Lake Intercalibration: status of ongoing work 2008-2012 Sandra Poikane Joint Research Centre Institute for Environment and Sustainability.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Intercalibration of assessment systems for the WFD: Aims, achievements and further challenges Presented by Sandra Poikane Joint Research Centre Institute.
Advertisements

National typologies - reports Presented by Sandra Poikane Joint Research Centre Institute for Environment and Sustainability.
25 oktober nd phase intercalibration CBGIG Macrophytes Rob Portielje.
Water.europa.eu Assessment River Basin Management Plans CIS Strategic Coordination Group meeting Brussels, May 2011 Marieke van Nood WFD Team DG.
Biological methods to detect the effects of hydrological and morphological pressures Introduction and overview of questionnaire responses.
Intercalibration Guidance: update Sandra Poikane Joint Research Centre Institute for Environment and Sustainability.
Presented by Sandra Poikane EC Joint Research Centre Institute for Environment and Sustainability Biological indicators of lakes and rivers and the Intercalibration.
WG 2A ECOSTAT 7-8 July 2004 Task on Harmonisation of Freshwater Biological Methods Status Report AC Cardoso and A Solimini Harmonisation Task Team: JRC.
Lakes Intercalibration Results - July 2006 Presented by Sandra Poikane Joint Research Centre Institute for Environment and Sustainability.
Lake Intercalibration Presented by Sandra Poikane Joint Research Centre Institute for Environment and Sustainability.
IC Guidance Annex III: Reference conditions and alternative benchmarks Sandra Poikane Joint Research Centre Institute for Environment and Sustainability.
ECOSTAT 8-9 October 2007 River GIGs: Future intercalibration needs/plans Presented by Wouter van de Bund Joint Research Centre Institute for Environment.
Working Group A ECOSTAT Intercalibration Progress Coast GIGs JRC, Ispra, Italy, March 2005 Dave Jowett, Environment Agency (England and Wales), Coast.
River Intercalibration Phase 2: Milestone 4 reports Presented by Wouter van de Bund Joint Research Centre Institute for Environment and Sustainability.
Intercalibration CB GIG River Macroinvertebrates Final Report ECOSTAT June 2011 Isabel Pardo Roger Owen.
Intercalibration Option 3 results: what is acceptable and what is not ? Sandra Poikane Joint Research Centre Institute for Environment and Sustainability.
ECOSTAT 8-9 October 2007 Comparability of the results of the intercalibration exercise – MS sharing the same method Presented by Wouter van de Bund Joint.
River Intercalibration Phase 2: Milestone 2 reports Presented by Wouter van de Bund Joint Research Centre Institute for Environment and Sustainability.
Meeting of the Working Group 2A on Ecological Status (ECOSTAT) – 3+4 July 2006, Stresa (IT) Eastern Continental GIG Draft final report on the results of.
River Intercalibration Phase 2: Milestone 3 reports Presented by Wouter van de Bund Joint Research Centre Institute for Environment and Sustainability.
Marcel van den Berg / Centre for Water Management The Netherlands
Working Group 2A ECOSTAT progress report Presented by Wouter van de Bund Joint Research Centre Institute for Environment and Sustainability Inland.
Task on Harmonisation of Freshwater Biological Methods
Intercalibration Results 2006
EU Water Framework Directive
Phasing out the use of lead shot in wetlands (1)
WG 2A Ecological Status First results of the metadata collection for the draft intercalibration register: RIVERS.
Intercalibration in transitional waters (TW) Phase 2: Milestone 4 Reports (M4R) Presented by Nikolaos Zampoukas Joint Research Centre Institute for Environment.
Working Group A ECOSTAT October 2006 Summary/Conclusions
2.1. ESS Agreement on Learning Mobility (IVET & Youth)
Results of the Coastal and Transitional Waters Metadata Analysis
Working Group 2A ECOSTAT progress report Presented by Wouter van de Bund Joint Research Centre Institute for Environment and Sustainability Inland.
Progress on Intercalibration COAST GIGs
River GIGs: Future intercalibration needs/plans Presented by Wouter van de Bund Joint Research Centre Institute for Environment and Sustainability.
River GIGs: Checking and completing the Decision Annex Presented by Wouter van de Bund Joint Research Centre Institute for Environment and Sustainability.
Working Group 2A ECOSTAT Summary progress report River GIGs Wouter van de Bund Joint Research Centre Institute for Environment and Sustainability Inland.
Report on WISE Art.8 and GIS issues
Habides update (May 2011).
Working Group A Ecological Status - ECOSTAT WFD CIS Strategic Coordination Group meeting, October 2005 Progress in the intercalibration exercise.
Lake Intercalibration
Working Group A ECOSTAT Summary Milestone Reports: River GIGs Wouter van de Bund Joint Research Centre Institute for Environment and Sustainability.
Programme adoptions Cohesion Policy:
ETS Working Group meeting 24-25/9/2007 Agenda point 7 CVTS3 brief update /09/ 2007 ETS working group.
Working Group A ECOSTAT Update on intercalibration Prepared by Wouter van de Bund Joint Research Centre Institute for Environment and Sustainability.
Working Group A Ecological Status - ECOSTAT State of play in the intercalibration exercise Water Directors Meeting, November 2005.
Natura 2000 – SCI Union Lists
Progress Report Working Group A Ecological Status Intercalibration (1) & Harmonisation (3) Activities Presented by Anna-Stiina Heiskanen EC Joint Research.
WG A Ecological Status Progress report April-October 2009
Comparison of methodologies for defining Good Ecological Potential
Working Group A ECOSTAT progress report on Intercalibration Presented by Wouter van de Bund Joint Research Centre Institute for Environment and Sustainability.
Working Group 2A ECOSTAT progress report Presented by Wouter van de Bund Joint Research Centre Institute for Environment and Sustainability.
IC remaining gaps: overview and way forward
Rivers X-GIG phytobenthos intercalibration
Follow up questionnaire
Update on legal issues Strategic Coordination Group 23 February 2010
River groups with extension
FITTING THE ITALIAN METHOD FOR EVALUATING LAKE ECOLOGICAL QUALITY FROM BENTHIC DIATOMS (EPI-L) IN THE “PHYTOBENTHOS CROSS-GIG” INTERCALIBRATION EXERCISE.
Lake Intercalibration – IC Decision Annexes + what to do in future
Presented by Ana Cristina Cardoso
Working Group A Ecological Status - ECOSTAT WFD CIS Strategic Coordination Group meeting, 22 Febraury 2006 Progress Report.
Lake Intercalibration
Working Group 2A ECOSTAT progress report Presented by Wouter van de Bund Joint Research Centre Institute for Environment and Sustainability Inland.
Finnish Environment Institute, SYKE
Intercalibration round 2: finalisation and open technical issues – RIVERS ECOSTAT October 2012.
Intercalibration of very large rivers in Europe
WG A Ecological Status Progress report October 2010 – May 2011
Baltic Sea GIG Status Ecostat 23 April 2013
Mismatches between nutrients and BQEs: what does it tell us?
DG Environment, Unit C.2 Marine Environment and Water Industry
ECOSTAT nutrient work : Brief intro
Presentation transcript:

Lake Intercalibration: status of ongoing work Sandra Poikane Joint Research Centre Institute for Environment and Sustainability

Outline  What is new ? –Overall structure –Benthic fauna –Fish –Phytoplankton and macrophytes  Summary

Lake IC - what's new ?  BQE groups established  Started work Benthic invertebrates and Fish fauna  Started East Cont GIG

GIG / BQE groups ALPCBMEDNOREASTNOR Phytoplankton Macrophytes Benthic invertebrates Fish fauna

GIG / BQE groups ALPCBMEDNOREASTNOR G.Wolfram AT K.Pall AT A. Solimini JRC, IT G.Phillips UK J.Ortiz- Casas ES n.a. for reservoirs To be decided 30 Sept – 1 Oct meeting R.Portielje NL J. Boehmer DE A. Lyche Solheim NO S. Hellsten FI L. Sandin SE G. Borics HU ? B. Csanyi HU G.Wolfram AT ALP GIG ? CB GIG M. van den Berg (NL) MED GIG J. Ortiz- Casas ES N GIG A. Pilke FI EC GIG O. Mihail RO PHYTO A. Lyche Solheim NO MACROPHYTES G.Phillips UK BENTHIC J. Boehmer DE FISH N Jepsen JRC C. Argillier FR n.a. for reservoirs

Work can be divided in 2 flows:  New work – benthic fauna and fish fauna (most active work)  Old results – phytoplankton and macrophytes (currently relax)

Benthic fauna - 4 groups

Benthic invertebrates 4 groups  Leader Juergen Boehmer (DE)  N GIG – L. Sandin (SE)  ALP GIG – A. Solimni (JRC, IT)  CB GIG – J. Boehmer (DE)  EC GIG – B. Csanyi (HU) ?

