optical Relay and Field Rotation (WBS , ) Brian Bauman April 26, 2007.
Generation-X telescope: Measurement of On-Orbit Adjustment Data Dan Schwartz, R. J. Brissenden, M. Elvis, G. Fabbiano, T. Gaetz, D. Jerius, M. Juda, P.
Figuring large off-axis segments to the diffraction limit Hubert Martin Steward Observatory University of Arizona.
ASTRI SST-2M The Prototype monolithic 1.8 m
Boston University Photonics Center: Precision Engineering Research Laboratory, Thomas Bifano Micromachined Deformable Mirrors for Adaptive.
8 September Observational Astronomy TELESCOPES, Active and adaptive optics Kitchin pp
SAM PDR1 SAM LGS Mechanical Design A. Montane, A. Tokovinin, H. Ochoa SAM LGS Preliminary Design Review September 2007, La Serena.
1 Kai Wei Institute of Optics and Electronics (IOE),CAS August 30,2010 The TMT Laser Guide Star Facility (LGSF)
MCAO Adaptive Optics Module Mechanical Design Eric James.
MCAO Adaptive Optics Module Subsystem Optical Designs R.A.Buchroeder.
Laboratory prototype for the demonstration of sodium laser guide star wavefront sensing on the E-ELT Sexten Primary School July 2015 THE OUTCOME.
19 February 2009 Cophasing sensor for synthetic aperture optics applications First steps of the development of a cophasing sensor for synthetic aperture.
LBT672 opto-electro-mechanical specification overview Presented by A. Riccardi A. Riccardi, G. Brusa, R. Biasi, D. Gallieni FLAO system external review,
NST PRIMARY MIRROR CELL: ANALYSIS AND SOLUTIONS BBSO, 02/11/2004 Leonid Didkovsky.
LBT Progress Report, Feb Marco Xompero 1/14 P45 Test Results and beyond… Marco Xompero Daniela Zanotti Armando Riccardi.
AO for ELT – Paris, June 2009 MAORY Multi conjugate Adaptive Optics RelaY for the E-ELT Emiliano Diolaiti (INAF–Osservatorio Astronomico di Bologna)
Integral Field Spectrograph Eric PRIETO CNRS,INSU,France,Project Manager 11 November 2003.
Chris Chrzanowski Charles Frohlich Swales Aerospace, Inc.
LBT672 ADAPTIVE SECONDARYLBT AO Review Firenze - 10  11 November, 2005 LBT672 ADAPTIVE SECONDARY UNITS Current status, acceptance test plan and specifications.
Low order modes sensing for LGS MCAO with a single NGS S. Esposito, P. M. Gori, G. Brusa Osservatorio Astrofisico di Arcetri Italy Conf. AO4ELT June.
Lyot Stop Focal Plane Mask OAP3 Out of plane spherical mirror.
AO review meeting, Florence, November FLAO operating Modes Presented by: S. Esposito Osservatorio Astrofisico di Arcetri / INAF.
FLAO system test plan in solar tower S. Esposito, G. Brusa, L. Busoni FLAO system external review, Florence, 30/31 March 2009.
An Approach to Stabilizing Large Telescopes for Stellar Interferometry It shakes like a…. [G. Vasisht, 31 March 2006] N. Di Lieto J. Sahlmann, G. Vasisht,
NORDFORSK Summer School, La Palma, June-July 2006 NOT: Telescope and Instrumentation Michal I. Andersen & Heidi Korhonen Astrophysikalisches Institut Potsdam.
1 1 st Light AO 4 LBT Pyramid WFS Adaptive Secondary MMT Unit.
K-D-PR Fabrication and testing of KGMT FSM prototype Oct Ho-Soon Yang, Hak-Yong Kihm, Il-Kwon Moon, Jae-Bong Song, Yun-Woo Lee Korea.
SAM PDR1 S OAR Adaptive Module LGS LGSsystem Andrei Tokovinin SAM LGS Preliminary Design Review September 2007, La Serena.
Design of a Lightweight Mounted Tip/Tilt Mirror
LBT SW workshop. Tucson, 2-6 Oct 2006 A. Riccardi - The LBT AdsSec units1 The two LBT adaptive secondary units (LBT672a, LBT672b) A. Riccardi, M. Xompero,
1 High-order coronagraphic phase diversity: demonstration of COFFEE on SPHERE. B.Paul 1,2, J-F Sauvage 1, L. Mugnier 1, K. Dohlen 2, D. Mouillet 3, T.
FLAO_01: FLAO system baseline & goal performance F. Quirós-Pacheco, L. Busoni FLAO system external review, Florence, 30/31 March 2009.
N A S A G O D D A R D S P A C E F L I G H T C E N T E R I n s t r u m e n t S y n t h e s i s a n d A n a l y s i s L a b o r a t o r y Fourier-Kelvin.
M1M3 Cell and Support System. M1M3 on Telescope 2 Location of the M1M3 Cell and Mirror on the Telescope.
Na Laser Guide Stars for CELT CfAO Workshop on Laser Guide Stars 99/12/07 Rich Dekany.
Design and Development of the FSM (Fast steering Secondary Mirror)
Some Thoughts on Ground Layer Adaptive Optics & Adaptive Secondary Mirrors for Keck P. Wizinowich 9/15/14 1.
Status report AHCAL Mechanics Karsten Gadow CALICE Collaboration Meeting KEK, Studies of AHCAL absorber structure stability.
Pre-focal wave front correction and field stabilization for the E-ELT
NST PRIMARY MIRROR CELL: ANALYSIS AND SOLUTIONS BBSO, 02/05/2004.
Lightweight mirror technology using a thin facesheet with active rigid support J. H. Burge, J. R. P. Angel, B. Cuerden, H. Martin, S. Miller University.
J. H. Burgea,b, W. Davisona, H. M. Martina, C. Zhaob
Parc Kennedy - Bat A , Rue Gilles Roberval / F NIMES  +33 (0) /  +33 (0) / Web :
Preparing the optical calibration of the M4-Deformable mirror for the E-ELT Briguglio, R., Pariani, G., Xompero, M., Riccardi, A. ADONI meeting, Firenze.
The ASTRI prototype: a pathfinder Dual-Mirror telescope for the CTA-SST array Rodolfo Canestrari for the ASTRI collaboration INAF-Astronomical Observatory.
DVAC PROGRESS OFFSET GREGORIAN DISH (DVAC-1) 郑元鹏 (Yuanpeng Zheng ) Joint Lab. for Radio Astronomy and Technology MAY 29, 2012.
Integral Field Spectrograph Opto-mechanical concepts PIERRE KARST, JEAN-LUC GIMENEZ CPPM(CNRS),FRANCE.
David Woody Caltech Owens Valley Radio Observatory
Pyramid sensors for AO and co-phasing
IR Detector - Test cryostat : Machining
Feasibilty/Concept Study Mid Term Status Review
Micromachined Deformable Mirrors for Adaptive Optics
Presentation transcript:

