Configuration Management Fundamentals including Margin Management Bill Kline FirstEnergy Nuclear Operating Company (FENOC) June 2, 2008 Shell Beach, CA.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
World Health Organization
Advertisements

INPO Update CMBG Meeting June 2013
Safety Software QA at BNL’s Collider-Accelerator Department (C-AD) Accelerator Safety Workshop E. Lessard Collider-Accelerator Department August 12-14,
Ensure Vendor/Engineer of Choice Product Quality
Revised 1/4/11 CM Equilibrium CM Equilibrium for NNPPs Equilibrium Upsets CM Process Model & Equilibrium Restoration Using CM to protect Design and Operating.
1 Component Design Basis Inspection (CDBI) Graydon Strong 6/17/14.
EQUIPMENT VALIDATION.
NRC Perspective of Recent Configuration Management Issues Tom Farnholtz Chief, Engineering Branch 1 Division of Reactor Safety, Region IV June 2014 CMBG.
A Seminar on 1.  Validation vs Qualification  Why to validate?  Who should do Equipment Validation?  Parts of Equipment Validation  Validation of.
2007 CMBG Conference Temporary Configuration Changes Tony Hathcock Duke Energy - Oconee June 18-20, 2007 Charleston, SC.
SAE AS9100 Quality Systems - Aerospace Model for Quality Assurance
Temporary Configuration Change Mike Hayes Exelon Nuclear.
Lindy Hughes Fleet Fire Protection Program Engineer Southern Nuclear Operating Company June 4, 2013 Fire Protection.
DITSCAP Phase 2 - Verification Pramod Jampala Christopher Swenson.
Validation Chapter 4 1. Validation Exemplifies Process Understanding 2.
Configuration Management Benchmarking Group Conference June 6 – 9, 2004 Kansas City, MO © 2004 CMBG Deployment of a Margin Model at Comanche Peak Presented.
Design Bases From 1957 to 2003 June 18, 2007 Chuck Casto Region II NRC.
Rocky Mountain RAPS Process Validation Presentation 6/7/06 By Clay Anselmo.
Configuration Management Fundamentals
Commissioning of Fire Protection and Life Safety Systems Presented by: Charles Kilfoil Bechtel National Waste Treatment Plant Richland WA.
0 Configuration Management Fundamentals Presented By: John Parler CMBG Steering Committee.
Configuration Management Benchmarking Group Conference June 6 – 9, 2004 Kansas City, MO © 2004 CMBG Configuration Management Fundamentals including Margin.
NHUG - Boston - 08/04/20101 Considerations for Operability of Chillers and Chilled Water Systems NHUG Summer Meeting August 4, 2010 Tim Mitchell Component.
INPO Update Operational Excellence Outcomes and Configuration Management Glenn J. Neises, INPO Sr. Evaluator June 2004 CMBG Glenn J. Neises, INPO Sr. Evaluator.
2006 CMBG Conference Sam Melton Supervisor, Configuration Management Brunswick Nuclear Plant Progress Energy June 11-14, 2006 Richmond, VA CM04 Facility.
Margin Management. PAGE 2 Margin Management Plant Shutdowns 1.Late 1990’s – numerous “surprise” long-term plant shutdowns 2.Shutdowns resulted when a.
Configuration Management Benchmarking Group Conference June 6 – 9, 2004 Kansas City, MO © 2004 CMBG Characteristics of a Good Calculation Program Presented.
2007 CMBG Conference Bill Kline FirstEnergy Nuclear Operating Company (FENOC) June 19, 2006 Charleston, SC Latent Issues and Lessons Learned Discussion.
PAGE 1 New Plant - CM Configuration Management For The Next Generation Of Nuclear Facilities Joseph Burack Consulting Engineer Configuration Management.
Obsolescence Impact on Configuration Management
Configuration Management for Digital Upgrades Configuration Management Benchmarking Group 2008 Conference Scott Patterson Program Manager for I&C Obsolescence.
1 Review of Specifications for Digital Upgrades NHUG Summer Meeting July 17, 2008 Tim Mitchell Component Engineering Palo Verde Nuclear Generating Station.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency Methodology and Responsibilities for Periodic Safety Review for Research Reactors William Kennedy Research Reactor.
2006 CMBG Conference Keith A. Reinsmith PPL Susquehanna 2006 CMBG Conference June 11-14, 2006 Richmond, VA Configuration Management Awareness Training.
CM Tools Data Management Trends Wednesday, June 4, 2008 Laurent Perkins Enterprise Informatics.
2010 CMBG Conference Temporary Design Changes Tony Hathcock Duke Energy - Oconee June , 2010 Charlotte, NC.
1 Safety factors for periodic safety review for research reactors Group A: SF1 – SF4.
2007 CMBG Conference Sam Melton Progress Energy June 19, 2007 Charleston, SC Configuration Management Principles And Practices for New Nuclear Plants.
Evaluating Configuration Management
1 Public Meeting with ASME to Discuss Pump Inservice Testing Issues NRC Headquarters OWFN Room 1F22 June 4, 2007.
2006 CMBG Conference BREAKOUT 1: Component Design Basis Inspection Facilitators: Bill Kline/FENOC Sonya Myers/NMC June 11-14, 2006 Richmond, VA.
ICS Area Managers Training 2010 ITIL V3 Overview April 1, 2010.
2006 CMBG Conference Mike Stout Spescom Software, Inc. Configuration Management For The Next Generation.
Good Laboratory Practice
Fukushima Flooding Task Force Jim Riley April 5, 2012.
Instructor: Lloyd Hancock
CM-101 Configuration Management Fundamentals
World Health Organization
A Brief History of CM in the Nuclear Industry
World Health Organization
Flooding Walkdown Guidance
Quality Systems in a Production Facility
NRC CM Pilot Inspections Methodology and Results
Presented By: Mike Stout – PPL Glenn Neises - INPO
Configuration Management Fundamentals
World Health Organization
Fast Track Modifications Keith Reinsmith PPL Susquehanna
BREAKOUT 4: Vendor Technical Information
INPO Perspective of Industry CM Performance
Configuration Management Fundamentals including Margin Management
Configuration Management Fundamentals
Analyzing CM-Related Condition Reports
Temporary Alterations in Support of Maintenance and Temporary Modifications Beth Kernes Krause - Cooper Station February 24, 2019 Cleveland 2005.
TRTR Briefing September 2013
Configuration Management AP-929, Revision 1 Mike Stout Chairman CMBG Steering Committee April 9, 2019 Cleveland 2005.
BREAKOUT 8: CM and The Next Generation of Plants
Workshop 1: Processing Facility Configuration Information
Vendor Technical Information
BREAKOUT 3: CM Health Reporting
Break Out 1: CM of Digital Equipment
Presentation transcript:

Configuration Management Fundamentals including Margin Management Bill Kline FirstEnergy Nuclear Operating Company (FENOC) June 2, 2008 Shell Beach, CA

PAGE 2 CM Fundamentals 2008 CM Fundamentals 1.CM Equilibrium Objective of Configuration Management 2.Margins Using CM to protect Design and Operating Margins 3.CM Process Model Restoring CM Equilibrium 4.Functional Areas Five Functional Areas of CM

PAGE 3 CM Fundamentals 2008 What is CM Equilibrium? In its simplest terms Configuration Management is what we do to assure ourselves and our regulators that we are doing everything we said we would do. The objective of Configuration Management is the conformance of the three elements represented by the CM Equilibrium Model

PAGE 4 CM Fundamentals 2008 CM Equilibrium Design Requirements technical requirements, derived from the design process, that are reflected in the final design. What Needs to be there Design characteristics and bounding parameters needed for the design to work Must be verified or monitored to confirm that design is valid Design Require- ments

PAGE 5 CM Fundamentals 2008 CM Equilibrium Facility Configuration Information (FCI) documentation that defines how the plant is designed and how we operate it. What we say is there Design Output Documents Operational Configuration Documents Other Operating, Maintenance, Training and Procurement Information Facility Config Info

PAGE 6 CM Fundamentals 2008 CM Equilibrium Physical Configuration actual physical location, arrangement and material condition of SSCs What is actually there SSCs installed (design configuration) component position (operating configuration) Physical Config

PAGE 7 CM Fundamentals 2008 CM Equilibrium Work Processes must assure that: Elements conform all the time processes in place to restore CM Equilibrium if it is lost All Changes are Authorized people are trained and qualified Conformance can be verified determine what configuration is and prove it was done correctly Design Require- ments Facility Config Info Physical Config

PAGE 8 CM Fundamentals 2008 CM Equilibrium Upsets Upsets Between Design Requirements & Facility Configuration Information errors in analysis, design inputs errors in licensing documents Operating procedure invalidates design calculation (response time) desired changes, such as power uprating Design Require- ments Facility Config Info

