Why is it important for Geno to establish research collaboration with the U.S? Sverre Bjørnstad Sverre Bjørnstad.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
T H E W O R L D L E A D E R I N B O V I N E G E N E T I C S ABS Global The World Leader in Bovine Genetics HB Genetics 2012.
Advertisements

John B. Cole* and Paul M. VanRaden Animal Genomics and Improvement Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA Beltsville, MD
Fokkerij in genomics tijdperk Johan van Arendonk Animal Breeding and Genomics Centre Wageningen University.
Use of Quantitative Trait Loci (QTL) in Dairy Sire Selection Fabio Monteiro de Rezende Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco (UFRPE) - Brazil.
Bull selection based on QTL for specific environments Fabio Monteiro de Rezende Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco (UFRPE) - Brazil.
Introduction to Beef & Dairy.  In the past cattle were bred for three main reasons: 1. To provide milk 2. To provide beef 3. To aid in farming – pulling.
A Canadian Dairy Perspective ~ Christina Crowley-Arklie.
Wiggans, 2013RL meeting, Aug. 15 (1) Dr. George R. Wiggans, Acting Research Leader Bldg. 005, Room 306, BARC-West (main office);
ADSA 2002 (HDN-P1) 2002 Comparison of occurrence and yields of daughters of progeny-test and proven bulls in artificial insemination and natural- service.
THE ISRAELI BREEDING PROGRAM elite cows selected based on their genetic evaluations. About ½ of these cows are mated to local elite bulls, and.
THE ISRAELI BREEDING PROGRAM elite cows selected based on their genetic evaluations. About ½ of these cows are mated to local elite bulls, and.
How Genomics is changing Business and Services of Associations Dr. Josef Pott, Weser-Ems-Union eG, Germany.
2012 ADSA-AMPA-ASAS-CSAS-WSASAS joint annual meeting (1)Norman Comparison of daughter performance of New Zealand and North American sires in US herds H.D.
But who will be the next GREAT one?. USA Bull Proofs * Bulls are ranked based upon their DAUGHTER’S (progeny) production and physical characteristics.
2007 Jana L. Hutchison Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA Beltsville, MD , USA
Mating Programs Including Genomic Relationships and Dominance Effects Chuanyu Sun 1, Paul M. VanRaden 2, Jeff R. O'Connell 3 1 National Association of.
WiggansARS Big Data Workshop – July 16, 2015 (1) George R. Wiggans Animal Genomics and Improvement Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA Beltsville,
Changes in the use of young bulls K. M. Olson* 1, J. L. Hutchison 2, P. M. VanRaden 2, and H. D. Norman 2 1 National Association of Animal Breeders, Columbia,
December 2014 Proof Changes
Is our dairy cow sustainable for the future? L. B. Hansen University of Minnesota.
George R. Wiggans Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD National Association.
Sperm are sorted. “X” sperm are saved “Y” sperm and “undetermined” sperm are discarded.
Performance of Holsteins that originated from embryo transfer or twin births H.D. Norman, J.R. Wright* and R.L. Powell Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory,
 Breeding Heifers Mark Carson Reproductive Specialist, EastGen.
2002 ADSA 2002 (HDN-1) H.D. NORMAN* ( ), R.H. MILLER, P.M. V AN RADEN, and J.R. WRIGHT Animal Improvement Programs.
Norway (1) 2005 Status of Dairy Cattle Breeding in the United States Dr. H. Duane Norman Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service,
Selection for Disease Resistance Gert Pedersen Aamand Nordic Cattle Genetic Evaluation.
Teagasc Presentation (Beef Round Table) Tuesday, 3 rd June 2014 Professor Gerry Boyle Director, Teagasc Pearse Kelly Head of Drystock Knowledge Transfer,
AFGC Convention 2004 (1) 2004 Possibilities for Improving Dairy Cattle Performance Dr. H. Duane Norman Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural.
John B. Cole Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA Beltsville, MD , USA The use and.
2007 Paul VanRaden, Mel Tooker, Jan Wright, Chuanyu Sun, and Jana Hutchison Animal Improvement Programs Lab, Beltsville, MD National Association of Animal.
H. Duane Norman Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD Missouri Dairy Summit.
John B. Cole, Ph.D. Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA Beltsville, MD, USA The U.S. genetic.
2007 J.B. Cole Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD Overview.
2002 Paul VanRaden, Ashley Sanders, Melvin Tooker, Bob Miller, and Duane Norman Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA,
Paul VanRaden and Melvin Tooker* Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD 2006.
2006 Mid-Atlantic Dairy Grazing Conference, 2006 (1) Is There a Need for Different Genetics in Dairy Grazing Systems? H. D. Norman, J. R. Wright, R. L.
2006 H. Duane Norman Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD
1 Genetic Improvement in Beef Cattle - What is Possible? Brian Wickham.
XX International Grassland Conference 2005 (1) 2005 Genetic Alternatives for Dairy Producers who Practise Grazing H. D. Norman, J. R. Wright, R. L. Powell.
Norman, 2014ICAR / Interbull annual meeting, Berlin, Germany, May 20, 2014 (1) Dr. H. Duane Norman Interim Administrator Council on Dairy Cattle Breeding.
H.D. Norman, J.R. Wright, and R.H. Miller Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD, USA
WiggansARS Big Data Computing Workshop (1) 2013 George R. Wiggans Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA Beltsville,
Genetic and environmental factors that affect gestation length H. D. Norman, J. R. Wright, M. T. Kuhn, S. M. Hubbard,* and J. B. Cole Animal Improvement.
H. Duane Norman Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD NDHIA 2009 meeting.
H. Duane Norman Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA Beltsville, MD , USA EAAP.
Multi-trait, multi-breed conception rate evaluations P. M. VanRaden 1, J. R. Wright 1 *, C. Sun 2, J. L. Hutchison 1 and M. E. Tooker 1 1 Animal Genomics.
Ashley H. Sanders and H. Duane Norman Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD
H.D. Norman* J.R. Wright, P.M. VanRaden, and M.T. Kuhn Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural.
H. Duane Norman Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD Dairy Cattle Reproductive.
CRI – Spanish update (1) 2010 Status of Dairy Cattle Breeding in the United States Dr. H. Duane Norman Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural.
Meori Rosen Past, Present, and Future Dairy Cattle Breeding in Israel.
Dairy Cattle Breeds. Ayrshire Scotland; known for vigor and health; average milk production Only 18,000 in the U.S.
2006 8th World Congress on Genetics Applied to Livestock Production (1) Trait Selection When Culling U.S. Holsteins H.D. Norman, J.L. Hutchison, J.R. Wright,
Cattle Breeding in Ireland.
IHFA Cork Club 27th Jan 2014.
The Dairy Research Foundation 2017 Symposium Ian Halliday July 2017
Y. Masuda1, I. Misztal1, P. M. VanRaden2, and T. J. Lawlor3
THE ROYAL GUERNSEY AGRICULTURAL AND HORTICULTURAL SOCIETY
Correlations Among Measures of Dairy Cattle Fertility and Longevity
Domestic vs. imported AI semen for Holstein graziers in the US
Use of a threshold animal model to estimate calving ease and stillbirth (co)variance components for US Holsteins.
Where AIPL Fits In Agricultural Research Service (ARS) is the main research arm of USDA (8,000 employees with 2,000 scientists at >100 locations) Beltsville.
Data Holstein breedings from 2006 through 2008 Total breedings
Percent of total breedings
Increased reliability of genetic evaluations for dairy cattle in the United States from use of genomic information Abstr.
Alternatives for evaluating daughter performance of progeny-test bulls between official evaluations Abstr. #10.
Effectiveness of genetic evaluations in predicting daughter performance in individual herds H. D. Norman 1, J. R. Wright 1*, C. D. Dechow 2 and R. C.
Economics of Reproduction: the Quality of the Pregnancy
Wading through the confusion of EPDs and genomics
Presentation transcript:

Why is it important for Geno to establish research collaboration with the U.S? Sverre Bjørnstad Sverre Bjørnstad

For dairy farmers and consumers - sustainable breeding for the ultimate cow

Geno’s key figures 2003 Annual turnover: $ million Book equity 59 %, $ 15 million Net profit: $ ,- Employees: 278 Members and owners: No. of inseminations: Research and development: $ 2.7 million –No of PhD 11

Geno’s opportunities Unique database Simultaneously genetic gain on functional traits and production Very positive results from testing of NRF-cows in the U.S, Ireland and Northern Ireland –Creating an international scientific base on the NRF Fast growing international sales on NRF Support from Norwegian authorities in establishing international contacts We benefit from an excellent status on animal health in Norway

Creating value in functional genomics you need Unique cattle biobank A well functioning recording and input system covering more than 95 % of the total dairy cow population in Norway Data from 1978 covering individualised phenotypic information from about 7,5 million animals (cows and sires) Pedigree information covering more than 5 generations Central storage blood/serum and semen samples from bulls and bull dams The most comprehensive recording system for health conditions, including more than 60 diseases/diagnostic groups Information covering production measures, health, fertility and conformation Large daughter groups ( ) Well structured and quality assured data located in a central database

Genetic trend NRF

No. of veterinary treatments

International research project with NRF California::NRF, SRB, Normand and Mont Beliard crossed with Holstein. Large dairies in California. Trial is run by Univ. Of Minnesota Nord-Irland:App 300 NRF-cows in herds and on Hillsborough Irland:30 heifers in 1999 on Moorepark 400 NRF NRF X Holstein Holstein on 50 farms. Starting in 2004 New US-initiativ this fall: USDA is willing to fund a seminar on a joint US-Norwegian effort to improve selection for health and fertility in dairy cows

Test results from California TraitHolsteinHolstein x Montbeliarde Holstein x Scandinavian Number Milk (kg)31,831,033,3 Fat (kg)1,10 1,17 Protein (kg)0,940,951,01 Fat + Protein (kg)2,102,002,24 Stillbirth12 %3 %5 % Dystocia1,591,261,19 SCS2,132,331,88

Dairy trends ”In ten years, a majority of Holstein calves will be crossbreds.The cattle most likely to be used will be popular European dairy breeds”. Leslie B. Hansen, Prof. Univ of Minnesota

Units of NRF-semen exported

Geno’s challenges Small resources for R&D, compared with the big companies Unlike oil, fish and skiing, Norwegian dairy production is not well known outside Norway The financial resources in the Ag-business is slowly declining

Conclusion There is a disparity between our potential and our financial and technological resources

Geno’s strategy Establish scientific platforms for marketing of NRF- germplasm Search for international funding –Appropriation bill thru U.S. Congress Establish alliances and cooperation with Univ. and researchers –Joint research projects; we have data and germplasm, find a partner with technology, knowledge and financial strength Where it is possible, make subsidiary companies where we invite investors to take part. Preferably outside core business

NRF x Holstein kg 305 days Preg. 95 day after calving lower SCC than average in herd