Overview of the Big Bend Regional Aerosol and Visibility Observational (BRAVO) study:  Understand the long-range, trans-boundary transport of visibility-reducing.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Analysis of 12 years of IMPROVE data in the Columbia River Gorge By Dan Jaffe University of Washington Northwest Air Quality Photo from the Wishram IMPROVE.
Advertisements

An Overview of the Big Bend Regional Aerosol and Visibility Observational (BRAVO) Study Marc Pitchford, Ph.D National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration.
FIRE AND BIOFUEL CONTRIBUTIONS TO ANNUAL MEAN AEROSOL MASS CONCENTRATIONS IN THE UNITED STATES ROKJIN J. PARK, DANIEL J. JACOB, JENNIFER A. LOGAN AGU FALL.
Christian Seigneur AER San Ramon, CA
BRAVO - Results Big Bend Regional Aerosol & Visibility Observational Study Bret Schichtel National Park Service,
Weight of Evidence Checklist Review AoH Work Group Call June 7, 2006 Joe Adlhoch - Air Resource Specialists, Inc.
Map of the Guadalupe Mountains Region NEW MEXICO TEXAS Guadalupe Mtns. Park Map To Carlsbad To El Paso To I-10 Visibility Degradation in Guadalupe Mountains.
Intercontinental Transport and Climatic Effect of Air Pollutants (ICAP) Second Workshop, October 21-22, 2004, Chapel Hill, NC Intercontinental Aerosol.
IMPROVE Network Assessment Plans. IMPROVE Network Assessment Motivation: –EPA’s air quality monitoring budget is not growing, but their requirements are.
BACKGROUND AEROSOL CONCENTRATIONS AND VISIBILITY DEGRADATION IN THE UNITED STATES Rokjin Park Motivated by EPA Regional Haze Rule Quantifying uncontrollable.
Springtime Airmass Transport Pathways to the US Prepared by: Bret A. Schichtel and Rudolf B. Husar Center for Air Pollution Impact and Trend Analysis (CAPITA)
Springtime Airmass Transport Pathways to the US Prepared by: Rudolf B. Husar and Bret Schichtel CAPITACAPITA,Washington University, Saint Louis, Missouri.
Evaluation of REMSAD- BRAVO Simulations Using Tracer Data and Synthesized Modeling Michael Barna Cooperative Institute for Research in the Atmosphere Colorado.
NATURAL AND TRANSBOUNDARY INFLUENCES ON PARTICULATE MATTER IN THE UNITED STATES: IMPLICATIONS FOR THE EPA REGIONAL HAZE RULE Rokjin J. Park ACCESS VII,
April 22, 2001 Dust Episode 20% worst for three sites in West Texas and Mid South Region Worst day for Bext at GUMO 20% best day for several sites in UT,
BRAVO Back-Trajectory Analyses Why Consider ATAD? History of use at Big Bend - How Good is our past? History of comparison to other wind fields. ATAD vs.
Colorado Plateau Sulfate Episode Worst 20% at 5 sites: INGA, BRCA, MEVE, WEMI & SAPE Best 20% at GICL, SACR, CHIR, SIAN, GUMO, TONT, and most California.
Tracer Simulation and Analysis of Transport Conditions Leading to Tracer Impacts at Big Bend Bret A. Schichtel ( NPS/CIRA.
MODELS3 – IMPROVE – PM/FRM: Comparison of Time-Averaged Concentrations R. B. Husar S. R. Falke 1 and B. S. Schichtel 2 Center for Air Pollution Impact.
Case study for September 3, 1997-Eastern US sulfate transport to Colorado Plateau 12 spatially coherent sites in TX, NM, AZ, CO 20% worst haze,with sulfate.
REMSAD Simulation of the BRAVO Tracer Experiment Michael G. Barna Cooperative Institute for Research in the Atmosphere Colorado State University Fort Collins,
BRAVO Results of CMAQ-MADRID Betty Pun, Christian Seigneur & Shiang-Yuh Wu AER, San Ramon Naresh Kumar EPRI, Palo Alto 10 October 2002.
Incorporating Monitoring, Modeling, and EI Data into AoH Analysis AoH Meeting, Salt Lake City September 21-22, 2004 Air Resource Specialists, Inc.
Causes of Haze Update Prepared by Marc Pitchford for the 5/24/05 AoH conference call.
Application of Combined Mathematical and Meteorological Receptor Models (UNMIX & Residence Time Analysis) to IMPROVE Aerosol Data from Brigantine.
Use of Airmass History Models & Techniques for Source Attribution Bret A. Schichtel Washington University St. Louis, MO Presentation to EPA Source Attribution.
MANE-VU states, Virginia and West Virginia Regional Haze Trend Analyses Latest available (December 2011) IMPROVE DATA (for TSC 5/22/2012) Tom.
U.S.-Canada Air Quality Agreement: Transboundary PM Science Assessment Report to the Air Quality Committee June, 2004.
Estimating local versus regional contributions to tropospheric ozone: An example case study for Las Vegas Mark Green and Dave DuBois Desert Research Institute.
Causes of Haze Assessment Dave DuBois Desert Research Institute.
Airmass History Analysis During High and Low Sulfate Days Bret A. Schichtel NPS/CIRA Fort Collins, CO BRAVO Study Data Analysis Meeting San Antonio, TX.
Causes of Haze Assessment Update for Fire Emissions Joint Forum -12/9/04 Meeting Marc Pitchford.
