PARCA at NSIDC DAAC Where we are so far and where we might go Mark Parsons 25 April 2001.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Global Warming Status 1. Knowledge Gap Between - What is Understood (science) - What is Known (public/policymakers) 2. Planetary Emergency - Climate Inertia.
Advertisements

Development of Bias-Corrected Precipitation Database and Climatology for the Arctic Regions Daqing Yang, Principal Investigator Douglas L. Kane, Co-Investigator.
NSIDC and IPY IPY Data & Information Service (DIS) (#49) What We’ve Done Presented at IPY Open Forum in Paris in March “Fuller proposal” for IPY DIS strongly.
IV: Ice velocity – costal regions + select areas (phase 1), all ice sheet (ph. 2) SEC: Surface elevation changes, ERS/Envisat/CryoSat, GLL: Grounding.
Present-Day Sea Level Change Present-Day Sea Level Change Assessment and Key Uncertainties Anny Cazenave Anny Cazenave LEGOS, Toulouse.
Climatological Estimates of Greenland Ice Sheet Sea Level Contributions: Recent Past and Future J. E. Box Byrd Polar Research Center Understanding Sea-level.
NASA ROSES – Interdisciplinary Research in Earth Science (IDS) Linking Greenland ice sheet mass loss to decadal circulation changes in the ocean and atmosphere.
David B. Reusch (New Mexico Tech) Derrick Lampkin (Penn State) David Schneider (NCAR) Funded by the Office of Polar Programs, National Science Foundation.
IceBridge Science Team Meeting: NSIDC Activities Marilyn Kaminski January 20,
2. Point Cloud x, y, z, … Complete LiDAR Workflow 1. Survey 4. Analyze / “Do Science” 3. Interpolate / Grid USGS Coastal & Marine.
Threatened Ice sheet Integrity By: Carl Egede Bøggild The University Centre in Svalbard, UNIS Department of Arctic Geophysics.
Improving Quality with the Substance Registry Services (SRS) John Harman U.S. EPA May 14, 2009.
Global Inter-agency IPY Polar Snapshot Year (GIIPSY): Goals and Accomplishments Katy Farness & Ken Jezek, The Ohio State University Mark Drinkwater, European.
Methods for Data Discovery – Portals Portal facilitates access to and also assimilation of data Portal is not simply a web site: it offers services such.
Data Ingest Automation GHRC Status and Plans Helen Conover GHRC DAAC Operations Manager Presented at ESIP Summer Meeting 2015.
Ice Bridge Data Management Scope, Challenges, Solutions Ron Weaver, NSIDC DAAC Manager National Snow and Ice Data Center Supporting Cryospheric Research.
Managing IceBridge Airborne Mission Data at the National Snow and Ice Data Center M. Kaminski, M. Brodzik, J. Deems, T. Scambos National Snow and Ice Data.
Preserving the Scientific Record: Establishing Relationships with Archives Matthew Mayernik National Center for Atmospheric Research Version 1.0 Review.
PODAG.21 October 15-17, 2003 Ron Weaver NSIDC DAAC Manager
DWINSA 2007 Website. Website Purpose Allow states to track status of questionnaires Allow systems >100K or states to upload project data.
Earth Observing System Data and Information System (EOSDIS) provides access to more than 3,000 types of Earth science data products and specialized services.
1PoDAG XXX: IceBridge October 12, 2011 PoDAG XXX: IceBridge Marilyn Kaminski IceBridge Project Manager October 12, 2011.
Malcolm McMillan1, Peter Nienow1, Andrew Shepherd1 & Toby Benham2
Tim Helweg-Larsen & Richard Hawkins. The Arctic.
Center for Satellite Applications and Research (STAR) Review 09 – 11 March 2010 Image: MODIS Land Group, NASA GSFC March 2000 Center for Satellite Applications.
Citing Data Sets in the Literature: ORNL DAAC Practices Robert Cook, Suresh SanthanaVannan, and Daine Wright Environmental Sciences Division Oak Ridge.
Improvement of Digital Elevation Model of Greenland Ice Sheet by Using ICESat Satellite Laser Altimetry Data Bea Csatho, Taehun Yoon and Yushin Ahn Byrd.
Elevation Change Anomalies in West Antarctica - New Windows Into Dynamics of Subglacial Water Flow S. Tulaczyk, UCSC L. Gray, CCRS I. Joughin, APL, UW.
The Sea Level Rise Story Bruno Tremblay McGill University Slide from Steven Nerem – University of Colorado.
©2010 Elsevier, Inc. 1 Chapter 14 Cuffey & Paterson.
LEARNING GOALS 1. I AM LEARNING THE IMPACT OF HUMAN ACTIVITIES AND TECHNOLOGIES ON WATER RESOURCES 2. I AM INVESTIGATING THE FACTORS THAT AFFECT LOCAL.
The Arctic Observing Network (AON) Cooperative Arctic Data and Information Service (CADIS) Florence Fetterer,
Seismic processing applied to radar data to investigate melt-water drainage structures in the southern Greenland Ice Sheet Jamin S. Greenbaum Institute.
MOWG 2 Sept 15-16,1999 David Hancock1 KEY PERSONNEL Dr. Bob Schutz, GLAS Science Team Leader Dr. Jay Zwally, ICESat Project Scientist, GLAS Team Member.
Polar Ice Sheets and Ice Shelves: Mass Balance, Uncertainties, and Potential Improvements Robert H Thomas…etc.
University of Kansas S. Gogineni, P. Kanagaratnam, R. Parthasarathy, V. Ramasami & D. Braaten The University of Kansas Wideband Radars for Mapping of Near.
Mercury – A Service Oriented Web-based system for finding and retrieving Biogeochemical, Ecological and other land- based data National Aeronautics and.
The goal of this NASA ACCESS-funded project is to create easy to use, multi-faceted web services for access, browse, online analysis and delivery of data.
Center for Satellite Applications and Research (STAR) Review 09 – 11 March Arctic Aircraft Altimeter (AAA) Experiment Envisat and ICESat underflights.
Greenland ice melt Ben Lee EPS 131 Friday 10/28/2005.
KEY PERSONNEL Dr. Bob Schutz, GLAS Science Team Leader Dr. Jay Zwally, ICESat Project Scientist, GLAS Team Member Mr. David Hancock, Science Software Development.
Data Activities at NSIDC DAAC September April 2001 Mark Parsons 25 April 2001.
PoDAG What’s this meeting all about?. Charge to UWG Members DAAC UWG TERMS OF REFERENCE 1. Provide continuing guidance to the DAAC on data holdings, system.
PoDAG XXIV: MODIS Snow Albedo Prototype Proposal Marilyn Kaminski MODIS Product Team Lead November 3, 2005.
Understanding and Predicting Arctic Land-ice Loss and its impacts Fiamma Straneo (WHOI), Ted Scambos (NSIDC) 1 Greenland Ice Sheet (6.5 m SLR) Arctic Ice.
NSIDC—Enhancing NASA’s Contribution to Polar Science A response to the NRC Polar Research Board’s review of NASA’s polar geophysical data sets Mark Parsons.
What is Climate Change?. Climate change refers to any significant change in the measures of climate lasting for an extended period of time. In other words,
LPDAAC/USGS_EROS CMR Metadata Reconciliation Meeting March 4-5, 2015.
Long Term Archival of ECS Data Held at the National Snow and Ice Data Center.
TERRA UPDATE Launch Date NSIDC DAAC Launch Readiness MODIS Snow and Ice Products General Product Release Timeline.
Global Change Master Directory (GCMD) Mission “To assist the scientific community in the discovery of Earth science data, related services, and ancillary.
Issues Summary List for PoDAG. Actions List Issues Thorsten Markus AI, should he pursue?  Now wrapped into the workshop development HARA disposition.
Advertising your data Alecia Aleman 1, Ruth Duerr 2 1 National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) 2 National Snow and Ice Data Center, University.
International Polar Year Data Management Activities at NSIDC Mark A. Parsons PoDAG Boulder, Colorado 16 February 2005 World Data Center for Glaciology,
Climate Change Mark C. Serreze Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO.
SEARCH Data Working Group SEARCH Data Working Group.
Table 1. The Five Medical Laboratory Case Studies Jan Martin et al. Transnational Evaluation of a New Continuing Professional Development Activity for.
Exchange for Local Observations and Knowledge of the Arctic ELOKA works to provide data management and user support to facilitate the collection, preservation,
Global Warming And the Planetary Water Cycle Ruth Curry Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution Ruth Curry Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution Global Warming.
Ice sheets and their relation to sea level
NSIDC DAAC Accessioning and “De-commissioning” Plans
Greg Scharfen U.S. National Snow and Ice Data Center
Center-wide strategy and plans Clark Judy Julia Collins
Scientific Priorities of NSIDC DAAC Data
Table 1. Data for coastal stations in Greenland.
NSIDC DAAC Statistics PoDAG XXIII Report.
MODIS Snow Cover Product Usage (as of 4/24/01)
Data Acceptance and De-Accessioning Plans
Change in fresh water inflow from glaciers and rivers
NASA Polar Program Kim Partington 27 April 2019 Polar Program.
Presentation transcript:

