CM-26 Cooler and Lead Test1 Tests of a PT415 Cooler with HTS Leads in the Drop-in Mode Michael A. Green Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory, Berkeley CA 94720,

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

CM-22 Magnet Issues, 6 June MICE Magnet Cool Down and Other Issues Michael A. Green Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory Berkeley CA

Advertisements

Liquid H 2 Absorber Production Contents (1)MICE Absorber Status (2)MICE Absorber Modification (3)Plan/Schedule (4)Summary MICE CM-23 in HARBIN Shigeru.

MICE RF and Coupling Coil Module Outstanding Issues Steve Virostek Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory MICE Collaboration Meeting October 26, 2004.

10 June 2006MICE Collaboration Meeting CM-151 Can MICE Solid and Liquid Absorbers be Characterized to better than 0.3 Percent? Michael A. Green 1, and.

The Use of Small Coolers for Hydrogen and Helium Liquefaction

1 Cooling the Hydrogen (Helium) Absorbers with Small Coolers Michael A. Green University of Oxford Department of Physics Oxford OX1 3RH, UK MICE Video.

Magnet Cooldown Scheme 17 th February 2012 Roy Preece (STFC RAL)

MUTAC Review, 9 April MuCOOL and MICE Coupling Magnet Status Michael A. Green Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory Berkeley CA

-1- Wang, Li The 23rd MICE Collaboration Meeting to 17 HIT/CHINA WANG, Li Institute of Cryogenics and Superconductivity Technology.

Spectrometer Solenoid Design and Procurement Review Steve Virostek Mike Green Mike Zisman Lawrence Berkeley National Lab MICE Collaboration Meeting October.

23 October 2005MICE Meeting at RAL1 MICE Tracker Magnets, 4 K Coolers, and Magnet Coupling during a Quench Michael A. Green Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory.

1 Update on Focus Coil Design and Configuration M. A. Green, G. Barr, W. Lau, R. S. Senanayake, and S. Q. Yang University of Oxford Department of Physics.

Michael A. Green Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory

10 October 2006 MICE CM-16 at RAL 1 Distributed versus Lumped Coupling Magnets Michael A. Green and Soren Prestemon Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory, Berkeley.

Spectrometer Solenoid Update Steve Virostek - LBNL MICE Video Conference #129 February 25, 2010.

9 June 2006MICE CM-15 Fermilab1 Progress on the MICE Cooling Channel and Tracker Magnets since CM-14 Michael A. Green Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory.

Spectrometer Solenoid Lead Testing Update S. Virostek and Mike Zisman Lawrence Berkeley National Lab MICO Meeting January 19, 2010.

Spectrometer Solenoid Fabrication & Testing Update Steve Virostek Lawrence Berkeley National Lab MICE CM24 at RAL June 1, 2009.

1 Technical Arguments in Favor of using the Cryomech PT-415 Cooler for Cooling the LH 2 Experiment Michael A. Green Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory Berkeley.

Magnet and Absorber Heat Loads and Cooling with Various Small Coolers

12 March 2006NFMCC Meeting, IIT, Chicago1 Progress on the MICE Cooling Channel and Tracker Magnets Michael A. Green Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory.

CM-18 June Magnet Conductor Parameters and How They affect Conductor Selection for MICE Magnets Michael Green Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory Berkeley.

MICE Spectrometer Solenoid Update Michael S. Zisman Center for Beam Physics Accelerator & Fusion Research Division Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory.

Update Hardware for conductive cooling of the quench resistors has been fabricated at LBNL. Preparation for installation to start this week. Installation.

1 Absorber Heat Transfer and Other Issues A Comparison between MICE and the Forced Flow Absorber System Michael A. Green Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory.

Spectrometer Solenoid and RFCC Update Michael S. Zisman Center for Beam Physics Accelerator & Fusion Research Division Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory.

Spectrometer Solenoid Fabrication & Testing Update Steve Virostek Lawrence Berkeley National Lab MICE Collaboration Meeting #26 University of California.

MICE Collaboration Meeting CM-151 Is the the pulse tube cooler a must or is it simply better for the MICE AFC module? Michael A. Green Lawrence Berkeley.

MICE Spectrometer Solenoid Review Some inputs for the in person meeting to be discussed at the November 13, 2009 phone meeting P.Fabbricatore on behalf.

