AMUSE-Virgo AGN MUlti-wavelength Survey in Early type galaxies Black Hole Accretion in the Nearby Universe: Evidence for Down-Sizing Elena Gallo | MIT.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
207th AAS Meeting Washington D.C., 8-13 January The Spitzer SWIRE Legacy Program Spitzer Wide-Area Infrared Extragalactic Survey Mari Polletta (UCSD)
Advertisements

COEVOLUTION OF SUPERMASSIVE BLACK HOLES AND THEIR HOST GALAXIES...OR: CHICKEN, EGG OR BOTH? Jari Kotilainen Tuorla Observatory, University of Turku, Finland.
Formation of Globular Clusters in  CDM Cosmology Oleg Gnedin (University of Michigan)
Supermassive Black Holes in Radio-loud AGNs
On the geometry of broad emission region in quasars Roberto Decarli Turin - May, 20 th, 2008 Università degli Studi dell’Insubria Dipartimento di Fisica.
Supermassive Black Holes Course 689 Presentation by Yan Shi Nov 5, 2009.
Tidal Disruptions of Stars by Supermassive Black Holes Suvi Gezari (Caltech) Chris Martin & GALEX Team Bruno Milliard (GALEX) Stephane Basa (SNLS)
AMUSE-Virgo AGN Multi-wavelength Survey in Early type galaxies On the survival of super-massive black holes in faint spheroids Elena Gallo | UCSB.
Luminous obscured quasars in the HELLAS2XMM survey: the Spitzer perspective Cristian Vignali Dipartimento di Astronomia, Universita`degli Studi di Bologna.
The relation among black holes, their host galaxies and AGN activity INAF ISTITUTO NAZIONALE DI ASTROFISICA NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR ASTROPHYSICS Galaxies.
Massive galaxies in massive datasets M. Bernardi, J. Hyde and E. Tundo M. Bernardi, J. Hyde and E. Tundo University of Pennsylvania.
Weak-Lensing selected, X-ray confirmed Clusters and the AGN closest to them Dara Norman NOAO/CTIO 2006 November 6-8 Boston Collaborators: Deep Lens Survey.
AGN and Quasar Clustering at z= : Results from the DEEP2 + AEGIS Surveys Alison Coil Hubble Fellow University of Arizona Chandra Science Workshop.
THE MODERATELY LARGE SCALE STRUCTURE OF QUASARS
AGN in Clusters of Galaxies Paul Martini The Ohio State University J.S. Mulchaey, D.D. Kelson (OCIW) E. Kim (CfA), A. Athey (OCIW)
Understanding LMXBs in Elliptical Galaxies Vicky Kalogera.
Class 24 : Supermassive black holes Recap: What is a black hole? Case studies: M87. M106. MCG What’s at the center of the Milky Way? The demographics.
On the inconsistency between the SMBH Mass Function from velocity dispersion and luminosity E. Tundo 1,2, M. Bernardi 2, R. K. Sheth 2 J. B. Hyde 2, A.
The Ultra-luminous X-Ray Sources Near the Center of M82 NTHU 10/18/2007 Yi-Jung Yang.
Cosmological evolution of Black Hole Spins Nikos Fanidakis and C. Baugh, S. Cole, C. Frenk NEB-XIII, Thessaloniki, June 4-6, 2008.
PRESIDENCY UNIVERSITY
ACCRETION MODELS FOR BLACK HOLE EVOLUTION Francesco Shankar In collaboration with: D. Weinberg J. Miralda-Escude’ L. Ferrarese A. Cavaliere S. Mathur CCAPP/OSU.
Black holes: do they exist?
X-Ray Observations of RCS Clusters at High Redshift
Obscured AGN in the (z)COSMOS survey AGN9, Ferrara, May Angela Bongiorno Max-Planck-Institut für extraterrestrische Physik, Garching, GERMANY AND.
The Evolution of Quasars and Massive Black Holes “Quasar Hosts and the Black Hole-Spheroid Connection”: Dunlop 2004 “The Evolution of Quasars”: Osmer 2004.
Populations of Galactic X-ray (compact) sources visible to Spectrum-RG Revnivtsev M., Space Research Institute; Moscow, Russia.
The fuelling of local supermassive black holes The fuelling of local supermassive black holes Silvia Pellegrini (Astronomy Dept., Bologna University, Italy)
Black Hole Growth and Galaxy Evolution Meg Urry Yale University.
Quasars, black holes and galaxy evolution Clive Tadhunter University of Sheffield 3C273.
The Black-Hole – Halo Mass Relation and High Redshift Quasars Stuart Wyithe Avi Loeb (The University of Melbourne) (Harvard University) Fan et al. (2001)
Obscured AGN and XRB models Andrea Comastri (INAF-OABologna-Italy) Roberto Gilli (INAF-OABologna-Italy) F. Fiore (INAF-OARoma-Italy) G. Hasinger (MPE-Garching-
