4/25/2017 9:25 AM Inertial Profiler Forum Intro to the Inertial Profiler Implementation September 28, 2015 © 2015 California Department of Transportation.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Volvo Construction Equipment Road Institute Paving Principles.
Advertisements

Chapter 15 Oscillatory Motion.
Minnesota Department of Transportation Mn/DOTs Gradual Shift from Profile Index to IRI.
Mn/DOT Combined Smoothness Specification Operator Certification Training Workshop July 12, 2010.
Why is ride important?. Our customers - the driving public values pavement smoothness very high.
Ride Specification – IRI Update Prepared by Joe Thomas, P.E. 11/1/06 MAAPT 53 rd Annual Asphalt Conference December 6, 2006.
Managing a Statewide Network An overview of the CDOT Pavement Management Program Eric Chavez Stephen Henry
Physics for Scientists and Engineers, 6e
A Connected Vehicle-Based Application to Estimate Road Roughness Transportation agencies devote significant resources towards collection of highly detailed.
Section Cross Slope District 1 Your logo here.
Road Design Basic Road Design
From… Maintenance Technical Advisory Guide (MTAG) Chapter 5 Diamond Grinding and Grooving.
IRI Smoothness Testing for Quality Assurance and Warranty Construction Alberta Transportation CUPGA November 15 th, 2009 Moncton, NB.
Proposal Note 555 Surface Smoothness for Bridges and Approaches
LLP HMA Pavements Inertial Profiler Prebid Meeting Solano A0104 Oakland, CA September 14, 2012 Peter Vacura Chief, Office of Asphalt Pavement.
From… Maintenance Technical Advisory Guide (MTAG) Chapter 2 Surface Characteristics.
Western Oregon University Oregon Department of Transportation Transportation Safety Division Driver Risk Prevention Curriculum Introduction to Backing.
Managing Time and Space Vehicle Positioning. USE ANY OF THESE VISUAL TECHNIQUES 1.IPDE 2.The Smith System 3.Zone Control.
Airfield Pavement Roughness -Gaps in the Industry-
1 PAVEMENT DATA ITEMS. 2 Climate_Shapes (4 LTPP zones) Soil_Shapes Metadata Estimates Section level data HPMS Pavement Data Summary level data.
The Company ViaTech is a Norwegian Company with a comprehensive range of tailor-made products and services aimed at road, rail and airport authorities.
History Dynatest was founded in 1976 in Denmark by a group of engineers and technicians who combined  science  technology and  business into the development.
International Roughness Index (IRI) for Construction Acceptance Technical Standards Branch Knowledge Presentations to the CEA February 13 th, 2014 Jim.
Ohio Department of Transportation Leadership Meeting#1 Jun 12, 2012 Steering Committee Meeting #1 WELCOME Bicycle and Pedestrian Travel Pike and Wok Travel.
PILOT CAR ESCORT CERTIFICATION JEOPARDY GAME Defensive Driving Breakdowns and Emergency Highway Operations Functions and Duties GA.
Pavement Ride Quality Nicholas Vitillo, Ph. D. Center for Advanced Infrastructure and Transportation.
1 Using GPS data for IFTA and IRP. 2 Objective Controls in an IT Environment GPS – How it Works? Applying Knowledge Gained to Future Audits.
Module 2-4 Roughness and Surface Friction Testing.
Data Collection for Determining Pavement Condition
PAVEMENT CONDITION SURVEYS Lecture 4. Instructional Objectives n Need for condition surveys n Collection methodologies n Four basic types of condition.
Project Manager: Tim Brown Project Editor: Tabatha Doughty Project Engineer: Drew Furry Project Engineer: Jim Walter.
Optimal Highway Durability in Cold Regions Jia Yan Washington State University 18 June 2015.