Progress on the MuCool and MICE Coupling Coils * L. Wang a, X. K Liu a, F. Y. Xu a, A. B. Chen a, H. Pan a, H. Wu a, X. L. Guo a, S. X Zheng a, D. Summers.

Spectrometer Solenoid Update Steve Virostek Lawrence Berkeley National Lab Roy Preece Rutherford Appleton Lab October 28, 2011 MICE Collaboration Meeting.

MICE - UK Project Progress Roy Preece 30 th April 2013.

Status and Integration of the Spectrometer Solenoid Magnets Steve Virostek Lawrence Berkeley National Lab MICE RAL June 15, 2007.

LBNL Test Cryostat Preliminary Design Review Tuning – Field Correction Soren Prestemon, Diego Arbelaez, Heng Pan, Scott Myers, Taekyung Ki.

Magnet quench during a training run Successfully trained to peak currents and operationally tested Thermal performance requirements met 3D magnetic bore.

Spectrometer Solenoid Fabrication & Testing Update S. Virostek and Mike Zisman Lawrence Berkeley National Lab NFMCC 2010 Collaboration Meeting University.

Spectrometer Solenoids MICO 214 Steve Virostek LBNL February 6, 2013.

Hall D Target Design Status Jim Fochtman- February 22, 2012.

Spectrometer Solenoids MICO 197 Steve Virostek LBNL August 15, 2012.

Spectrometer Solenoid: Plans to Fix Magnet 2 Steve Virostek Lawrence Berkeley National Lab Spectrometer Solenoid Review November 18, 2009.

Preliminary Design for the Coupling Coil Cryostat in MICE

Abstract: The Muon Ionization Cooling Experiment (MICE) is an international effort sited at Rutherford Appleton Laboratory, which will demonstrate ionization.

CMS FPIX Cooling System Studies Joe Howell, Fermilab for the FPIX Upgrade Mechanical Working Group CMS Upgrade Workshop April 27,

Spectrometer Solenoid Fabrication & Testing Update Steve Virostek Lawrence Berkeley National Lab MICE CM25 at RAL November 6, 2009.

Spectrometer Solenoid Fabrication Status and Schedule Steve Virostek Lawrence Berkeley National Lab MICE RAL October 20, 2008.

Hall D Target System Review J. FochtmanSeptember 28,2011 Preliminary Design Work.

MICE Cooling Channel Magnets: Spectrometer Solenoid Procurement RF Module Coupling Coil Proposal Steve Virostek Lawrence Berkeley National Lab NFMCC 07.

Magnet vacuum vessel w/radiation shield and cold mass in place Magnet leads (left) and the three cryocoolers on the top of the spectrometer solenoid service.

Spectrometer Solenoid Update Steve Virostek Lawrence Berkeley National Lab MICE Collaboration Meeting #28 Sofia, Bulgaria.

Spectrometer Solenoid Fabrication Update Steve Virostek Lawrence Berkeley National Lab NFMCC at LBNL January 25, 2009.

22 October 2005MICE Meeting at RAL1 Tracker Solenoid Overview Michael A. Green Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory MICE Collaboration Meeting 22 October 2005.

Spectrometer Solenoid Update Steve Virostek Lawrence Berkeley National Lab MICE Video Conference 120 May 7, 2009.

1 Small Coolers for MICE Michael A. Green University of Oxford Department of Physics Oxford OX1 3RH, UK MICE Collaboration Meeting RAL.

MICE Spectrometer Solenoid Review A summary of P.Fabbricatore on behalf the review board Amalia Ballarino, Elwyn Baynham, Tom Bradshaw, Mike Courthold,

Spectrometer Solenoid Design and Test Results Steve Virostek Lawrence Berkeley National Lab Spectrometer Solenoid Review November 18, 2009.

Cryogenic Summary - K. C. Wu Testing D2L102 in MAGCOOLJune, 02 Difference between D2L102 and D2L101 Operating Summary Cooldown to 100 K and 6 K Test Condition.

Date 2007/Sept./12-14 EDR kick-off-meeting Global Design Effort 1 Cryomodule Interface definition N. Ohuchi.

-1- Steve Virostek (LBNL) and Li Wang (SINAP) Instrumentation for the MICE Coupling Coil Steve Virostek Lawrence Berkeley National Lab February.

MICE Spectrometer Solenoid Recovery Review - December 3-4, Steve Virostek MICE Spectrometer Solenoid Design and Assembly.

