Use of HITL in Bus Priority Design Kevin Balke, Ph.D., P.E. TransLink ® Research Center Director Texas Transportation Institute Hardware-in-the-Loop Symposium.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Proactive Traffic Merging Strategies for Sensor-Enabled Cars
Advertisements

Bus Priority in Portland - Lessons Learned
GIS Data in Real-Time Transit Management Systems 2011 GIS in Public Transportation Conference St. Petersburg, FL, September 14, 2011.
Travel Time Estimation on Arterial Streets By Heng Wang, Transportation Analyst Houston-Galveston Area Council Dr. Antoine G Hobeika, Professor Virginia.
Overview of MOST: A Hands On Approach to Signal Timing Training Federal Highway Administration Webinar 15 April 2009 Michael Kyte, MOST Principal Investigator.
Transit Signal Priority Applications New Technologies, New Opportunities Peter Koonce, PE APTA BRT Conference – Seattle, WA Wednesday, May 5, 2009 Technology.
MBTA Key Bus Route Improvement Program Joanne Haracz, AICP responsive client solutions since 1976 Pennsylvania Public Transportation Association April.
WMATA Bus ITS Project Update Transit Signal Priority Briefing to the Traffic Signals and Operations Working Group April 21, 2005.
Optimized Signal Timing Plans vs. InSync ® Adaptive Traffic Signals The Results of a New Microsimulation Study by Aleksandar Stevanovic, Ph.D, PE RhythmTraffic.com.
Miroslav Vujic University of Zagreb Faculty of Transport and Traffic Sciences Zagreb, 10 October 2013 CIVITAS-ELAN 8.2. Public Transport Priority and Traveler.
Presented by: SAGE KAMIYA, P.E., PTOE
MTC Technology Transfer Seminar Transit Signal Priority Abbas Mohaddes, President & CEO October 22, 2003.
Geometry information from Liufang Ave. North in Beijing Green phase (s): 99,77,66,75,60 Dwell time distribution: N (30,9), N (27,7), N (24,6) Maximal bandwidth:
Transit Signal Priority Work Group Report 7/30/13
Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering Development of a Portable Work Zone Traffic Safety Information System using DSRC Based V2I and V2V Communication.
Advanced Traveler Information System ATIS. What are Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS) ? The application of advanced sensor, computer, electronics,
Gresham Traffic Signal System Optimization A Comprehensive Evaluation of Corridor Performance After Deploying Adaptive Signal Control.
Lec 24, Ch.19: Actuated signals and detectors (Objectives) Learn terminology related to actuated signals Understand why and where actuated signals are.
Advanced Public Transit Systems (APTS) Transit ITS CEE582.
CRASH IMMINENT SAFETY: A TIER 1 UNIVERSITY TRANSPORTATION CENTER PROFESSOR UMIT OZGUNER TRC INC. CHAIR ON INTELLIGENT TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS DIRECTOR,
Direction territoriale Ile-de-France A review of urban traffic regulation centres in France Contribution of ITS for traffic management in urban area Arnaud.
Measuring the Effects of Congestion and Request Location on Transit Signal Priority Matt Dorado Erin Qureshi River Hwang Portland State University.
TSP Must Fit Within An Overall Agency ITS Plan. Transit Priority Data Needs Vehicle Location –Speed Door & Lift Status –Predictions Passenger Counting.
Gainesville Area Traffic Management System. Traffic Management System  In 1984, the original Traffic Signal Master Plan was developed for the Gainesville.
Advanced Evaluation Techniques and Hardware-In- The-Loop Simulation Darcy Bullock, P.E. Professor Purdue University.
2015 Traffic Signals 101 Topic 7 Field Operations.
Transit Priority Systems (TPS) Chun Wong, P.E. City of Los Angeles, Department of Transportation T3 Webinar.
3rd Street Light Rail Process and Challenges of Developing Transit Signal Priority Javad Mirabdal, Jack Fleck & Britt Thesen Department of Parking and.
2015 Traffic Signals 101 Topic 11 Emergency Vehicle Preemption (EVP) and Railroad (RR) Preemption.
1Prepared by AC Transit Service Development Transit Signal Priority For the San Pablo Rapid Bus.
Signalized Intersection Delay Monitoring for Signal Retiming SafeTrip-21 Safe and Efficient Travel through Innovation and Partnership in the 21 st Century.
Sensitivity Evaluation of Subspace-based Damage Detection Technique Saeid Allahdadian Dr. Carlos Ventura PhD Student, The University of British Columbia,
RT-TRACS A daptive Control Algorithms VFC-OPAC Farhad Pooran PB Farradyne Inc. TRB A3A18 Mid-Year Meeting and Adaptive Control Workshop July 12-14, 1998.
Applied Transportation Analysis ITS Application SCATS.
Evolving TSP to meet the needs of the ITS community 1.
Assessment of Urban Transportation Networks by integrating Transportation Planning and Operational Methods /Tools Presentation by: Sabbir Saiyed, P.Eng.
Transit Signal Prioritization (TSP) and RTS RTS Transit Signal Priority Work Group A Path to Successful Implementation 1 July 16, 2013.
Transit Priority Strategies for Multiple Routes under Headway-based Operations Shandong University, China & University of Maryland at College Park, USA.
Regional Traffic Simulation/Assignment Model for Evaluation of Transit Performance and Asset Utilization April 22, 2003 Athanasios Ziliaskopoulos Elaine.
A Genetic Algorithm Based Microscopic Simulation To Develop The Evacuation Plan For Multi-institutional Centers Fengxiang Qiao, Ph.D., Assistant Professor,
Guidelines for the Planning and Deployment of EVP and TSP Presented by: Hesham Rakha Associate Professor, Civil and Environmental Engineering Director,
2010 Fall Transportation Conference A Guideline for Choosing Cycle Length to Maximize Two-Way Progression in Downtown Area Saeedeh Farivar Zong Tian University.
Implementation Transit Priority System and Mobile Internet Passenger System in the City of Los Angeles Kang Hu and Chun Wong City of Los Angeles Department.
Transit Signal Priority (TSP). Problem: Transit vehicles are slow Problem: Transit vehicles are effected even more than cars by traffic lights –The number.
Transit Signal Priority (TSP): Deployment Issues and R&D Needs as Identified by Practitioners Hallie Smith Brendon Hemily.
ITS Lab Members  Ph.D Student in Civil Engineering  Areas of Interest  Freeway Management and Operation  Transit Operation  Intelligent Transportation.
Software In The Loop Applications for VISSIM TRB Traffic Signal Systems Committee – Simulation Subcommittee Kiel Ova, P.E., PTOE.
Line 22 BRT: Summary Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority May 2003.
TRB/APTA 2004 Bus Rapid Transit Conference The Results of Selected BRT Projects 2:00 – 3:20 p.m. Walt Kulyk Director, FTA Office of Mobility Innovation.
1 RANKING OF FUNCTIONAL REQUIREMENTS/ TOPIC AREAS FOR NEEDED RESEARCH BY THE TRB TRAFFIC SIGNAL SYSTEMS COMMITTEE JULY 21, 2002 MID-YEAR MEETING IN SALT.
Transit Signal Priority: Managing Expectations Kevin N. Balke, Ph.D., P.E TransLink ® Research Center Director Texas Transportation Institute Transportation.
Abstract The City of Portland, in collaboration with TriMet (Portland’s regional transit service provider) and the Oregon Department of Transportation,
Transportation Research Board Planning Applications Conference, May 2007 Given by: Ronald T. Milam, AICP Contributing Analysts: David Stanek, PE Chris.
Overview of King County Transit Signal Priority Program T3 Webinar January 22, 2008.
Transit Signal Priority: The Importance of AVL Data David T. Crout Tri-County Metropolitan Transportation District of Oregon (TriMet) Presented at Transportation.
05/16/2008 Improved Traffic Signal Efficiency in Rural Areas through the use of Variable Maximum Green Time Aswini Rajagopalan.
Opticom ™ GPS Priority Control System 3M™ Opticom™ GPS Priority Control System Driver Training.
DSRC and SPaT, SSM, SRM & MAP
City of Portland - Isolated Timing Operations January 9, 2005 Isolated Timing Operations - Workshop on Best Practices for Signal Timing Bill Kloos Signals.
March 10, 2010 Smart City Award: ITS America. Traffic Signal Systems in Oregon Significant application of adaptive control (100+ signals) Priority for.
Thinking Inside the Box
Traffic Signal Operations: An Evaluation of Vehicle Detection Systems
Guide for Determining Time Requirements for Traffic Signal Preemption at Highway-Rail Grade Crossings: Revisions to the TxDOT Worksheet Kevin Balke, PhD,
MOVA Traffic Signal Control Trial
Emergency Vehicle Preemption (EVP) and Railroad (RR) Preemption
* Topic 7 Field Operations
Transit Signal Priority: Evolution
Transit Signal Priority: The Importance of AVL Data
A Deep Reinforcement Learning Approach to Traffic Management
Presentation transcript:

Use of HITL in Bus Priority Design Kevin Balke, Ph.D., P.E. TransLink ® Research Center Director Texas Transportation Institute Hardware-in-the-Loop Symposium Portland, Oregon July 29, 2003

Presentation Outline Algorithm Development and Testing Product Evaluation Sensor Location Design

Algorithm Development Proof-of-concept testing of algorithm Investigated New computer algorithm Manipulating traffic signal parameters in real traffic signal controller Evaluate whether algorithm performs as designed

Product Evaluation Test functionality of controllers/ technology Compare features in similar situations Develop deep understanding of how a product responds Controlled environment

Sensor Location Design Recent application of HITL technologies Conducted as part of Houston METRO’s installation of Regional Traffic Computer Signal System (RTCSS) Investigate question  where to place optical detection zones?

Houston Metro TSP Architecture Naztec 2070 w/ NextPhase ® Software 3M Opticom® Series 700 System Priority Phase Call Receiver Phase Selector Emitter

Houston Metro Issues Near-side bus stops ≈ 75% are nearside stops Many priority systems designed for far side stops Emitter Range > 2500 ft in ideal conditions Designed for emergency vehicle preemption How do you apply to transit priority?

Our Study What is the optimal length of the detection zones? Too far  “priority” occurs before bus gets to intersection Too close  “priority” hasn’t started when bus arrives Investigate interaction between: Bus stop location Detection zone location Priority algorithm performance

Our Approach Use HITL Simulation VISSIM model of two intersection Naztec controller with planned NextPhase timings Three bus stop locations 1500 ft upstream of intersection 50 ft upstream of intersection Two bus stops on same approach  100 ft and 500 ft

Detection Zones Lengths Varied detection zone length 1500 ft, 1000 ft, 500 ft, 100 ft, and No detection x Detection Zone Length

MOEs Probability of bus “successfully” clearing intersection without stopping Bus Delay

Lessons Learned Optimum detection range between 1000 ft and 1500 ft Exact length will vary depending upon Cycle length Degree of congestion Passenger demands (dwell times) Type of TSP logic Do not include multiple bus stops or intersections

Questions