Kalanand Mishra BaBar Coll. Meeting December, 2006 1/11 New Kaon Neural Net Selectors Kalanand Mishra University of Cincinnati  Overview  New selectors’

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

UK egamma meeting, Sept 22, 2005M. Wielers, RAL1 Status of Electron Triggers Rates/eff for different triggers Check on physics channels Crack region, comparison.

Advertisements

Kalanand Mishra BaBar Coll. Meeting Sept 26, /12 Development of New SPR-based Kaon, Pion, Proton, and Electron Selectors Kalanand Mishra University.

14 Sept 2004 D.Dedovich Tau041 Measurement of Tau hadronic branching ratios in DELPHI experiment at LEP Dima Dedovich (Dubna) DELPHI Collaboration E.Phys.J.

Measurement of non BB Decays of Y(4S) to Y(1S)     and Y(2S)     Silvano Tosi Università & INFN Genova.

8. Statistical tests 8.1 Hypotheses K. Desch – Statistical methods of data analysis SS10 Frequent problem: Decision making based on statistical information.

Summary of downstream PID MICE collaboration meeting Fermilab Rikard Sandström.

Particle Identification in the NA48 Experiment Using Neural Networks L. Litov University of Sofia.

Exclusive D s Semileptonic decays using kinematic fitting.

Tracking Efficiency and Momentum Resolution Analysis Chris Meyer UCSC ILC Simulation Reconstruction Meeting March 13, 2007.

Hot Topics from BaBar Fabrizio Bianchi INFN, Torino (on behalf of the BaBar Collaboration) Direct CP Violation in (hep-ex/ ) Observation of and search.

Preliminary Measurement of the BF(   → K -  0  ) using the B A B AR Detector Fabrizio Salvatore Royal Holloway University of London for the B A B AR.

1 CC analysis update Repeat of CC analysis with R1.9 ntuples –What is the effect of improved tracking efficiency? Alternative PID methods: likelihood vs.

A data-driven performance evaluation method for CMS RPC trigger system & Study of Muon trigger efficiencies with official Tag & Probe package for ICHEP.

DPF 2009 Richard Kass 1 Search for b → u transitions in the decays B → D (*) K - using the ADS method at BaBar Outline of Talk *Introduction/ADS method.

L3 Muon Trigger at D0 Status Report Thomas Hebbeker for Martin Wegner, RWTH Aachen, April 2002 The D0 muon system Functionality of the L3 muon trigger.

Current Status of Hadron Analysis Introduction Hadron PID by PHENIX-TOF  Current status of charged hadron PID  CGL and track projection point on TOF.

Performance of the PANDA Barrel DIRC Prototype 1 GSI Helmholtzzentrum für Schwerionenforschung GmbH, Darmstadt 2 Goethe-Universität Frankfurt Marko Zühlsdorf.

Archana Sharma, Suman Beri Panjab University Chandigarh India-CMS meeting TIFR, Jan Updates on the RPC trigger efficiency work with data driven.

Mapping separation power Klaus Götzen GSI Darmstadt PID TAG Meeting 15. Feb

Kalanand Mishra April 27, Branching Ratio Measurements of Decays D 0  π - π + π 0, D 0  K - K + π 0 Relative to D 0  K - π + π 0 Giampiero Mancinelli,

Kalanand Mishra Kaon Neural Net 1 Retraining Kaon Neural Net Kalanand Mishra University of Cincinnati.

Bob Jacobsen July 24, 2001 From Raw Data to Physics From Raw Data to Physics: Reconstruction and Analysis Reconstruction: Particle ID How we try to tell.

Electron-hadron separation by Neural-network Yonsei university.

PANDA GSI 13. December 2006 PID TAG Georg Schepers PANDA Technical Assessment Group PID Status Report G. Schepers for the PID TAG GSI PID TAG.

Optimization of  exclusion cut for the  + and  (1520) analysis Takashi Nakano Based on Draft version of Technical Note 42.