The Adaptive Mirror for the E-ELT E. Vernet, M. Cayrel, N. Hubin (ESO) R. Biasi, G. Angerer, M. Andrighettoni, D. Pescoller (Microgate) D. Gallieni, M. Tintori, M. Mantegazza (ADS) A. Riccardi, M. Riva, G. Pariani, R. Briguglio, M. Xompero (INAF) The M4 is currently in a preliminary design update phase to take into account the change of the telescoep diameter but also the additional requirements which have been requested to M4. all these additional requirements are not related to AO correction but more to stability requirement and flatness requirements of the mechanical structure itself.

Outline M4 key functional requirements Positioning system & wavefront correction AO requirements & additional features Current design of M4 Demonstration prototype design & objectives Project timeline

An adaptive mirror in the E-ELT Main goals: Provide adaptive correction Cancel part of telescope wind shaking & static aberrations 10 degree FOV 2 Nasmyth focii In plane centering & tip-tilt system The M4 Mirror is the deformable mirror slightly elongated with a maximum external optical diameter of 2387mm. The inner optical diameter is 540mm while the M4 must provide a 520mm free central hole for the telescope optical beam propagation. The central hole has a conical shape to allow the 10 degree field of view to go through M4 without any vignetting. With an orientation angle of 7.75 degree, the M4 Adaptive Subunit requires system to feed the two Nasmyth focii. The baseline design includes a rotator at the level of the interface with the telescope. Less than 5 minutes shall be needed by M4 to switch between Nasmyth focii. The focus selection mechanism shall have a repeatability of at least 30 mechanical arcsec as measured about any of the three local axes of the M4 Mirror Subunit

