1 Projections and Total Effect of Measures: The Swiss experience Contents 1. The Swiss energy scenarios - Methodology - Institutional arrangements 2. Other.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
EXIOPOL Presentation March Presentation of the IP Agenda Introducing EXIOPOL –IP project –Objectives –Implementation plan –Structure.
Advertisements

Data needs in future GHG emission control regimes Technical Workshop on Emissions from Aviation and maritime Transport Oslo 4/5 October 2007 Jakob Graichen.
Reporting on Projections and the Total Effect of Policies and Measures Introductory presentation by the UNFCCC secretariat Workshop on the preparation.
Workshop on Emissions Projections (Bonn, Germany) “General and Cross-Cutting Issues” Takaaki Ito Ministry of the Environment, Japan.
National Circumstances and Greenhouse Gas Inventory Information Denmark's experience with reporting in NC3 by Erik Rasmussen Danish Environmental Protection.
1 Workshop on inventories of greenhouse gas emissions from aviation and navigation May 2004, Copenhagen EU greenhouse gas emission trends and projections.
UNFCCC WORKSHOP Port Louis, Mauritius (8-11 April 2003) USE OF THE GUIDELINES FOR THE PREPARATION OF NATIONAL COMMUNICATIONS FROM NON-ANNEX I PARTIES MITIGATION.
GHG projections in Norway Peer Stiansen Ministry of Environment.
Experience with GHG emission projections for energy sector in LATVIA Workshop on emissions projection 6-8 September 2004, UNFCCC Secretariat, Bonn Janis.
KEY CLIMATE CHANGE POLICIES AND POLICY APPROACHES REPORTED BY ANNEX I PARTIES IN THE THIRD NATIONAL COMMUNICATIONS Katia Simeonova Programme Officer UNFCCC.
Review of the Gothenburg Protocol – Emission quality Kristin Rypdal, TFEIP Chair.
Ort, Datum Autor UNFCCC General and cross-cutting issues - summary of the discussions - Workshop on emissions projection Bonn, Germany 6-8 September 2004.
Norwegian Emission projections Facts and experiences.
Click to edit Master title style Projecting GHG emissions & removals New Zealand Leonard Brown New Zealand Climate Change Office Presented at the UNFCCC.
1 Dr. Christo Christov Energy Institute JSCo Sofia, Bulgaria Bulgaria GHG Emission Projections - Results and Methodological Problems Dr. Christo Christov.
National Inventory System in Finland Workshop on QC and QA of GHG Inventories and the Establishment of National Inventory Systems 2-3 September 2004, Copenhagen.
1 Introduction, reporting requirements, workshop objectives Workshop on greenhouse gas and ammonia emission inventories and projections from agriculture.
Canada Climate Change Development Fund (CCCDF) Projects in support of national communications Satender Singh Department of Foreign Affairs and International.
6.1 Module 6 Reporting of Mitigation Assessments in National Communications Ms. Emily Ojoo-Massawa CGE Chair.
UNFCCC Workshop, 9/ /1 2004, Dublin. September 30 – October 1, 2004, Dublin, Ireland Jiří Spitz ENVIROS, s. r. o. Czech Republic UNFCCC Workshop,
Quantifying Impacts of Transport- Related CO 2 Abatement Policies Roundtable on Transport - Related Climate Change Problems OECD Environment Directorate.
National circumstances and inventories of GHG emissions Mirja Kosonen UNFCCC WS, Dublin.
Brussels, 1-2 September 2004 Improving Air Quality in the enlarged EU: Workshop on Plans and Programmes of Air Quality and National Emission Ceilings Directives.
Reporting on Policies and Measures Introductory presentation by the UNFCCC secretariat Workshop on the preparation of fourth national communications from.
Capacity Building in National Communications Role of UNEP RISOE CENTRE Presentation at side event on: financial and technical support on NC, Bonn 9 June.
“Jožef Stefan” Institut, Ljubljana, Slovenia Energy Efficiency Centre Experiences with energy-related GHG projections for Slovenia Stane Merše M.Sc.
CARICOM WORKSHOP ON ENVIRONMENT STATISTICS St. Vincent and the Grenadines 7 th and 8 th April 2014.
Technical aspects of NAMAs: Options and methodologies for developing baselines for different categories of NAMAs* Neha Pahuja Associate.
‘Projections in Hindsight’ – An assessment of past emission projections reported by Member States under EU air pollution and greenhouse gas legislation.
Finland’s national system for estimating, reporting and archiving greenhouse gas inventory information UNFCCC Workshop on National Systems under Article.
Inventory Management and Archiving Swiss System/Procedures Paul Filliger Swiss Federal Agency for the Environment, Forests and Landscape Economics and.
Plans for establishment of national system (NIS) in the Czech Republic Pavel Fott, CHMI UNFCCC workshop, Bonn, 12 April 2005.
