Validation of the OMI Surface UV product OMI Science Team Meeting #11 De Bilt, June 20-23, 2006 Aapo Tanskanen.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
WP 5 : Clouds & Aerosols L.G. Tilstra and P. Stammes Royal Netherlands Meteorological Institute (KNMI) SCIAvisie Meeting, KNMI, De Bilt, Absorbing.
Advertisements

WP 3: Absorbing Aerosol Index (AAI) WP 10: Level-1 validation L.G. Tilstra 1, I. Aben 2, and P. Stammes 1 1 Royal Netherlands Meteorological Institute.
Simulation of Absorbing Aerosol Index & Understanding the Relation of NO 2 Column Retrievals with Ground-based Monitors Randall Martin (Dalhousie, Harvard-Smithsonian)
Surface UV radiation monitoring based on GOME and SCIAMACHY Jos van Geffen 1,2, Ronald van de A 1, Michiel van Weele 1, Marc Allaart 1, Henk Eskes 1 1)
Results from the OMPS Nadir Instruments on Suomi NPP Satellite
UltraViolet Index Craig S. Long National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration National Weather Service National Centers for Environmental Prediction.
DIRECT TROPOSPHERIC OZONE RETRIEVALS FROM SATELLITE ULTRAVIOLET RADIANCES Alexander D. Frolov, University of Maryland Robert D. Hudson, University of.
Ozone and UV Radiation Observational Activities in Turkey Serpil YAĞAN Climatology Division Research Department Turkish State Meteorological Service WMO/UNEP.
Variability of Total Column Ozone During JAN JUN 2011: Consistency Among Four Independent Multi-year Data Records E.W. Chiou ADNET Systems Inc.,
Slide 1 Atmospheric Chemistry User Workshop, 20th & 21st January 2004, ESTEC EUMETSAT Satellite Application Facility on Ozone Monitoring
1 Surface nitrogen dioxide concentrations inferred from Ozone Monitoring Instrument (OMI) rd GEOS-Chem USERS ` MEETING, Harvard University.
ESTEC July 2000 Estimation of Aerosol Properties from CHRIS-PROBA Data Jeff Settle Environmental Systems Science Centre University of Reading.
Chapter 2: Satellite Tools for Air Quality Analysis 10:30 – 11:15.
IDEA - Infusing satellite Data into Environmental (air quality) Applications Summer 2003: Prototype Analysis, Fusion, and Visualization of NASA ESE and.
WP 3: Absorbing Aerosol Index (AAI) WP 10: Level-1 validation L.G. Tilstra 1, I. Aben 2, and P. Stammes 1 1 Royal Netherlands Meteorological Institute.
Validation of OMI UV products: results of two ground UV measurement campaigns in Austria P. Weihs 1, M. Blumthaler 2, H. E. Rieder 1,3,*, A. Kreuter 2,
J. Tamminen Finnish Meteorological Institute TROPOMI workshop KNMI, De Bildt, March 5-6, 2008 FMI participation in OMI and plans for TROPOMI.
Cloud algorithms and applications for TEMPO Joanna Joiner, Alexander Vasilkov, Nick Krotkov, Sergey Marchenko, Eun-Su Yang, Sunny Choi (NASA GSFC)
EARLINET and Satellites: Partners for Aerosol Observations Matthias Wiegner Universität München Meteorologisches Institut (Satellites: spaceborne passive.
Quality of the official SCIAMACHY Absorbing Aerosol Index (AAI) level-2 product L.G. Tilstra and P. Stammes Royal Netherlands Meteorological Institute.
Algorithms and chemical data assimilation activities at Environment Canada Chris McLinden Air Quality Research Division, Environment Canada 2 nd TEMPO.
From TOMS to OMI Reflections on 15 years of NASA/KNMI/FMI Collaboration Pawan K Bhartia Earth Sciences Division- Atmospheres NASA Goddard Space Flight.
A. Bracher, L. N. Lamsal, M. Weber, J. P. Burrows University of Bremen, FB 1, Institute of Environmental Physics, P O Box , D Bremen, Germany.
Latest results on the comparison between OMI and ground-based data at two European sites (Rome and Villeneuve d’Ascq) Virginie Buchard, Colette Brogniez,
Surface UV from TOMS/OMI measurements N. Krotkov 1, J. Herman 2, P.K. Bhartia 2, A. Tanskanen 3, A. Arola 4 1.Goddard Earth Sciences and Technology (GEST)
AMFIC second progress meeting MariLiza Koukouli & Dimitris Balis Laboratory of Atmospheric Physics Aristotle University of Thessaloniki.
Center for Satellite Applications and Research (STAR) Review 09 – 11 March 2010 Image: MODIS Land Group, NASA GSFC March 2000 Image: MODIS Land Group,
A four year record of Aerosol Absorption measurements from OMI near UV observations Omar Torres Department of Atmospheric and Planetary Sciences Hampton.
OMI Validation Status Mark Kroon - KNMI (on behalf of the OMI validation team) OMI Science Team Meeting Helsinki, 23 June 2008.
Status and Outlook of the OMI Surface UV (OMUVB) product OMI Science Team Meeting Baltimore, June 7, 2007 Aapo Tanskanen.
