STATISTICAL MODELING OF ASYNCHRONOUS IMPULSIVE NOISE IN POWERLINE COMMUNICATION NETWORKS Marcel Nassar, Kapil Gulati, Yousof Mortazavi, and Brian L. Evans.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Principal Investigator:
Advertisements

Underwater Acoustic MIMO Channel Capacity
Chapter 3. Noise Husheng Li The University of Tennessee.
Principal Investigator:
EE 6332, Spring, 2014 Wireless Communication Zhu Han Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering Class 4 Jan. 27 th, 2014.
Modeling and Mitigation of Interference in Multi-Antenna Receivers Aditya Chopra September 16,
SRC GRC Annual Review March 8, 2011 Powerline Communications for Enabling Smart Grid Applications Prof. Brian L. Evans Wireless Networking and Communications.
Ultra-Wideband Channel Model for Intra-Vehicular Wireless Sensor Networks C. Umit Bas Electrical and Electronics Engineering, Koc University.
Powerline Communications: Channel Characterization and Modem Design Yangpo Gao Helsinki University of Technology
College of Engineering Optimal Access Point Selection and Channel Assignment in IEEE Networks Sangtae Park Advisor: Dr. Robert Akl Department of.
Design of Interference-Aware Communication Systems Presentation to Freescale Semiconductor Wireless Networking and Communications Group 16 Dec 2010 Prof.
1 NLOS Identification Using a Hybrid ToA-Signal Strength Algorithm for Underwater Acoustic Localization By : Roee Diamant, Hwee-Pink Tan and Lutz Lampe.
1(48) An Analysis of the Throughput of Packet Radio Networks André Stranne Licentiate thesis presentation Lund, 16/5 – 2003 André Stranne Licentiate thesis.
In-vehicle PLC Milad Mohammadi L. Lampe, M. Lok, S. Mirabbasi, M. Mirvakili, R. Rosales, & P. van Veen.
1 Characterization of an Unintentional Wi-Fi Interference Device – The Residential Microwave Oven Tanim M. Taher Ayham Z. Al-Banna Joseph L. LoCicero Donald.
Introduction to Cognitive radios Part two HY 539 Presented by: George Fortetsanakis.
DAC: Distributed Asynchronous Cooperation for Wireless Relay Networks 1 Xinyu Zhang, Kang G. Shin University of Michigan.
Outline Smart power grids Powerline noise Receiver design Testbeds
Design of Interference-Aware Communication Systems WNCG “Dallas or Bust” Roadtrip Wireless Networking and Communications Group 24 Mar 2011 Prof. Brian.
Energy-Efficient Signal Processing Techniques For Smart Grid Heterogeneous Communication Networks Prof. Naofal Al-Dhahir Prof. Brian L. Evans Univ. of.
Ghadi Sebaali and Brian L. Evans
Mohammad Alkhodary Ali Al Saihati EE 578 Simulation Communication Systems Case Study (101) Phase II KFUPM Ultra WidebandUltra WidebandChannel.
Design of Interference-Aware Wireless Communication Systems Wireless Networking and Communications Group 2 Dec 2010 Brian L. Evans Lead Graduate Students.
Local Utility Smart Grid Communications
Radio Frequency Interference Sensing and Mitigation in Wireless Receivers Talk at Intel Labs at Hillsboro, Oregon Wireless Networking and Communications.
PhD Defense 13 May 2011 Wireless Networking and Communications Group Radio Frequency Interference Modeling and Mitigation in Wireless Receivers Kapil Gulati.
On the Coded Complex Field Network Coding Scheme for Multiuser Cooperative Communications with Regenerative Relays Caixi Key Lab of Information.
Design of Sparse Filters for Channel Shortening Aditya Chopra and Prof. Brian L. Evans Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering The University.
POWER CONTROL IN COGNITIVE RADIO SYSTEMS BASED ON SPECTRUM SENSING SIDE INFORMATION Karama Hamdi, Wei Zhang, and Khaled Ben Letaief The Hong Kong University.
Prof. Brian L. Evans Dept. of Electrical and Computer Engineering The University of Texas at Austin EE445S Real-Time Digital Signal Processing Lab Fall.
August 4, 2011 Non-Parametric Methods for Mitigating Interference in OFDM Receivers American University of Beirut 1 Prof. Brian L. Evans Department of.
