Coordinated Assessments April 3, 2014 Workshop Data Exchange Standard: Overview, Changes, Additions, and Direction Mike Banach PSMFC 503-595-3152 ----

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Collaborative, Systemwide Monitoring and Evaluation Program
Advertisements

RTT Analysis Workshop Species Status and Trend (Chapter 1) Casey Baldwin RTT Chairperson WDFW Research Scientist.
Smolt Monitoring Program 1982-Present BPA project#
COMPARATIVE SURVIVAL STUDY (CSS) of PIT-tagged Spring/Summer Chinook and PIT-tagged Summer Steelhead CBFWA Implementation Review Mainstem/Systemwide.
A forum for coordinating state, federal, and tribal aquatic monitoring programs in the Pacific Northwest Pacific Northwest Aquatic Monitoring Partnership.
Annual Stock Assessment – Coded Wire Tag Program (ODFW & WDFW) BPA Project Numbers: and
Chinook Salmon Adult Abundance Monitoring Paul Kucera and Dave Faurot Nez Perce Tribe Department of Fisheries Resources Management BPA Project
Assessment of A-run Steelhead population in the Clearwater Nez Perce Tribe Department of Fisheries Resources Management.
Chinook Salmon Adult Abundance Monitoring Project Dave Faurot Nez Perce Tribe Pacific Northwest National Laboratory.
Data Management Projects Data Management Framework Subcommittee Update June 19, 2007.
Monitoring and Evaluation of Yearling Fall Chinook Salmon Released Upstream of Lower Granite Dam Nez Perce Tribe Department of Fisheries Resources Management.
1.A standardized format that identifies the types of information required or allowed in a particular document or exchange. 2.Data exchange templates contain.
Lower Snake River Compensation Plan Hatchery Evaluations – Salmon River Project No Nez Perce Tribe Department of Fisheries Resources Management.
Information Needs for the Integrated F&W Program (ESA and Power Act) Jim Geiselman - BPA.
Spatial scales of homing and the efficacy of hatchery supplementation of wild populations Northwest Fisheries Science Center National Marine Fisheries.
Frank Leonetti, Snohomish County
1 CS 446 – Tutorial 6 Frid. Nov. 6 th, 2009 Implementation Tutorial.
Preliminary Results of Management Question Survey Jim Geiselman & Jen Bayer March 16, 2006 Pacific Northwest Aquatic Monitoring Partnership (PNAMP)
CSMEP Goal: Improve the quality and consistency of fish monitoring data, and the methods used to evaluate these data, to answer key questions relevant.
P4 Tagging Software and MRR Data Model Preview John Tenney, Nicole Tancreto and Craig White Pacific States Marine Fisheries Commission A Presentation for.
TRIBAL DATA NETWORK COLUMBIA RIVER INTER-TRIBAL FISH COMMISSION.
Documentation of CAX Methods and Protocols Jen Bayer USGS/PNAMP March 16,
Assessing the use of PIT Tags as a Tool to Monitor Adult Chinook Salmon Returns to Idaho John Cassinelli Regional Fisheries Biologist Idaho Department.
COLUMBIA RIVER SALMON AND STEELHEAD RETURNS FPAC and TMT – March 2013 Presented by: Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife.
Integrated Status & Trend (ISTM) Project: An overview of establishing, evaluating and modifying monitoring priorities for LCR Steelhead Jeff Rodgers (ODFW)
Pacific Northwest Aquatic Monitoring Partnership (PNAMP) A Presentation for: Columbia Basin Fish and Wildlife Authority Anadromous Fish Advisory Committee.
8/29/2006 DRAFT Implementing an Adaptive Management Framework for the Fish and Wildlife Program DRAFT.
Coordinated Assessments Project; Priorities and Expectations March 16, 2015 StreamNet Executive Committee.
A Guiding Framework For Regional Monitoring Participants –Alan Byrne (IDFG) –Alex Conley (Yakima Salmon Recovery Board) –Chris Drivdahl (WA State NPCC)
StreamNet Project Overview for Data Management Category Review Bruce Schmidt Pacific States Marine Fisheries Commission Presented to: NPCC Independent.
Coordinated Assessments Roadmap: Selecting & Prioritizing Indicators July 8, 2015.
Report on UNSD activities since the last meeting of the Expert Group on International Economic and Social Classifications Meeting of the Expert Group on.