Positioning system Decentering capability of +-20 mm (0.5mm accuracy, 0.05 resolution) Tip-tilt capability of +-2 arcmin (0.5 arcsec accuracy, 0.27 resolution) Cross-coupling with tilt <54 mas/mm PV lateral displacement Cross-coupling with lateral displacement 1.85 micron/arcsec PV tilt 0.5mm position stability in xy & 1 arcsec orientation stability (with LUT), 0.5mm position stability in z (without LUT) The M4 Adaptive Subunit is mounted on a positioning system providing a first stage large stroke low frequency mechanical tilt, a two dimensions rigid body decentering degrees of freedom and a focus selector. Forty millimeters stroke displacements have been foreseen for realignment of M4 with respect to M1 during observation and initial stroke needed during integration on the telescope.  The tip-tilt range of four arc-minutes will allow correcting quasi-static perturbations due to thermal loads and gravity effects. All the degree have been specified with stringent cross coupling requirements (limited by the system resolution for small displacements and tip-tilt) and good positioning accuracy (~400 times smaller than the total stroke) to allow a reliable and efficient alignment during preset. Each leg has been specified with the following requirements to fulfill M4 requirements: Maximum leg elongation velocity 1 mm/s Lateral displacement absolute accuracy 23 micron Lateral displacement resolution 1.1 micron Maximum tip-tilt velocity 10 arcsec/s Absolute tip-tilt accuracy 0.5 arcsec Tip-tilt resolution 0.27 arcsec Courtesy of Adoptica

Wavefront corrector Correct for both low and high spatial frequencies wavefront errors Stroke budget includes: Quasi static term(<1Hz) for misalignment errors due to gravity Term for wavefront errors due to wind load on the telescope structure, M1, M2 (tip, tilt, focus, coma, astigmatism) Stroke for atmospheric disturbances (15% of total stroke) Stroke for manufacturing, gravity and thermal effects (35%) TOTAL STROKE BUDGET: 140 micron 50% A quasi static stroke budget needed to correct at low frequency (<1Hz) wavefront errors due to misalignment of the different mirrors with gravity. A budget of 10 micron PtV wavefront has been foreseen to correct for the first 20 Zernike quasi-static aberrations

AO specifications Temporal WFE <60nm rms Best Median Bad Worst Seeing 0.5arcsec 0.85arcsec 1.1 arcsec 2.5 arcsec Lo 25 m 50 m 100 m Tau o 0.7msec 2.5msec 1.5msec Fitting nm rms 120 145 180 0.5’’ FWHM All OA spec in term of fitting include quasi stratic errors and stroke for wind load as well as cophasing errors Temporal WFE <60nm rms -3dB Closed loop bandwidth > 400Hz Segment cophasing

Additional features Thermal control: optical surface within [-0.5,+1]ºC Any other external surface within [-1.5,1.5]ºC Diagnostics Maintainability Safety functions: Earthquake detection

Current design characteristics 5190 actuators (4326 in pupil) 6 segment shells ~2mm thick Light-weighted structural reference body A “mirror cell” with load spreaders Hexapod for tip-tilt and decentering A rotator for Nasmyth selection Courtesy of Adoptica

Shells Each segment has comparable size as DSM (1 m radial direction, 1.2m on other direction) Av. thickness tolerance incl wedge :+-15 micron Local error:10 micron PtV wedge removed 31.5 mm triangular actuator pattern Residual optical error after fitting 14nm rms WF (goal 8nm rm WF) 24 membranes for lateral restraint

Brick concept Self standing Line Replaceable Unit Modularity: three types of bricks with respectively 15, 28, 36 actuators Voice coil motors Mounting structure + cooling plate for actuators & electronics Electronics: Capacitive sensor board Voice coil driver board Power + logic on a fin identical for all brick types Tool for alignment and fixation on the reference body structure Courtesy of Adoptica

Actuators and local sensors Updated voice coil motor more compact: 36mm long and 15 mm diameter screwed on the cold plate Same contactless technology but enhanced design for more reliable actuators New capacitive sensor armature design, signal pick-up strategy and contacting to electronics boards to overcome the problems seen on current units (major source of non working actuators)

Reference body Triangular structure ~2500 m diameter Conical central hole for optical beam clearance Structure overall thickness 300mm with smaller ribs 100mm thick. ~ 25mm thick front face Two materials currently traded-off: Zerodur and SiC Reference body holds 180 bricks (about 2 kg each) Courtesy of Adoptica

Demonstration Prototype upgrade 800 mm long, 454mm large Using same shell as phase B DP New reference body following M4 design 10 pre-production bricks 15mm thick with 28 actuators (some partially covered by shells) Liquefied gas used for cooling Compliant with real time, control, safety and timing interface requirements with a central drilled hole to pass the wires and more reliable design Bias magnet at the center to hold the shell when the coil is off. Courtesy of Adoptica

DP objectives Design validation: System performance: Voice coil actuator design, Capacitive sensor armature, Capacitive sensor pick-up, Shell edge controllability, Cophasing stability, Cooling plant efficiency, Power dissipation, SW ad HW safety features Design validation: Brick concept, Brick interfaces, Reference body material, Control aspects, Cooling plant design

Project timeline DP Reference body material selection: mid September 13 DP Start of procurement: Oct 13 Sub-systems assembly readiness review: Dec 13 DP Electromechanical Testing: late Spring 14 DP Optical Testing: Summer 14 Preliminary design review: September 14