College of Engineering WiFi and WCDMA Network Design Robert Akl, D.Sc. Department of Computer Science and Engineering Robert Akl, D.Sc. Department of Computer.
Performance of Energy Detection: A Complementary AUC Approach
Cyclic Spectral Analysis of Power Line Noise in the kHz Band Karl Nieman †, Jing Lin †, Marcel Nassar †, Khurram Waheed ‡, Brian L. Evans † † Department.
Power Line Carrier Communication VAIBHAV RAI EN VI-B
FPGA Implementation of Denoising in OFDM Systems using DSP Design Module Prof. Brian L. Evans PhD Students Jing Lin, Marcel Nassar & Karl Nieman Wireless.
2015 IEEE Int. Conf. on Communications
College of Engineering Robert Akl, D.Sc. Department of Computer Science and Engineering.
Overcoming Interference Limitations in Networked Systems Prof. Brian L. Evans The University of Texas at Austin Cockrell School of Engineering Department.
Copyright © 2010 National Institute of Information and Communications Technology. All Rights Reserved 1 R&D and Standardization Activities on Distributed.
Task Description: Increase powerline communication (PLC) data rate for better monitoring/controlling applications for residential and commercial energy.
A Factor-Graph Approach to Joint OFDM Channel Estimation and Decoding in Impulsive Noise Channels Philip Schniter The Ohio State University Marcel Nassar,
Cooperative Communication in Sensor Networks: Relay Channels with Correlated Sources Brian Smith and Sriram Vishwanath University of Texas at Austin October.
A Distributed Relay-Assignment Algorithm for Cooperative Communications in Wireless Networks ICC 2006 Ahmed K. Sadek, Zhu Han, and K. J. Ray Liu Department.
Statistical Modeling of Co-Channel Interference IEEE Globecom 2009 Wireless Networking and Communications Group 1 st December 2009 Kapil Gulati †, Aditya.
Prof. Brian L. Evans Dept. of Electrical and Computer Engineering The University of Texas at Austin EE445S Real-Time Digital Signal Processing Lab Fall.
Synchronization of Turbo Codes Based on Online Statistics
Marcel Nassar PhD Defense Committee Members: Prof. Gustavo de Veciana
Computer Arch. And Embedded Processors Embedded Real-Time Signal Processing Systems Prof. Brian L. Evans The University of Texas at Austin August 26, 2008.
University of Toronto – Connection Fast Wideband Electromagnetic Modeling of Indoor Wireless Channels Abbas Alighanbari Supervised by: Prof. Costas.
CIS 6930 Powerline Communications Powerline Channels (c) Richard Newman.
Fen Hou 、 Lin X. Cai, University of Waterloo Xuemin Shen, Rutgers University Jianwei Huang, Northwestern University IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON VEHICULAR TECHNOLOGY,
November 9th, 2010 Low Complexity EM-based Decoding for OFDM Systems with Impulsive Noise Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems, and Computers
Copyright © All Rights Reserved. MIMO Receiver Design in Impulsive Noise Aditya Chopra and Kapil Gulati.
Impulsive Noise at Wireless Receivers
Characterization of PowerLine Communications Disturbed by Impulsive Noise Anderson Gusmão de Lima Universidade Presbiteriana Mackenzie São Paulo – São.
Comparative Study of Impulse Noise Models in the Narrow Band Indoor PLC Environment 10 th Workshop on Power Line Communications Paris, October 10-11, 2016.
Task , Brian L. Evans, The University of Texas at Austin
Jinseok Choi, Brian L. Evans and *Alan Gatherer
Diversity and Coexistence within Smart Grid Communications
Radio Coverage Prediction in Picocell Indoor Networks
Power Line Communications for Enabling Smart Grid Applications
Jing Lin and Brian L. Evans
Presentation on Power Line Communication
International Journal of Control and Automation Vol. 3, No
MIMO Receiver Design in the Presence of Radio Frequency Interference
Powerline Communications: Channel Characterization and Modem Design
Preliminary Results Mitigation of Radio Frequency Interference from the Computer Platform to Improve Wireless Data Communication Prof. Brian L. Evans Graduate.
The University of Texas at Austin
Presentation transcript:

