CSCM type test: Diode Leads and Diodes Gerard Willering & Vincent Roger TE-MSC With thanks to Bernhard Auchmann, Zinour Charifoulline, Scott Rowan, Arjan.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
RRR Measurements in S23 during LS1 Emmanuele Ravaioli Daniel Rasmussen Scott Rowan Thanks to Z. Charifoulline, R. Denz, J. Steckert, H. Thiesen, A. Verweij.
Advertisements

Booster Main Bending Magnet Test in SM18. Why The energy upgrade of the PS Booster main bending magnet requires endurance tests at high current (≈12 kA)
Motion Balance and Stability Fluid Mechanics Force.
Circuit Performance Variability Decomposition Michael Orshansky, Costas Spanos, and Chenming Hu Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Sciences,
Quality control of LHC electrical interconnections to be produced during the 2009 shutdown Since the functional properties of the LHC electrical interconnections.
TE-MPE –TM, 16/05/2013, Mateusz Bednarek, TE/MPE-EE ELQA testing during and beyond LS1.
LDO characterization Laura Gonella Pjysikalisches Institut Uni Bonn.
Proposal for measurements on RB.A81 on 1st September August 2010 Emmanuele Ravaioli Thanks to A. Verweij.
1 Copper Stabilizer Continuity Measurement Project CSCM Mini Review Powering Implementation H. Thiesen 30 November 2011.
2 nd Joint HiLumi LHC – LARP Annual Meeting INFN Frascati – November 14 th to 16 th 2012 Helene Felice Paolo Ferracin LQ Mechanical Behavior Overview and.
Design and operation of existing ZS B.Balhan, J.Borburgh, B.Pinget B.BalhanDesign and operation of existing ZS SPS ZS Electrostatic Septum Upgrade Review.
CSCM Project Powering cycle and results of the PSpice simulations Emmanuele Ravaioli Thanks to H. Thiesen, A. Verweij TE-MPE-TM
LMC 30 LPC A. Verweij, TE-MPE. 30 Sept 2009, LMC meeting 1.9 K, 0 T, 7.5 kA run Heat pulse.
A. Verweij, TE-MPE. 3 Feb 2009, LHC Performance Workshop – Chamonix 2009 Arjan Verweij TE-MPE - joint stability - what was wrong with the ‘old’ bus-bar.
A. Siemko and N. Catalan Lasheras Insulation vacuum and beam vacuum overpressure release – V. Parma Bus bar joints stability and protection – A. Verweij.
1 Second LHC Splice Review Copper Stabilizer Continuity Measurement possible QC tool for consolidated splices H. Thiesen 28 November 2011 K. Brodzinski,
Superconducting IR Magnets CHEN, Fusan May 11, 2007.
The diode lead resistance ‘issue’ A. Verweij, TE-MPE, CSCM workshop 7/10/2011 Contents:  Diode geometry  Measurements performed in the past  Measurements.
1 Copper Stabilizer Continuity Measurement Project Copper Stabilizer Continuity Measurement Status & Plans – May 2011 MPE-TM – 12 May 2011 M. Koratzinos,
LHC diodes: Status report (for information)
Frequency Transfer Function Measurements during LS1 Emmanuele Ravaioli Thanks to Arjan Verweij, Zinur Charifoulline, Andrea Musso MPE-TM
Diodes qualification: Results and plans for LHC and spares MSC Technical Meeting on F. Savary, on behalf of the diode working group, with special.
1 CSCM-7TeV Powering Implementation and ELQA Third LHC Splice Review November 2012 M. Bajko, M. Bernardini, B. Bordini, k. Brodzinski, J. Casas-Cubillos,
Chapter 4 Bipolar Junction Transistors
TE/MPE/EE Short ‘Halfway’ Update ELQA – LS1 Activities MPE/The Electrical Engineering section Knud, on behalf of TE/MPE/EE – 20 September LSC Reminder:
MP3 recommendations from June 2013-Feb 2014 Arjan Verweij on behalf of the MP A. Verweij, LSC meeting 7/2/2014 One of the tasks of the MP3 is.
CSCM Project Status and Prospects Andrzej Siemko on behalf of the CSCM project core team: Mike Koratzinos, Jens Steckert, Hugues Thiessen and Arjan Verweij.