PAGE 9 CM Fundamentals 2008 CM Equilibrium Upsets Upsets Between Physical Configuration & Facility Configuration Information drawing / plant discrepancies components in wrong position maintenance errors that affect plant configuration desired changes: modifications, manipulating plant components Facility Config Info Physical Config

PAGE 10 CM Fundamentals 2008 CM Equilibrium Upsets Upsets Between Physical Configuration and Design Requirements failure of SSC to meet performance criteria as designed equipment out of tolerance unexpected degradation in performance of SSCs Design Require- ments Physical Config

PAGE 11 CM Fundamentals 2008 CM Equilibrium  Margins Protect the Design Basis  Design Configuration conforms to Design Basis  Operational Configuration conforms to Design Configuration Design Basis Each boundary has margins to protect these limits NSD Figure Operational Configuration Design Configuration

PAGE 12 CM Fundamentals 2008 INPO Margin Model Analyzed Design Limit Operating Limit Normal Operations Operating Margin Design Margin Unanalyzed Margin Operating Margin Range of Normal Operation Equipment /Function Failure Let’s view this cross-section

PAGE 13 CM Fundamentals 2008 Margins Range of Normal Operation Ultimate Capability Operating Margin Design Margin Analyzed Design Limit Operating Limit Analytical Margin Documented on design documents Documented in engineering calculation Failure Point Undetermined depends on many variables controlled by Operations controlled by Engineering unanalyzed region

PAGE 14 CM Fundamentals 2008 Margins Range of Normal Operation Ultimate Capability Operating Margin Design Margin Analyzed Design Limit Operating Limit Analytical Margin Documented on design documents Documented in engineering calculation Failure Point Undetermined depends on many variables controlled by Operations controlled by Engineering unanalyzed region Notes on Model describes one parameter only; different parameters may be interrelated direction may be positive or negative doesn’t represent all possible limits and setpoints gaps not intended to represent relative size of margins – may be zero

PAGE 15 CM Fundamentals 2008 Margins Range of Normal Operation Ultimate Capability Operating Margin Design Margin Analyzed Design Limit Operating Limit Analytical Margin Documented on design documents Documented in engineering calculation Failure Point Undetermined depends on many variables controlled by Operations controlled by Engineering unanalyzed region Other Limits and Setpoints Operator Alarm (HI-HI) Operator Alarm (HI) Tech Spec Limit Regulatory Limit

PAGE 16 CM Fundamentals 2008 Operating Margin Design Margin Analytical Margin Margins Range of Normal Operation Ultimate Capability Analyzed Design Limit Operating Limit Elevator Example Rated Load posted in elevator = 3500 lbs Dept of Labor - design for 25% passenger overload 4375 lbs Analyzed & tested to 4650 lbs 100 – 600 lbs Failure Point – undetermined depends on many variables

PAGE 17 CM Fundamentals 2008 Margins Normal Operation Operating Margin Design Margin Analytical Margin HVAC Example OAC Room Temperature Original analysis: Room temperature must be kept under 90° F to protect computers Note: vendor’s Operating Limit = utility’s Ultimate Capability Analyzed Design Limit = 84° F, calculated for worst case conditions Operating Limit =78° F to give operators time to take action (analysis assumption) High Alarm is set at 75° F (warning of abnormal condition) 84° F 78° F 72° F 75° F 90° F

PAGE 18 CM Fundamentals 2008 Margins HVAC Example Over time margin is lost due to one or more of these causes: heat loads added to room lake temperature higher than analyzed poor heat exchanger performance due to fouling OAC Room Temperature Normal Operation Operating Margin Analytical Margin 88° F 82° F 74° F 78° F 90° F Design Margin New Analyzed Design Limit (88°F) reduces Analytical Margin and affects Operating Limit (78° F to 82°F) affects Operating Margin affects Alarm Setpoint (75° F to 78°F)

PAGE 19 CM Fundamentals 2008 Normal Operation Operating Margin Design Margin Analytical Margin OAC Room Temperature 84° F 78° F 72° F 75° F 90° F Larger air conditioning unit can restore room temperature margin but will require more electrical power increase weight on Aux Bldg roof Margins HVAC Example Voltage AnalysisRoof Structural Analysis Normal Operation Operating Margin Design Margin Analytical Margin Normal Operation Operating Margin Design Margin Analytical Margin …resulting in other margin losses

