Electric / Gas / Water Summary of White Paper Findings CPUC SWH Workshop August 26, 2008.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
A Systems Approach To Training
Advertisements

Solid Waste Management Coordinating Board Solid Waste Management Coordinating Board Regional/County Solid Waste Master Plan Update June 22, 2011.
Financial Pros and Cons of Residential Solar Installations: A Residential and Municipal Perspective Joshua Brock Environmental Specialist City of San Diego.
Natural Gas – the cleaner, greener fuel! Natural gas is the cleanest-burning fossil fuel with 45 percent fewer carbon dioxide emissions than coal. Natural.
California’s MASH Low Income Solar PV Incentive Program October 5, 2011 Melanie McCutchan Senior Analyst California Center for Sustainable.
Considering Assistive Technology and the AT Plan Sara Menzel, ATP UCP Michigan Assistive Technology Center
CPUC EM&V WO54 – Market Assessment & Market Effects Baseline Characterization Market Effects Study of Investor-Owned Utility Residential.
Jim Pauley, P.E. Vice President, Industry and Government Relations – Schneider Electric Chair, NEMA High Performance Building Council Building Star An.
Next Steps. 2 Timelines and Action Items Immediate action items For parties: submit post workshop comments on all issues discussed in workshop In particular,
Overview of Property Assessed Clean Energy (PACE) Program San Antonio Office of Environmental Policy December 16, 2009.
Evaluating Minnesota’s Subsurface Sewage Treatment (SSTS) Professional Experience Program Nicholas Haig.
School of Marketing Ehrenberg-Bass Institute for Marketing Science Sales management issues relating to cross-functional selling teams John Wilkinson.
State Incentives for Energy Efficiency Commercial and Industrial New Jersey Board of Public Utilities Office of Clean Energy Mona L. Mosser Bureau of Energy.
1 1 Solar Water Heating Basics for Homeowners Solar Water Heating Pilot Program Skip Fralick.
Dedicated to improving home building since Understanding Installation and Costs of the Residential Fire Sprinkler Market.
Part A - QUALITY AS (3.1): Demonstrate understanding of how internal factors interact within a business that operates in a global context.
Minnesota Healthcare Setting Employee Influenza Vaccination Program Survey Denise Dunn, RN, MPH Adult/Adolescent Immunization Coordinator Minnesota Department.
Cost-Effectiveness and Solar Water Heating. 2 Why is it important to discuss cost- effectiveness (C-E) of SWH? C-E is a metric by which the CPUC will.
© 2010 San Diego Gas and Electric Co. and Southern California Gas Company. All copyright and trademark rights reserved. On-Bill Financing Frank Spasaro.
Realtor Solar Overview California Solar Initiative Updated
Developing Successful Products Brandon Burton Greg Zankowsky Melina Blundetto.
Chapter 3 Needs Assessment
Rachel Weaver Program Manager Maryland Energy Administration
1 Copyright © 2000 by Harcourt, Inc. All rights reserved. (1) 5 Module 5 Sales Organization Structure and Salesforce Deployment.
Knowledge to Shape Your Future Electric / Gas / Water Information collection, analysis and application EE Potential Summary Study Overview CALMAC Meeting.
VIRTUAL BUSINESS RETAILING
Brian Ross, Principal, CR Planning, Inc. Local Best Practices for Solar: Planning, Zoning, Permitting 1 Solar Minnesota November 26, 2012.
CSI Phase II: R Solar for Affordable Housing CPUC Intent: Set aside a “minimum” of 10% of budget $216.8M Solar Economics Less Compelling to CARE-Households.
Article 5 of the Energy Services Directive Edward Green.
Renewable Energy in New Jersey’s Clean Energy Program Scott Hunter Renewable Energy Program Administrator, Office of Clean Energy in the New Jersey Board.
IPv6 Survey: Taking the Federal Pulse on IPv6 Summary Results Market Connections, Inc. June 2006.
Performance Metrics for Weatherization UGI LIURP Evaluation Yvette Belfort Jackie Berger ACI Home Performance Conference April 30, 2014.
Presentation to the: Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission Demand-Side Response Working Group December 8, 2006 Gas Utility Decoupling in New Jersey A.
UNDERSTANDING PRINCIPLES OF MARKETING