PARCA at NSIDC DAAC Where we are so far and where we might go Mark Parsons 25 April 2001

26 April 2001 PoDAG XVIII History n Program for Arctic Regional Climate Assessment: 25 investigators working to understand the Greenland Ice Sheet n PARCA PIs agreed to make their data available through their web sites by March 2001 n PIs to submit metadata to NSIDC n NSIDC to build “jump page” pointing to all PARCA data sites n NSIDC created a “godawful” form to facilitate metadata submission

26 April 2001 PoDAG XVIII Submission Status n Bromwich & Chen: Modelled Precipitation n Davis, et al.: Elevation Change of the Southern Greenland Ice Sheet from n Abdalati: Ice Sheet Melt Characteristics n Steffen & Box: Greenland Climate Network AWS Data n Thomas, et al.: Ice Velocities Around the 2000-meter Traverse n Thomas, et al.: Mass Balance Estimates by Comparing Ice Discharge Across the 2000-m Traverse n Hamilton & Whillans: Ice Sheet Mass Balance Using Precision GPS n Krabill: Ice Surface Elevations from NASA ATM Airborne Lidar

26 April 2001 PoDAG XVIII NSIDC Project Status n Data jump page available at n Single catalog entry in NSIDC catalog listed under many subject areas n Submitted one überDIF for all the PARCA data to GCMD n Implemented tracking script to measure success of page

26 April 2001 PoDAG XVIII Issues n Few submissions n Need to do some outreach n Will investigators be able and willing to support the data? n Should NSIDC take over these data for longer term archival?

26 April 2001 PoDAG XVIII Very rough cost estimate for archival n Qualifiers: – based only on the eight data sets – some missing ones bigger and more complex – only considers initial cost of ingest, documentation, etc. – does not consider ongoing maintenance and support – assumes active support from Pis to develop documentation n Consider low and high levels of service: primary difference is level of documentation and user services review

26 April 2001 PoDAG XVIII Handwaving cost estimate