I. Advantages of Smooth Pavements: Longer Life Public Opinion Save Fuel Less Surface Maintenance II. Ways to Ensure Smooth Pavements Subgrade and Subbase.
Geometric & Pavement Design Example Problems
CO2 Cars Project #2 Land Transportation.
Horizontal Alignment.
Shelton School District Precise Vehicle Placement
Complete High Speed Data Collection System
Moving to International Roughness Index Measured By Inertial Profilers for Acceptance of New Asphalt Construction in Ontario By John A. Blair, Bituminous.
Footer Text 3D TEXTURE MEASUREMENT Development and Field Evaluation of a Texture Measurement System Based on Continuous Profiles from a 3D Scanning Instrument.
Emmanuel Fernando, Texas A&M Transportation Institute and and Magdy Mikhail, Texas Department of Transportation Texas Department of Transportation Road.
On Low Speed Problem in Road Smoothness Profiling Vadim Peretroukhine Michael Nieminen September 28, 2011.
Jason Chapman Data Collection & Management Systems.
MODULE 5 Objectives: Students will learn to recognize moderate risk environments, establish vehicle speed, manage intersections, hills, and passing maneuvers.
Comparison of Inertial Profiler Measurements with Leveling and 3D Laser Scanning Abby Chin and Michael J. Olsen Oregon State University Road Profile Users.
CE303: Introduction to Construction Blueprint Lab.
ASTM E17 Committee Mini-Seminar Dec. 5, 2006 Federal Aviation Administration 1 FAA PERSPECTIVE Airfield Pavement Roughness Presentation to: ASTM E17 Committee.
Addressing Localized Roughness at the Project Level by Gary Higgins.
Automatic Pavement Cracking Distress Measurement System Bugao Xu and Yaxiong Huang University of Texas at Austin (512) December.
Using LTPP Data in Evaluating the Effectiveness of Pavement Smoothness.
Caltrans Test Method METHOD OF TEST FOR OPERATION, CALIBRATION AND OPERATOR CERTIFICATION OF INERTIAL PROFILERS References: AASHTO R 56 – Certification.
MnDOT Pavement Surface Smoothness Specification 23 rd Annual RPUG Meeting September 29, 2011.
1 COMPARISON OF MPD VALUES FROM HIGH- SPEED LASER MEASUREMENTS WITH MPD FROM TWO STATIONARY DEVICES Rohan Perera, PhD, PE Soil and Materials Engineers,
By Terry Treutel Ride Quality Consultant Former WisDOT Ride Spec Coordinator.
User perceptions of highway roughness
Aim: What are confidence intervals for means that have unknown standard deviations and sample sizes less than 30? Quiz Friday.
IRI T ESTING IN N ORTH C AROLINA Presented by Christopher Bacchi, PE Vice President, Trimat Materials Testing, Inc. Raleigh, NC.
Office of Highway Safety Sight Distance and Roadway Condition Dan Walsh, P.E.
Pavement Preservation Program Emily McGraw, PE February 23 and 24, 2015 – NCDOT & CAPA Workshop.
NCDOT – “Final Surface Testing” CAPA / NCDOT Asphalt Training Workshop February 21-22, 2012 Raleigh, NC IRI Standard Specification Article
National Highway Institute 4-1 REV-2, JAN 2006 PROFILE INDICES BLOCK 4.
Jiangbi Hu, Transportation Research Center, Department of Civil Engineering,Beijing University of Technology, China A QUANTITATIVE MODEL OF ROAD-SURFACE.
ROAD PROFILING-ROUGHNESS Presentation by Niranjan Santhirasegaram
National Highway Institute 5-1 REV-2, JAN 2006 EQUIPMENT FACTORS AFFECTING INERTIAL PROFILER MEASUREMENTS BLOCK 5.
Transitioning to IRI for Pavement Smoothness
Patented Precision 8 August 2014 US Patent 6,775,914
Missouri Stringless Paving: I-35 Unbonded Concrete Overlay
ACEC Designer Training
Presentation transcript:

4/25/2017 9:25 AM Inertial Profiler Forum Intro to the Inertial Profiler Implementation September 28, 2015 © 2015 California Department of Transportation. All Rights Reserved © 2007 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved. Microsoft, Windows, Windows Vista and other product names are or may be registered trademarks and/or trademarks in the U.S. and/or other countries. The information herein is for informational purposes only and represents the current view of Microsoft Corporation as of the date of this presentation. Because Microsoft must respond to changing market conditions, it should not be interpreted to be a commitment on the part of Microsoft, and Microsoft cannot guarantee the accuracy of any information provided after the date of this presentation. MICROSOFT MAKES NO WARRANTIES, EXPRESS, IMPLIED OR STATUTORY, AS TO THE INFORMATION IN THIS PRESENTATION.

Objectives What is Smoothness? Profilograph Inertial Profiler 4/25/2017 9:25 AM Objectives What is Smoothness? Profilograph Inertial Profiler International Roughness Index (IRI) Equipment & Operator Certification To understand pavement smoothness we must first define pavement roughness © 2007 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved. Microsoft, Windows, Windows Vista and other product names are or may be registered trademarks and/or trademarks in the U.S. and/or other countries. The information herein is for informational purposes only and represents the current view of Microsoft Corporation as of the date of this presentation. Because Microsoft must respond to changing market conditions, it should not be interpreted to be a commitment on the part of Microsoft, and Microsoft cannot guarantee the accuracy of any information provided after the date of this presentation. MICROSOFT MAKES NO WARRANTIES, EXPRESS, IMPLIED OR STATUTORY, AS TO THE INFORMATION IN THIS PRESENTATION.

What is Pavement Smoothness? 4/25/2017 9:25 AM What is Pavement Smoothness? ASTM defines pavement roughness as “The deviations of a pavement surface from a true planar surface with characteristic dimensions that affect vehicle dynamics…” Pavement Smoothness is lack of pavement roughness Smoothness does not mean less friction! To understand pavement smoothness we must first define pavement roughness © 2007 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved. Microsoft, Windows, Windows Vista and other product names are or may be registered trademarks and/or trademarks in the U.S. and/or other countries. The information herein is for informational purposes only and represents the current view of Microsoft Corporation as of the date of this presentation. Because Microsoft must respond to changing market conditions, it should not be interpreted to be a commitment on the part of Microsoft, and Microsoft cannot guarantee the accuracy of any information provided after the date of this presentation. MICROSOFT MAKES NO WARRANTIES, EXPRESS, IMPLIED OR STATUTORY, AS TO THE INFORMATION IN THIS PRESENTATION.

Benefits of Smooth Pavements 4/25/2017 9:25 AM Benefits of Smooth Pavements Smoother roads: Provide comfortable ride Last longer, Stay smoother longer, Are safer, and Save money No matter how well a pavement is designed and built, no matter how long that pavement lasts, the users of the roadway will call it good or bad primarily based on the smoothness (or comfortability) of the ride. Numerous studies by the Federal Highway Administration, National Cooperative Highway Research Program (NCHRP), and National Asphalt Pavement Association (NAPA) have looked at the affect of smoothness on pavement life. There studies have found a common thread: Pavement built smoother tend to last longer. One reason as to why they last longer could be attributed to the effect of dynamic loading. Rougher pavements result in more dynamic loading, subjecting pavements to much heavier loads than they were designed for. Thus, wearing them out faster. There is evidence from limited studies of smoothness progression over time shows that pavements built smoother will stay smoother longer. There are a lot of design and construction factors that influence smoothness; but when designed and constructed properly, smoother roads tend to stay smoother longer. Rough roads can result in a loss of vehicle control, a reduction in a person’s ability to perform motor tasks, driver fatigue, and an increased frequency of lost load accidents. Smoother roads help save both the user and owner-agency money. Studies suggest that pavements built smoother initially, require less maintenance over the life of the pavement. Additionally studies have shown that smoother pavements decrease both fuel consumption and vehicle maintenance for users. © 2007 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved. Microsoft, Windows, Windows Vista and other product names are or may be registered trademarks and/or trademarks in the U.S. and/or other countries. The information herein is for informational purposes only and represents the current view of Microsoft Corporation as of the date of this presentation. Because Microsoft must respond to changing market conditions, it should not be interpreted to be a commitment on the part of Microsoft, and Microsoft cannot guarantee the accuracy of any information provided after the date of this presentation. MICROSOFT MAKES NO WARRANTIES, EXPRESS, IMPLIED OR STATUTORY, AS TO THE INFORMATION IN THIS PRESENTATION.

