DZero Run IIb PMG January 28, Agenda Run IIb D-Zero PMG January 28, 2003  Overview, issues (Kotcher)  Project status (O’Dell)  Trigger technical status (Wood)  AOB Jon Kotcher DZero Run IIb PMG January 28, 2003

DZero Run IIb PMG January 28, Run IIb Project Organization D0 Run IIb Project J. Kotcher, Project Manager R. Partridge, Deputy; V. O’Dell, Associate; W. Freeman, Assistant M. Johnson, Technical Coordinator C. Yoshikawa, Budget Officer; T. Erickson, Administration WBS 1.1 Silicon M. Demarteau TBD Sensors R. Demina, F. Lehner Readout System A. Nomerotski, E. von Toerne QA, Testing, & Burn-in C. Gerber, TBD 1.1.3, Mechanics & Assembly W. Cooper, K. Krempetz Monitoring M. Corcoran, S. de Jong Production J. Fast, TBD Software & Simulation F. Rizatdinova, L Shabalina WBS 1.2 Trigger H. Evans D. Wood L1 Track Trigger M. Narain L1 Cal Upgrade M. Abolins, (H. Evans), P. LeDu L2  Upgrade R. Hirosky Silicon Track Trigger U. Heintz WBS 1.3 DAQ/Online S. Fuess P. Slattery L1 Cal/Track Match K. Johns Simulation M. Hildreth, E. Perez WBS 1.5 Installation R. Smith Silicon Installation Mechanical: H. Lubatti Electronics: L. Bagby, R. Sidwell Trigger Installation D. Edmunds WBS 1.4 Project Administration Administration (D. Wood) Administration (M. Demarteau) Control Systems F. Bartlett, G. Savage, V. Sirotenko Level 3 Systems D. Chapin, G. Watts DAQ/Online Management (P. Slattery) Network & Host Systems J. Fitzmaurice, S. Krzywdzinski Red: Today’s speakers Blue: New silicon co-leader will be in place Mar 1 Agreement with Alice Bean was one year, ended Aug ’02 Two silicon Level 3 subsystems need co-leaders

DZero Run IIb PMG January 28, Overview of Status  Schedule “statussed” for Dec 1-31 time period (talk by O’Dell) u Second full shot since Nov 4-8 EIR  Monthly effort reports being handled in straightforward manner u Work package assignments to individuals’ effort made by WBS Level 3 personnel in hour or two u Returned to Project Office, double-checked before sending to PPD  Lunar report cycle: u Wk –1: Effort reports finalized u Wk 1-2: Status schedule, collect monthly report information u Wk 3: Integrate information, edit reports, identify change control, discuss with project u Wk 4: Report Laboratory, hand in to DOE  First monthly report drafted (bootstrapped from NuMI report) u Overview of project status u Milestone status & summary (includes Gantt) u Narrative highlights to WBS Level 3 u Variance analysis u Cost reports s Tables to WBS Level 3, plots to WBS Level 2 s Pending final approval, only BCWS available

DZero Run IIb PMG January 28, Overview of Status  Have suggested COBRA/reporting meeting with all principals u Want to have final machinery in place in anticipation of FY03 spending approval; many details to consider, commonality: s Inclusion (or not) of R&D s Handling of pass-through s COBRA report output s Change control/variance thresholds s Timing of consultant visit s Finalize form of monthly reports s Tracking university costs s Integration of actuals s … u OPMO on board, setting it up s “Office of Project Management Oversight”  First Production Readiness Review will take place Jan 30 u “Purple Card” for silicon readout during testing, production u Does not go in final detector, used for stand-alone testing at SiDet u Was useful test bed for PRR process, worked quite smoothly

DZero Run IIb PMG January 28, Purple Card PRR  Review Committee: u C. Gerber (UIC) u J. Green (Fermilab) u K. Hanagaki (Fermilab) u S. Lager (Stockholm) u R. Lipton (Fermilab, Chair) u R. Sidwell (KSU)

