Educator Evaluation System: District Process and Responsibilities.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
WV High Quality Standards for Schools
Advertisements

Professional Learning Communities Connecting the Initiatives
This We Believe: Keys to Educating Young Adolescents The position paper of the Association for Middle Level Education.
North Carolina Educator Evaluation System. Future-Ready Students For the 21st Century The guiding mission of the North Carolina State Board of Education.
PORTFOLIO.
Charlotte Danielson’s The Four Domains of Teaching Responsibility
April 6, 2011 DRAFT Educator Evaluation Project. Teacher Education and Licensure DRAFT The ultimate goal of all educator evaluation should be… TO IMPROVE.
The Marzano School Leadership Evaluation Model Webinar for Washington State Teacher/Principal Evaluation Project.
Principal Professional Development project
Overview of the New Massachusetts Educator Evaluation Framework Opening Day Presentation August 26, 2013.
 Reading School Committee January 23,
Georgia School Standards District Strategic Plan School Strategic Plan (SSP) Heavy focus on CRCT, ITBS, Perceptual Surveys Teacher Evaluation Instrument.
Student Growth Developing Quality Growth Goals II
Muscogee County School District Division of Academics (DOA) District Accreditation Module 4: Quality Assurance.
Formative Assessment A Maryland Race to the Top Initiative Denise Hunt NCSA June 2013.
Critical Success Factors and the PSP
EDUCATOR EVALUATION August 25, 2014 Wilmington. OVERVIEW 5-Step Cycle.
Kansas accreditation is:  1.A school improvement plan  2.An external assistance team  3.Local assessments aligned with state standards  4.Teachers.
Teacher: Decide what to teach Decide what to assign Decide how to assess Decide how to grade In the end, convey how the kids did compared to each.
1 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations – for all students – for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through the.
SMART Goals.
Stronge Leader Effectiveness Performance Evaluation System
Matt Moxham EDUC 290. The Idaho Core Teacher Standards are ten standards set by the State of Idaho that teachers are expected to uphold. This is because.
1 GENERAL OVERVIEW. “…if this work is approached systematically and strategically, it has the potential to dramatically change how teachers think about.
Federal Programs Directors Conference Office of Professional Preparation WVDE.
© 2013 ESD 112. All rights reserved. Putting Evidence Into Context, Trainer.
Session Materials  Wiki
Session Materials Wireless Wiki
Student Assessment Inventory for School Districts Context setting, assessment scenarios, and communications.
Strategic Human Resource Alignment: The Context for Changing Teacher Compensation Herb Heneman & Tony Milanowski Consortium for Policy Research in Education.
Welcome What’s a pilot?. What’s the purpose of the pilot? Support teachers and administrators with the new evaluation system as we learn together about.
Webinar: Leadership Teams October 2013: Idaho RTI.
Learner-Ready Teachers  More specifically, learner-ready teachers have deep knowledge of their content and how to teach it;  they understand the differing.
CLASS Keys Orientation Douglas County School System August /17/20151.
Compass: Module 2 Compass Requirements: Teachers’ Overall Evaluation Rating Student Growth Student Learning Targets (SLTs) Value-added Score (VAM) where.
 Reading Public Schools Staff Presentations March 30, 2012.
West Virginia Educator Evaluation Pilot Participant Update Division of Educator Quality and System Support West Virginia Department of Education Webinar.
Type Date Here Type Presenter Name/Contact Here Making Evaluation Work at Your School Leadership Institute 2012.
Teacher and Principal Evaluation A new frontier….
Geelong High School Performance Development & Review Process in 2014.
1. Housekeeping Items June 8 th and 9 th put on calendar for 2 nd round of Iowa Core ***Shenandoah participants*** Module 6 training on March 24 th will.
Intro to TPEP. A new evaluation system should be a model for professional growth, supporting collaboration between teachers and principals in pursuit.
Using Teacher Evaluation as a Tool for Professional Growth and School Improvement Redmond School District
AdvancED District Accreditation Process © 2010 AdvancED.
Staying on Message in Changing Times Oklahoma Statewide System of Support (SSOS) January 7, 2011 Dr. Cindy Koss, Assistant State Superintendent Oklahoma.
Distinguished Educator Initiative. 2 Mission Statement The Mission of the Distinguished Educator is to build capacity in school districts to enable students.
Standards Aligned System What is SAS? A collaborative product of research and good practice Six distinct elements Clear Standards Fair.
TPEP Teacher & Principal Evaluation System Prepared from resources from WEA & AWSP & ESD 112.
1 SUPPORTING SSPS IN THE MIDYEAR PROCESS ActionDescriptionSupport Resources Available online Reflect on SSP performance to date Review beginning of year.
 Development of a model evaluation instrument based on professional performance standards (Danielson Framework for Teaching)  Develop multiple measures.
BY COURTNEY N. SPEER TECHNOLOGY AS A TOOL SPRING Professional Growth & Self- Reflection.
Powerpoint Templates Page 1 Powerpoint Templates John S. Bell, Ed. D. Office of Teaching and Leading Alabama Department of Education.
Ohio Department of Education March 2011 Ohio Educator Evaluation Systems.
What do you need for your learning? Think about a time outside of education where you learned to do something successfully….
ANNOOR ISLAMIC SCHOOL AdvancEd Survey PURPOSE AND DIRECTION.
A Signature Tool of The Institute for Learning
The Future of State Technology Support for Instructional Improvement Kentucky Department of Education.
Staff All Surveys Questions 1-27 n=45 surveys Strongly Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree The relative sizes of the colored bars in the chart.
Educator Evaluation RESA Training July and August 2012.
Educator Evaluation RESA Training July and August 2012.
DANIELSON MODEL SAI 2016 Mentor Meeting. Danielson Model  Framework with rubrics  Define specific types of behaviors expected to be observed  A common.
Superintendent Formative Evaluation April 26, 2015.
Teacher Evaluation Performance Categories Rose Hermodson Assistant Commissioner Minnesota Department of Education July 10,
FLORIDA EDUCATORS ACCOMPLISHED PRACTICES Newly revised.
Education.state.mn.us Principal Evaluation Components in Legislation Work Plan for Meeting Rose Assistant Commissioner Minnesota Department of Education.
By: Miss Michelle M. Brand Pine Grove Area Elementary School PSCA President-Elect.
August 5-12, 2011 EDUCATOR EVALUATION PILOT. Overview The “Big Picture” – Where are we headed? – Where have we been? – How will we get there? Previewing.
Teacher Effectiveness and Support for Growth
Administrator Evaluation Orientation
Presentation transcript:

Educator Evaluation System: District Process and Responsibilities

Overview Feedback from Pilot Alignment of 3 Systems Superintendents’ role in Principals Evaluation Online system overview Additional Webinar Topics

Educator Evaluation System School Leaders Teachers Counselors

Pilot Schools Alignment of all three systems provided a clear focus and direction on improving student learning Student learning goals changed the culture of our PLC’s because we were all speaking a common language System enabled us to focus on our individual strengths and weaknesses and gain support

System Alignment Levels of Performance Self Reflection Student Learning Goals Professional Conduct Plans to Support Continuous Improvement Summative Weighting

Levels of Performance DistinguishedAccomplishedEmergingUnsatisfactory Distinguished performance describes professional teaching that engages students to be highly responsible for their own learning. Performing at this level involves contributing to the professional learning of others through teacher leadership. Accomplished performance describes professional teaching that exhibits mastery of the work of teaching while improving practice and serving the professional community. Emerging performance represents teaching that demonstrates knowledge and skills to implement essential elements albeit not always successfully at times. Unsatisfactory performance describes teaching that does not convey sufficient understanding of concepts or the successful implementation of essential elements.

Self Reflection (p. 9)

Setting Student Learning Goals (p. 12) Goal 1: Student Learning Goal 2: Personal goal based on self- reflection Goal 3: Optional

Professional Conduct (p. 18)

Page 21

Page 10

Putting It All Together 5% 80% 15%

Principal Evaluation System: Superintendent Process and Responsibilities

1)Interpersonal and collaborative skills 2)Clear and focused learning mission 3)Rigorous Curriculum, engaging instruction and balanced assessment 4)Positive learning climate and cohesive culture 5)Professional Growth 6)Support Systems for Student Success 7)Operations to promote learning 8)Family and community connections 9)Continuous Improvement

Page 8

Stakeholder Surveys

Teacher id for principal is first four letters of Last name, space, first initial blat m User id for principal is WVEIS log in

Questions

For more information on: Teacher Evaluation System – Lee Ebersole School Leader Evaluation System – Georgia Porter