2014 National Call Collaboration for Effective Educator Development, Accountability and Reform H325A120003.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Readiness Centers Initiative Early Education and Care Board Meeting Tuesday, May 11, 2010.
Advertisements

1 UW-Whitewater & CESA 2 Licensure Renewal & Support Center.
August 2006 OSEP Project Director's Conference 1 Preparing Teachers to Teach All Children: The Impact of the Work of the Center for Improving Teacher Quality.
LAKE COUNTY SCHOOLS System Accreditation Overview of Standards March 3-6, 2013 Susan Moxley, Ed.D. Superintendent Hugh Hattabaugh Chief Academic Officer.
The SWIFT Center SCHOOLWIDE INTEGRATED FRAMEWORK FOR TRANSFORMATION.
1 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations – for all students – for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through the.
1 GENERAL OVERVIEW. “…if this work is approached systematically and strategically, it has the potential to dramatically change how teachers think about.
College, Career, & Life Readiness The contents of this PowerPoint were developed under a grant from the US Department of Education, H323A However,
Welcome to LC W University Parkway. Who is who? Director Alexis Palmer Academic Service- Learning Director Jonathan Westover Program Coordinator.
The Stages of Professional Development: A Resource for All Teachers Responsible for the Achievement of Students with Disabilities Online Professional Development.
The Power Of Partnership: Maryland’s Historic Memorandum of Understanding on the Use of Student Learning Objectives Webinar with David Volrath,
Using Evidence Based Practices to Reform Teacher and Leader Education: Useful Tools and Resources in Action U.S. Department of Education, H325A
1. 2 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations –for all students –for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through.
CEEDAR Cross State Convening Overview: Innovation Configurations Course Enhancement Modules H325A
®® Judy Shanley, AIR Steve Fleischman, AIR Cynthia Ward, MSU Judy Shanley, AIR Steve Fleischman, AIR Cynthia Ward, MSU Playing in the Sandbox: Scaling.
Proficiency Delivery Plan Strategies Curriculum, Assessment & Alignment Continuous Instructional Improvement System ( CIITS) New Accountability Model KY.
Reaching for Excellence in Middle and High School Science Teaching Partnership Cooperative Partners Tennessee Department of Education College of Arts and.
Teaming with Kansas: An Early Childhood Personnel Development Partnership Kansas Technical Assistance System Network ( TASN) Quarterly Meeting February.
Healthy Schools Leadership Program Findings and Lessons Learned.
College, Career, & Life Readiness The contents of this PowerPoint were developed under a grant from the US Department of Education, H323A However,
National Consortium On Deaf-Blindness Families Technical Assistance Information Services and Dissemination Personnel Training State Projects.
Connecting with the SPP/APR Kansas State Personnel Development Grant.
Measuring Educator Effectiveness: Implications for Improving Teacher Preparation Programs Lynn Holdheide, Deputy Director Office of Special Education Program’s.
State Support System for Districts New Hampshire Department of Education.
Ruth Ryder SPDG National Meeting March 5-6, 2013 ESEA Flexibility and SPDG: What’s the connection?
Policy for Results: How Policy Meets Preparation to Lead the Way to Improved Outcomes: H325A
Collaboration for Effective Educator Development, Accountability and Reform H325A
C ollaboration for E ffective E ducator D evelopment, A ccountability, and R eform (CEEDAR) Center U.S. Department of Education, H325A