About the status and outlook for OMI Surface UV product OMI Science Team Meeting Helsinki, June 24-27, 2008 Antti Arola.
1 Ground-level nitrogen dioxide concentrations inferred from the satellite-borne Ozone Monitoring Instrument Lok Lamsal and Randall Martin with contributions.
Measuring UV aerosol absorption. Why is aerosol UV absorption important ? Change in boundary layer ozone mixing ratios as a result of direct aerosol forcing.
Investigation on the possibilities of trend detection of spectral irradiance Merle Glandorf and Gunther Seckmeyer Institute of Meteorology and Climatology.
Validation by Model Assimilation/Satellite Intercomparison - ESRIN 9–13 December 2002 Expected Validation of Envisat Ozone Data E. Hilsenrath NASA Goddard.
UV Aerosol Product Status and Outlook Omar Torres and Changwoo Ahn OMI Science Team Meeting Outline -Status -Product Assessment OMI-MODIS Comparison OMI-Aeronet.
11th OMI Science Team Meeting De Bilt, June The Aura Validation Data Center Bojan R. Bojkov.
OMI Science Team 2014, Anders Lindfors / FMI OMI cloud optical depth contributes to the observed positive bias in surface UV Anders V. Lindfors, T. Mielonen,
As components of the GOES-R ABI Air Quality products, a multi-channel algorithm similar to MODIS/VIIRS for NOAA’s next generation geostationary satellite.
R. T. Pinker, H. Wang, R. Hollmann, and H. Gadhavi Department of Atmospheric and Oceanic Science, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland Use of.
UNCERTAINTY IN THE TOTAL OZONE DATA: IMPLICATIONS FOR UV RECONSTRUCTIONS Janusz W. Krzyścin Institute of Geophysics Polish Academy of Sciences MCM X COST.
Validation of OMI total ozone using ground-based Brewer observations ESA Atmospheric Science Conference, 8-12 May 2006, Frascati, Italy Dimitris Balis.
A Long Term Data Record of the Ozone Vertical Distribution IN43B-1150 by Richard McPeters 1, Stacey Frith 2, and Val Soika 3 1) NASA GSFC
OMI ST meeting KNMI Validation of OMI total ozone using ground-based Brewer and Dobson observations D. Balis 1, E. Brinksma 2, M. Kroon 2,V.
Retrieval of Vertical Columns of Sulfur Dioxide from SCIAMACHY and OMI: Air Mass Factor Algorithm Development, Validation, and Error Analysis Chulkyu Lee.
Recent Solar Irradiance Data From SBUV/2 and OMI Matthew DeLand and Sergey Marchenko Science Systems and Applications, Inc. (SSAI) SOLID WP-2 Workshop.
SCIAMACHY TOA Reflectance Correction Effects on Aerosol Optical Depth Retrieval W. Di Nicolantonio, A. Cacciari, S. Scarpanti, G. Ballista, E. Morisi,
0 0 Robert Wolfe NASA GSFC, Greenbelt, MD GSFC Hydrospheric and Biospheric Sciences Laboratory, Terrestrial Information System Branch (614.5) Carbon Cycle.
Center for Satellite Applications and Research (STAR) Review 09 – 11 March 2010 Requirement: Provide information to air quality decision makers and improve.
OMI Soft Calibration P. K. Bhartia, Glen Jaross, Steve Taylor, Xiong Liu, Tom Kelly, Changwoo Ahn, Dave Haffner NASA GSFC, Maryland, USA.
SAG UV Last meetings: Melbourne, Australia, Jul 2011 Next meeting: Hannover, May 2015 Susana Diaz (Chair)
Lok Lamsal, Nickolay Krotkov, Sergey Marchenko, Edward Celarier, William Swartz, Wenhan Qin, Alexander Vasilkov, Eric Bucsela, Dave Haffner 19 th OMI Science.
AERONET DRAGON Campaign, Summer 2011 Christina Justice College Park Scholars – Science & Global Change Program Environmental Science and Policy
1 UWG Meeting, November 16, 2010 UWG Member: Nickolay Krotkov Affiliation: NASA Contact Information: NASA-NOAA-FMI-KNMI project.
Preliminary Documentation for: Earth Surface and Atmospheric Reflectivity ESDR Since 1979 from Multiple Satellites (TOMS, SBUV, SBUV-2, OMI, SeaWiFS, NPP,
OMI BSDF Validation Using Antarctic and Greenland Ice Glen Jaross and Jeremy Warner Science Systems and Applications, Inc. Lanham, Maryland, USA Outline.
Center for Satellite Applications and Research (STAR) Review 09 – 11 March 2010 Image: MODIS Land Group, NASA GSFC March 2000 STAR Enterprise Synthesis.
Use of Near-Real-Time Data for the Global System
Australian report for Atmosphere theme
Validation of the OMI Surface UV Data
Stelios Kazadzis A. Bais, A. Arola OMI science team meeting
Comparison of GOME-2 and OMI surface UV products
Surface UV from TOMS/OMI measurements
The Successor of the TOU
2018 STCE Annual Meeting Surface UV radiation.
Diurnal Variation of Nitrogen Dioxide
Retrieval of SO2 Vertical Columns from SCIAMACHY and OMI: Air Mass Factor Algorithm Development and Validation Chulkyu Lee, Aaron van Dokelaar, Gray O’Byrne:
Presentation transcript:

Validation of the OMI Surface UV product OMI Science Team Meeting #11 De Bilt, June 20-23, 2006 Aapo Tanskanen

OMI Surface UV Algorithm N. Krotkov /GEST Center, University of Maryland J. Herman /NASA GSFC A. Tanskanen, A. Arola /FMI paper: ”Surface Ultraviolet Irradiance from OMI”, IEEE TGRS Aura Special Issue, May 2006 Validation of the OMI Surface UV Data A. Määttä, A. Tanskanen, J. Kaurola, T. Koskela, A. Karpetchko /FMI V. Fioletov / MSC Environment Canada G. Bernhard / Biospherical Instruments poster: ”Validation of the OMI surface UV data” in the AGU fall meeting, 5-9 Dec, 2005 R. McKenzie / NIWA Y. Kondo / University of Tokyo OMI is a contribution of NIVR in collaboration with FMI to the EOS Aura mission of NASA. Scientific use of OMI data is coordinated by KNMI, NASA and FMI.

UV radiation affects Human health: skin cancer, cataracts, immune system, vitamin D synthesis Aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems Materials Additionally, UV is involved in various atmospheric and other processes by photochemical reactions Surface UV depends on Solar zenith angle Total column ozone Clouds Aerosols Surface albedo Topography Some Background Information about UV There is a need for UV forecasts and longterm monitoring of UV. These services are being developed for example within the PROMOTE GSE of ESA.