Damon Franz California Public Utilities Commission ACEEE 2010 Hot Water Forum May 13, 2010 The California Solar Initiative - Thermal.
DBA 6 Bangkok, ID No Thailand
5.1 Understand the process and value of conducting a feasibility analysis for your business Key Terms: Industry Target customers Competitive grid Prototype.
Lesson 6: Market Research. Objectives Outline the five major steps in the market research process Describe how surveys can be used to learn about customer.
Market Research Lesson 6. Objectives Outline the five major steps in the market research process Describe how surveys can be used to learn about customer.
Welcome to Course title goes here Your Logo. Introduction.
Statewide Home Energy Efficiency Survey Program Presented by: Sharyn Barata Vice President - Marketing Opinion Dynamics Corp. Statewide Home Energy Efficiency.
NEET Workgroup #3 - Residential Subgroup Snohomish County PUD November 2008.
Comprehensive Cultural Assessments Summary of Scope & Methodology A. Levin © SYNERGY Consulting Services Corporation, 1999.
A Place-Based Approach to Changing the Market for Energy Efficiency Derek Long and Shawn Collins Sustainable Connections and Opportunity Council Bellingham,
Workshop 2 – Administrative Structure Recycled Water Feasibility Study Rancho Murieta Community Services District January 8, 2008.
Measurement & Evaluation of the San Francisco Peak Energy Pilot Program (SFPEP) MAESTRO/CALMAC Evaluation Showcase July 26, 2006 Kevin Cooney.
M ICHIGAN P UBLIC S ERVICE C OMMISSION Energy Optimization Plans 2011 Biennial Review Pre-Filing Update Rob Ozar, Manager Energy Optimization Section March.
Knowledge to Shape Your Future Electric / Gas / Water Information collection, analysis and application Presentation to the Low Income Oversight Board November.
Chapter 09 Business Markets and Buying Behavior Part Four Customer Behavior.
Electric / Gas / Water Summary of Final Evaluation Report Prepared by: Rafael Friedmann, PG&E Kris Bradley & Christie Torok, Quantum Consulting 2003 Statewide.
Utilities’ Update on Energy Savings Assistance Program Studies Ordered in D LIOB Meeting August 21, 2013 Sacramento, California.
Evaluation Plans for Energy Efficiency Programs Outline for California Measurement Advisory Council February 21, 2007.
California Solar Initiative Dian M. Grueneich, Commissioner California Public Utilities Commission March 30, 2006.
Electric / Gas / Water Summary of Final Evaluation Report Prepared by: John Cavalli, Itron Beatrice Mayo, PG&E July 27, Express Efficiency Program.
Trinity Collaborative Recreation Assessment and Forest Contractor and Workforce Assessment.
Barriers to Implementing Energy Efficiency at Small and Rural Utilities Jennifer Anziano and Ryan Firestone August 19, 2015.
Steps in Developing a Business Basic Business Concepts.
Small and Rural Utility Technical Needs Study:.  Acknowledgements  Project objectives  Project methodology  Key findings and recommendations  Utility.
California Energy Action Plan December 7, 2004 Energy Report: 2004 and 2005 Overview December 7, 2004.
Chapter 29 Conducting Market Research. Objectives  Explain the steps in designing and conducting market research  Compare primary and secondary data.
Marjorie McRae, Ph.D., Principal Jane S. Peters, Ph.D., President Research Into Action, Inc.,
Energy efficiency for better business. Agenda Welcome Goal for today and introductions About Energy Trust of Oregon Benefits of energy efficiency Customer.
© 2005 San Diego Gas and Electric Company and Southern California Gas Company. All copyright and trademark rights reserved Water Energy Nexus Calculator.
1 Detailed EM&V Approach for each of BGE’s Proposed Conservation Programs January 10, 2008.
1 Issues With Offering Just Electric Energy Efficiency Programs – No Gas Presented by Ruth Kiselewich Director, Conservation Programs January 10, 2008.
MULTIFAMILY PERFORMANCE PROGRAM
Self-Generation Incentive Program (SGIP)
Workshop Presentation
Tool Lending Library Program evaluation
DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEES AB 1600 UPDATE
Presentation transcript:

Electric / Gas / Water Summary of White Paper Findings CPUC SWH Workshop August 26, 2008

