Recent decisions and rulings relating to international tax Kees van Raad Professor of international tax law (Leiden, NYU, PKU) Chairman International Tax.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Beneficial Ownership: Recent Developments in Canada and China Jinyan Li April 20, 2010.
Advertisements

Int’l & EU Tax Law 2007/2008 Exam Discussion (first sit)
Dividend and Interest 7 June Dividend and InterestPage 2 Article 10 of the UN MC – A snapshot  Article 10(1) – Distributive Rule  Article 10(2)
PwC Tax Structuring of Real Estate Investments in India 1 December 2009.
Code of Corporate Governance for Listed Companies in China
Corporation Tax Introduction to Taxation, ch. 10 Business Law, chs. 15 and 16.
The new Germany/UK Treaty - The German Perspective IFA Trilateral Meeting 3 November 2010 Jan Brinkmann.
TAXATION TAXATION OF INDIVIDUALS IN THE CZECH REPUBLIC.
Abdul Aziz Tayabani Advocate High Court Noorani & Company.
Global Rewards Update Sandy Shurin Deloitte Tax LLP.
1 Business taxation Geoff Leese Sept 1999 revised Sept 2001, Jan 2003, Jan 2006, Jan 2007, Jan 2008, Dec 2008 (special thanks to Geoff Leese)
Trade mission Hungarian construction sector 19 April 2012.
Gray, Salter & Radebaugh Chapter 4 GLOBAL ACCOUNTING AND CONTROL: A MANAGERIAL EMPHASIS   Sidney J. Gray, University of New South Wales   Stephen B.
CYPRUS – LITHUANIA TAX STRUCTURING
INTRODUCTION: In recent years integration has been achieved through tax harmonisation and through European Court of Justice (ECJ) case law This integration.
The link between the acte éclairé/clair doctrine and state liability Dennis Weber Professor European Corporate Tax Law Loyens & Loeff Judge Court of Appeals.
Page 1 Business income and associated enterprise Prashant Khatore.
International Tax Concepts for Cross-border Employees.
Ministry of Economy and Finance Public Revenues and Taxes Department Main features of the new Income Tax Law December 2009.
1 Impatriates: French tax regime CABINET SEVESTRE, 71 avenue Marceau – PARIS Tél : 33 (0) – Fax : 33 (0)
Chapter Objectives Be able to: n Explain sources of Canadian tax law. n Identify the two primary entities that are subject to tax. n Explain how residency.
Tax treaty between the PRC and the Netherlands Increasing opportunities for mutual investments Robert Jan van Lie Peters – Loyens & Loeff Hong Kong.
1 Audit | Tax | Advisory 17 April 2012, WTC Amsterdam Audit | Tax | Advisory The Expatcenter Meets.
Tax system Tax systems of countries of the world State tax policy: directions, functions and methods 4-5. Personal Income Tax.
Question 1, Case A (Part 1) The case „Saint-Gobain“ was about a French company having a PE in Germany that held participations in foreign companies incl.
1 Attribution of Profits to Permanent Establishments -Recent Developments- Xiamen University – 18 February 2011 Josine van Wanrooij.
All rights reserved | 1 Conditions for Service und Agency Permanent Establishments Summary of cases discussed.
Greenfield investment in Serbia Belgrade, November
Instructor’s Manual with Transparency Masters to accompany Introduction to Risk Management and Insurance, 7E - Dorfman © 2002 by Prentice Hall, Inc. A.
EU 3 rd Energy Package in the context of the tax problems of cross-border energy supplies REPORTER: KUROCHKIN DENIS ALEKSEEVICH EURASIAN RESEARCH CENTRE.
Preliminary Double Taxation Conventions / Agreements United Arab Emirates and Mexico SCOF: 24 June 2008.
1 STRUCTURE AND OPERATION OF (INTERNATIONAL) TAX TREATIES.
TAXATION TAXATION OF INDIVIDUALS IN THE CZECH REPUBLIC.
INDUSTRIAL OWNERSHIPS. Single Ownership (Proprietorship) Companies Partnership Companies Joint Stock Companies Co-operative Societies/Organizations Public.
PRC IIT for Expatriates and Cross-Border Business Travellers 18 th March 2010 Presented by Kathy Siu – Principal
Personal Tax and Social Security in cross-border situations Bulgaria 2010 Nevena van Kuyk.
CORPORATE EXPATRIATION IN MEXICO RICARDO LEON-SANTACRUZ Washington D. C. APRIL 16, 2009.
IFA - Mauritius, 11 May 2012 Recent case law developments on the beneficial ownership concept Ridha Hamzaoui IBFD The Netherlands IBFD -
Nexia International Tax Conference Istanbul Rajesh Sharma, Smith & Williamson Limited, London.
Topic 2 Vicarious liability.
Misclassification of Workers By: Sarah R. Johnson, Esq. Holifield & Associates, PLLC Kingston Pike Suite 201 Knoxville, TN 37934
Morgan Stanley & Co : Analysis of Apex Court Decision Shri. Girish Dave IRS Director of Incometax International Taxation, Mumbai.
Institute of International Bankers Tax Treaty Developments & The New U.S. Model Income Tax Treaty Tuesday - June 19, : :45 AM Daniel J. RaimondoBenedetta.
1 TAX PLANNING FChFP Conversion Course Jason Lam CPA.
Horlings is a world-wide network of independent accountants and consultants firms 6 February 2009 The Dutch co-operative Nexia European Tax Group Meeting.
BUSINESS FORMATION CHAPTER 9. What is Business Formation ? What is the legal formation of a business? Why the legal business formation is important?
Shanker Iyer Shanker Iyer & Co 30 th May 2008 NEXIA INTERNATIONAL – TAX CONFERENCE Cross Border Transactions.
Case Study 3 NETHERLANDS HOGE RAAD (SUPREME COURT) CASE Number
- Draft - For Discussion Purposes Only - The information contained in this communication is intended only for the use of the addressees and may contain.
Chapter – 3 setoff and carry forward of losses
Right to opt and EC Law Bas Opmeer Malta, 5 February 2010.
Resource Capital Fund III LP v Commissioner of Taxation.
Governance, Risk and Ethics. 2 Section A: Governance and responsibility Section B: Internal control and review Section C: Identifying and assessing risk.
Plenary 1 Taxation of Intra-group Services Japan May 12, 2016 TMI Associates (Japan) Partner Attorney-at-law, Certified Public Tax Accountant Nobuaki Iwashina.
The interpretation of the acte clair doctrine by the tax administrations and courts in EC Member States The Dutch practice Dennis Weber Professor European.
Centre for Tax Policy and Administration Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development Auditing Multinational Enterprises 3 Taxation of Multinational.
European and International Taxation