Accretion in Early-Type Galaxies Haiguang Xu Department of Physics Shanghai Jiao Tong University
THE HST VIEW OF LINERS AND OTHER LOCAL AGN MARCO CHIABERGE CNR - Istituto di Radioastronomia - Bologna Alessandro Capetti (INAF-OATo) Duccio Macchetto.
Young X-ray source populations in M81 and other galaxies Andreas Zezas Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics In collaboration with: K. Gazeas, J.
Dynamical formation of LMXBs in the inner bulge of M31 by Rasmus Voss with Marat Gilfanov X-rays from nearby galaxies ESAC September 2007.
Scaling relations of spheroids over cosmic time: Tommaso Treu (UCSB)
IAU Jong-Hak Woo Univ. California Santa Barbara Collaborators: Tommaso Treu (UCSB), Matt Malkan (UCLA), & Roger Blandford (Stanford) Cosmic Evolution.
Local SMBH and Galaxy Correlations M bul / M BH  800 M BH -σ* relation (Gebhardt et al. 2000, Ferrarese & Merritt 2000) (e.g. Kormendy & Richstone 1995,
M-σ. Predicted in based on self- regulated BH growth M ~ σ 5 (Silk & Rees) M ~ σ 4 (Fabian)
Populations of accreting X-ray sources in galaxies
LMXB in Globular Clusters: Optical Properties Sivakoff et al David Riebel & Justice Bruursema.
The Accretion History of SMBHs in Massive Galaxies Kate Brand STScI Collaborators: M. Brown, A. Dey, B. Jannuzi, and the XBootes and Bootes MIPS teams.
FRI RADIO GALAXIES AT z > 1 STUDYING THE BUILDING BLOCKS OF TODAY'S MOST MASSIVE GALAXIES AND CLUSTERS Marco Chiaberge Space Telescope Science Institute.
Galactic Astronomy 銀河物理学特論 I Lecture 2-1: Active galaxies and super massive black holes in the local universe Seminar: Gultekin et al. 2009, ApJ, 698,
The Fundamental Plane of Quasars Timothy Scott Hamilton NASA/GSFC, National Research Council …Putting the “fun” back in “Fundamental Plane”!
AGN9: Black Holes & Revelations 25 May 2010 Eleonora Sani Enhanced star formation in Narrow Line Seyfert 1 AGN Co-Is: D. Lutz, G. Risaliti, L. H. Gallo,
Growing black holes: from the first seeds to AGN Mar Mezcua Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics T. Miyaji, F. Civano, G. Fabbiano, M. Karouzos,
Exploringthe μJy and nJy Sky with the EVLA and the SKA Ken Kellermann NRAO East Asia SKA Workshop December 3, /2/20111KASI, Daejeon, Korea.
AGN feedback in action: constraints on the scaling relations between BH and galaxy at high redshift Andrea Merloni (EXC, MPE) A. Bongiorno (MPE), COSMOS.
The Links Between AGN and Galaxy Formation
Galaxies and X-ray Populations G. Fabbiano Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics.
The dependence on redshift of quasar black hole masses from the SLOAN survey R. Decarli Università dell’Insubria, Como, Italy A. Treves Università dell’Insubria,
Evolution of Accretion Disks around Massive Black Holes: Constraints from the Demography of Active Galactic Nuclei Qingjuan Yu UC Berkeley April 21, 2006.
The Black Hole-Galaxy Evolution Connection Ezequiel Treister Einstein Fellow IfA, Hawaii IfA, Hawaii Credit: ESO/NASA, the AVO project and Paolo Padovani.
The GOOD NICMOS Survey (GNS): Observing Massive Galaxies at z > 2 Christopher J. Conselice (University of Nottingham) with Asa Bluck, Ruth Gruethbacher,
The M BH -  star relation at the highest redshifts Fabian Walter (MPIA)
Roeland van der Marel Black Hole Demographics: Observations, Theory and Extrapolation to Intermediate-Mass.
Evolution of massive binary black holes Qingjuan Yu Princeton University July 21, 2002.
AGN in the VVDS (Bongiorno, Gavignaud, Zamorani et al.) 1.What has been done: main results on Type 1 AGN evolution and accretion properties of faint AGN.
HMXB, ULX and star formation
The AMUSE surveys: Down-sizing in black hole accretion
Kyoko Onishi SOKENDAI (The Graduate University for Advanced Studies)
how they might form and evolve
Virgo cluster survey with MXT
Why are Massive Black Holes Small in Disk Galaxies ?
Black Hole - Stellar Mass
Black Hole Growth in the Local Universe
Black Holes in the Deepest Extragalactic X-ray Surveys
Presentation transcript:

AMUSE-Virgo AGN MUlti-wavelength Survey in Early type galaxies Black Hole Accretion in the Nearby Universe: Evidence for Down-Sizing Elena Gallo | MIT Kavli Institute

Galaxies & super-massive black holes Kormendy & Richstone 95, McLure & Dunlop 02, Tremaine et al 02, Marconi & Hunt 03, Ferrarese & Merritt 00; Gebhardt et al 00; Haring & Rix 04; Gültekin et al. 09  Empirical scaling relation between black hole mass and host bulge properties  BH / galaxy evolution link (feedback processes)  Do nuclear BHs survive at low mass/luminosity?

Galaxy evolution and black hole feedback Croton et al. 2006Ciotti & Ostriker 2007 Semi-analytic modelsSimulations (hydro, 1D)

X-rays: AGN vs. `inactive’ galaxies Pellegrini 2005; Soria et al 2006 ROSAT effectively sensitive down to 1e40 erg/sec for nearby galaxies Chandra bridges the gap between active (>1E-2 L_Edd) and (formally) inactive galaxies X-rays from inactive galaxies:

Black hole vs nuclear star clusters Ferrarese et al (see also Wenher & Harris 2006, Kormendy et al 2009)  ACS Virgo Cluster Sample (ACSVCS Cote’ et al 04)  Nuclear star clusters increasingly prominent moving down the mass function > might replace black holes  X-ray perspective: enhanced contamination from X-ray binaries

AMUSE-Virgo: the survey Chandra ACIS-S Spitzer MIPS Hubble ACS VLA Targets 100 early type galaxies which compose the HST ACS Virgo Cluster Survey (ACSVCS, Cote’ et al 04)  Duty cycle of super-massive black hole (highly sub-Eddington) activity  Local black hole occupation fraction

AMUSE-Virgo: the survey  84 new targets with Chandra ACIS-S (454 ksec) + 16 archival (>1Msec) complete down to L_Edd for a 3 M_Sun object  57 new targets with Spitzer MIPS (9.5 hr) + 43 archival  HST ACS g- & z-band archival images (100 orbits)

AMUSE: black holes, star clusters & LMXBs Contamination from Low-Mass X-ray Binaries (LMXBs) addressed quantitatively : each nuclear X-ray source Lx is assigned a prob. (1-Px) to be an active black hole, where Px is the chance probability of having a LMXB  Lx within the ACIS PSF, based on X-ray luminosity function of LMXBs:  in the FIELD ( Gilfanov 2004 ) in the absence of nuclear star clusters  in GLOBULAR CLUSTERS ( Sivakoff et al ) in the presence of a nuclear cluster Gallo et al 2008, 2010

AMUSE-Virgo: Nuclear X-ray census  32/100 show a nuclear X-ray source  51/100 show a massive nuclear star cluster  6/100 show both a nuclear X-ray source and a star cluster  24-34% of the galaxies host an active super- massive black hole (95% C.L.)  ACTIVE FRACTION as a function of M *, M BH

AMUSE-Virgo: Active black hole fraction Gallo+ 2009, in prep. Active fraction raises with host stellar mass (Gallo et al 2008, 2010; see Ho et al 1997 Kaufmann et al 2003, Decarli et al 2007, Seth et al 2008, 2010) log (M  /M sun ) Active fraction (%) N(M  )

AMUSE-Virgo: Bayesian approach Gallo+ 2009, in prep. Assume: Log( L X,38 )=A + B log( M BH,8 ) Intrinsic scatter  dex error on M BH Uniform prior on BH mass function A=1.0±0.1 B=0.38±0.13  0 =0.46±0.08 dex 00 B ‹L X ›  M BH 0.38

AMUSE-Virgo: Accretion Down-sizing Gallo+ 2009, in prep. log (M BH ) log L X Gallo et al 2010 (ApJ, in press) ‹L X / M BH ›  M BH -0.62

AMUSE-Virgo: Summary  32/100 nuclear X-ray sources ; 51/100 nuclear clusters ; 6/100 hybrids  Bona fide active black holes (after LMXB contamination assessment): between 24-34% host an accreting black hole. Strong lower limit to occupation fraction in the local universe.  AVERAGE L X /L EDD DESCREASES WITH INCREASING M BH  NEXT: results from Spizter MIPS: absorption, dust reprocessing etc. ( Leipski et al. in prep, Paper III) + AMUSE-Field approved Large Program (Cycle 11, PI Gallo) on 100 field spheroidals, to investigate environmental effects.