ALP GIG – benthic fauna  5 MS – AT, IT, FR, SI, DE  All (except AT) have assessment methods, good data availability  Agreement on: –Criteria for compliance of national systems –Definition of refcond –Lake types and pressures General degradation+littoral Eutrophication + profundal –Minimum data requirement and data quality criteria

ALP GIG  Data collection – Oct-Nov 2008  Pilot exercise 2009 –define the general approach to IC, –typology/pressure analysis, –common metrics test

N GIG – Benthic fauna Acidification  Lot of progress (pre-IC with SE and UK data)  significant delays due to data availability /quality, late delivery of MS methods –SE, UK (only clear water lakes), –NO – developing –IE, FI – no methods

N GIG - Benthic fauna  Plan:  Finalisation of national methdos  Further development of common metrics  Include more biological data  Results 2010

N GIG Eutrophication  Work just started  info on data and methods  Only 2 methods  Different habitats  The first ideas developed

N GIG Eutrophication FISEIEUKNO Profundal Method BQI No method, data Littoral Method ASPT No method, data Data from 2009 CPET (whole lake) datamethod

N GIG Eutrophication The next steps  Finalize typology  Reference criteria  Collect the data  Identify the common metrics  Results 2011

CB GIG – Benthic fauna Work has started  Not all MS have methods, most have data  Focus on different habitats/pressures –eulittoral/general degradation (eutrophication+hydromorphology): Be/Fl, DE, EE, NL –deeper zones / eutrophication: FR –CPET (whole lake) / eutrophication: UK –undecided and no method so far: DK, LT, LV, PL

CB GIG - Benthic fauna Agreements on  Eulittoral zone and “general degradation”  Option 2 or 2/3  other zones and pressures possibly later Working on:  criteria to be used to define reference conditions  criteria to be used to define pressures

CB GIG - Benthic fauna  Collection of data 2009  A set of common intercalibration metrics based on normative definitions, correlations with stressors and most commonly used metrics  Intercalibration exercise 2010/2011  Report 2011

 Work has started in 3 GIGs –Overview of methods/data –Principal decisions –Data collection started  No work in Eastern Continental GIG (so far)  No work in Mediterranean GIG (common position of LM GIG on benthic fauna - not applicable for reservoirs) Benthic fauna - overview

 Benthic fauna leaders meeting planned 5-6 November, Amsterdam  to discuss the progress and comparability between the GIGs

Fish fauna ?

Fish fauna  Start of work and data collection /typology  it was decided to establish a database with information of the lakes where fish data available  At now huge dataset (Cemagref, France) –Climatic, hydromorphological and physico-chemical data –from 2478 lakes in total –1742 of these fulfilled the requirements and have been analyzed  resulted in a division into 3 types of natural lakes and two types of reservoirs

Fish fauna  Fish IC Meeting 30 Sep -1 Oct  Overview –AT, FI, SE, DE, NL - methods –Most – started monitoring –Some – still fish not in  Discussion - how to continue work –GIGs –Develop common European fish metric

PHYTOPLANKTON IC  Phytoplankton IC results just published  Cross-GIG groups established with the aim to facilitate cooperation  Phytoplankton group started the work with discussion papers (IC on full BQE level, combination rules, bloom metrics etc)

Phytoplankton - common issues  Full BQE intercalibration (chlorophyll-a + composition)  Not all MS and GIG have developed/IC composition metrics  Bloom metrics ?

MACROPHYTES  IC results just published, so at this moment no active work going on;  Cross-GIG groups established with the aim to facilitate cooperation  work with discussion papers (phytobenthos, hm pressure)

TYPOLOGY:  Mediterranean GIG is working to find out natural lake types –ES: most of them very small and shallow –PT: no natural lakes –FR: very few natural lakes –IT: some small Sicilian lakes –GR: about 14 natural lakes –CY: 5 natural lakes. –RO: in EC GIG  Eastern Continental GIG has drafted lake typology

The main difficulties  Lack of capacity and resources in several cases  Need for new Guidance –Summarize our experience –Way forward

Expert work  Commitment - depend on higher administration level  ~ 3 groups of countries –Active work (NL, DE, SE, ES, AT, UK) –Participating (in some case only appearing in meetings) –Not showing up at all  Makes work slow and ineffective !  CZ - official statement – no lakes, no IC,  but reservoirs, experts willing to work

Main message  Fish and benthos – work has started  Phyto and macrophytes – waiting for guideleines, new data, WISER  EC GIG – only typology so far  New guidance needed  Problem – assessment methods and involvement of the MS  How to solve it ?

Thank you !