Knowledge to Shape Your Future 2 Purpose of White Paper  Report on the status of the CCSE SWHPP  Identify the extent to which the SWHPP design is similar to other SWH incentive programs  Identify current market barriers in California and how to address the market barriers  Provide information on equipment and installation costs and identify unique business practices that may help increase cost-effectiveness  Make recommendations on the design of a statewide incentive program  Outline future evaluation analyses as part of enhanced Interim Evaluation Report

Knowledge to Shape Your Future 3 Methodology  Analyze application data obtained by CCSE for types of systems installed and associated costs  Interview different groups of market players  Program participants and non-participants  Contractors throughout California  Market Actors (NREL, SRCC, CalSEIA, HISEIA, ODOE)  SWH incentive program administrators throughout the U.S.  Manufacturers and distributors of SWH equipment

Knowledge to Shape Your Future 4 Purpose of White Paper  Report status on CCSE SWHPP  Identify the extent to which the SWHPP design is similar to other SWH incentive programs  Identify current market barriers in California and how to address the market barriers  Provide information on equipment and installation costs and identify unique business practices that may help increase cost-effectiveness  Make recommendations on the design of a statewide incentive program  Outline future evaluation analyses as part of enhanced Interim Evaluation Report

Knowledge to Shape Your Future 5 SWHPP Relative to Other SWH Incentive Programs

Knowledge to Shape Your Future 6 Incentive Structure of SWH Incentive Programs

Knowledge to Shape Your Future 7 Summary of Program Administrator Surveys  Key takeaways from interviewing other Program Administrators  Equipment and contractor certification provide increased confidence in SWH systems  Inspections are important  Build and maintain strong relationships with contractors  Program administrators need to be adaptive

Knowledge to Shape Your Future 8 Purpose of White Paper  Report status on CCSE SWHPP  Identify the extent to which the SWHPP design is similar to other SWH incentive programs  Identify current market barriers in California and how to address the market barriers  Provide information on equipment and installation costs and identify unique business practices that may help increase cost-effectiveness  Make recommendations on the design of a statewide incentive program  Outline future evaluation analyses as part of enhanced Interim Evaluation Report

Knowledge to Shape Your Future 9 Residential Participant Survey Results  Out of the 40 interviewed participants, 19 of them had previously owned a SWH.  Residential participants were primarily motivated by environmental concerns and energy savings to install SWH systems.

Knowledge to Shape Your Future 10 Workshop Attendee (Program Non-participant) Survey Results  30 workshop attendees who elected not to purchase a SWH were also surveyed  Primary reasons for interest in SWH were the same as for participants

Knowledge to Shape Your Future 11 Workshop Attendee (Program Non-participant) Survey Results  The most commonly reported factor which would have the greatest influence on the decision to install SWH was a higher rebate

Knowledge to Shape Your Future 12 SWH Market Barriers  Initial installation cost  Lack of knowledge about the technology  Competition between PV systems, energy efficiency and SWH  Difficulty and expense associated with building permits

Knowledge to Shape Your Future 13 Initial Installation Cost  The Problems:  SWH has a high initial cost (average cost is $7,000)  The payback for NG is not as fast as for electric backup systems  Solutions:  Rebate program  Zero or low interest loans  Advice on the timing of the installation

Knowledge to Shape Your Future 14 Lack of Knowledge about the Technology  The Problems:  Most of the general population are completely unaware of SWH “Right now there is no market for SWH because there is no state or public recognition of the benefits of SWH.”  Some of the general population confuse SWH with PV  Builders are reluctant to implement SWH technologies in new construction  Solutions  Statewide marketing campaign  Compare and contrast SWH and PV, including costs  Explain that SWH can act as a hedge against increasing fuel costs  Education and outreach to builders, building permit inspectors

Knowledge to Shape Your Future 15 Competition with PV and Energy Efficiency  The Problems:  There is a statewide incentive for PV and energy efficiency measures but not for SWH “A huge problem is that there are incentives for PV and energy efficiency but not for SWH and this drives the market away from SWH.”  There is limited roof space and money  Solutions  Educate public about the benefits of SWH and costs compared to PV and tankless water heaters  Create incentive program for SWH to put it on equal footing with PV and energy efficiency  Need to consider how PV, energy efficiency, and SWH fit together “There is competition between PV, SWH, and energy efficiency but only to those who do not understand SWH. The three should be done together and be well thought through.”