Leveraging Federal Resources: Teacher Quality, Research, and Program Improvement Peggi Zelinko Office of Innovation and Improvement (OII) Robert Ochsendorf.
Special Education Teacher Preparation Program Improvement Grants (325T) Bonnie D. Jones, Ed. D. Education Program Specialist Office of Special Education.
State Systemic Improvement Plan (SSIP) Office of Special Education January 20, 2016.
Preparing Principals to Support the Development of Effective Inclusive Schools James McLeskey CEEDAR Center, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL Wayne.
WHAT A GREAT IDEA!! Focusing on Results and Using IDEA (Individuals with Disabilities Education Act) Part D Investments to Support Improved Outcomes for.
Mathematics and Science Partnerships Grant RFP Informational Session April 5, 2010.
PERKINS IV AND THE WORKFORCE INNOVATION AND OPPORTUNITY ACT (WIOA): INTERSECTIONS AND OPPORTUNITIES.
Utah State Spotlight 2014 Cohort. Why We Applied  To improve Tier 1/core instruction to meet the needs of an increasingly diverse student population,
SEA Strategies for Promoting Equity: SEA/IHE Collaboration on Teacher Preparation Lynn Holdheide, Center on Great Teachers and Leaders & Collaboration.
Achieve OER State Policy Recommendations July 30, 2015 CC BYCC BY Achieve 2015.
Office of School Turnaround Center for Accountability and Improvement, Ohio Department of Education 25 South Front Street, Columbus, Ohio
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Jack O’Connell, State Superintendent of Public Instruction California Mathematics and Science Partnership (CaMSP) Grant.
1 Update on Teacher Effectiveness July 25, 2011 Dr. Rebecca Garland Chief Academic Officer.
OSEP-Funded TA and Data Centers David Guardino, Office of Special Education Programs, U.S. Department of Education.
Informational Webinar Troy Grant Assistant Executive Director for P-16 Initiatives Tennessee Higher Education Commission.
C ollaboration for E ffective E ducator D evelopment, A ccountability, and R eform (CEEDAR) Center U.S. Department of Education, H325A
Leaders for All Learners: Reforming Leadership Preparation in Oregon
Georgia State University
Cross-Institutional Collaboration for Sustainability
Aligning Efforts to Improve Capacity
Phyllis Lynch, PhD Director, Instruction, Assessment and Curriculum
U.S. Department of Education, H325A120003
Collaboration for Effective Educator Development, Accountability and Reform H325A
Educator preparation policy as a lever for improving teacher and leader preparation: Keeping promises in Tennessee Collaboration for Effective Educator.
High-Leverage Practices
CEEDAR 2.0: Where we’ve been and where we’re going
Investing in Innovation (i3) Fund
Meg Kamman & Erica McCray University of Florida Nichelle Robinson
Ohio Deans Compact Overview CEEDAR Webinar June 21, 2018
Ohio Dean’s Compact Meeting September 14, 2018 ceedar.org
Pay For Success: An Invitation to Learn More
2018 OSEP Project Directors’ Conference
Mary T. Brownell, Director
2018 OSEP Project Directors’ Conference
2018 OSEP Project Directors’ Conference
Poster Presentations for the CEEDAR Cross-State Convening 2017
Margaret Boorady Mary Jo Conrad Casandra Wright
Ohio Presentation Building Ohio’s Community of Practice to Meet the Needs of All Learners.
Overview of the Kansas Technical Assistance System Network: Using Technical Assistance to Facilitate Implementation of Evidence-based Practices Kerry.
Multiple background possibilities
Access, Equity, and Progress
Support for State Deaf-Blind Projects Part 2: NCDB TA Services
Presentation transcript:

2014 National Call Collaboration for Effective Educator Development, Accountability and Reform H325A120003

Today’s Goals  This webinar will provide: –An overview of the CEEDAR Center –The purpose and scope of CEEDAR’s intensive TA to states –Guidance on the process for states to apply for assistance –Opportunity for Q&A

CEEDAR Center Leadership  Mary Brownell, Director  Paul Sindelar and Erica McCray, Co-directors  Meg Kamman, Project Coordinator Partners  American Institutes for Research (AIR)  University of Kansas, Center for Research on Learning  Council of Chief State School Officers  New Teacher Center  Goodlad Institute for Educational Renewal at the University of Washington  Major organizations  Senior advisors OSEP Project Officers: Dr. Bonnie Jones and Dr. David Guardino

CEEDAR’s Mission  To create aligned professional learning systems that provide teachers and leaders effective opportunities to learn how to improve and support core and specialized instruction in inclusive settings that enable students with disabilities to achieve college and career readiness standards

Our Approach

Fundamentals of Our Approach  Facilitate collaborative relationships among SEAs, IHEs (and other training programs), and LEAs to:

Key Assumptions Powerful strategies Effective learning opportunities Sustained learning opportunities Supportive policies Change through collaboration

Effective Opportunities to Learn Content Quality of instruction Time --Elliott, 2012; Kurz, 2011

Dimensions of O(TL) 2  Content coverage –Content knowledge, pedagogy for enacting the content, and how students learn content  Instructional quality –Evidence-based strategies that promote adult learning  Time

CEEDAR CENTER INTENSIVE TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE

What is CEEDAR Center’s Intensive TA?  CEEDAR Center will work with 20 individual states to form leadership teams that can use TA tools to analyze and improve current practice –Licensure and certification standards –Content and structure of teacher education and leader education programs –Evaluation of teacher and leader programs

First Round Intensive TA States

How does the CEEDAR Center establish state partnerships?  State Selection –Five states/IHE teams per year to receive intensive TA  Memorandum of Understanding –Outlines specific expectations negotiated between the CEEDAR Center and each SEA, IHE, and, as appropriate, each LEA partner  Sub-grant Awards –Sub-grants of up to $200,000 per state will support CEEDAR partnership & leverage state resources.

Outcomes of Intensive TA  Reformed leader and teacher education programs that incorporate O(TL) 2  An aligned and coherent state policy structure that supports effective PLSs for teachers and leaders  Improved capacity for evaluating teacher and leader education programs  Improved capacity for scaling up teacher and leader education reform statewide

Outcomes of Intensive TA  Teacher and leader graduates that can deliver evidence based, multi-tiered instruction to help students with disabilities achieve college and career ready standards

Who are the Partners Eligible for Intensive TA?  CEEDAR Center seeks state/IHE teams (DC and US territories as well) to apply for intensive TA supports: –State Education Agency –3 Institutions of Higher Education –Local Education Agencies, as appropriate and available

How Do We Apply?  Chief State School Officer or designee is responsible for starting and finishing the online application. Each IHE fills out a portion of the application.  If you are an IHE representative, contact your state to get the process started!  Current Targeted TA states– Meg!

What is the Purpose of the State Application Process?  To provide each state/IHE team with a standard process for submitting information concerning current efforts and demonstrated need.  To assist the state/IHEs in considering their current level of effort related to teacher and leader preparation to support the academic and social growth of students with disabilities.

How to Apply?  Online Application –Brief present levels, paragraph summaries, and ability to upload supporting documentation Leadership Support Program Alignment/Integration Data and Formative Evaluation Leveraging Existing Efforts and Resources –For each area: Describe present State and IHE efforts Write a brief narrative describing each effort Submit any documentation/evidence to support the narrative where appropriate

Online State Application  Visit the CEEDAR website to access the application: ceedar.org  Dedicated and phone number for questions: – CEEDAR  All online applications should be submitted via the website no later than 11:59 pm on August 1 st.

Online State Application Process Two Step Process–Start Early! Step 1: The state gathers key stakeholders’ contact information and requests an online account. Step 2: Complete online application (Directions available at ceedar.org)ceedar.org Application demonstration–June 27 th webinar

Important Dates  May 6, 2014 National Call  May 23, st Informational Webinar about State Applications  June 27, nd Informational Webinar about State Applications  August 1, 2014 Application Deadline  Aug-Sept 1, 2014 Application review & state selection completed  Sept 15, 2014 Notification of states selected for intensive TA

Questions?  Please type your question into the chat pod.

Archived Webinars and Q&A  For future reference, these resources are available on the CEEDAR website: -National Call Webinars -National Call Document -Q&A Document

Thank you!

Disclaimer The contents of this webinar were developed under a cooperative agreement from the U.S. Department of Education, H325A However, those contents do not necessarily represent the policy of the U.S. Department of Education, and you should not assume endorsement by the Federal government.