Direct Detection of Supersymmetric Particles in Neutrino Telescopes Z. Chacko University of Arizona I. Albuquerque & G. Burdman.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Going Smaller than Atoms AQA Syllabus A A Level Physics – Module 2 © T Harrison. The National School.
Advertisements

Joe Sato (Saitama University ) Collaborators Satoru Kaneko,Takashi Shimomura, Masato Yamanaka,Oscar Vives Physical review D 78, (2008) arXiv:1002.????
Flavor and Dark Matter Zackaria Chacko University of Maryland, College Park.
Neutrino Mass Seesaw at the Weak Scale, the Baryon Asymmetry, and the LHC Z. Chacko University of Maryland, College Park S. Blanchet, R.N. Mohapatra.
Cosmology The Origin and Future of the Universe Part 2 From the Big Bang to Today.
Highly-Ionizing Particles in Supersymmetric Models John Ellis King’s College London & CERN.
MAGNETIC MONOPOLES Andrey Shmakov Physics 129 Fall 2010 UC Berkeley.
Particle Physics and Cosmology Dark Matter. What is our universe made of ? quintessence ! fire, air, water, soil !
Discovery of Long-Lived The LHC Bryan Smith West Coast Theory Network University of California, Irvine 4 th May 2007 Work with Jonathan Feng,
Neutral Particles. Neutrons Neutrons are like neutral protons. –Mass is 1% larger –Interacts strongly Neutral charge complicates detection Neutron lifetime.
Susy05, Durham 21 st July1 Split SUSY at Colliders Peter Richardson Durham University Work done in collaboration with W. Kilian, T. Plehn and E. Schmidt,
Looking for SUSY Dark Matter with ATLAS The Story of a Lonely Lepton Nadia Davidson Supervisor: Elisabetta Barberio.
Search for Long-Lived Particles at DØ Todd Adams Florida State University July 19, 2005 SUSY05 IPPP Durham.
Basic Measurements: What do we want to measure? Prof. Robin D. Erbacher University of California, Davis References: R. Fernow, Introduction to Experimental.
Charged Particles. Nuclear Physics Charged particles can come from nuclear decay. Nuclear physics figures into particle detection. Use terminology from.
Chapter 43 Elementary Particles
Interactions with Matter
Modern Physics LECTURE II.
Outline Searching for charm with ZEUS and HERA: Tales of a classical physicist or physical classicist Philip Allfrey Somerville College.
Quintessino model and neutralino annihilation to diffuse gamma rays X.J. Bi (IHEP)
ROY, D. (2011). Why Large Hadron Collider?. Pramana: Journal Of Physics, 76(5), doi: /s
The Dark Side of the Universe What is dark matter? Who cares?
The Number of Light Neutrino Families ● Physics motivation for measurement ● Direct / indirect searches for ● Analysis methodology for ● Single photon.
August 22, 2002UCI Quarknet The Higgs Particle Sarah D. Johnson University of La Verne August 22, 2002.
Happyphysics.com Physics Lecture Resources Prof. Mineesh Gulati Head-Physics Wing Happy Model Hr. Sec. School, Udhampur, J&K Website: happyphysics.com.
Detecting GRB ν’s – an Opportunity For Observing Lorentz Invariance Violation Uri Jacob and Tsvi Piran The Hebrew University Jerusalem, Israel ν γ.
The BTeV Project at Fermilab Talk to DOE/Fermi Group Jan. 11, 2001 Introduction – Joel Butler Tracking detectors – David Christian Particle Identification.
Particle Physics Chris Parkes Experimental QCD Kinematics Deep Inelastic Scattering Structure Functions Observation of Partons Scaling Violations Jets.
Gamma rays annihilated from substructures of the Milky Way and Quintessino dark matter Bi Xiao-Jun Institute of High Energy Physics, Chinese Academy of.
1 FK7003 Lecture 6 ● Isospin ● SU(2) and SU(3) ● Parity.
The ANTARES neutrino telescope is located on the bottom of the Mediterranean Sea, 40 km off the French coast. The detector is installed at a depth of 2.5.