Knowledge to Shape Your Future 16 Obtaining Building Permits  The Problems:  Permits are expensive  Permits can be difficult to obtain and often require multiple inspections  Every city has different requirements  Solutions:  Target training sessions for city and county building permit inspectors to provide education regarding SWH systems  Cities need to have consistent requirements  Oregon requires plumbing permits for SWH to be under $100 and the state provides guidance to cities that are not knowledgeable about permitting SWH  In Arizona, permit costs are a percentage of the total project cost

Knowledge to Shape Your Future 17 Purpose of White Paper  Report status on CCSE SWHPP  Identify the extent to which the SWHPP design is similar to other SWH incentive programs  Identify current market barriers in California and how to address the market barriers  Provide information on equipment and installation costs and identify unique business practices that may help increase cost-effectiveness  Make recommendations on the design of a statewide incentive program  Outline future evaluation analyses as part of enhanced Interim Evaluation Report

Knowledge to Shape Your Future 18 System Cost Components

Knowledge to Shape Your Future 19 Contractor Business Characteristics  Business characteristics and practices that may affect SWH system installation or repair costs  Portion of business attributed to SWH  Variety of system types being installed  Number of dedicated sales staff  Types of marketing  Number of experienced SWH system installers  Types of training (manufacturer, on-the-job, conference workshops, etc.) and frequency of training  Installing monitoring equipment

Knowledge to Shape Your Future 20 Practices that could Improve Cost-Effectiveness  The small sample of contractors surveyed combined with a variety of business characteristics made it difficult to discern “best practices” for SWH contractors  Practices which could improve SWH cost-effectiveness  Installation of cookie-cutter systems  Implementation of plug-and-play technologies  Increased training of installers  Optimized design/install logistics  Buying and/or selling in bulk

Knowledge to Shape Your Future 21 Purpose of White Paper  Report status on CCSE SWHPP  Identify the extent to which the SWHPP design is similar to other SWH incentive programs  Identify current market barriers in California and how to address the market barriers  Provide information on equipment and installation costs and identify unique business practices that may help increase cost-effectiveness  Make recommendations on the design of a statewide incentive program  Outline future evaluation analyses as part of enhanced Interim Evaluation Report

Knowledge to Shape Your Future 22 Recommendations for a Successful SWH Incentive Program  Incentive Structure  Base incentive on estimated energy savings, but ensure calculation is not too complicated and that the method is transparent  Provide incentives that decline over the life of the program  Offer zero or low-interest loans  Include an incentive for the replacement of parts of existing SWH under certain circumstances  Contractor requirements  Limit number of additional requirements “Contractors need to have a state license in order to install systems. It is not necessary for an incentive program to require anything more than what the state law requires.”  Provide a streamlined approval process for qualified contractors in good standing  Equipment requirements  Require OG-300 certification for residential and OG-100 certification for commercial and industrial  Prove viability by having technology in commercial operation for at least 1 year

Knowledge to Shape Your Future 23 Purpose of White Paper  Report status on CCSE SWHPP  Identify the extent to which the SWHPP design is similar to other SWH incentive programs  Identify current market barriers in California and how to address the market barriers  Provide information on equipment and installation costs and identify unique business practices that may help increase cost-effectiveness  Make recommendations on the design of a statewide incentive program  Outline future evaluation analyses as part of enhanced Interim Evaluation Report

Knowledge to Shape Your Future 24 Further Evaluation Work  Interim Evaluation Report  Additional survey work needed for Interim Evaluation Report  Manufacturer and distributor interviews  Contractor interviews  Contractor confidential cost survey  Residential/commercial non-participants and residential/commercial customers with SWH outside of the San Diego area  Additional analysis needed for Interim Evaluation Report  Market assessment  Business models  Cost-effectiveness analysis  Respond to comments from this workshop  Final Program Evaluation Report  Performance data  Cost-effectiveness analysis  Additional participant and non-participant surveys

Knowledge to Shape Your Future 25 Contact Information  For anyone who would like to provide input on the program please contact me at: Heidi Ochsner Itron, Inc