1 Habitat Action Effectiveness Program for the FCRPS BiOp.
Preliminary Results Progress Coordinated Assessments Reports from the Field.
Defining CBFWA’s FY09 Workplan Members January 15, 2009.
Monitor and Evaluate Salmonid Production in the Asotin Creek Subbasin - LSRCP (ID #200116)
May 10, 2012 Presented by Micki Varney Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife.
1 Collaborative Systemwide Monitoring and Evaluation Project (CSMEP) June ??, 2007 DRAFT.
RMIS Overview & Infomap Service PSMFC Regional Mark Processing Center (RMPC) Overview of RMPC & CWT Database Since 1977 the RMPC has provided essential.
United Nations Statistics Division Registry of national Classifications.
REGIONAL COORDINATION High Level Indicators Draft “white paper” to recommend a core set indicators that can be shared among all types of monitoring Protocol.
Common PSMFC “data use agreement or policy” Overview of current data sharing in PTAGIS, RMIS, StreamNet.
Estimating integrative effects of the H’s on salmon populations.
1 Collaborative Systemwide Monitoring and Evaluation Project (CSMEP) Presentation to PNAMP Steering Committee August 21, 2007.
M&E requirements for grant signing: M&E Plan Workshop on effective Global Fund Grant negotiation and implementation planning January 2008 Manila,
The Status of Puget Sound Chinook Salmon What do we know? and How do we know it? Kit Rawson Tulalip Tribes.
Chinook Salmon Supplementation in the Imnaha River Basin- A Comparative Look at Changes in Abundance and Productivity Chinook Salmon Supplementation in.
Steelhead Kelt Reconditioning Program Update Presented by: Bill Bosch, Yakama Fisheries Acknowledgements: D. Fast, M. Johnston, T. Newsome Prosser Hatchery.
Status & Trend Monitoring Data End User Management Questions, Directives, Research & Monitoring Plans and Other Strategies 1.Federal Columbia River Estuary,
Variation in the effectiveness of alternative broodstock, rearing, and release practices among three supplemented steelhead populations - Hood Canal, WA.
October 20 & 21, 2009 Stevenson, WA Columbia Basin Coordinated Anadromous Monitoring Strategy Workshop Lower Columbia Sub-Basin.
BPA F&W Program Data Management Needs for Monitoring Support and Coordination Coordinated Assessments Workshop, 2011.
Pacific Northwest Aquatic Monitoring Partnership (PNAMP) Technology Exchange Meetings Steve Rentmeester, Environmental Data Services Sean Quigely, Pacific.
Improved access to data to support high level indicators for salmon and steelhead.
Estuary Actions for Salmon and Steelhead Columbia River Estuary Science Policy Exchange September 10-11, 2009 NOAA 2008 FCRPS Biological Opinion Estuary.
Ocean rivers SARs LGR-LGR SARs LGR-LGR Harvest Mouth of Columbia predicted returns Mouth of Columbia predicted returns Juvenile travel time and survival.
Student Centered ODS ETL Processing. Insert Search for rows not previously in the database within a snapshot type for a specific subject and year Search.
1 The Collaborative, Systemwide Monitoring and Evaluation Project (CSMEP) CBFWA – Ken MacDonald ESSA Technologies Ltd. - Marc Porter State Agencies IDFG.
Oregon Fish Habitat Distribution Data Standard Revisions to Version 2.0.
Coordinated Assessments Project Overview & Next steps January 17, 2012 Presented to: Independent Science Review Panel Tom Iverson, CBFWA.
A forum for coordinating state, federal, and tribal aquatic monitoring programs in the Pacific Northwest Pacific Northwest Aquatic Monitoring Partnership.
A forum for coordinating state, federal, and tribal aquatic monitoring programs in the Pacific Northwest Pacific Northwest Aquatic Monitoring Partnership.
Lessons Learned from DET Development and Initial Pilot.
Archiving and Document Transfer Utilities
StreamNet Executive Committee Meeting
Agenda Item D.1.a Supplemental NMFS Presentation 1 November 2018
Agenda Item D.1.a Supplemental NMFS Presentation 2 November 2018
StreamNet Steering Committee Meeting
Eagle Fish Genetics Lab (IDFG): Craig Steele Mike Ackerman
StreamNet Steering Committee
Presentation transcript:

Coordinated Assessments April 3, 2014 Workshop Data Exchange Standard: Overview, Changes, Additions, and Direction Mike Banach PSMFC

What is a “Data Exchange Standard (DES)”? It's about DATA It's about EXCHANGING (transferring) those data It's the STANDARD for transferring those data Also known as: o Data Exchange Format o Data Exchange Template o Data Dictionary

Very specific, English language descriptions of: Data categories The table(s) that will hold the data o Purpose and name of each table o Purpose and name of each column in each table o Codes used in each column o Rules for required columns, acceptable values, etc. o Relationships among tables and among columns What is a “Data Exchange Standard (DES)”?

How is DES used? Used by database managers o When creating databases for storing data o When working with newly-arrived data Used by programmers when writing programs for moving data Not specific to one technology o But is the guide to implementing them

Who developed the DES? BPA CBFWA (r.i.p.) Colville Tribes CRITFC IDFG Nez Perce Tribe NMFS ODFW PSMFC USFWS USGS WA Governor's Salmon Recovery Office WDFW Yakama Nation

How and when is the document updated? Modifications to existing tables on as- needed basis Additions as possible. (But not too fast) Plan is to revisit document annually, but try to live with existing versions whenever possible

Current data categories Exist in the 2012/2013 DES versions All are for natural origin fish All are highly derived “indicators” at the population scale for a single year o Spawner abundance o Smolt to adult ratio o Recruits per spawner  Recruits can be any life stage  Spawners can be all fish, adults, or ♀♀

What is changed in the 2014 version? “ID” column Run names changed to match NMFS Allows multiple estimates for same population X year o Among agencies o Within an agency  New column indicates which is TRT estimate

What is changed in the 2014 version? NOSA table: % natural replaced with % hatchery o Done to match the new PNI table House cleaning Improved definitions Renamed a column or two

What is new in the 2014 version? Characterizing hatchery programs o All for population scale and single year  Total fish spawned (plus #hatch & #natural)  Egg take  PNI  Egg to release survival  SAR  Recruits per spawner

General layout of tables Every table is a “flat” 2-D table Should not be beyond those who normally use spreadsheets No programming required

General layout of tables Each table has sections for: o Defining unique records o Values of “indicators” o Values of “metrics” o Age composition (when appropriate) o Methods documentation o Comments o “Supporting information”

General layout of tables Defining unique records o “ID” o Population and year o Agency and method

General layout of tables Values of “indicators” o Point estimates o Confidence limits Values of “metrics” o Point estimates o Confidence limits Age composition (each age class) o Point estimates o Confidence limits

General layout of tables Methods documentation o ‘Protocols’ and ‘methods’ from MonitoringMethods.org Supporting information o Contact person o Date record was updated o Data status (draft; reviewed; final)

For today Questions? We wish to get full group’s approval to adopt current draft DES as new version, effective today Get ideas / directions for the next indicators to pursue (see next slide)

Additional indicators suggested so far “Juvenile abundance” is next in line o This is assumed to be number of outmigrants; clarification during DES development Hatchery fish stray rate Hatchery fish catch/escapement profile Expand scope to include “resident fishes” A couple others I misplaced (please remind me)

END

Who manages the document? Mike Banach StreamNet Fisheries Biologist Pacific States Marine Fisheries Commission 205 SE Spokane Street, Suite 100 Portland, OR