Taikan Suehara et al., ILC tokusui meeting, 21 Dec page 1 Status of LCFIPlus Taikan Suehara, Tomohiko Tanabe (ICEPP, U. Tokyo)

Particle Identification at BESIII Kanglin He April 23, 2007, Amsterdam.

Some remarks on (mis)identification: separation of pions from electrons Answer the question of the feasibility of p_bar p  e + e - Answer the question.

A measurement of the B 0 B 0 oscillation frequency and determination of flavor-tagging efficiency using semileptonic and hadronic B 0 decays S. Bolognesi.

Lukens - 1 Fermilab Seminar – July, 2011 Observation of the  b 0 Patrick T. Lukens Fermilab for the CDF Collaboration July 2011.

I.BelikovCHEP 2004, Interlaken, 30 Sep Bayesian Approach for Combined Particle Identification in ALICE Experiment at LHC. I.Belikov, P.Hristov, M.Ivanov,

Jet Tagging Studies at TeV LC Tomáš Laštovička, University of Oxford Linear Collider Physics/Detector Meeting 14/9/2009 CERN.

Kalanand Mishra BaBar Coll. Meeting February, /8 Development of New Kaon Selectors Kalanand Mishra University of Cincinnati.

1 Guannan Xie Nuclear Modification Factor of D 0 Mesons in Au+Au Collisions at √s NN = 200 GeV Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory University of Science.

Cincinnati, May Kalanand Mishra Kalanand Mishra University of Cincinnati Branching Ratio Measurements of Decays D 0  π - π + π 0, D 0  K - K.

1 Studies of Heavy Flavour Jet Tagging with ZVTOP in JAS3 Overview Jet flavour tagging in JAS3 Cosθ dependence Primary vertex momentum Use of neutral energy.

Kalanand Mishra June 29, Branching Ratio Measurements of Decays D 0  π - π + π 0, D 0  K - K + π 0 Relative to D 0  K - π + π 0 Giampiero Mancinelli,

Kalanand Mishra February 23, Branching Ratio Measurements of Decays D 0  π - π + π 0, D 0  K - K + π 0 Relative to D 0  K - π + π 0 decay Giampiero.

QM2004 Version1 Measurements of the  ->     with PHENIX in Au+Au Collisions at 200 GeV at RHIC PPG016 Figures with Final Approval Charles F. Maguire.

1 A Study On Photonic Electrons In The Endcap EMC  Purity of electrons from MC simulation & real data  Reconstructed photonic electrons Naresh Subba,KSU.

Momentum vs. Angle A Loose Collection of Plots For E’, Pi+, and K+ Using e-p RAPGAP Data Created: July 2009, William Foreman, BNL Last Updated: October.

Particle identification by energy loss measurement in the NA61 (SHINE) experiment Magdalena Posiadala University of Warsaw.

Tau31 Tracking Efficiency at BaBar Ian Nugent UNIVERSITY OF VICTORIA Sept 2005 Outline Introduction  Decays Efficiency Charge Asymmetry Pt Dependence.

Proton to Pion ratio in Jet and Bulk region in Heavy Ion collisions Misha Veldhoen (Utrecht University) For the ALICE collaboration Hard Probes 2012 Cagliari,

Photon Selection Algorithm Ming Yang ， Mingshui Chen BESIII Meeting

14/06/2010 Stefano Spataro Status of LHE Tracking and Particle Identification Status of LHE Tracking and Particle Identification Stefano Spataro III Panda.

Results from BaBar on the Decays B  Kl + l - and B  K*l + l - FPCP-2002, U.Pennsylvania John J. Walsh INFN-Pisa.