STATISTICAL MODELING OF ASYNCHRONOUS IMPULSIVE NOISE IN POWERLINE COMMUNICATION NETWORKS Marcel Nassar, Kapil Gulati, Yousof Mortazavi, and Brian L. Evans Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering The University of Texas at Austin

Outline Intro on Noise in Powerline Communications (PLC) Prior Work on Asynchronous Noise Modeling System Model and Assumptions Summary of the Approach Simulation Results and Verification 1

Noise in Powerline Communications Background NoisePeriodic and Cyclostationary Noise Asynchronous Impulsive Noise colored noise superposition of lower- intensity sources decreases with frequency includes narrowband interference modulated periodic signal cylostationary in time and frequency synchronous and asynchronous wrt AC mains Sources: rectified and switched power supplies dominant in 3-500kHz Caused by switching transients Duration: micro to millisecond arbitrary inter-arrival time 50db above background noise present MHz [Zimmermann02][Zimmermann02],[Corripio06], [Reiken11],[Nassar12] [Zimmermann02],[DiBert11] 2 time

Prior Work on Asynchronous Noise Empirical Measurements [Zimmermann, Dostert 2002] Empirical Fitting and Modeling Hidden Markov Models [Zimmermann,Dostert2002] Middleton’s class-A [Umehara,Yamaguchi,Morihiro 2004] Gaussian Mixture [Di Bert,Caldera, Schwingshackl,Tonello 2011] Rayleigh [Chan,Donaldson 1989 ] Nakagami-m [Meng,Guan,Chen 2005] 3

Statistical Models 4 ParameterDescription Number of Gaussian components Mixing probabilities Component variances (power) ParameterDescription Overlap index (indicates impulsiveness) Mean intensity

Powerline Communication Networks 5 Objective: Statistical-Physical model for interference at the receiver from M sources Interference from source i Sources of Asynchronous Noise: Bursty Wireless Transmissions Uncoordinated users (coexistence issues) Switching Transients

Interference from a Single Source i ( ) 6 reference time t=0 window of duration T with k i impulses Noise Envelope

7 pathloss Channel experienced by impulse l Amplitude of impulse l at t=0 Is impulse l active at t=0? Assumptions and System Model

Summary of Statistical Modeling Total Interference : After messy calculations, the characteristic function is: Aggregate for multiple Interfering sources 8 Middleton’s Class-A

Modeling Results 9 Dominant Interference Source Homogeneous PLC Network General PLC Network

Simulation Results (Tail Probabilities) 10 General PLC NetworkHomogenous PLC Network Larger Networks with more interferers have higher interference power with smaller tails.

Some Measurements of PLC Noise 11 Collected in the kHz range indoors Gaussian Mixture provide a good fit as well

Thank you Questions? 12

References [1] M. Zimmermann and K. Dostert, “Analysis and modeling of impulsive noise in broad-band powerline communications,” IEEE Trans. Electromagn. Compat., vol. 44, no. 1, pp. 249–258, [2] D. Umehara, H. Yamaguchi, and Y. Morihiro, “Turbo decoding in impulsive noise environment,” in Proc. IEEE Global Telecommun. Conf., vol. 1, 2004, pp. 194–198. [3] L. Di Bert, P. Caldera, D. Schwingshackl, and A. Tonello, “On noise modeling for power line communications,” in Proc. Int. Symp. Power-Line Comm. and its Appl., 2011, pp. 283–288. [4] H. Meng, Y. Guan, and S. Chen, “Modeling and analysis of noise effects on broadband power-line communications,” IEEE Trans. Power Del.,vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 630–637, [5] M. Chan and R. Donaldson, “Amplitude, width, and interarrival distributions for noise impulses on intrabuilding power line communication networks,” IEEE Trans. Electromagn. Compat., vol. 31, no. 3, pp. 320–323, [2] D. Middleton, “Statistical-physical models of electromagnetic interference,” IEEE Trans. Electromagn. Compat., vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 106–127, [3] K. Gulati, B. L. Evans, J. G. Andrews and K. R. Tinsley, "Statistics of Co-Channel Interference in a Field of Poisson and Poisson-Poisson Clustered Interferers", IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, vol. 58, no. 12, Dec. 2010, pp