Assessment of Student Learning in General Education AAHE/NCA 2003 Assessment Workshop Omaha, Nebraska ● June 2003.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Session Learning Target You will gain a better understanding of identifying quality evidence to justify a performance rating for each standard and each.
Advertisements

Curriculum Development and Course Design
Institutional Effectiveness (ie) and Assessment
Project Monitoring Evaluation and Assessment
Forward Moving Districts Information Summarized by Iowa Support Team as they Study Identified Buildings and Districts Actions in those Buildings and Districts.
Program Review: The Foundation for Institutional Planning and Improvement.
1 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations – for all students – for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through the.
Consistency of Assessment
Pace University Assessment Plan. Outline I. What is assessment? II. How does it apply to Pace? III. Who’s involved? IV. How will assessment be implemented.
The Academic Assessment Process
E-Program Portfolio Let’s Begin Department of Reading and Language Arts Program Portfolio Central Connecticut State University Name: Date Submitted: Program.
Comprehensive Guidance and Counseling
Standards and Guidelines for Quality Assurance in the European
Developing an Assessment Plan Owens Community College Assessment Day Workshops November 13-14, 2009 Anne Fulkerson, Ph.D. Institutional Research.
Ensuring Quality and Effective Staff Professional Development to Increase Learning for ALL Students.
Title I Needs Assessment/ Program Evaluation Title I Technical Assistance & Networking Session October 5, 2010.
Evaluation of Math-Science Partnership Projects (or how to find out if you’re really getting your money’s worth)
EVIDENCE THAT CONSTITUTE A “GOOD PRACTICE IN THE EVALUATION OF POLICIES Education Commission of the States National Center for Learning and Citizenship.
1. 2 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations –for all students –for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through.
Assessment & Evaluation Committee A New Road Ahead Presentation Dr. Keith M. McCoy, Vice President Professor Jennifer Jakob, English Associate Director.
Overhaul of a Graduate Program in Arts Administration Master of Arts in Arts Administration – Initiated in 2003 – Low-residency—one weekend per month (over.
1. Continue to distinguish and clarify between Student Learning Outcomes (SLOs) and Service Area Outcomes (SAOs) 2. Develop broad SLOs/SAOs in order to.
Everything you wanted to know about Assessment… Dr. Joanne Coté-Bonanno Barbara Ritola September 2009 but were afraid to ask!
Focus on Learning: Student Outcomes Assessment and the Learning College.
Overhaul of a Graduate Program in Arts Administration Master of Arts in Arts Administration –Initiated in 2003 –Low-residency—one weekend per month (over.
Year Seven Self-Evaluation Workshop OR Getting from Here to There Northwest Commission on Colleges and Universities.
Implementation and Management of an Information Systems Practicum in a Graduate Computer Information Technology Curriculum S amuel C onn, Asst. Professor.
Basic Workshop For Reviewers NQAAC Recognize the developmental engagements Ensure that they operate smoothly and effectively” Ensure that all team members.
NCATE Standard 3: Field Experiences & Clinical Practice Monica Y. Minor, NCATE Jeri A. Carroll, BOE Chair Professor, Wichita State University.
1. Housekeeping Items June 8 th and 9 th put on calendar for 2 nd round of Iowa Core ***Shenandoah participants*** Module 6 training on March 24 th will.
What could we learn from learning outcomes assessment programs in the U.S public research universities? Samuel S. Peng Center for Educational Research.
Management in relation to learning processes Proposal Sources: ANECA, CHEA, DETC.
“A Truthful Evaluation Of Yourself Gives Feedback For Growth and Success” Brenda Johnson Padgett Brenda Johnson Padgett.
A Basic Guide to Academic Assessment Presented by Darby Kaikkonen Director of Institutional Research.
1 Roles and Responsibilities of The Learning Evidence Team at CCRI Presented at CCRI Peggy Maki
ANNOOR ISLAMIC SCHOOL AdvancEd Survey PURPOSE AND DIRECTION.
Introduction to Academic Assessment John Duffield Office of Academic Assessment Georgia State University September 2013.
A HANDBOOK FOR PROFESSIONAL LEARNING COMMUNITIES AT WORK CHAPTERS 1-3 Learning by Doing.
2008 Spring Semester Workshop AN INTRODUCTION TO STRATEGIC PLANNING AND ASSESSMENT WORKSHOP T. Gilmour Reeve, Ph.D. Director of Strategic Planning.
Workshop For Reviewers Operating the Developmental Engagements Prof. Dr. Hala SalahProf. Dr. Hoda ELTalawy.
Elementary School Administration and Management GADS 671 Section 55 and 56.
Constructing a Syllabus and Writing Good Learning Outcomes.
Office of Service Quality
Office of Service Quality
Introduction to the quality system in MOHE Prof. Hala Salah Consultant in NQAAP.
The Literacy and Numeracy Secretariat Le Secrétariat de la littératie et de la numératie October – octobre 2007 The School Effectiveness Framework A Collegial.
HLC Criterion Five Primer Thursday, Nov. 5, :40 – 11:40 a.m. Event Center.
Indicator 5.4 Create and implement a documented continuous improvement process that describes the gathering, analysis, and use of student achievement.
Monitor and Revise Teaching. ObjectivesObjectives Describe how to monitor teaching List ways to contribute to broader evaluations Explain how to review.
December 9, 2010 Laura A. Bayless, PhD Dean of Students St. Mary’s College of Maryland.
Note: In 2009, this survey replaced the NCA/Baldrige Quality Standards Assessment that was administered from Also, 2010 was the first time.
Outcomes By the end of our sessions, participants will have…  an understanding of how VAL-ED is used as a data point in developing professional development.
Model of an Effective Program Review October 2008 Accrediting Commission for Community and Junior Colleges.
Assessment Strategies for Student Affairs
CBU CALIFORNIA BAPTIST UNIVERSITY Assessment, Accreditation, and Curriculum Office CBU - OIRPA.
Assessment Basics PNAIRP Conference Thursday October 6, 2011
CALIFORNIA BAPTIST UNIVERSITY Office of Educational Effectiveness
Assessment & Evaluation Committee
Consider Your Audience
NCATE Standard 3: Field Experiences & Clinical Practice
Assessment & Evaluation workshop
Information Technology (IT)
Institutional Effectiveness Presented By Claudette H. Williams
Assessment and Accreditation
Presented by: Skyline College SLOAC Committee Fall 2007
Assessment & Evaluation Committee
Assessing Academic Programs at IPFW
Coastal Bend College’s Quality Enhancement Plan
Brooklyn College Fall 2019 OFFICE OF Institutional effectiveness August 29th 2019.
Presentation transcript:

Assessment of Student Learning in General Education AAHE/NCA 2003 Assessment Workshop Omaha, Nebraska ● June 2003

Mesa ● Arizona Presenter: Gail Mee ● Dean of Instruction Mesa Community College

Session Objectives Participants will: Recognize the characteristics of a successful program to assess general education outcomes. Determine how assessment results can be used to improve the curriculum, instruction, and student learning.

Why Assess Student Learning in General Education?  To respond to demands for accountability from external constituents  To provide evidence of instructional effectiveness

Why Assess Student Learning in General Education?  To document successes and identify weaknesses in the general education program  To improve the curriculum, instruction, and student learning in general education

The Language of Assessment

What is Institutional Effectiveness? A comprehensive evaluation of the degree to which the entire college is accomplishing all aspects of its educational mission

Institutional Effectiveness Outcomes  Describe indicators that the college’s mission is being achieved.  Example: Students will express satisfaction with the quality of the instructional program.

What is Student Outcomes Assessment? The measurement and documentation of the degree to which students are attaining specific learning outcomes defined and valued by faculty and the college community.

Student Learning Outcomes Describe, in measurable terms, what students will be able to do, what they will know, and/or attitudes they will hold as the result of a program of study. Example: “Students will be able to construct and deliver a clear, well- organized verbal presentation.”