(LHE) tracking and PID packages

On behalf of the BABAR Collaboration

Di-electron elliptic flow in

Parameterization of EMC response for

for Particle Identification

First step to Reconstruction of PANDA Barrel DIRC in PandaRoot

EMC session, Annecy General Meeting

Radiative Penguin B Decays at BABAR

For the BaBar Collaboration

EMCal Recalibration Check

Analysis of BK(*) against

DGWG session, Caltech general Meeting,

EMCal Recalibration Check

Study of dE/dx Performance in TPC at CEPC

Direct CP Violation in Observation of and search for

Study of e+e- pp process using initial state radiation with BaBar

Problems with the Run4 Preliminary Phi->KK Analysis

Hadronic recoil analysis:

NKS2 Meeting with Bydzovsky NKS2 Experiment / Analysis Status

Identified Charged Hadron

Extreme Penguins: Tools requirements at the analysis frontier

Search for Lepton Flavour Violation in the decay  → BaBar

/ Separation and the New Dirc

Presentation transcript:

Kalanand Mishra BaBar Coll. Meeting December, /11 New Kaon Neural Net Selectors Kalanand Mishra University of Cincinnati  Overview  New selectors’ performance  Summary

Kalanand Mishra BaBar Coll. Meeting December, /11 The input variables for neural net are: likelihoods from SVT, DCH, DRC (both global and track-based) and momentum and polar angle (  ) of the tracks. Separate neural net training for ‘Good Quality’ and ‘Poor Quality’* tracks: gives two family of selectors - “KNNGoodQual“ and “KNNNoQual”. Kaon neural net overview * Poor Quality tracks are defined as belonging to one of the following categories: - outside DIRC acceptance - passing through the cracks between DIRC bars - no DCH hits in layers > 35 - EMC energy < 0.15 GeV

Kalanand Mishra BaBar Coll. Meeting December, /11 Performance of ‘KNNGoodQual’ selector Non-interesting Region Efficiency Purity The higher curve/ point represents better performance

Kalanand Mishra BaBar Coll. Meeting December, /11 Performance in select momentum bins Low momentum: 0.3 < P < 0.5 GeV/c dE/dx - DRC transition region: 0.8 < P < 1.0 GeV/c Intermediate range: 1.9 < P < 2.1 GeV/c High momentum: 3.0 < P < 3.2 GeV/c

Kalanand Mishra BaBar Coll. Meeting December, /11 ‘Good quality’ tracks: 0.3 < P < 0.5 GeV/c Efficiency Purity Non-interesting Region

Kalanand Mishra BaBar Coll. Meeting December, /11 ‘Good quality’ tracks: 0.8 < P < 1.0 GeV/c Efficiency Purity Non-interesting Region

Kalanand Mishra BaBar Coll. Meeting December, /11 ‘Good quality’ tracks: 1.9 < P < 2.1 GeV/c Efficiency Purity Non-interesting Region

Kalanand Mishra BaBar Coll. Meeting December, /11 ‘Good quality’ tracks: 3.0 < P < 3.2 GeV/c Efficiency Purity Non-interesting Region

Kalanand Mishra BaBar Coll. Meeting December, /11 Performance of ‘KNNNoQual’ selector Efficiency Purity

Kalanand Mishra BaBar Coll. Meeting December, /11 New KNN selectors show significant improvement in performance over the old KNN selectors. Two different family of kaon neural net selectors available based on track quality. Each family has 4 levels of selection criteria : very loose, loose, tight, very tight. Analysts can tune in the performance of PID selection by making an optimal combination of ‘GoodQual’ and ‘NoQual’ selectors depending on the requirements of the analysis ( they have 4 x 4 = 16 choices, though some of the combinations do not make sense ! ).  New KNN selectors are competitive against likelihood selectors over a wide range of momentum and . Summary Continued …..

Kalanand Mishra BaBar Coll. Meeting December, /11 The comparison of the overall performances of the neural net and likelihood based selectors is a bit complicated. For ‘GoodQual’ tracks, the LH selector seems to be performing better at tight level, but NN selector has an edge at loose level. For ‘NoQual’ tracks, NN selector performs better at every level. The new KNN selectors are now part of the latest version of ‘BetaPid’. I will finalize the fine-tuning of the neural net cuts and do bug fixing very soon (hopefully this week). And then the new KNN selectors will become part of the PID-table making machinery. Documentation to be completed by the end of January. Summary continued …..