Deep Inelastic Scattering ep->eX. Structure of Matter  Stuff -> atoms.  Atoms -> nucleons  Nucleons -> ?  This is what deep-inelastic scattering is.
M. Cobal, PIF 2003 Resonances - If cross section for muon pairs is plotted one find the 1/s dependence -In the hadronic final state this trend is broken.
The Nucleus Nucleons- the particles inside the nucleus: protons & neutrons Total charge of the nucleus: the # of protons (z) times the elementary charge.
What IS Fundamental???  Many new particles were discovered with the advent of particle accelerators …are they ALL fundamental??? Baryons: particles with.
Cosmic Rays Cosmic Rays at Sea-Level - Extensive Air Showers and the detection of cosmic rays.
12004, TorinoAram Kotzinian Neutrino Scattering Neutrino interactions Neutrino-electron scattering Neutrino-nucleon quasi-elastic scattering Neutrino-nucleon.
Modern Physics. Reinventing Gravity  Einstein’s Theory of Special Relativity  Theorizes the space time fabric.  Describes why matter interacts.  The.
22 December 2006Masters Defense Texas A&M University1 Adam Aurisano In Collaboration with Richard Arnowitt, Bhaskar Dutta, Teruki Kamon, Nikolay Kolev*,
SUSY08 Seoul 17 June 081 Daniel Teyssier RWTH Aachen University Searches for non-standard SUSY signatures in CMS on behalf of the CMS collaboration.
Nucleon Decay Search in the Detector on the Earth’s Surface. Background Estimation. J.Stepaniak Institute for Nuclear Studies Warsaw, Poland FLARE Workshop.
STANDARD MODEL class of “High Energy Physics Phenomenology” Mikhail Yurov Kyungpook National University November 15 th.
PHY418 Particle Astrophysics
A photon with a wavelength of 2
CEBAF - Continuous Electron Beam Accelerator Facility.
Gravitino Dark Matter in R-violating SUSY M. Lola MEXT-CT Work with N.E.Bomark, P.Osland and A.Raklev.
Long-lived superpartners in the MSSM Alexey GLADYSHEV (JINR, Dubna / ITEP, Moscow) PROTVINO, December 25, 2008 PHYSICS OF FUNDAMENTAL INTERACTIONS PHYSICS.
Standard Model - Standard Model prediction (postulated that neutrinos are massless, consistent with observation that individual lepton flavors seemed to.
Detecting metastable staus and gravitinos at the ILC Hans-Ulrich Martyn RWTH Aachen & DESY.
1 Methods of Experimental Particle Physics Alexei Safonov Lecture #9.
Diquark Higgs production at LHC Nobuchika Okada Theory Division, High Energy Accelerator Research Organization (KEK) In collaboration with Rabindra Nath.
Time-dilation experiment Prof Raghava Varma. This experiment is an indirect verification of special theory of relativity using cosmic ray muons. The picture.
M. Cobal, PIF 2006/7 Quarks. Quarks are s = ½ fermions, subject to all kind of interactions. They have fractional electric charges Quarks and their bound.
10/29/2007Julia VelkovskaPHY 340a Lecture 4: Last time we talked about deep- inelastic scattering and the evidence of quarks Next time we will talk about.
BSM YETI Meeting 10 th Jan SUSY Decays Peter Richardson IPPP, Durham.
The Standard Model of Particle Physics
The Standard Model An Introduction to Particle Physics
Unit 7.3 Review.
The Standard Model strong nuclear force electromagnetic force
A –Level Physics: Nuclear Physics Particle Classification
Shufang Su • U. of Arizona
Propagation of Supersymmetric Charged Slepton at High Energies
ELEMENTARY PARTICLES.
Shufang Su • U. of Arizona
Shufang Su • U. of Arizona
Testing the Standard Model and Beyond
Shufang Su • U. of Arizona
SUSY WIMP and Collider Signatures
ICRC2011, 32ND INTERNATIONAL COSMIC RAY CONFERENCE, BEIJING 2011
SUSY SEARCHES WITH ATLAS
Presentation transcript:

Direct Detection of Supersymmetric Particles in Neutrino Telescopes Z. Chacko University of Arizona I. Albuquerque & G. Burdman

Historically cosmic rays have played a very important role in particle physics. Led to the discovery of positron, muon and pion. However there has been very little recent progress in the direct detection of exotic particles. Why is this?

Four reasons jump out! 1. Require centre of mass energy in collision to exceed the mass of any exotic particle being produced. However flux of high energy cosmic rays falls rapidly with energy. 2. Cross-section for heavy particle to be produced falls rapidly with centre of mass energy. Therefore number of events falls very quickly with mass of exotic. Relatively few events!

3. Heavy particles typically have very short lifetimes. A tau is only 20 times heavier than a muon. However, The short lifetime makes it difficult to characterize exotic particles. 4.How does one distinguish an exotic particle from the surrounding debris? These reasons make identification of an exotic very challenging!

An enormous detector can compensate for the reduced number of events, at least partially. This is exactly what large neutrino telescopes offer! These consist of cubic grids of Cerenkov counters placed in ice or water that can detect charged particles passing through. Each side of the grid is of order a kilometer across. Neutrino telescopes offer a new opportunity for the direct detection of charged,quasi-stable exotics produced by cosmic rays.

There remains the problem of identifying exotics. Are there interesting candidate theories that predict quasistable charged particles? Consider supersymmetry! Supersymmetric theories have a discrete symmetry called R-parity, under which all Standard Model particles are + but all supersymmetric particles are --. This means the `Lightest Supersymmetric Particle’, the `LSP’, is stable! What is the LSP? This is generally either the neutralino or the gravitino, depending on the supersymmetry breaking scale. If the LSP is the gravitino, the `Next-to-Lightest Supersymmetric Particle’, the `NLSP’, is typically the superpartner of the right-handed tau, the right-handed stau. In a large class of theories, including gauge mediated models and superWIMP Models, this particle is long-lived and can be directly detected in neutrino telescopes.

How are the staus produced? High energy neutrinos passing through the earth collide with nucleons, resulting in production of a pair of supersymmetric particles, which decay promptly to staus. This is the supersymmetric analogue of the weak processes which give rise to muon events in neutrino telescopes. The signal is a pair of parallel, upward going charged tracks.

What are the dominant diagrams? How large is the corresponding cross-section?

We see that cross-section for stau production is 3-4 orders of magnitude below cross-section to Standard Model particles. Why is this? For a neutrino of energy E to produce a pair of particles whose masses sum to M, the parton it interacts with needs to carry a parton momentum fraction where m is the mass of the nucleon. Since supersymmetric particles are heavier, they require bigger values of x for fixed neutrino energy E. Since parton distribution functions fall with x, the supersymmetric cross-sections are much smaller. Naively, this would imply that any signal of supersymmetry would be swamped. However, this does not happen! The reason is that the smaller cross-section for supersymmetric particles is compensated for by their much larger range.

Why does the range matter? Define P as probability any given neutrino will give rise to an event in the detector. Then, assuming P is much less than one, where P μ is the probability of a muon event, n the number density of nucleons in the earth, σ μ the neutrino-nucleon cross-section to muons and L μ the muon range. Similarly, the probability of a supersymmetric event

Since stau range is larger than muon range as much as three orders of magnitude, this can partially compensate for reduced cross-section. Why is the muon range so much smaller? Consider formula for electromagnetic energy loss, where a(E) and b(E) are slowly varying functions of energy. While a(E) represents energy loss due to ionization, b(E) represents energy loss from radiation. At high energies, radiation losses dominate. Crudely, b(E) scales as the inverse of the mass of the propagating particle. Since the stau is much heavier than the muon, it travels much further. Stau range can be as large as thousands of kilometers. (careful study by Reno, Sarcevic and Su)

Since stau range is very large, the stau tracks will appear nearly parallel. What is their separation in detector? We can estimate the angular separation of the tracks by where E is the energy of the incident neutrino and M is of order the masses of the supersymmetric particles. Then track separation This naïve estimate is justified by a more detailed calculation. The signal is therefore two parallel charged tracks about 100m apart.

What are the possible backgrounds? Parallel tracks arising from independent single muon events are very rare. Instead, the largest background arises from Standard Model processes which result in two muons. The main source of these di-muons is the production of a charmed hadron, which subsequently decays semi-leptonically to a muon. Here H c is a charmed baryon and H x is a strange or non-strange baryon. However we expect most of the di-muon background can be eliminated by making cuts on track separation and angular distribution. Since the muon range is only of order 10 kilometers, much smaller than the stau range, the muon tracks, even if parallel, are only very rarely more than 30m apart. It may also be possible to distinguish individual muon tracks from stau tracks.

How large are the signals? For this we need to know the incident neutrino flux. We will use the Waxman-Bahcall and Mannheim-Protheroe-Rachen bounds as a guide. Results show that first concrete evidence for supersymmetry may emerge from neutrino telescopes. See also analyses of Bi, Wang, Zhang & Zhang, and Ahlers, Kersten & Ringwald.

As explained earlier, the track separations of signal and background tend to be very different.

Conclusions Neutrino telescopes may provide the first concrete evidence for weak scale supersymmetry. More generally, any theory that predicts quasi-stable charged particles at the weak scale which can be pair produced through neutrino-nucleon interactions can be probed in this way.