OMI Surface UV Algorithm and Surface UV Products Inherits from the TOMS UV algorithm based on look-up-tables made with various radiative transfer models. 1.Calculate clear-sky surface UV irradiance 2.Define cloud optical depth  that gives the measured TOA radiance 3.Make cloud correction using the obtained  4.Absorbing aerosol correction to be added in the future Input: OMI Level 2 total ozone column data from NASA Products: Erythemal dose rate at local solar noon (UV Index) Erythemal daily dose Irradiances at 305, 310, 324 and 380 nm at local solar noon Processing, archiving and dissemination of the OMI surface UV data are performed at FMI’s Satellite Data Centre in Sodankylä. The OMI surface UV algorithm is implemented in two separate processing systems: OMI-VFD and Global OMUVB.

OMI Very-Fast-Delivery has been operational since March 2006 OMI data is received by Direct Broadcast in Sodankylä and is processed immediately after each overpass of the Aura satellite. Distribution plots for total column ozone, UV Index and Erythemal daily dose are published within 30 minutes after the overpass at

Global OMUVB product is based solely on the L2 OMTO3 data, The rest of the presentation corresponds to this data product

Currently, some 6886 granules out of the total ECS Collection 2 OMTO3 granules have been processed, which corresponds to a time period from August 17, 2004 to March 24, The L2 OMI Surface UV data (OMUVB) are archived locally in Sodankylä and have been submitted to the Aura Validation Data Center. AVDC provides overpass data for some 80 sites for OMI validation teams. There are plans to reprocess all the data as a reprocessed version of the OMTO3 data becomes available. Processing Status Data Dissemination AVDC provides L2 OMUVB overpass data, new sites can be added as requested FMI provides a website for online plotting and download of L3 OMUVB images Additionally, both L2 (HDF5-EOS) and L3 (1x1 degrees TOMS) data are available at FMI’s ftp site for registered users

Validation of the OMI UV data with Ground-Based Spectral UV Measurements Comparison of the daily erythemal doses Ground-based reference data Brewers in Jokioinen and Sodankylä SUV100 network data by National Science Foundation Canadian Brewer network data from Meteorological Service of Canada Spectral UV data from Palmer and Tokyo

Please note that the scatterogram for Jokioinen does not correspond to the latest validation results!

Brewer data provided by MSC/Environment Canada Preliminary data: calibration errors up to 5% are possible

SUV-100 data provided by NSF UV Monitoring Network, operated by Biospherical Instruments Inc. under a contract from the US National Science Foundation’s Office of Polar Programs via Raytheon Polar Services Company. Preliminary Version 0 data: no cosine correction, Version 2 data will be higher by 4-10%

Preliminary results. Ground-based data provided by NIWA and University of Tokyo

Validation Statistics for Daily Doses [kJ/m 2 ] Validation instrumentnBias%BiasRMS%RMSr Jokioinen Brewer Mk-III # %0.2233%0.99 Sodankylä Brewer Mk-II # % %0.97 Toronto Brewer Mk-II # % %0.98 Toronto Brewer Mk-III # % %0.97 San Diego SUV % %0.95 Ushuaia SUV % %0.97 Barrow SUV % %0.94 Palmer %0.5124%0.97 Tokyo %1.0075%0.92

Conclusions Analog to the TOMS total column ozone time-series the surface UV time-series are continued with the OMI measurement data applying an algorithm that is similar to the TOMS UV algorithm First validation results imply anticipated accuracy of the OMI surface UV data: it’s time to publish the data Results imply that there is a need to introduce a correction for absorbing aerosols in order to get better agreement with reference data in sites affected by urban pollution or aerosols from natural sources. The validation effort continues: use more reference data from ground-based instruments, validate also spectral irradiances, elaborate the statistical analysis of validation results

I will be out of office from July 3rd till August 15th See you in Boulder!