The influence of variable marine survival on fishery management objectives for wild steelhead Dan Rawding & Charlie Cochran.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
McNary Dam The Dalles DamBonneville Dam John Day Dam Evaluate Spawning of Fall Chinook and Chum Salmon Below the Four Lower-most Columbia River Mainstem.
Advertisements

Interior Columbia Basin TRT Draft Viability Criteria June, 2005 ESU & Population Levels.
Evaluate recreational and commercial mark-selective fisheries. (35018) Geraldine Vander Haegen, WDFW Charmane Ashbrook, WDFW Chris Peery, U. Idaho Annette.
Annual Stock Assessment – Coded Wire Tag Program (ODFW & WDFW) BPA Project Numbers: and
Chinook Salmon Adult Abundance Monitoring Paul Kucera and Dave Faurot Nez Perce Tribe Department of Fisheries Resources Management BPA Project
Investigate Re-establishing Anadromous Fish Populations Above Man-made Barriers Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife Willamette Basin.
Assessment of A-run Steelhead population in the Clearwater Nez Perce Tribe Department of Fisheries Resources Management.
Chinook Salmon Adult Abundance Monitoring Project Dave Faurot Nez Perce Tribe Pacific Northwest National Laboratory.
Lower Snake River Compensation Plan Hatchery Evaluations – Salmon River Project No Nez Perce Tribe Department of Fisheries Resources Management.
Information Needs for the Integrated F&W Program (ESA and Power Act) Jim Geiselman - BPA.
Principal Investigators: Sherman Sprague-Spring Chinook Billy Arnsberg-Fall Chinook Nez Perce Tribal Hatchery Monitoring & Evaluation BPA Project #
Frank Leonetti, Snohomish County
Future of Our Salmon Conference Portland, OR Oct 17, 2012 Why Artificial Propagation? Why Artificial Propagation? Gary James, Confederated Tribes of the.
Life History Patterns and Habitat Use in the Upper Columbia Greer Maier Science Program Manager Upper Columbia Salmon Recovery Board.
Covariation in Productivity of Mid-Columbia Steelhead Populations S.P. Cramer & Associates, Inc. 600 N.W. Fariss Road Gresham, OR
Dan Rawding, Thomas Buehrens, and Charlie Cochran.
Adult Steelhead Monitoring Challenges in Cedar Creek, WA Josua Holowatz & Dan Rawding.
Reduced Recruitment Performance in Natural Populations of Anadromous Salmonids Associated with Hatchery- reared Fish Pacific Coast Steelhead Meeting –
Federal Concerns Regarding Hatchery Steelhead Spawning in the Wild NOAA Fisheries Salmon Recovery Division.
Precision of Redd Based Escapement Estimates for Steelhead
Coordination of Tag and Mark Recovery Programs Dan Rawding WDFW.
Stephanie Carlson 1 and William Satterthwaite 2 1 Department of Environmental Science, Policy & Management, UC Berkeley 2 NOAA-Fisheries, Santa Cruz Managing.
Management strategies for balancing hatchery functions with natural fish protections Brad Cavallo.
Resident Fish Above Chief Joseph and Grand Coulee Dams Project No Kalispel Tribe of Indians Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife Spokane.
Development of the Lower Snake River Compensation Plan: A Brief History Scott Marshall LSRCP Program Administrator U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service.
LONG-TERM EFFECTS OF SIZE- SELECTIVE FISHERIES & HATCHERY MATING PRACTICES ON AGE & SEX COMPOSITION OF CHINOOK SALMON RETURNING TO HATCHERIES David Hankin.
Missing collaborator. Conceptual Overview SHIRAZ Landscape Processes Land Use Freshwater Habitat Biological Response Land use & landscape processes affect.
Population viability analysis of Snake River chinook: What do we learn by including climate variability? Rich Zabel NOAA Fisheries Seattle, WA.
MANAGEMENT AND RESEARCH OF KALAMA RIVER STEELHEAD WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND WILDLIFE KALAMA RESEARCH TEAM PAT HULETT CAMERON SHARPE CHRIS WAGEMANN.
Revisiting Stock-Recruitment Relationships Rainer Froese Mini-workshop on Fisheries: Ecology, Economics and Policy CAU, Kiel, Germany.
Integrated Status & Trend (ISTM) Project: An overview of establishing, evaluating and modifying monitoring priorities for LCR Steelhead Jeff Rodgers (ODFW)
Proposed Approach for Developing Columbia Basin Salmon and Steelhead Goals June 3, 2015.
Strategy Rationale Oregon Recovery Plan Washington Recovery Plan NOAA Monitoring Guidance (includes RPAs) Integrated Status & Trends Monitoring (ISTM)