How Do We Measure Pavement Smoothness? 4/25/2017 9:25 AM How Do We Measure Pavement Smoothness? Before 2012, Pavement smoothness was measured using a California profilograph and straightedge After 2012, pavement smoothness was measured using inertial profiler and straightedge © 2007 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved. Microsoft, Windows, Windows Vista and other product names are or may be registered trademarks and/or trademarks in the U.S. and/or other countries. The information herein is for informational purposes only and represents the current view of Microsoft Corporation as of the date of this presentation. Because Microsoft must respond to changing market conditions, it should not be interpreted to be a commitment on the part of Microsoft, and Microsoft cannot guarantee the accuracy of any information provided after the date of this presentation. MICROSOFT MAKES NO WARRANTIES, EXPRESS, IMPLIED OR STATUTORY, AS TO THE INFORMATION IN THIS PRESENTATION.

California Profilograph 4/25/2017 9:25 AM California Profilograph The first profilograph was invented by Francis Hveem and constructed in 1940 by the Materials and Research Division of the California Division of Highways. © 2007 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved. Microsoft, Windows, Windows Vista and other product names are or may be registered trademarks and/or trademarks in the U.S. and/or other countries. The information herein is for informational purposes only and represents the current view of Microsoft Corporation as of the date of this presentation. Because Microsoft must respond to changing market conditions, it should not be interpreted to be a commitment on the part of Microsoft, and Microsoft cannot guarantee the accuracy of any information provided after the date of this presentation. MICROSOFT MAKES NO WARRANTIES, EXPRESS, IMPLIED OR STATUTORY, AS TO THE INFORMATION IN THIS PRESENTATION.

How is Smoothness Quantified using a Profilograph? Profile Index Must Grinds

Profile Index (PI) HMA Pavement Concrete Pavement 4/25/2017 9:25 AM Profile Index (PI) HMA Pavement PI of 2.5 inches per 0.1 mile Thicknesses greater than or equal to 0.25 foot On tangents and curves larger than 2,000 foot radius PI of 5 inches per 0.1 mile On 1,000 foot to 2,000 foot curves Concrete Pavement Same as HMA pavement with no thickness limitation © 2007 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved. Microsoft, Windows, Windows Vista and other product names are or may be registered trademarks and/or trademarks in the U.S. and/or other countries. The information herein is for informational purposes only and represents the current view of Microsoft Corporation as of the date of this presentation. Because Microsoft must respond to changing market conditions, it should not be interpreted to be a commitment on the part of Microsoft, and Microsoft cannot guarantee the accuracy of any information provided after the date of this presentation. MICROSOFT MAKES NO WARRANTIES, EXPRESS, IMPLIED OR STATUTORY, AS TO THE INFORMATION IN THIS PRESENTATION.

4/25/2017 9:25 AM Must Grinds Defined by Caltrans as “a deviation of 0.3 inch or more in a length of 25 feet” In other words, a must grind is an isolated area of roughness. © 2007 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved. Microsoft, Windows, Windows Vista and other product names are or may be registered trademarks and/or trademarks in the U.S. and/or other countries. The information herein is for informational purposes only and represents the current view of Microsoft Corporation as of the date of this presentation. Because Microsoft must respond to changing market conditions, it should not be interpreted to be a commitment on the part of Microsoft, and Microsoft cannot guarantee the accuracy of any information provided after the date of this presentation. MICROSOFT MAKES NO WARRANTIES, EXPRESS, IMPLIED OR STATUTORY, AS TO THE INFORMATION IN THIS PRESENTATION.

Limitations of Profilograph Because its front and rear wheels are in contact with the pavement surface, the profilograph cannot accurately measure the pavement profile.

Limitations of Profilograph 4/25/2017 9:25 AM Limitations of Profilograph Actual Profile Dip Dip Profilograph Trace Phantom Bumps © 2007 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved. Microsoft, Windows, Windows Vista and other product names are or may be registered trademarks and/or trademarks in the U.S. and/or other countries. The information herein is for informational purposes only and represents the current view of Microsoft Corporation as of the date of this presentation. Because Microsoft must respond to changing market conditions, it should not be interpreted to be a commitment on the part of Microsoft, and Microsoft cannot guarantee the accuracy of any information provided after the date of this presentation. MICROSOFT MAKES NO WARRANTIES, EXPRESS, IMPLIED OR STATUTORY, AS TO THE INFORMATION IN THIS PRESENTATION.