Levels of Assessment

Levels of Student Outcomes Assessment  Classroom  Course  Program: above the course General Education Degrees (e.g., AA, BA, MA)

Purpose of Assessment “The overriding purpose of assessment is to understand how educational programs are working and to determine whether they are contributing to student growth and development. Hence, the ultimate emphasis of assessment is on programs rather than on individual students.” Palomba & Banta, 1999 Assessment Essentials

Characteristics of a Successful Program to Assess General Education

1.Assessment of student learning begins with educational values. AAHE, 2001

Characteristics 2. The college makes a long-term commitment.

Characteristics 3. The CAO and other instructional leaders understand and believe in value of assessment. CAO has responsibility for leadership of assessment. CAO encourages participation and provides support for faculty involvement and professional development. CAO ensures that results are used appropriately.

Characteristics 4. Faculty lead the program and own the results. Faculty define student learning outcomes. Faculty identify or develop appropriate tools for assessment. Faculty implement the assessment program. Faculty use assessment results to make programmatic changes and improve learning.

Characteristics 5. Faculty lead the program and own the results, (continued) Faculty governing body is an integral part of the assessment process. A majority of faculty are knowledgeable about assessment vocabulary and practice. Faculty pursue development opportunities related to assessment.

Characteristics 6. Technical expertise and support are provided. Research Office plays a formal support role, or knowledgeable staff or faculty play that role. Roles of faculty and technical support staff are clearly defined.

Characteristics 7. Learning outcomes are clearly defined at the program level. The difference between “course” and “program” assessment is clear. The college has clearly identified “programs”. Student learning is assessed at the completion of a program.

Characteristics 8. Measurement tools align directly with learning outcomes. Outcomes are clearly defined before measures are developed. Selected measures match the defined outcomes.

Direct and Indirect Measures  Direct Measures: directly assess the skills and abilities described in the learning outcomes.  Indirect Measures: rely on reports from students and others about student attitudes, experiences, or what they have learned.

Measures aligned with outcomes Example: Mesa Community College (AZ)  Learning Outcome Area: Arts and Humanities Outcomes:  Demonstrate  Knowledge of human creations  Awareness of context  Impact on audience  Evaluate creations

Arts and Humanities Outcomes Assessment content

visual arts Visual Arts Famous Words Music and Its Context A Story Told – and Imagined

The following photo was taken of a recent art exhibit Visual Arts 1. After seeing it, describe your immediate personal response to this exhibit. photo

Title

The American Dream Goes to Pot Kate Millet The title and date of the work are now displayed. Describe how this information might affect your perceptions of the work.

“The American Dream Goes to Pot” 3. Identify elements in this particular exhibit that qualify it to be considered art. 4. Imagine (and describe) possible historical, political, and/or economic contexts (circumstances) in which this exhibit might have been created. 5. Finally, consider the creator’s message. Describe two or more differing experiences or reactions other observers might carry away.

Characteristics 9. The program has a viable research design There is a systematic plan identifying who is assessed, how they will be assessed, etc. (for example, longitudinal design, pre- post design, cross-sectional design, matched group)

Characteristics 10. Sound methodology is used for data collection and analysis. There is a systematic plan for gathering, analyzing, reporting, and disseminating the results.

Characteristics 11. Results are used by faculty to improve learning. A process is in place for sharing results with faculty. Faculty are making changes to curriculum and instruction based upon assessment results.

Characteristics 12. Assessment is linked to college planning. Results are used to develop department plans. Results of assessment inform college planning and budgeting decisions.

Sustained Assessment for the Long Term  Create an expectation for assessment among students Catalog, schedule, student handbook, student newspaper, web sites  Disseminate the results of assessment Annual assessment reports, faculty publications, newsletters, web sites  Constantly evaluate the outcomes, measures, procedures, and results

Sustaining Assessment, continued.  Link assessment results to planning and budgeting processes.  Engage faculty in decision-making during every stage of the process.  Allow the program to evolve and mature.

Assessment and Student Learning Student outcomes assessment places learning at the center of the academic program and the student experience.