Corporation Tax Corporation Tax
Johan and Maria, Part II.
TRANSFER PRICING EFFECTS ON TRADING AND FINANCING CYPRUS COMPANIES AND SOLUTIONS By Marios Efthymiou Managing Director.
Kevin Smits
Short-Term Assignments of Employees in International Tax Law
Resource Capital Fund III LP v Commissioner of Taxation
Hiring or Performing Work Outside the U.S.
Provisions of Turkey Tax Amnesty Law
Preliminary Double Taxation Conventions / Agreements United Arab Emirates and Mexico PCOF: 17 June 2008.
Employment Income Taxand Asia Junior School 2019 July 29-31, 2019.
Business Profits Taxand Asia Junior School 2019 July 29-31, 2019.
Presentation transcript:

Recent decisions and rulings relating to international tax Kees van Raad Professor of international tax law (Leiden, NYU, PKU) Chairman International Tax Center Leiden Of counsel Loyens & Loeff

1. Canada pending case: Prevost > beneficial ownership 2. United States US Ct of Appeal 15 Jan 2008 NatWest > treaty interpretation 3. Netherlands Supr Ct decisions 8 December 2006 > economic employer (15.2.b OECD)

Canada Tax Court pending case: Prevost > beneficial ownership

P Henly’s Group PLC Volvo Bus Corporation Prevost Holding BV Prevost Car Inc. CAN NL UK SWE 49%51% 100%

NL UK 51% 100% CAN SWE 49% dividend

NL UK 51% 100% CAN SWE 49% 5% dividend 10% wht15%

United States US Ct of Appeal 15 Jan 2008 NatWest > apportionment of interest expenses, capital of a PE, properly maintained accounts > treaty interpretation > deemed separate enterprise notion

treaty interpretation > status of OECD Commentary > relevance of consistently held positions by tax agency of one treaty country > other issues

deemed separate enterprise notion > like an independent corporation > or: something less ?

Netherlands Supr Ct decisions 1 December 2006 > economic employer (15.2.b OECD)

Art. 15 OECD: employment income Employee, resident of residence state, works in work state -- para. 1: work state has taxing right -- para. 2: provided the employee has a `strong link´ with that work state: link a: more than 183 days spent in work state link b: salary paid by employer who is resident of work state link c: salary borne by a work state permanent establishment of the employer (wherever resident) >> in absence of any such link: taxation in residence state

Link b: salary paid by employer who is resident of work state `The remuneration is paid by, or on behalf of, an employer who is … a resident of the other State´ Dutch Supreme Court 1 December 2006 : A person is an employer for Art b purposes if: 1. (effective) authority to instruct the employee and 2. employment activities are rendered for the account and risk of that person:

2. employment activities are rendered for the account and risk of that person: a. risk : all benefits and damages / losses / costs / risks regarding the employee are for the account of that person b. account : that person bears the expense of the salary paid to the employee for the activities Re b: When the salary is paid by the legal employer who charges the salary to the person/company for whom the employee works, the latter person/company is considered to be the economic employer only if the employee’s salary is individually charged (i.e., not as part of lump sum charge) to that latter person (it is permitted to base the charge on the average salary paid to employees in same category as the employee concerned).

OECD 2007 proposed clarification of term `employer´ The nature of the services rendered by the individual will be an important factor since it is logical to assume that an employee provides services which are an integral part of the business activities carried on by his employer. … [A] key consideration will be which enterprise who bears the responsibility or risk for results produced by the individual’s work. … … The following additional factors may be relevant to determine whether this is the case: [ cf. para. 18 of 1992 OECD Commentary – abuse ] - who has the authority to instruct the individual regarding the manner in which the work has to be performed ; - who controls and has responsibility for the place at which the work is performed; - the remuneration of the individual is directly charged by the formal employer to the enterprise to which the services are provided … ; - who puts the tools and materials necessary for the work at the individual’s disposal; - who determines number and qualifications of the individuals performing the work.

OECD 2007 proposed clarification of term `employer´ R Co and its employee E-R are residents of State R. S Co is a resident of State S. 1. R Co is in business of providing training services, and sends E-R to S Co to train S Co’s staff >> S Co is not employer for purposes of Art b 2. R Co is parent of S Co and sends E-R over to S Co to ensure that S Co correctly implements the group’s marketing strategy: >> S Co is not employer 3. R Co sends E-R over to its foreign sister company S Co that has a temporary shortage of staff with foreign language skills: >> S Co is employer 4. R Co is an employment agency for highly specialized personnel. At the request of S Co it recruits an engineer for 5 months and makes him available to S Co on a cost-plus basis: >> S Co is employer 5. R Co is an engineering firm, which makes one of its engineers who is temporarily idle available to another engineering firm that badly needs an engineer for 5 months: >> S Co is employer