Inertial Profiler ©Copyright the U. of Michigan

Inertial Profiler

Inertial Profiler Benefits Collects data at a high rate of speed Collects data for both wheel paths simultaneously No need to set up traffic control Safer for workers and users Provides cost savings

How is Smoothness Quantified using an Inertial Profiler? International Roughness Index (IRI) Computer Algorithm (Quarter car model) Areas of Localized Roughness Isolated areas of roughness

Ride Comfort Depends on: Road Roughness Vehicle Response to the Road Human Response to Vibration

Human Response to Vibration

International Roughness Index The International Roughness Index (IRI) is a scale for roughness based on the simulated response of a generic motor vehicle to the roughness in a single wheel path of the road surface. IRI is used to define a characteristic of the longitudinal profile of a traveled wheel track and constitutes a standardized roughness measurement.

International Roughness Index It’s true value is determined by obtaining an accurate measurement of the profile of the road, processing it through an algorithm that simulates the way a reference vehicle would respond to the roughness inputs, and accumulating the suspension travel Commonly reported in units of inches/mile or meters/kilometer

Quarter Car (Golden Car) Filter ©Copyright the U. of Michigan

Mean Roughness Index The average of the IRIs from the left and right wheel paths for the same lane is the mean roughness index (MRI) Pavement smoothness is quantified as averaging the results of the IRI for the left and right wheel paths in an individual lane Every 0.1 mile (528 ft) section of the lane is analyzed SSP highlights

Revised Standard Specification Definition - IRI ETW Direction of Travel Direction of Travel LWP IRI = 62 in/mi IRI = 64 in/mi RWP IRI = 58 in/mi IRI = 60 in/mi ETW 0.1 mile 0.1 mile RWP = Right Wheel Path LWP = Left Wheel Path

Definitions – IRI/MRI ETW Direction of Travel Direction of Travel LWP IRI = 62 in/mi IRI = 64 in/mi MRI = 60 in/mi MRI = 62 in/mi RWP IRI = 58 in/mi IRI = 60 in/mi ETW 0.1 mile 0.1 mile RWP = Right Wheel Path LWP = Left Wheel Path

Areas of Localized Roughness “Areas of Localized Roughness” in inertial profiler replaced the locations of “Must Grinds” in profilograph Areas of localized roughness uses a continuous IRI for each wheel path with a 25 ft interval Areas of localized roughness must be corrected regardless of the MRI values of a 0.1 mile section

International Roughness Index 31 states currently using IRI for HMA smoothness index

International Roughness Index 16 states currently using IRI for PCC smoothness index

IP Operator & Equipment Certification Day 1 – Translab (5900 Folsom Blvd, Sacramento, CA 95819) The following will be performed: Operator Written Test (Min 70% passing score) Day 1 or 2 – Calibration Site The following tests will be performed: Block (laser test) Bounce (accelerometer test) DMI (distance measuring test) Repeatability (precision) Reproducibility (comparison to reference profile/device) All tests will be done in accordance to AASHTO standards R 56 “Certification of Inertial Profiling Systems” R 57 “Operating Inertial Profiling Systems” California Test Method (CTM) 387

Calibration Site N HMA TEST SECTION

Calibration Site Information The site is located in the median of Interstate 80 at the Sacramento Regional Transit Light Rail station (Watt/I-80) parking lot Asphalt test section University of California Pavement Research Center administers the calibration program Certification testing will be conducted approximately 5 to 6 times per year

Calibration results Inertial Profilers passing the calibration tests will be issued a decal The decal signifies certification valid for 12 months Equipment Operators will be certified for 12 months Equipment operators certification is based on the inertial profiler equipment brand/vendor used during the testing

Smoothness Website http://www.dot.ca.gov/hq/maint/Pavement/Offices/Pavement_Engineering/Smoother_Pavements.html Go to Caltrans website and type “Pavement Smoothness” in the search section on the top right corner and click on Go. Then click on Smoother Pavements link. GO TO SMOOTHNESS WEBSITE AND SHOW AUDIENCE THE LIST OF CERTIFIED IP OPERATORS AND EQUIPMENT

Thank You