Upper limits for QPS thresholds for selected 600 A circuits B. Auchmann, D. Rasmussen, A. Verweij with kind help from J. Feuvrier, E. Garde, C. Gilloux,
A PROPOSAL TO PULSE THE MAGNET BUSES TO VALIDATE SPLICE QUALITY H. Pfeffer 3/7/09 Version 4.
C.KotnigFCC Design Meeting FCC Beam Screen cooling Claudio Kotnig.
Cold powering test results of MBHSP102 Gerard Willering, TE-MSC-TF With thanks to Jerome and Vincent and all others from TF for their contribution.
1 RQ7000M High Speed Automatic machine for Fishing and Marine industry 24-Nov,2010.
Advanced simulations of events in the RB circuit Short circuit to ground Quench of a dipole provoked by the quench heaters Emmanuele Ravaioli Thanks to.
LHC magnet protection diodes status and recommendations for LS1 October 10 th, 2012 F. Savary on behalf of the diode working group (TE-MSC and MPE Groups.
Third LHC Splice Review Geneva – 12 to 14 November 2012 Diodes Status F. Savary.
HWC with nQPS Splice Monitoring Zinur Charifoulline & Bob Flora Real Time (~10 sec) BUS Voltage Energy Extraction Trip 300 µV threshold on Un-bypassed.
TE/MPE-MS MPE-TM meeting 14/06/2012, Richard Mompo Updated ELQA test procedure Co-authors: Nuria Catalan Lasheras Mateusz Bednarek Giorgio D’Angelo Richard.
Main dipole circuit simulations Behavior and performance analysis PSpice models Simulation results Comparison with QPS data Ongoing activities Emmanuele.
LHC circuit modeling Goal: Create a library of electrical models and results for each circuit Useful and usable for the next 20 years…… Web site cern.ch/LHC-CM.
Protection of 600 A bus bars, follow up W. Venturini Delsolaro and A. Verweij MPP meeting, 17/10/2006.
Daniel Molnar Diode simulations and measurements.
MPE Workshop for LS1 Summary of Global Activities Thanks to Speakers Arjan Verweij Hugues Thiesen Zinur Charifoulline Kajetan Fuchsberger.
TE-MPE-CP, RD, LHC risk review 06-Mar R. Denz TE-MPE-CP Radiation Hardness of Cold By-pass Diodes Acknowledgements: D. Hagedorn (former project.
Quench behavior of the main dipole magnets in the LHC By Gerard Willering, TE-MSC On behalf of the MP3-CCC team Acknowledgements TE-MSC, MP3, BE-OP, TE-MPE,
Cold powering test results of the 11 T cosθ model magnets at CERN Gerard Willering With thanks to Jerome Feuvrier, Vincent Desbiolles, Hugo Bajas, Marta.
CSCM Test description and Risk assessment  Goal  The typical and ultimate current cycle  Test sequence for type test and regular test  Risk assessment.
Batch 4 I-V and Conductivity Analysis List of Samples P134C 14 (SH) 2 20μm wells SU-8 (old) P135C 14 (SH) 2 40μm wells SU-8 (old) P136C 14 (SH)
Introduction, Andrzej Siemko
D1 and D2 powering and protection
Frequency Transfer Function of a dipole What is it Why is it important How to calculate it How to model it How to measure it Emmanuele Ravaioli LHC-CM.
LHC Interconnect Simulations and FRESCA Results
12 October 2009 RRB Plenary R.-D. Heuer
Circuit-protection aspects of different preliminary magnet-design options
Powering the LHC Magnets
Update on test results MBHDP102 Re-discussion of test program
Concepts for magnet circuit powering and protection M
Dipole diode lead resistance measurement
Dipole circuit & diode functioning
Consolidation of the dipole diode insulation Technical aspects
3 issues identified in review
L. Bottura and A. Verweij Based on work and many contributions from:
Andrzej Siemko (CERN) and Marco Zanetti (MIT)
Hilumi WP3 meeting, 1 October 2014
Induction Motor Drives
Long term behavior and high-QI test in the MQXFS program
Other arguments to train two sectors to 7 TeV
MBHSP109 and MBHSP May 2019, Gerard Willering.
MBHSP109 Test results 11T technical meeting – EDMS number:
Electrical measurements and diagnostics
Presentation transcript:

CSCM type test: Diode Leads and Diodes Gerard Willering & Vincent Roger TE-MSC With thanks to Bernhard Auchmann, Zinour Charifoulline, Scott Rowan, Arjan Verweij, Daniel Wollmann and all involved in the CSCM test MPE-TM

Outline Diode leads Test parameters and conditions Measurements Comparison with test station data Diodes Test parameters and conditions Measurements Concluding remarks Gerard Willering – TE-MSC-TF - CSCM type test - 16/05/2013

Diode leads: Measured voltages Board A Board B Large data set acquired: RB156 voltage signals RQF 51 voltage signals QPS Board A: BB + interconnections QPS Board B: BB + interconnections + diode leads

Diode lead resistance Gerard Willering – TE-MSC-TF - CSCM type test - 16/05/2013 Diode leads Include 3 types of contact - Diode – Heatsink (clamped) - Heatsink – busbar (bolted) - Busbar – busbar (bolted) - About 60 cm of bus bar In total 6 contacts per voltage signal.

Diode lead resistance Gerard Willering – TE-MSC-TF - CSCM type test - 16/05/2013 Low-resistance RB lead

Diode lead resistance Gerard Willering – TE-MSC-TF - CSCM type test - 16/05/2013 Highest resistance RB lead -At 2 kA run still low resistance -Resistance increase from the first 4 kA run onwards -Resistance reduction during long 7 kA run after short 8 kA run. -Low-current characteristics used for statistical analysis.

Typical behavior: 1.At the first ramp to a higher current the resistance increase is significant 2.After a prolonged run at the similar current the resistance is reduced. For the RQF diode leads similar behavior is seen.

During CSCM R max = 70 µΩ in 6 contacts combined In Block-4 R max > 35 µΩ in 1 diode-heatsink contact. Note: - Different current profiles - Different cooling Diode lead resistance - Comparison to test station data ?

Fast jumps in diode lead resistance Fast jumps identified as the main risk: possibly mechanical movement in bolted joints WhereTypeI (kA) Step (mv) Step ( μΩ) Time (ms) LHC ’11Quad lead416040<50 LHC ‘13Dip lead4307< 120 LHC ’13Quad lead45012< 120 LHC ’13Quad Lead6508< 120 LHC ‘13Quad lead < 120 SM18HS-diode – LHC quad - Verweij 2013 – CSCM type test 2012 – SM18 test station Heatsink-busbar The SM18 test shows that heatsink-busbar contacts can have fast jumps.

Remarks on Diode lead resistance Gerard Willering – TE-MSC-TF - CSCM type test - 16/05/2013 Data analysis -Maximum resistance is in the range as observed for diode-heatsink contact -Fast jumps may occur as well in diode-heatsink contact -A resistance increase in the other two contacts are not identified, but cannot be excluded. -The high-resistances are all “self-healing” as was seen before for diode- heatsink contacts Impact on the test after LS1 -No unexpected results → No show stoppers. Note: the part that was deemed most risky is consolidated during LS1 (the connection plates of the quad diode leads).

Diode opening Gerard Willering – TE-MSC-TF - CSCM type test - 16/05/2013 Prior to high current runs the diodes need to be opened. 1. PC initialization 2. Ramp to 400 A 3. Warmup of magnets and gradual opening of diodes 4. Warmup of diodes → reduction of V forward 5. High current ramp In stage 1 and 2 most current is in the magnet From stage 3 on the current shifts more to the diode circuit. “Slow” opening is required to allow the PC to respond.

Diode opening – Forward voltage Gerard Willering – TE-MSC-TF - CSCM type test - 16/05/2013 Typical opening 1.Increase in I magnet and V 2.V forward reached 3.Warming of the diode – decrease in V forward Dip in voltage after opening -Only in Quad diodes at I = 400 A in 47 out of 364 cases. -Quick decrease in voltage suggest quick increase in temperature → local warm-spot -Regular pattern, always 1.55 to 1.65 V -At 1.5 V the temperature is well below 70 K. -In all the cases the voltage characteristics is the same within ± 1 % and the dip seems to have no permanent effect.

Remarks on V forward of the diodes Gerard Willering – TE-MSC-TF - CSCM type test - 16/05/2013 Data analysis -Strange dip seen only in 13 % of Quad diode openings -At high currents these diodes did not show any deviation from normal behavior. Comments for LS1 qualification test -Since V forward remains at 1.6 V the temperature is much less than 70 K. -After the dip all diodes show similar values of V forward.

Concluding remarks on diodes and diode leads Gerard Willering – TE-MSC-TF - CSCM type test - 16/05/2013 -No show stoppers identified on diodes and diode leads for the CSCM test in LS1 -Large sets of data on diode leads show resistance variations in the range that has been seen before. -Variations in diode opening voltage were unexpected, but are deemed not to be a risk for the test.

Spare slides

Diode opening – statistics of dips With a lower opening temperature (higher voltage) the dip is occurring more often.

Increasing to 6 kA Increasing in to 13 kA