Monitor and Evaluate Salmonid Production in the Asotin Creek Subbasin - LSRCP (ID #200116)
Washington State Steelhead Status Review PACIFIC COAST STEELHEAD MEETING JON ANDERSON WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF FISH & WILDLIFE MARCH 9-11, 2010.
Steelhead Stock Status Review and ESA Oregon Rhine Messmer ODFW District Staff Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife Pacific Coast Steelhead Management.
Life History of Western Washington Winter Steelhead, a 30 Year Perspective Hal Michael Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife
Modeling physical environmental impacts on survival: the SHIRAZ model Ecosystem based management FISH 507.
Photo by John McMillan Spawning habitat Winter rearing Summer rearing Smolt Carrying Capacity.
Steelhead and Snow Linkages to Climate Change ?. Recruitment Curves Fact or Fiction?
Pacific Coast Steelhead Management Meeting What Are Managers Required to Provide Their Constituents? March 9-11, 2004 Bob Leland.
COMPARATIVE SURVIVAL STUDY Chapter 3: Annual SAR by study category and ratios of SARs Comparisons of SARs Transport to In-River By hatchery group Hatchery.
February 5, 2003 Integrating Fisheries Management Into Comprehensive Recovery Planning Jeff Koenings, Randy Kinley Mike Grayum, Curt Kraemer, Kit Rawson.
Chinook Salmon Supplementation in the Imnaha River Basin- A Comparative Look at Changes in Abundance and Productivity Chinook Salmon Supplementation in.
Linking freshwater habitat to salmonid productivity Watershed Program 1 1. NW Fisheries Science Center 2725 Montlake Blvd. East, Seattle, WA
An exploratory analysis of climate impacts on Washington steelhead productivity Nate Mantua University of Washington Climate Impacts Group Pacific States.
03Nov2006 Revision11 Priority Questions of TID/MID/CCSF Regarding Tuolumne River Salmonids & Macroinvertebrates.
Variation in the effectiveness of alternative broodstock, rearing, and release practices among three supplemented steelhead populations - Hood Canal, WA.
October 20 & 21, 2009 Stevenson, WA Columbia Basin Coordinated Anadromous Monitoring Strategy Workshop Lower Columbia Sub-Basin.
A Bayesian Approach to Combine Multiple Sources of Escapement Data to Estimate Wind River Steelhead Abundance Dan Rawding and Charlie Cochran.
Comparison of Winter Steelhead Trap Estimates in Small Basins to Other Escapement Methods and the Representativeness of ODFW Life-Cycle Monitoring Sites.
Supplementation using steelhead fry: performance, interactions with natural steelhead, & effect of enriched hatchery environments Christopher P. Tatara.
Bryce Glaser Dan Rawding (WDFW)
POPULATION DYNAMICS Zoo 511 Ecology of Fishes 2009.
Recruitment in Wild Smolt and Adult Steelhead Trout: the 30-year Experience at the Keogh River. Bruce R. Ward B.C. Ministry of Environment, U.B.C. And.
Joe Bumgarner Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife.
Ocean rivers SARs LGR-LGR SARs LGR-LGR Harvest Mouth of Columbia predicted returns Mouth of Columbia predicted returns Juvenile travel time and survival.
Northwest Power Planning Council Fish and Energy Impacts Resulting from Reductions in Summer Bypass Spill July 16, 2003.
November 3-5, 2009 Stevenson, WA Columbia Basin Coordinated Anadromous Monitoring Strategy Workshop Upper Columbia Sub-Region 2 Listed ESU/DPS Steelhead-
Oncorhynchus mykiss : The Quandary of a Highly Polymorphic Species under the U.S. Endangered Species Act by: Kathryn Kostow Oregon Department of Fish and.
Upstream passage success rates and straying of returning adults Presenter: Jack Tuomikoski CSS Annual Meeting Apr 2 nd 2010.
Quiz 7. Harvesting strategies and tactics References Hilborn R, Stewart IJ, Branch TA & Jensen OP (2012) Defining trade-offs among conservation, profitability,
COLUMBIA RIVER SALMON CUMULATIVE IMPACTS EXAMPLE.
Salmon and Steelhead Conservation through adaptive management of water levels in the Jenner estuary NOAA’S National Marine Fisheries Service.
Payette MPG Sockeye Adult Tributary Juvenile Data Tributary Data
MPG Spring-Summer Chinook
Snake River MPG Fall Chinook Adult Tributary Juvenile Data Tributary
Status of Washington Steelhead 2006
On Recruitment of Steelhead in Mid Columbia Subbasins
Dave Pflug & Ed Connor Seattle City Light
Presentation transcript:

The influence of variable marine survival on fishery management objectives for wild steelhead Dan Rawding & Charlie Cochran

Population Monitoring Program Adult and smolt population estimated using mark-recapture or mark-resight Trout Creek adult census or trap count except 1995,96,& 97 -timing & redd surveys Precision of mark-recapture population estimates (95%CI) > + 20% Wild Spawner equivalents –Reproductive success of hatchery steelhead to the smolt stage ~ 30% (Kostow 2003) –Reproductive success of hatchery steelhead to the adult stage ~ 12% (Leider et al & Hulett et al. 1996)

Wind River Steelhead Biological Information ~95% summer and ~5% winter steelhead Segregation of race is due to Shipherd Falls –4 falls/cascades from 2 to 4 meters Summer steelhead sex ratio ~2:1 (F:M) Repeat spawner rate ~ 6% Repeats both spawners & recruits Spawner-Recruit modeling assumes steelhead are semelparous –therefore Smolt to Adult Survival (SAS) includes repeats

Out of Subbasin Information Unaccounted for loss between BON and Shipherd Falls is ~17% and assumed to be harvest from Zone 6 and sport fishing Mortality not accounted for –BON Adults 1.4% & Smolts 13.4% –Caspian Terns (Rice & Sand Islands)~10% –Cormorants ~2% –Marine Mammals Predation (2%) –Mainstem fishing below BON (2%?) –Northern Pikeminnow predation ?

Terms Spawner-Recuit (SR) or Spawner-Recuit-Relationship (SRR) SRR –Assume lognormal errors –Beverton-Holt (BH) –Ricker (R) –Hockeystick (HS) –Quadratic & Logistical Hockeystick(QHS,LHS)

SRR Reference Points

Fishery Management Is there a relationship between spawners & recruits? Would more data help? What is wrong?

No, No, It’s the ocean Smolt to adult survival ranged from 1% to 10%, or by a factor of 10

Possible Solutions Annual recruitment adjustment based on marine survival index (climate, hatchery steelhead survival, wild steelhead survival) Covariate (climate, hatchery or wild steelhead survival) into SRR –Two Stage SRR R = aS/(1+ aS/B) * MS - Hatchery smolt survival R = aS/(1+ aS/B) * (HS) c

Possible Solutions (continued) PDO or other ocean/climate index PDO adjusted for smolt outmigration year

Fishery Management Objectives Maximize Harvest? –Maximum Sustainable Yield (MSY) –MSY as lower bound Maximize fishing opportunity (C&R)? Maximize/maintain Freshwater Production? –S* = minimum escapement to maximize smolt yield –½ K = freshwater 50% of capacity Maintain Genetic Diversity? –500 spawners –WSP / average maturity (600 spawners)

Wind River MSY objectives

Summary MSY goals for low (3%)ocean survival MSY goals for hi (6%) ocean survival MSY goals for avg(4.5%)ocean survival MSY goals are highly variable depending on SAS (1%) to 1192(10%) Precautionary approach suggest MSY as lower bound MSY goals for small steelhead populations may compromise genetic diversity

Summary Current Wind River escapement goal 1,000 to 1,300 based on habitat model with good marine survival MSY goals for 4.5% SAS Minimum genetic goal spawners SRR goals freshwater productivity (517 – 729) –Beverton-HoltHockeystick ½ K = 729 S* = 532, S* for QHS = 517

Fishery Management Wind River Steelhead are listed under ESA Currently, WDFW manages steelhead commercial & recreational fishery impacts in the Wind River and other Lower Columbia River populations for less than 10% Fishery management and escapement objectives for Wind River will be a compromise of science and policy Recovery planners advocate “extra spawners” (above MSY) to take advantage of habitat restoration or lessen extinction risk

Fishery Management When fisheries are managed for fixed escapement goals, they are more likely to meet escapement objectives When fisheries are managed for fixed harvest rates, they are more likely to meet fishing objectives If we desire more precise management, a fishery management with multiple thresholds or controls between 300 and 800 adults could be developed for this population (BC approach with conservation and target reference points)