Multiple Environmental Externalities Of Conservation Tillage: Empirical Assessment of Practice And Performance Based Targeting Luba Kurkalova, Catherine.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Payments for Environmental Services Nancy, April 2012 Patrice Harou.
Advertisements

1 Economic and Environmental Co-benefits of Carbon Sequestration in Agricultural Soils: Retiring Agricultural Land in the Upper Mississippi River Basin.
Conservation Effects Assessment Project (CEAP) Measuring the Environmental Benefits of Conservation Managing the Agricultural Landscape for Environmental.
East Africa Tradeoff Analysis Workshop. Workshop goals and strategy Strategy Monday Introduction to TOA approach Tuesday AM Conceptual framework Tuesday.
1 Reported policies and measures; Agriculture Heikki Granholm Programme Officer UNFCCC MIS Programme.
Ecosystem Services and Other Values Andrew Manale National Center for Environmental Economics October National Center for Environmental Economics.
Potentials for Organic Farming Enviromental friendly agriculture and Efficient Sustainable Small-Scale Wastewater Systems Maria Staniszewska and Gunnar.
ENFA Model ENFA Kick-off Meeting Hamburg, 10 May 2005.
Stakeholder consultation on discussion document on GHG mitigation potential within the agriculture and forest sector Portlaoise 15 May 2015 Eugene Hendrick.
Nonpoint Source Pollution Reductions – Estimating a Tradable Commodity Allen R. Dedrick Associate Deputy Administrator Natural Resources & Sustainable.
Agricultural Water Pollution: Some Policy Considerations Catherine Kling Center for Agricultural and Rural Development, Iowa State University Iowa Environmental.
TRANSECT ZONING IN DUBUQUE COUNTY Prepared by: Barrett Voigt Jamie Sanchagrin Evgeny Chavanin Special thanks to: Dr. Anthony Andrea Uhl.
Economic and Biophysical Models to Support Conservation Policy: Hypoxia and Water Quality in the Upper Mississippi River Basin CARD Resources and Environmental.
Measuring Carbon Co-Benefits of Agricultural Conservation Policies: In-stream vs. Edge-of-Field Assessments of Water Quality. Measuring Carbon Co-Benefits.
Results of the environmental assessments with the CCAT-tool W. de Vries, J.P. Lesschen, J. Kros, M. Kempen and B.S. Elbersen Alterra, Wageningen UR and.
Global Warming Mitigation Proposed Curriculum for New Mexico Middle Schools 6 th through 8 th Marcia Bardy – ST589 Climate Change and Carbon Sequestration.
Task 1:Basic Understanding of Processes and Mechanisms. Research on biophysical processes that control soil organic carbon (SOC) dynamics and greenhouse.
Sustainable intensification based CA for sustainable food security and poverty reduction: Initial evidences from SIMLESA Mulugetta Mekuria – SIMLESA Program.
Tradeoff Analysis: From Science to Policy John M. Antle Department of Ag Econ & Econ Montana State University.
WLI REGIONAL KNOWLEDGE EXCHANGE WORKSHOP ON DECISION-SUPPORT TOOLS AND MODELS SEPTEMBER, 2013, JERBA, TUNISIA Economic analysis of improved water.
Co-Benefits from Conservation Policies that Promote Carbon Sequestration in Agriculture: The Corn Belt CARD, Iowa State University Presented at the Forestry.
World Resources Institute. Hypoxia: What is it? What causes It? The Dead Zone > Seasonally oxygen depleted zone in the Gulf of Mexico > Mobile aquatic.
We note that: Math Trick: Multiplications of Numbers 25  35 = ? 25 =  = 
The Importance of Watershed Modeling for Conservation Policy Or What is an Economist Doing at a SWAT Workshop?
Assessing Alternative Policies for the Control of Nutrients in the Upper Mississippi River Basin Catherine L. Kling, Silvia Secchi, Hongli Feng, Philip.
Watershed Management Assessment Through Modeling: SALT and CEAP Dr. Claire Baffaut Water Quality Short Course Boone County Extension Office April 12, 2007.
Agriculture’s Role in Climate Change Mitigation July 18, 2007 (revised) Daniel A. Lashof, Ph.D. Science Director Climate Center Natural Resources Defense.
USDA Role in Supporting Decisions on Climate Change William Hohenstein Global Change Program Office January 10, 2005.
SOCO Sustainable Agriculture and Soil Conservation 1 Ancona, 1 February 2008 Sustainable Agriculture and Soil Conservation: The SOCO project Brechje Maréchal,
Least Cost Control of Agricultural Nutrient Contributions to the Gulf of Mexico Hypoxic Zone Sergey Rabotyagov, Todd Campbell, Manoj Jha, Hongli Feng,
How Breakthroughs in Information Systems Can Impact Local Decisions Bruce Babcock Center for Agricultural and Rural Development Iowa State University.
The Value of Accurate, Field-Scale, Soil Carbon Assessment Technology: Conservation Tillage in Iowa Lyubov Kurkalova, Catherine Kling, and Jinhua Zhao.
OECD work on fossil fuel subsidies Helen Mountford Acting Deputy Director OECD Environment Directorate 14 December 2009.
Office of International Research, Education, and Development, Virginia Tech Economic and Impact Analysis of Conservation Agriculture Practices Mike Bertelsen,
Linking Land use, Biophysical, and Economic Models for Policy Analysis Catherine L. Kling Iowa State University October 13, 2015 Prepared for “Coupling.
Sequestration: What Elements Are Needed to Implement It, And Are They in Place? October 13, 2004 Forestry and Agriculture Greenhouse Gas Modeling Forum.
Economic Assessment of GHG Mitigation Strategies for Canadian Agriculture: Role of market mechanisms for soil sinks Presentation to GHG Modeling Forum.
Biofuels and Water Quality in the Midwest: Corn vs. Switchgrass Silvia Secchi, Philip W. Gassman, Manoj Jha, Lyubov Kurkalova, and Catherine L. Kling Center.
Bighorn Long-Term Issues Group Where Are We Going?
Resource Use and Sustainability Dr. George Norton Agricultural and Applied Economics Virginia Tech Copyright 2006.
National Assessment for Cropland. Analytical Approach Sampling and modeling approach based on a subset of NRI sample points. Farmer survey conducted to.
Trade-Offs of Carbon Sequestration through Land Retirement versus Working Land Hongli Feng, Luba Kurkalova, and Catherine Kling Center for Agricultural.
Nutrient Management Summary CNMP Core Curriculum Section 5 – Nutrient Management.
Modeling the Impacts of Forest Carbon Sequestration on Biodiversity Andrew J. Plantinga Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics Oregon State.
George W. Norton and Abigail Nguema Presented at the SANREM CRSP Annual Meeting Cincinnati, Ohio October 20, 2012.
IOWA NUTRIENT REDUCTION STRATEGY A science and technology-based framework to assess and reduce nutrients to Iowa waters and the Gulf of Mexico James Gillespie.
Simulated Sorghum Grain and Biomass Yield, Water Use, Soil Erosion and Carbon Evolution, and Potential Ethanol Production in Central and South Texas Manyowa.
Slide 1 Achieving Effective Conservation in the Upper Mississippi River Basin CEAP —Conservation Effects Assessment Project.
U.S. Farm Policy Choices in 2007 Bruce A. Babcock Center for Agricultural and Rural Development Iowa State University Presented at Outlook Conference 2006.
Use of Farm-Level Survey Data in the Development of CARD Production Budgets Luba Kurkalova, Todd Campbell, Phil Gassman, Uwe A. Schneider, and Chris Burkart.
Development of an integrated approach for introducing conservation agricultural practices to the tribal communities of Odisha, India Jacqueline Halbrendt.
Costs and Environmental Gains from Conservation Programs
Lyubov Kurkalova, Catherine Kling, and Jinhua Zhao
Economics and Agricultural Sustainability Catherine L. Kling
Lyubov Kurkalova, Catherine Kling, and Jinhua Zhao
Chad Hart & Bruce Babcock
Lyubov Kurkalova, Catherine Kling, and Jinhua Zhao
GIS and Related Activities in the
Luba Kurkalova and Sergey Rabotyagov
Markets and Regulation: Alternative or Complements?
Jinhua Zhao, Catherine Kling, and Luba Kurkalova
Institute for the Study of Society and Environment
A Faith Based Vision for Iowa’s Climate Future
Luba Kurkalova and Sergey Rabotyagov
CASE 2: Corn Belt Soil Carbon & Other Options
RC Izaurralde – JGCRI With contributions from NJ Rosenberg – JGCRI
An Economic Feasibility Analysis of Manure Applications and No-Tillage for Soil Carbon Sequestration in Corn Production Dustin L. Pendell, Jeffery R. Williams,
Luba Kurkalova and Sergey Rabotyagov
Jinhua Zhao, Catherine Kling, and Luba Kurkalova
Presentation transcript:

Multiple Environmental Externalities Of Conservation Tillage: Empirical Assessment of Practice And Performance Based Targeting Luba Kurkalova, Catherine Kling, and Jinhua Zhao Center for Agricultural and Rural Development Iowa State University Presented at 2 nd World Congress of Environmental and Resource Economics, Monterey, CA June 24-27, 2002

Research questions If a policy that targets conservation tillage is implemented, how much less environmental benefits are obtained than if the benefits were targeted? If only one environmental benefits is targeted, what are the associated other environmental benefits?

Data and models Data: Some13,000 NRI points located in Iowa Benefits: Physical processes simulation model EPIC Carbon sequestration Soil erosion Nitrogen runoff Costs: Model of conservation tillage adoption Econometrically estimated Predicts subsidy needed for adoption

Model of conservation tillage adoption Traditional approach Approach of Pautsch, Kurkalova, Babcock, Kling (CEP, 2001)

Model of conservation tillage adoption (continued)

Practice and performance based targeting, same budget, $5.7 M Target conservation tillage Target carbon

Fraction of maximum possible benefits obtainable under conservation tillage targeting

Fraction of maximum possible benefits obtainable under carbon targeting

Conclusions The proposed methodology allows for comparison of alternative benefit targeting schemes Targeting conservation tillage provides high fractions of the maximum possible amounts of the 3 environmental benefits in Iowa Targeting a single benefit is estimated to provide high fractions of other associated benefits