1 PROJECTIONS IN COUNTRY THE DUTCH EXPERIENCE UNFCC WORKSHOP ON THE PREPARATION OF NATIONAL COMMUNICATIONS BONN 28 FEBR - 2 MARCH 2001 HARRY VREULS.
1 Emission projections Norwegian approach Projection Expert Panel Dublin, Oct 25th 2007 Anne Kristin Fosli, Ministry of Finance Senior Adviser.
The current position: a policy stocktake and reflection on the role of economic modelling to date Sarah Hendry, Department for Environment, Food & Rural.
Report of the Outcome of the Workshop on emissions projections from Annex I Parties Bonn, 6-8 September 2004 Micheal Young Department of Environment, Heritage.
National Inventory System in the Slovak republic Janka SZEMESOVA Slovak Hydrometeorological Institute Bratislava April 2005, Wissenschaftszentrum,
A retrospective of projecting the future – an ex-post assessment of emission projections used for EU air pollution and greenhouse gas policy Melanie Sporer,
Quality assurance / Quality control system for the Greek GHG emissions inventory Yannis Sarafidis, Elena Georgopoulou UNFCCC Workshop on National Systems.
1 Austria‘s emission projections Stephan Poupa & Melanie Sporer, 10th Mai 2010.
KRAJOWE CENTRUM INWENTARYZACJI EMISJI NATIONAL EMISSION CENTRE UNFCCC WORKSHOP ON NATIONAL SYSTEMS Bonn, April 2005 National emission inventory system.
Inventory Planning in Norway UNFCCC Workshop on National Systems Audun Rosland 11 – 12 April 2005.
Reporting on National Circumstances and Greenhouse Gas Inventory Information Introductory presentation by the UNFCCC secretariat Workshop on the preparation.
Adaptation to Climate Change Actions in Mongolia Adaptation Workshop IFAD, Rome May 2007.
UNFCCC secretariat Ruta Bubniene, Programme officer, Reporting and Review unit, Mitigation and Data Analysis programme Overview of the synthesis report.
Quality Management in the Finland’s Greenhouse Gas Inventory Leena Raittinen, Statistics Finland UNFCCC Workshop on National Systems April 2005 Bonn,
Federal Department of the Environment, Transport, Energy and Communications DETEC Federal Office for the Environment FOEN The implementation of the Gothenburg.
SEA in the Czech Republic Prague, 24 September 2008.
Comparison of GHG mitigation efforts between Annex 1 countries Markus Amann International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA)
Technical Paper on enabling environments for technology transfer Daniele Violetti Programme Officer, Technology Climate Change Secretariat (UNFCCC) UNFCCC.
Dutch Reference Outlook Energy and Greenhouse Gases Remko Ybema, ECN Policy Studies Workshop on Energy-related National and EU-Wide Projections.
1 Short overview of the implementation of IPPC, LCP, Seveso II, Waste Landfill and Incineration directives Short overview of the implementation of IPPC,
3rd Stage Review: Lead Reviewers Experience Outline: –Objectives –Overview of technical findings –Lessons Learned/Confirmed –Value of 3 rd Stage –Lead.
UNDP Guidance for National Communication Project Proposals UNFCCC Workshop on the Preparation of National Communications from non-Annex I Parties Manila,
1 Norwegian baseline Bilthoven June 2009 Marte Sollie, Ministry of Finance.
BELGIAN FEDERAL DEPARTMENT OF THE ENVIRONMENT UNFCCC Workshop on the preparation of Annex I National Communications National circumstances: the case of.
NAMA potential of Vietnam Vuong Xuan Hoa Institute of Meteorology, Hydrology and Environment Ministry of Natural Resources and Environment Climate Change.
Determinations / verifications under JI – Experience to date UNFCCC Technical Workshop on Joint Implementation Bonn, February 13 th, 2007 For the benefit.
U.S. Mitigation Presentation Jonathan Pershing UNFCCC Pre-sessional Workshop Bangkok, Thailand April 2011.
Workshop on the Criteria to establish projections scenarios Sectoral projection guidance: Residential and services Mario Contaldi, TASK-GHG Emanuele Peschi,
Understanding the Integrated Resource Plan (IRP 2010 Rev 2)
Monitoring of sdgs indicators in the Russian federation
Implementation of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDG) in the Republic of Uzbekistan Geneva, April 12, 2017.
CAFE SG 23 November Brussels
Sustained MRV capacity building in the Western Balkan and Turkey
Bulgaria and art.5(1) of the Kyoto Protocol
Presentation title Integrated template for the NC7 in-depth review report and the BR3 technical review report 5th Lead Reviewers Meeting Bonn, 28 February-1.
M. Amann, W. Asman, I. Bertok, J. Cofala, C. Heyes,
TFEIP Workshop on Emission Projections
GHG trends and projections for Annex I Parties
Presentation transcript:

1 Projections and Total Effect of Measures: The Swiss experience Contents 1. The Swiss energy scenarios - Methodology - Institutional arrangements 2. Other projections 3. What‘s new? 4. Problems in the last communication 5. How we try to solve them 6. General issues UNFCCC Workshop on the preparation of national communications, Bonn, INFRAS, on behalf of Swiss Federal Office of Environment, Forests and Landscape Markus Maibach

2 The Swiss energy scenarios: Methodology  Aim: Aggregate basis for energy policy monitoring  Assumptions based on Swiss general scenarios (population, economic development etc.)  Bottom up data, specific model based forecasting  Specific measures are treated on an aggregate level  Transport is treated separately (based on specific traffic forecasts)  1990 to 2030 (1990 not temperature adjusted)  Basis for CO2-projections for energy related sources

3 The scenarios  Scenario I: Adopted measures (cons. measures based on legislation and reasonable implementation  Scenario II: Proposed measures (cons. measures which are on the official political agenda) high probability to be adopted 2a/2b: Different intension of measures (esp. energy production and pricing options)  Scenario III: Measures under consideration (cons. Measures which are proposed by popular initiatives) failed in the meantime  Scenario IV: Optimised goal oriented measures Least cost approach towards CO2-targets

4 Major Assumptions

5 Results

6 Institutional arrangements  Federal ministry of environment, transport, energy and telecommunication is leading the process  Coordination with other ministries (population and economic development), as an input  Federal office of energy has contracted private institutes (permanent procedure)  Service for transport studies is in charge of transport forecasts  Federal office of environment (FOEFL) is involved  Updating procedure: Problem driven, based on policy changes

7 Other projections  Decentralised process, based on emission and input data No specific institutional arrangements FOEFL is leading agency  Most important: Air pollution emission forecasts, for transport and other sectors, mainly only considering adopted measures  Scenarios available for agriculture, at least for the main input data, depending on the development of the Swiss agriculture policy (In charge: Swiss federal office of agriculture)

8 What‘s new?  Updated scenario 1 for all energy related sources (Adopted measures, considering the Swiss transport policy changes)  Adopted CO2-legislation (target oriented) is not considered yet  Scenario 3 (cons. popular initiatives of energy taxation) obsolete  New transport emission forecast (all GHG emissions and precursors)  Very good monitoring data (effects) of energy policy measures

9 Problems occured during the review  Switzerland has no ‚without measures scenario‘.  The ‚with measures scenario‘ differs from inventory data, due to temperature adjustment and other minor issues.$  The effect of measures is only possible on a disaggregated level (individual impact studies)  Historic trend extrapolation for other sources as the main methodological input.

10 How we treat these problems?  A new basis for the scenario ‚adopted measures‘ with improved data quality  Since we implemented new measures, there is a chance to show a general effect of new measure, by comparing with the old scenario 1.  Better use of impact studies (transport sector, energy measures, based on monitoring reports) to show the effect of measures.  Illustration of possible implementation paths of our CO2- legislation.

11 Issues for discussion  What is an ‚adopted‘ measure? Depends very much on the interpretation of legislation  It is important to show uncertainties and range of possibilities properly  Effect of measures: Bottom up aggregation is not equal to a general BAU- scenario (methodological inconsistencies)  Clear and transparent reference to impact studies, qualititative aggregate statement  Internal update procedure and UNFCCC requests: How to optimise synergies? ‚wrong official data‘ versus ‚true‘ inofficial data  Show the officiality, and report progress within the reviews