Causes of Haze Assessment (COHA) Update. Current and near-future Major Tasks Visibility trends analysis Assess meteorological representativeness of 2002.
Influence of the Asian Dust to the Air Quality in US During the spring season, the desert regions in Mongolia and China, especially Gobi desert in Northwest.
Springtime Airmass Transport Pathways to the US Prepared by: Bret A. Schichtel and Rudolf B. Husar Center for Air Pollution Impact and Trend Analysis (CAPITA)
Trajectory Calculations Trajectory or backtrajectory analyses use interpolated measured or modeled meteorological fields to estimate the most likely central.
NARSTO PM Assessment NARSTO PM Assessment Chapter 5: Spatial and Temporal Pattern TOC Introduction Data Global Pattern NAM Dust NAM Smoke NAM Haze NAM.
Technical Projects Update WRAP Board Meeting Salt Lake City, UT November 10, 2004.
NATURAL AND TRANSBOUNDARY POLLUTION INFLUENCES ON AEROSOL CONCENTRATIONS AND VISIBILITY DEGRADATION IN THE UNITED STATES Rokjin J. Park, Daniel J. Jacob,
Springtime Airmass Transport Pathways to the US Prepared by: Bret A. Schichtel and Rudolf B. Husar CAPITA CAPITA,Washington University Saint Louis, Missouri.
Modeling Regional Haze in Big Bend National Park with CMAQ Betty Pun, Christian Seigneur & Shiang-Yuh Wu AER, San Ramon Naresh Kumar EPRI, Palo Alto CMAQ.
Global and Local Dust over North America Initial Assessment by a Virtual Community on Dust Coordinated by R.
Seasonal Airmass Transport to the US Prepared by: Rudolf B. Husar and Bret Schichtel CAPITACAPITA,Washington University, Saint Louis, Missouri Submitted.
WRAP Regional Modeling Center, Attribution of Haze Meeting, Denver CO 7/22/04 Introduction to the the RMC Source Apportionment Modeling Effort Gail Tonnesen,
Brief evaluation of REMAD and CMAQ for east Texas tracers Mark Green, DRI Model results from Christian Seigneur and Betty Pun- AER (CMAQ and REMSAD), and.
BRAVO Results of REMSAD Shiang-Yuh Wu, Betty Pun & Christian Seigneur AER, San Ramon 10 October 2002.
Springtime Airmass Transport Pathways to the US Prepared by: Rudolf B. Husar and Bret Schichtel CAPITACAPITA,Washington University, Saint Louis, Missouri.
NPS Source Attribution Modeling Deterministic Models Dispersion or deterministic models Receptor Models Analysis of Spatial & Temporal Patterns Back Trajectory.
Seasonal Airmass Transport Pathways to the US Prepared by: Rudolf B. Husar and Bret Schichtel CAPITACAPITA,Washington University, Saint Louis, Missouri.
Ambient Monitoring & Reporting Forum Plans for 2005 Prepared by Marc Pitchford for the WRAP Planning Team Meeting (3/9 – 3/10/05)
NARSTO PM Assessment NARSTO PM Assessment Chapter 5: Spatial and Temporal Pattern TOC Introduction Data Global Pattern NAM Dust NAM Smoke NAM Haze NAM.
Aerosol Pattern over Southern North America Tropospheric Aerosols: Science and Decisions in an International Community A NARSTO Technical Symposium on.
Observations Complex mixture of contributors to 20% worst Many 20% worst extinction days at many sites Sulfate episodes in Midwest, SE and SW Soil.
Causes of Haze Assessment (COHA) Update Jin Xu. Update Visibility trends analysis (under revision) Assess meteorological representativeness of 2002 (modeling.
Preliminary Analysis by: Fawn Hornsby 1, Charles Rogers 2, & Sarah Thornton 3 1,3 North Carolina State University 2 University of Texas at El Paso Client:
V:\corporate\marketing\overview.ppt CRGAQS: CAMx Sensitivity Results Presentation to the Gorge Study Technical Team By ENVIRON International Corporation.
Properties of Particulate Matter
AOSC 200 Lesson 27. A Typical Day in a Pollution Episode A common severe pollution weather pattern occurs when high pressure is centered just west of.
Attribution Of Haze Case Study for Nevada Jarbidge Wilderness Area
The average PM2.5 mass concentration based on IMPROVE data available from September 2000 to December 2002 is 3.3 mg/m3 The highest occurrence of the 20%
Attribution Of Haze Case Study for Nevada Jarbidge Wilderness Area
Contribution of Dust to Regional Haze Based on Available IMPROVE Data From (Provided by Marc Pitchford (NOAA) and Jin Xu (DRI), 01/14/04) Mean.
MANE-VU Contribution Assessment Efforts: Trajectory Cluster Analysis
Causes of Haze Assessment Brief Overview and Status Report
Joe Adlhoch - Air Resource Specialists, Inc.
Regional Modeling Update
Monitoring the Weather
Synthesized CMAQ A BRAVO community Product
Contribution of Dust to Regional Haze Based on Available IMPROVE Data From (Provided by Marc Pitchford (NOAA) and Jin Xu (DRI), 01/14/04) Mean.
Joe Adlhoch - Air Resource Specialists, Inc.
Presentation transcript:

Overview of the Big Bend Regional Aerosol and Visibility Observational (BRAVO) study:  Understand the long-range, trans-boundary transport of visibility-reducing particles from regional sources in the U.S. and Mexico  Quantify contributions of U.S. and Mexican source regions responsible for poor visibility at Big Bend NP BRAVO conducted during July-October 1999  Large network of aerosol and SO2 monitoring sites, tracer released from 4 locations, additional upper air measurements  Specialized aerosol measurements at Big Bend  Extensive data analysis and modeling (MM5,REMSAD, CMAQ)

BRAVO aerosol and tracer monitoring sites and tracer release locations

Tracer transport Eagle Pass tracer > detection limit at the 6 hour sites 16% to 59% of the time (most frequently at northern sites) Timing tracers from Eagle Pass indicated transport times most often hours Northeast Texas and Houston area tracers hit 6 hour sites infrequently and tends to hit all sites during an episode (broader plume) San Antonio tracer > detection limits 15% to 34% of the time with several periods of short-term impacts at most or all sites

4 major episodes, 2-4 days duration Sulfate scattering dominated extinction

Some findings Sulfates dominated fine mass budget, followed by carbon, crustal Secondary organics identified as important by organic speciation, but could not be apportioned Some periods of African dust (July, August) identified from calcium deficiency, backtrajectories Spatial pattern analysis (TAGIT) of SO 2 and SO 4 near Big Bend attribute 75% of SO 2 to “local” sources and 90% of SO 4 to “regional” sources

TAGIT-SO2 method results

HYSPLIT Residence time for entire BRAVO study- flow mostly from SE along border area Residence time worst 20% light scattering (6-hour periods) flow more from NE prior to along border area

This episode appeared to have transport from eastern US

Weak cold front passes through area, bring flow from the NE behind front-episode 3

Conceptual model for late summer/early fall haze episodes at Big Bend Weak early season cold front approaches Texas SE flow ahead of front brings emissions from sources in east Texas/Gulf Coast inland under humid conditions Northeast-east flow after frontal passage carries polluted airmass toward Big Bend Flow returns to typical SE as it approached Big Bend, also carrying emissions from border area Absolute worst-case had “back-door cold front approach from NE, carrying sulfur compounds from eastern US in additional to regional and local emissions

Preliminary Particulate Sulfur Source Attributions for BRAVO by Trajectory Mass Balance Regressions- Kristi Gebhart, NPS

Results using MM5 36-Km Winds

Preliminary Source Attributions from Trajectory Mass Balance Regressions Carbon I/II – % East Texas – % Monterrey Region, Mexico City & Volcano – % El Paso Region – 0 - 7% Eastern U.S. – 0 - 7% Western U.S. – negligible

Air Quality modeling MM5 with 36 and 12 km grids entire 4 months, 4 km near Big Bend two 10-day episodes CMAQ for two 10-day episodes REMSAD for entire 4 months (36 km and 12 km)

August- Particulate S and observed iPPCH Big Brown tracer and Observed S Big Brown tracer Observed S

12km CMAQ and 36km REMSAD Big Brown tracer obs/preds time series for sequestered period August- CMAQ and observed iPPCH Look at CMAQ first…Obs Preds

12km CMAQ and 36km REMSAD Big Brown tracer obs/preds time series for sequestered period August- REMSAD and observed iPPCH Now REMSAD…Obs Preds

October- Particulate S and observed PTCH Houston tracer and observed S Houston tracer Observed S

12km CMAQ and 36km REMSAD Houston tracer obs/preds time series for sequestered period October- CMAQ and observed PTCH Look at CMAQ first… Obs Preds

October- REMSAD and observed PTCH 12km CMAQ and 36km REMSAD Houston tracer obs/preds time series for sequestered period Now REMSAD… Obs Preds

REMSAD PTCH 36 km 12 km REMSAD vs. CMAQ 36 km vs. 12 km PTCH (Houston Tracer) October 12 Graphics from AER

SO4 at K-BAR, August-October 1999 from CIRA

Modeling status Modeling work is on-going Additional work being done (CMAQ at 36 km, etc.) to help understand CMAQ transport problems REMSAD and CMAQ sensitivity tests to assess contributions to sulfate from Mexico, east Texas, west Texas, non-Texas US areas