Cooling Circuit Design Steve Virostek Lawrence Berkeley National Lab February 29, 2012 MICE Coupling Coil Cryostat Design Review Lawrence Berkeley National.

MICE CC Magnet Cryostat Design Overview Derun Li Center for Beam Physics Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory MICE CC Cryostat Design Review LBNL, February.

MICE Coupling Coil Fabrication Steps to Complete Allan DeMello Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Coupling Coil Working Group January 28, 2014 January.

Technology & Engineering Division Lead Stabilization Alexey Radovinsky (PSFC, MIT) MICE CC Cryostat Design Review Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory.

CMS CO 2 Cooling Test Stand Capacity and Load Disruption Tests Simon Kwan Erik Voirin Simon Kwan, Erik Voirin1CMS CO2 Cooling Test Stand Test Results.

Michael A. Green and Heng Pan

Spokesman's update.

MICE Meeting at RAL, Oct-23, 2005

Spectrometer Solenoid Update

Small Coolers for MICE MICE Collaboration Meeting RAL Michael A. Green

Slides for ME 115 Laboratory

Presentation transcript:

CM-26 Cooler and Lead Test1 Tests of a PT415 Cooler with HTS Leads in the Drop-in Mode Michael A. Green Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory, Berkeley CA 94720, USA

CM-26 Cooler and Lead Test2 The Purpose of Cooler and Lead Test The cooler performance was to be measured as a function of the first stage heat load and the second stage heat load. Re-condensation was tested. Without re-condensation there is no cooling of the MICE magnets. The heat leak down the copper leads was measured at zero current and at 275 A. The lead performance was measured for two different lead IL/A’s. The temperature drops across the cooler drop-in joint, the intercepts for heat the room temperature leads and the copper between the leads and the cooler were measured. The test provided a measurement of the system time constant as a response to changes.

CM-26 Cooler and Lead Test3 First PT-415 Drop-in Cooler Test Photos 1st Stage heater and Tapered Plate 2nd Stage heater and Condenser PT-415 Drop-in Cooler

CM-26 Cooler and Lead Test4 Schematic Diagram of the Lead Test

CM-26 Cooler and Lead Test5 Lead Test Assembly Photos

CM-26 Cooler and Lead Test6 Photos of the Lead Test with a PT415 Cooler

CM-26 Cooler and Lead Test7 The saturation temperature of the helium in the tank can be determined by the tank pressure. The temperature sensor on the tank is not very accurate so the tank sensor was calibrated using the temperature calculated from the tank pressure. T = P P P P 4 T is given in K. P is given in bar Helium Temperature is determined by Pressure

CM-26 Cooler and Lead Test8 Calibration of the Tank Temperature Sensor

CM-26 Cooler and Lead Test9 Cooler Performance with Two IL/A Leads Not in Equilibrium

CM-26 Cooler and Lead Test10 Tests of 4 Identical Leads, an Example of the Test not being in Equilibrium For T 2, the time to come equilibrium is ~10 hours. For T 1, the time to come equilibrium is ~1.5 hours.

CM-26 Cooler and Lead Test11 Observations Concerning the Cooler Tests The copper leads used in the previous magnet 2 had a heat leak that was too high. The IL/A for these leads was 5.3x10 6 A m -1. Is was clear that this IL/A was too large. The second leads tested had an IL/A = 3.1x10 6 A m -1. The ICST calculations for IL/A suggest that the copper lead IL/A should be 3x10 6 A m -1 for copper leads with an RRR = 10. The RRR of the cable used for the leads was unknown. IL/A is an important design feature for the leads. It appears that an IL/A of 3 x 10 6 A m -1 is about right. The time to come to equilibrium (four time constants) is long for the experiment (~10 hrs). The magnet equilibrium time constant is proportional to the helium mass and inversely proportional to the number of coolers and the cooling power per cooler at 4.2 K.

CM-26 Cooler and Lead Test12 Cooler Test Observations continued From the operating diagram it is clear that the cooler first stage temperature should not be greater than 45 K. This means that the first stage heat load should be less than 50 W. The HTS lead lead current is limited by temperature and magnetic field. The temperature drop between the top of the HTS leads and the cooler first stage is very important. The  T in the drop-in joint was 1 to 2 K. The  T from the leads to the copper plate was about 1 K. In the experiment, the copper plate that carried heat from the lead heat intercept to the cooler had the largest  T. The copper plates for all of the MICE magnets should be thicker and the distance from the leads to the coolers must be minimized.