DZero Run IIb PMG January 28, Some Near-Term Silicon Milestones Six Major Upcoming Silicon Milestones Project Target Date Current Forecast Baseline Date Comments Silicon Prototype Mechanical Stave Built 12/16/0312/18/031/6/03Major integration milestone – was met L2-L5 Sensors Released for Production 2/11/032/18/033/24/03Further delays expected; characterizing sensors. Should not extend to baseline date. SVX4 Released for Production7/10/038/19/0310/20/03Excellent performance of initial prototype Successful Fabrication of Electrical-Grade Pre- Production Silicon Stave* 7/17/037/24/0310/10/03Major integration milestone Successful Readout of Full Silicon Stave 10/10/0310/17/031/29/04Major integration milestone Silicon Module Production Begun 2/16/04 5/17/04Remains on track * Not a DOE L2/Director’s Milestone Forecasts remain well ahead of baseline dates

DZero Run IIb PMG January 28, Some Near-Term Level 1 Trigger Milestones Five Major Upcoming Silicon Milestones Project Target Date Current Forecast Baseline Date Comments L1 ADF shipped to Fermilab5/2/036/23/037/11/03Saclay designing, fabricating L1 cal front-end L1 Calorimeter Trigger TAB/GAB Prototype Complete 7/16/037/15/039/29/03Columbia/Nevis ADF+TAB Prototype Integration7/17/037/16/039/30/03Major integration milestone: in-situ integration summer ’03 L1 CTT Algorithm Firmware Coded & Simulated with FPGA Simulation Tools 7/17/037/11/039/15/03First major L1 CTT milestone Fabrication & assembly of L1 Trigger Cal-TRK Match MTCM complete 10/20/03 11/10/03Completion of production; based on current muon trigger cards Forecasts remain well ahead of baseline dates Level 2 trigger, online begin later

DZero Run IIb PMG January 28, Run IIb Labor  Request for full-time electronics technician for silicon made at last PMG (Dec 10) u Commissioning and maintenance of existing testing, burn-in stands u Cecil Needles joining us, first introductory tour scheduled for this week  Other technical needs covered at the moment  Project Office continually asking project to anticipate their manpower requirements u Collaboration help as well as FNAL technical staff u Lead times can be unwieldy

DZero Run IIb PMG January 28, Labor Cost Extracted from Schedule vs. Actuals (R&D) Actuals: Oct = $168.5k, Nov = $132.8k (FY03 k$) No contingency or G&A in schedule prediction Agreement quite good, but earned value is real measure (actuals, COBRA) Actuals in FY02 k$ Scheduled labor in FY02 k$ Updated for Dec/Jan as soon as information from PPD is available

DZero Run IIb PMG January 28, Comments  Significant Lab-wide parallel efforts (shutdown) never come for free, but impact on Run IIb not as serious as initially thought u Loss of IIb SiDet personnel to Beams Division ameliorated by extra effort from other project principals u Experts within DZero redirected to Collision Hall work, but for reasonably short amount of time u Inter-cryostat gaps photographed, mapped out – required for further Run IIb design work u We have no argument whatsoever with the priorities!!!  I am going to begin assuming that accelerator will run only at 396 nsec u Studies & document outlining utility of SIFT upgrade for physics at 396 nsec being completed (Bross, Hildreth, et al.) u In event SIFT is deemed to be unnecessary, personnel on SIFT project should be redirected within DZero u Have particular interest in integrating P. Rubinov into group of Run II(b) electronics experts – sore and obvious need u Formal statement on 132 from Lab would be useful u Will discuss privately with Mont, et al.

DZero Run IIb PMG January 28, Comments  Jan trip to France to discuss terms of Saclay involvement in Level 1 Calorimeter Trigger very productive u Responsible for front-end (ADF) trigger boards – ADC/Digital Filtering u LHC commitments might compete with proper Run IIb completion u Saclay has agreed to seek extension of their involvement beyond initially proposed 2005 time scale  Things like: u Delays in obtaining FY03 spending approval u Further bottoms-up evaluations of Run IIb project  …send very powerful message. Make it increasingly difficult to maintain committed core of upgrade groups and personnel.

DZero Run IIb PMG January 28, Conclusions  Project making steady, solid technical progress  No change control thresholds yet encountered, but SVX4 is on (schedule) cusp  Project tracking machinery being continually developed & shaken out  COBRA and its implementation an important ingredient to nail down now  Lead time associated with labor requests might grow into a concern as project heats up  Will try on our end to make our requests as early on, and as well-defined, as possible  Cultural stasis exhibited by all entities poses a continuous difficulty – schedule drives these projects!