PAGE 20 CM Fundamentals 2008 CM Process Model high level model integrated processes used to return CM Equilibrium developed in early 2002 by CMBG task force. included in INPO Ap-929, Revision 1 in 2005

PAGE 21 CM Fundamentals 2008 CM Process Model Evaluate Identified Problem or Desired Change apparent discrepancy (discovered error) desired change (modification, manipulating plant components) Evaluate Identified Problem or Desired Change Change Facility Configuration Information ? Change Design Requirements ? Change Physical Configuration ? Do Nothing More CM Equilibrium Physical Configuration Change Authorization Process Design Requirements Change Process Facility Configuration Information Change Process No Yes No CM001

PAGE 22 CM Fundamentals 2008 CM Process Model Change Design Requirements? What are Design Requirements? Does change affect Design Requirements?  Use Design Requirements change process Evaluate Identified Problem or Desired Change Change Facility Configuration Information ? Change Design Requirements ? Change Physical Configuration ? Do Nothing More CM Equilibrium Physical Configuration Change Authorization Process Design Requirements Change Process Facility Configuration Information Change Process No Yes No CM002

PAGE 23 CM Fundamentals 2008 CM Process Model Change Physical Configuration? Modify components or change position of components?  Use mod process to change design Configuration  Use operating procedures to change component position Evaluate Identified Problem or Desired Change Change Facility Configuration Information ? Change Design Requirements ? Change Physical Configuration ? Do Nothing More CM Equilibrium Physical Configuration Change Authorization Process Design Requirements Change Process Facility Configuration Information Change Process No Yes No CM003

PAGE 24 CM Fundamentals 2008 CM Process Model Change Facility Configuration Information? Design Output documents (drawings & specs) Operational Configuration Documents Other operating, maintenance, training, etc. Evaluate Identified Problem or Desired Change Change Facility Configuration Information ? Change Design Requirements ? Change Physical Configuration ? Do Nothing More CM Equilibrium Physical Configuration Change Authorization Process Design Requirements Change Process Facility Configuration Information Change Process No Yes No CM004

PAGE 25 CM Fundamentals 2008 CM Process Model Do Nothing More If cost effective, do nothing more…except Document your conclusion Evaluate Identified Problem or Desired Change Change Facility Configuration Information ? Change Design Requirements ? Change Physical Configuration ? Do Nothing More CM Equilibrium Physical Configuration Change Authorization Process Design Requirements Change Process Facility Configuration Information Change Process No Yes No

PAGE 26 CM Fundamentals 2008 Functional Areas of CM #1Protect the Design Basis Design Basis Configuration #2Modify the Plant Engineering Change Control #3Operate the Plant Operational Configuration Control #4Maintain the Plant Configuration of SSCs not in service #5Test the Plant Plant Design Validation

PAGE 27 CM Fundamentals 2008 Functional Areas of CM Protect the Design Basis Objective: Understand and maintain design basis consistent with licensing basis design Major processes control of licensing and design basis documents (such as & UFSAR) engineering calculations Causes for upsets in CM Equilibrium new or revised Design Requirements inadequate original review

PAGE 28 CM Fundamentals 2008 Functional Areas of CM Modify the Plant Objective: Assure that changes to design configuration conform to Design Requirements and are accurately reflected on Facility Configuration Information Major processes modification process Causes for upsets in CM Equilibrium desired change (modification) undocumented plant changes

PAGE 29 CM Fundamentals 2008 Functional Areas of CM Operate the Plant Objective: Assure that alignment of in-service equipment is consistent with approved design through use of approved technical procedures. Major processes operating procedures tag out process Causes for upsets in CM Equilibrium failure to follow operating procedures human errors due to workarounds, abandoned equipment, temp mods, etc.

PAGE 30 CM Fundamentals 2008 Functional Areas of CM Maintain the Plant Objective: Assure that SSCs are procured and maintained in accordance with approved design Major processes maintenance procedures procurement procedures Causes for upsets in CM Equilibrium failure to follow procedures inadequate procurement QA

PAGE 31 CM Fundamentals 2008 Functional Areas of CM Test the Plant Objective: Assure the performance of SSCs meets Design Requirements Major processes performance testing plant walkdowns Causes for upsets in CM Equilibrium inadequate performance testing programs inadequate plant aging programs

PAGE 32 CM Fundamentals 2008 “It’s what you do now When you don’t have to do anything That lets you be What you want to be When it’s too late to do anything about it.” Warren Owen, former Exec. VP Duke Power